本文是對人類自由心靈的探究，藝術作品則是做為探索的中介；藝術作品中的審美感性作用本是「私己的」，然而，由於藝術作品來自於社會的集體生產，使得藝術作品在私人審美之前，早已沾染「他人」的價值判斷─私密的審美其實是社會性的。審美價值的傾注及接收皆在不知不覺中進行著，審美之人在接受、認同審美價值的過程中，總是帶有拜物教的形式意味；而拜物教又與人類的宗教崇拜心境直接關聯著，因此，本來看似「自由」的審美體驗，其實與象徵「束縛」的權威互為條件，事實上，走在自由的路上就是走在服從權威的路上。「詮釋」則被視為是審美價值傳遞的必要媒介，亦是使得拜物教形式得以可能的必然現象。 / This article is an inquiry about freedom of human’s mind, the artwork is presented as intermediary of it. Aesthetic function is originally private, but actually is embedded with “fait social” by dint of artwork’s social-production character , which makes every man’s aesthetic values is utterly infiltrated by ”Others” before they make their own judgment : aesthetic judgment which appears private is in fact social-collected. The impregnation and absorption of aesthetic values always processes in state of unconsciousness. When people intake and approve the values given by others, they worship in form of fetishism ; Fetishism is associated with the worship of religion, therefore aesthetic experience containing human’s free choice is correlated with authority symbolizing constraint. In fact, when we quest for freedom, we’re at the same time in quest of conformity. Explanation is regarded as necessary intermediary communicating aesthetic judgment as well as indispensable phenomenon conditioning the worship of fetishism.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0922610092 |
| Creators | 王建評, WANG, JIAN-PING |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds