Submitted by Fabiano Vassallo (fabianovassallo2127@gmail.com) on 2017-05-09T20:08:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
TESE FINAL - JUAN MARCELLO.pdf: 6859706 bytes, checksum: 9a871ea6d872e0034efbeab3d7750d40 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Josimara Dias Brumatti (bcgdigital@ndc.uff.br) on 2017-05-19T17:54:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
TESE FINAL - JUAN MARCELLO.pdf: 6859706 bytes, checksum: 9a871ea6d872e0034efbeab3d7750d40 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-19T17:54:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
TESE FINAL - JUAN MARCELLO.pdf: 6859706 bytes, checksum: 9a871ea6d872e0034efbeab3d7750d40 (MD5) / Por meio desta Tese, nos propusemos a uma pesquisa mapeadora de todas as
principais etapas históricas nas quais foi recepcionada a obra do poeta simbolista
brasileiro João da Cruz e Sousa (1 8611898), analisando e comparando os textos em
que identificamos transformações paulatinas nas leituras críticas do poeta ao longo do
tempo, desde 1893, quando suas produções marcam o advento do Simbolismo no país,
até os nossos dias, situando o “crítico” como o “efetivo leitor”, sem olvidar os
acadêmicos. O ineditismo da proposta consistiu na abordagem crítica que trouxe à baila
numerosos textos e trabalhos, em uma revisão de praticamente “todas” as leituras (salvo
algumas produções de menor relevo), e na utilização do arcabouço teóricometodológico da Estética da Recepção, não somente através de seus principais
representantes, como Hans Robert Jauss, Wolfgang Iser e Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, mas
igualmente Luiz Costa Lima, Regina Zilberman, e nas teorias de Mikhail Bakhtin, Paul
Zumthor, Roland Barthes, Hugo Friedrich, Umberto Eco, dentre os demais que
apontamos na Introdução. Direcionando os estudos para a recepção crítica da obra,
aprofundamos a pesquisa na análise comparada, buscando compreender a progressão
histórica e sociocultural, que acompanhou a evolução receptiva de Cruz e Sousa,
passando pelas questões etnorraciais, e verificamos de que forma se lê,
contemporaneamente, a obra do poeta catarinense. Decorrente de todo nosso percurso,
embasamos teoricamente uma possível interpretação prospectiva de sua obra e
realizamos nossas próprias leituras, com o intuito de poder contribuir para a iluminação
de novos caminhos e fazer a diferença na renovação da forma de se interpretar a obra de
Cruz e Sousa / Through this thesis, we propose a mapping research of every main historical step
which hosted the work of Brazilian symbolist poet João da Cruz e Sousa (1861 1898),
by means of the analysis and comparison of the texts, in which it was identified a slow
transformation in the critical readings of the poet through time, since 1893, when his
work established the emergence of Symbolism in Brazil, up until today, positioning the
“critic” as the “effective reader”, and including the academicists. The originality of the
proposal consists of the critical approach that brought along several texts and essays, in
which practically “all” readings were analyzed (except for a few smaller works), and
that used the “Aesthethic of Reception” as a theoreticalmethod framework, not only
through its main representatives, such as Hans Robert Jauss, Wolfgang Iser and Hans
Ulrich Gumbrecht, but also Luiz Costa Lima, Regina Zilberman, and the theories of
Mikhail Bakhtin, Paul Zumthor, Roland Barthes, Hugo Friedrich, Umberto Eco, among
others pointed out in the Introduction. Directing the studies towards the critical
reception of the work, the research was enriched by the compared analysis, in which we
tried to understand the historical and sociocultural progression that followed the
evolution of Cruz e Sousa’s reception, taking ethnic and racial matters into
consideration, and we verified the ways in which the poet’s work is read
contemporarily. As a result of our journey, we based his work theoretically upon a
possible prospective interpretation in our own readings, for the purpose of contributing
to give light to new paths and to make a difference in the renovation of the manner in
which Cruz e Sousa’s work is interpretated
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:https://app.uff.br/riuff:1/3680 |
| Date | 19 May 2017 |
| Creators | Capobianco, Juan Marcello |
| Contributors | Fonseca, José Luis Jobim de Salles, Lima, André Luiz Dias, Villar, Marilia Santanna, Magalhães, Pedro Armando de Almeida, Vianna Neto, Arnaldo Rosa |
| Publisher | Niterói |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFF, instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense, instacron:UFF |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds