觀察台灣產業品牌發展，在相同的產業裡，各企業或許會出現ㄧ致的品牌策略，亦或許會出現迥異的品牌策略，是哪些原因影響，讓企業在相同的產業環境下，卻有不同的品牌策略選擇? 或堅持某一特定策略?
本研究將透過深度個案訪談及次級資料分析方式，針對企業在品牌策略的發展歷程中，其品牌策略選擇的影響因素，同時透過食品業與科技業的跨產業比較，以企業經理人觀點出發，探討品牌策略選擇的影響要因。
個案選擇其品牌策略概分為「企業品牌」與「多品牌」兩種策略，產業之個案選擇以食品業之統一、味全、桂冠，科技業則為宏碁、華碩、英華達等。
研究結果顯示，企業品牌策略發展歷程中，其品牌策略選擇的影響因素，主要涵蓋企業、產品與市場三大構面。在食品產業成長發展過程中，各廠商間品牌策略選擇，較偏向多品牌策略，受訪經理人認為，食品業由企業品牌轉多品牌策略，主要與消費者需求改變有關，過去消費者注重價格實惠的理性消費；但隨著台灣經濟社會開發後，人民所得普遍提高，因此，轉變為多樣化的需求，因此必須對應多品牌以鮮明訴求不同產品定位。
在科技產業成長發展過程中，各廠商間品牌策略選擇，較偏向企業品牌策略，受訪經理人表示，主要原因為產品屬性因素，科技產品的標準化生產流程，使個產品不會有所謂的口味、生活習慣等文化差異，在食品業所強調「家鄉市場」（home market）的條件，已經不存在，對科技公司而言，品牌的戰略不同於食品業由區域品牌做起的單點突破方式，各區域消費差異小，而是以全球消費者目標的全面式出擊，加上企業研發與製造投資金額龐大，營運風險高，採行企業品牌，可降低投資風險，增加品牌投資綜效，節省龐大行銷費用；再加上國際先驅品牌大廠，以採取類似的組合品牌策略，因此，大多採取一致的品牌策略。
在食品與科技不同產業間，其品牌策略發展將有不同的趨勢，科技業品牌，因全球標準一致性，因此全球品牌走向大者恆大的趨勢，未來將僅存續全球十大品牌；食品業則較具文化與地理上障礙，將朝區域品牌大廠發展，跨區域間，則進行策略聯盟發展。 / Observing the brand development of Taiwan industrials, there may appear consistent or inconsistent brand strategy in the same industry. Which factors are influencing on managers during brand strategy decision-making? Why do managers choose different brand strategy or insist on a specific strategy under the same industrial environment.
The purpose of this study is to identify the cause of brand strategy choice from manager’s viewpoints, through the secondary data and case study method. This study will also compare with the technology industrial and food industrial cases. There are categorized two type strategies- corporate branding and product branding strategy. Case study lists are President, Weichuan, Laurel, acer, Asus and OKwap.
The result of study shows, the brand strategy influenced factors contain the corporate, product and market attributive factors. While the food industry developed, they preferred to choose product branding. Managers told us that this change is related to consumer demand change. Consumers paid attention on the benefit of price in the past. Since the economic booming in Taiwan, people's incomes were generally raised. Consumers changed to diversified demands. The product branding is appealed to this request.
While the technology industry developed, they preferred to choose corporate branding. Managers told us that the main reason is product attribute factor, for example standardized and homogeneous product attribute. They need to face global market, without any regional market advantage. Their products must target to all of users world wide. They must make investment hugely on R&D, marketing and manufacturing. The operation risk is high. They can reduce the risk by adapting corporate branding strategy. Retracing the leading company internationally, they also chose the same brand strategy.
Among food and technology industries, their brands developed differently and have different trends in the future. Technology brands will exist only top ten vendors due to standardized and homogeneous product influenced. Food industry relatively has obstacle on culture and geography. They only will develop brands towards local regional markets. For cross-regions markets, they will cooperate by strategic alliance.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0094362017 |
| Creators | 呂昆安, Lu, Kun An |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds