Return to search

Pol?ticas p?blicas e fechamento das escolas do campo no Brasil / Public policies and closure of the field schools in Brazil

Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-09-12T18:37:55Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - F?bio de Oliveira Guimar?es.pdf: 1251443 bytes, checksum: 253b701b2675bab50e6a173f746b3ba8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-12T18:37:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - F?bio de Oliveira Guimar?es.pdf: 1251443 bytes, checksum: 253b701b2675bab50e6a173f746b3ba8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-12-08 / The research studied the challenges of rural education: closure of rural schools in Brazil. One of the problems still experienced today in the countryside is the rural exodus and the terrible conditions of access and permanence in these spaces. Our main objective with this text is to evaluate the extremely high rates of closure of rural schools in Brazil in the last fifteen years. About 32,512 schools were closed, according to the source of the II PNERA - Report of the II National Survey on Education in Agrarian Reform. The Constitution of the Brazilian Federative Republic of 1988, the Law on the Guidelines and Bases of National Education and the following public policies: PRONERA - National Program for Education in Agrarian Reform, PROCAMPO - Support Program for Higher Education in Field Education and PRONACAMPO - National Program of Field Education are radically against the policy of closing schools. The course of this work was accomplished through the survey of sources, critical analysis of existing documentation, legislation, visits to universities, social movements of the field and libraries. As still partial results of the work we understand the culture in a very broad sense of educational formation of the subjects, bearers of references to the identity, action and memory of the different groups formed in the Brazilian society. In the Dissertation, we will defend an educational service specialized in the rural schools, including creating possibilities for individual and collective subjects in the field to have the same teaching conditions in capitals and urban centers. We will rescue the identities of gender, race and culture of the various localities of the peasants, contemplating the diversity of educators and learners in their formation. The closure of the rural schools, daycare centers, preschools, elementary and high schools, can be characterized as a crime against public administration and punished with all the rigor of the Law. If possible, they are treated as heinous crimes, adolescents at risk, leading to rural exodus, crime, disorderly growth, irregular land occupation, among other aspects. Denied basic elementary human rights to the subjects of the field, a chain reaction is generated. Individuals and camp collectives are assaulted and marginalized, deprived of the basic subsistence minimum. This debate is strengthened on March 27, 2014. Article 28 of the LDB was amended with the following text: "The closing of rural schools, indigenous and quilombolas will be preceded by a manifestation of the normative organ of the respective education system, which will consider the justification presented by the Secretary of Education, the analysis of the diagnosis of the impact of the action and the manifestation of the school community. " At this juncture, the social movements of the countryside are protagonists and denounce the daily lives of students who live in the countryside, however, to continue their studies, it is necessary to travel to the city. / A pesquisa estudou os desafios da educa??o do campo: fechamento das escolas do campo no Brasil, Um dos problemas vividos ainda hoje no campo ? o ?xodo rural e as p?ssimas condi??es de acesso e perman?ncia nesses espa?os. Nosso principal objetivo com esse texto ? avaliar os ?ndices alt?ssimos de fechamento das escolas do campo no Brasil nos ?ltimos quinze anos. Cerca de 32.512 escolas foram fechadas, segundo fonte do II PNERA ? Relat?rio da II Pesquisa nacional sobre educa??o na reforma Agr?ria. A Constitui??o da Rep?blica Federativa Brasileira de 1988, a Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educa??o Nacional e as seguintes pol?ticas p?blicas: PRONERA ? Programa Nacional de Educa??o na Reforma Agr?ria, PROCAMPO ? Programa de Apoio ? Forma??o Superior em Licenciatura em Educa??o do Campo e PRONACAMPO ? Programa Nacional de Educa??o do Campo s?o radicalmente contra a pol?tica de fechamento das escolas. O percurso desse trabalho se concretizou atrav?s do levantamento de fontes, an?lise cr?tica da documenta??o existente, legisla??o, visitas ?s universidades, movimentos sociais do campo e bibliotecas. Como resultados ainda parciais do trabalho compreendemos a cultura num sentido bem abrangente de forma??o educacional dos sujeitos, portadores de refer?ncias ? identidade, a??o e mem?ria dos diferentes grupos formados na sociedade brasileira. Na Disserta??o, defenderemos um atendimento educacional especializado nas escolas do campo, inclusive, criando possibilidades para que os sujeitos, individuais e coletivos, do campo, tenham as mesmas condi??es de ensino das capitais e centros urbanos. Resgataremos as identidades de g?nero, ra?a e cultura das diversas localidades camponesas, contemplando a diversidade de educadores e educandos, em sua forma??o. O fechamento das escolas do campo sejam elas, creche, pr?-escola, ensino fundamental e ensino m?dio, podem ser caracterizados como crime contra a administra??o p?blica e punidos com todo rigor da Lei. Se poss?vel, equiparados ? crimes hediondos, pois colocam crian?as e adolescentes em risco, propiciando o ?xodo rural, a criminalidade, o crescimento desordenado, a ocupa??o irregular do solo, entre outros aspectos. Negados os direitos humanos b?sicos elementares aos sujeitos do campo, uma rea??o em cadeia ? gerada. Indiv?duos e coletivos do campo s?o agredidos e marginalizados, destitu?dos do m?nimo b?sico de subsist?ncia. Esse debate ? fortalecido em 27 de mar?o de 2014. O Artigo 28 da LDB foi alterado, com o seguinte texto: ?O fechamento de escolas do campo, ind?genas e quilombolas ser? precedido de manifesta??o do ?rg?o normativo do respectivo sistema de ensino, que considerar? a justificativa apresentada pela Secretaria de Educa??o, a an?lise do diagn?stico do impacto da a??o e a manifesta??o da comunidade escolar?. Nessa conjuntura, os movimentos sociais do campo s?o protagonistas e denunciam o cotidiano de estudantes que residem no campo, no entanto, para continuarem seus estudos, se faz necess?rio o deslocamento para cidade.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/2434
Date08 December 2017
CreatorsGUIMAR?ES, F?bio de Oliveira
ContributorsSantos, Ramofly Bicalho dos, Santos, Ramofly Bicalho dos, Oliveira, Lia Maria Teixeira de, Santos, Rafael dos
PublisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o Agr?cola, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Agronomia
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds