Den svenska fastighetsmarknaden har trots sina upp- och nedgångar varit relativt stadig under åren, fram till att coronapandemin drabbade landet. Marknaden drabbades av högre osäkerhetsnivåer och vakanserna ökade för flera fastighetssegment. Syftet med uppsatsen var att undersöka hur tre utvalda fastighetsbolag gick till väga vid värdering av sina avkastningsfastigheter under pandemin. Vidare undersöktes även de ökade vakanserna som var en konsekvens av pandemin, och hur bolagen påverkades av dessa. Avslutningsvis tydliggjordes lärdomarna som bolagen fick under pandemin, och hur dessa kommer tillämpas i framtida fastighetsvärdering. Med hjälp av semistrukturerade intervjuer fastställde studien att den praktiska värderingen var oförändrad under pandemin. Däremot uppkom högre osäkerhetsnivåer, vilket innebar att bevis på marknaden behövde inväntas innan förändringar gjordes i värderingen. Hyresgästernas betalningsförmåga var ännu en osäkerhet, men genom att inkludera statens coronabidrag i kalkylerna uppnåddes fortsatt realistiska resultat. Vidare tog bolagen hänsyn till vakanser för de fastighetssegment som påverkades av dem mest. Kunskapen implementerades dock på olika sätt, där ett bolag räknade med fortsatta hyresintäkter medan ett annat gjorde avdrag. Slutligen fastställdes det att användning av relevanta jämförelseobjekt, undvikande att skriva ned fastighetsvärden innan bevis på marknaden kan stödja antagandena och god kontakt med branschkollegor är de lärdomarna som bolagen kommer tillämpa i framtiden. / Despite its ups and downs, the Swedish real estate market has been relatively stable over the years, until the corona pandemic hit the country. The market was affected by higher levels of uncertainty and vacancies increased for several property segments. The purpose of the essay was to investigate how three selected real estate companies proceeded in valuing their rental properties during the pandemic. Furthermore, the increased vacancies were also examined, and how the companies were affected by these. Finally, the lessons learned from the companies during the pandemic were clarified, and how these will be applied in future property valuation. Using semi-structured interviews, the study established that the practical valuation was unchanged during the pandemic. On the other hand, higher levels of uncertainty arose, which meant that evidence on the market needed to be awaited before changes were made to the valuation. The tenants' ability to pay rent was another uncertainty, but by including the state's corona contribution in the calculations, continued realistic results were achieved. Furthermore, the companies took into account vacancies for the property segments that were most affected by them. However, the knowledge was implemented in different ways, where one company counted on continued rental income while another made deductions. Finally, it was established that the use of relevant comparative objects, avoiding writing down property values before evidence on the market can support the assumptions and good contact with industry colleagues are the lessons that the companies will apply in the future.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kth-314309 |
| Date | January 2022 |
| Creators | Nisic, Alina, Unver, Yeliz |
| Publisher | KTH, Fastigheter och byggande |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | TRITA-ABE-MBT ; 22299 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds