För att klara av den befolkningsökning som sker i städerna projekteras nybyggnadsområden. Innan byggnation av bostäder kan ske måste ett beslut tas om val av spillvattensystem. I nuläget saknas enkla hjälpmedel för att jämföra och göra val baserat på systemens totala kostnader under dess livslängd. Målet med detta arbete var att ta fram en beräkningsmall som kan göra en livscykelkostnadsanalys samt vara ett komplement vid projektering och val av spillvattensystem. Topografin och områdesspecifika kostnader bryts ner och förs in i beräkningsmallen för den sträcka där spillvattenledningen ska anläggas. Mallen kontrollerar därefter om områdets förutsättningar uppfyller de krav som finns för spillvattenledningar eller ej. Resultatet som erhålls av beräkningsmallen påvisar initiala-, årliga och ackumulerade kostnader för de båda systemen. Skillnader och eventuella brytpunkter mellan ackumulerad kostnad för de båda systemen redovisas och kan användas som underlag vid val av spillvattensystem. Arbetet visade att det finns ett stort b / In order to cope with the population increase that occurs in the cities, new construction areas are being planned. Before the construction of housing can take place, a decision must be made regarding the choice of sewerage system. At present there are no simple tools to compare and make choices based on the systems total lifetime cost. The aim of this thesis has been to develop a calculation template that can perform a life cycle cost analysis and to be a complement to the project planning and choice of sewerage systems. The topography and area-specific costs are broken down and entered into the calculation template for the distance where the wastewater pipeline is to be constructed. The template then checks whether the area's conditions meet the requirements for wastewater pipelines or not. The result obtained from the calculation template shows initial, annual, and accumulated costs for the two systems. Differences and possible breakpoints between the accumulated cost of the two systems are reported and can be used as a basis for decision. The work showed that there is a great need for supporting tools to facilitate the planning and decision making of water systems.

Submitted by SBI Biblioteca Digital (sbi.bibliotecadigital@puc-campinas.edu.br) on 2018-08-09T11:58:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MARIA PAULA MINORIN BABONI.pdf: 3935036 bytes, checksum: 6b16b5f82fcb82f4f4e69e7cfd8367d7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-09T11:58:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MARIA PAULA MINORIN BABONI.pdf: 3935036 bytes, checksum: 6b16b5f82fcb82f4f4e69e7cfd8367d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-28 / To maximize basic sanitation benefits, it?s necessary to solve the challenge of conflicting objectives. As the performance depends on the value of the one who evaluates, this research proposes to evaluate the sanitation from the perspective of different stakeholders that have conflicting objectives: the User Population - PU and the Service Provider - PS. In order to verify how the municipalities placed themselves in each perspective and in the joint vision, this research proposed to classify the Services of Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage of the municipalities of the Metropolitan Region of Campinas, from the vision of the PU and the PS, during the years of 2014 and 2015, according to the relations of efficiencies. Data Envelopment Analysis was used to evaluate the efficiencies of the municipalities in the two views, considering the CCR model oriented to Output and the data provided by the SNIS and IMP, and the Malmquist Index in order to evaluate the movement of the municipalities. It was verified that the majority of the municipal policies favored the PS in detriment of better services for the PU. The municipalities that reached the Great Balance were Engenheiro Coelho and Americana in 2014 and 2015 and Cosm?polis in 2015. In addition, the dominant force of advancement towards the PS occurred due to Technological Progress rather than to the improvement of municipal relative efficiency in the period, while the forces advancing towards the PU were results of the progress of the Frontier and relative municipal efficiency. As regards the characterization of the service providers, it was concluded that the Scope is decisive in the view of the stakeholder when compared to the Legal Nature and the Property, since the municipalities operated by the Regional provider were considered efficient in the view of the PS but inefficient in the vision of the PU, obtaining the last positions in the Ranking of the User Population. / A quest?o dos objetivos conflitantes deve ser resolvida para universalizar os servi?os do saneamento, foco estrat?gico do setor. Para tanto, prop?e-se avaliar o desempenho dos sistemas de abastecimento de ?gua e esgotamento sanit?rio da Regi?o Metropolitana de Campinas ? RMC sob a ?tica de stakeholders que t?m objetivos conflitantes: a Popula??o Usu?ria ? PU e o Prestador de Servi?os ? PS. Os servi?os de ?gua e esgoto foram classificados a partir da vis?o da PU e do PS durante os anos de 2014 e 2015, segundo suas rela??es de efici?ncia, para verificar como os munic?pios colocavam-se em cada perspectiva e na vis?o conjunta. Utilizaram-se a An?lise Envolt?ria de Dados ? DEA para avaliar a efici?ncia municipal, considerando o modelo CCR orientado para Sa?da e os dados p?blicos disponibilizados pelo Sistema Nacional de Informa??es sobre Saneamento ? SNIS e pelo produto Informa??es dos Munic?pios Paulistas ? IMP da Funda??o Sistema Estadual da An?lise de Dados - SEADE, e o ?ndice de Malmquist ? IM para avaliar o comportamento dos munic?pios no per?odo. Verificou-se que a maioria das pol?ticas municipais privilegiavam o PS em detrimento de melhores servi?os para a PU nos dois anos e que os munic?pios que atingiram o Equil?brio ?timo foram Engenheiro Coelho e Americana, em 2014 e 2015, e Cosm?polis em 2014. No sentido do PS, o avan?o ocorreu devido ao Deslocamento da Fronteira ? EFC e o retrocesso de Cosm?polis e Santo Ant?nio de Posse ocorreu devido ao Emparelhamento ? TEC. No sentido da PU, o avan?o ocorreu tanto por causa do TEC quanto do EFC. O retrocesso de Holambra ocorreu tanto por conta do TEC quanto do EFC. A Abrang?ncia do prestador de servi?o, se comparada ? Natureza Jur?dica e ao Direito, foi decisiva na vis?o do stakeholder, j? que os munic?pios operados pelo prestador regional foram ineficientes para a PU e eficientes para o PS, em 2014 e 2015.