Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:33:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
449501.pdf: 979316 bytes, checksum: 85b1da1739b6057f90d95a477dfd9908 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-03-04 / Objective: To describe the use of umbilical artery catheter (UAC) and compare the clinical outcome according to the presence or absence of umbilical arterial catheter in extremely low birth weight infants. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, conducted in two neonatal intensive care units. All infants with a birth weight less than or equal to 1000 grams who were hospitalized in these units from January 2006 to December 2010 were included. Neonates were divided into three groups: the first group consisted of patients who had no medical indication for catheter placement, the second group, the patients who had indication for UAC placement and the catheter was placed and group 3 the ones who had the indication for UAC placement but its passage was not possible because there was no progression in the artery. The 3 groups were compared in terms of weight, gestational age, Apgar scores, sex, hospital care, type of delivery and prenatal care performance. Groups 2 and 3 were compared in relation to mortality, development of hypernatremia or hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, to the number of blood gases collected, number of blood transfusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, late sepsis and intracranial hemorrhage. Results: One hundred and twenty-one preterm infants were included in the study. The umbilical arterial catheter (UAC) was recommended to 106 (88%) of newborns. It was possible to pass the UAC in 77 (63%) of neonates and in 29 (24%) it was not possible. The newborn infants who had the indication for UAC placement had gestational age, birth weight and Apgar score lower in the first minute than the patients who had no indication for UAC. The patients of the groups in which catheterization was indicated (groups 2 and 3) were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and perinatal conditions. Comparing the two groups in respect to clinical outcome, there was no difference in mortality, presence of hyponatremia or hypernatremia, hypoglycemia, number of blood transfusions, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy, late sepsis and intracranial hemorrhage. The diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis was four times higher in the group that the umbilical arterial catheter was attempted without success (OR:4,20; IC 95%: 1,49-11,86; p =0,007). Conclusion: The outcomes of patients catheterized or not were similar, with the exception of necrotizing enterocolites, which was more frequent in the group in which the umbilical artery catheterization was attempted without success. / Objetivo: Descrever o uso do cateter arterial umbilical (CAU) e comparar o desfecho cl?nico de acordo com a presen?a ou n?o do cateter arterial umbilical em rec?m-nascidos de extremo baixo peso. M?todos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo de coorte, realizado em duas unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatais. Foram inclu?dos todos os rec?m-nascidos com peso igual ou menor que 1000 gramas que internaram nestas unidades no per?odo de janeiro de 2006 a dezembro de 2010. Os neonatos foram divididos em tr?s grupos: no grupo 1 foram inclu?dos os pacientes que n?o tiveram indica??o pelo m?dico assistente da coloca??o de cateter; no grupo 2, os pacientes que tiveram a indica??o de coloca??o de CAU e o cateter foi colocado; e no grupo 3 os pacientes que tiveram a indica??o da coloca??o do CAU, mas n?o foi poss?vel sua passagem por n?o se conseguir sua progress?o na art?ria. Os 3 grupos foram comparados quanto ao peso de nascimento, idade gestacional, Apgar, sexo, hospital de atendimento, tipo de parto e realiza??o de pr?-natal. Os grupos 2 e 3 foram comparados quanto ? mortalidade, desenvolvimento de hipernatremia ou hiponatremia, hipoglicemia, ao n?mero de gasometrias coletadas, n?mero de transfus?es sangu?neas, enterocolite necrosante, displasia broncopulmonar, retinopatia da prematuridade, sepse tardia e hemorragia intracraniana. Resultados: Cento e vinte e um pr?-termos <1000 gramas foram inclu?dos no estudo. O CAU foi indicado em 106 (88%). Foi conseguido em 77(63 %), e em 29(24%) n?o foi poss?vel. Os rec?m-nascidos com a indica??o da coloca??o do CAU tiveram a idade gestacional, peso de nascimento e Apgar no primeiro minuto menores em rela??o aos pacientes que n?o foi indicado o CAU. Os pacientes dos grupos para os quais foi indicado o cateterismo (grupo 2 e 3) foram semelhantes em rela??o ?s caracter?sticas demogr?ficas e condi??es perinatais. Na compara??o dos dois grupos em rela??o ao desfecho cl?nico n?o houve diferen?as na mortalidade, presen?a de hiponatremia ou hipernatremia, hipoglicemia, n?mero de transfus?es sangu?neas, displasia broncopulmonar, retinopatia da prematuridade, sepsis tardia e hemorragia intracraniana. O diagn?stico de enterocolite necrosante foi quatro vezes maior no grupo em que o CAU foi tentado sem ?xito (OR:4,20; IC 95 %:1,49-11,86; p =0,007). Conclus?o: Os desfechos dos pacientes cateterizados ou n?o foram similares, com exce??o da enterocolite necrosante, que foi mais frequente no grupo em que o cateterismo da art?ria umbilical foi tentado sem ?xito.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/1421 |
| Date | 04 March 2013 |
| Creators | Oliveira, Marinez Casarotto de |
| Contributors | Fiori, Humberto Holmer |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Medicina/Pediatria e Sa?de da Crian?a, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Medicina |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3098206005268432148, 500, 600, 8624664729441623247 |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds