• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Informe para la sustentación de expedientes: N° 03196-2011-0-0401-JR-CI-01 (Expediente privado) /N° 504745-2012/DSD (Expediente público)

Vasquez Solis Duran, Gianfranco 24 August 2021 (has links)
El presente informe versa el expediente civil N° 03196-2011-0-0401-JR-CI-01, proceso iniciado por Héctor Orestes Rondón Rivas, quien interpone demanda contra Belia Perfecta Guillen, Asociación de Vivienda las Buganvillas de Arequipa y Centro de Conciliación para la Paz Social, con la finalidad de declarar la Nulidad del Acto Jurídico del acuerdo conciliatorio contenido en el Acta de Conciliación N° 1540-2011, mediante el cual la Sra. Belia se inscribió como asociada en la ficha de Padrón del Centro de Conciliación. Las causales de nulidad planteadas fueron: falta de manifestación de voluntad (al transmitirse su derecho de asociado sin su consentimiento) y nulidad virtual (vulneración a la Ley Electoral y Ley N° 26872). Por otro lado, la demandada planteó como respuesta, que el acto jurídico contenido en el acta conciliatoria tenía como finalidad regularizar sus derechos como propietaria, reputando la validez del acto, siendo este ejercido en amparo de una anterior sentencia expedida por el Juzgado de Familia, la cual disolvió el vínculo matrimonial con el demandante y se dispuso el 50.00% para cada cónyuge del único inmueble que pertenecía a la sociedad de gananciales. Al respecto, el juzgado de primera instancia declaró infundada la demanda considerando que el inmueble adquirido se produjo durante la vigencia del vínculo matrimonial entre las partes, no presentándose causal de nulidad invocada; decisión respecto del cual se interpuso recurso de apelación señalando falta de motivación, apelación que ha sido concedida y elevado al Superior Jerárquico, quienes revocaron la sentencia de primer grado y declararon fundada la demanda. / This report deals with a civil proceeding N° 03196-2011-0-0401-JR-CI-01, where Héctor Orestes Rondón Rivas files a lawsuit against Belia Perfecta Guillen, Las Buganvillas de Arequipa Housing Association and Conciliation Center for Social Peace, in order to declare the Nullity of the Legal Act of the conciliation agreement contained in the Conciliation Act No. 1540-2011, through which Mrs. Belia registered as an associate in the Register of the Conciliation Center. The grounds for nullity raised were due to a lack of expression of will (when his right to associate was transferred without his consent) and virtual nullity (violation of the Electoral Law and Law No. 26872). On the other hand, the defendant raised in response, that the legal act contained in the conciliation act was intended to regularize her rights as owner, presuming the validity of the act, being this exercised under a previous ruling issued by the Family Court, which dissolved the marriage bond with the plaintiff and 50.00% was provided for each spouse of the only property that belonged to the marriage. In this regard, the court of first instance declared the claim unfounded, considering that the property acquired was produced during the validity of the marriage bond between the parties, with no grounds for nullity invoked; decision regarding which an appeal was filed indicating lack of motivation, an appeal that has been granted and raised to the Hierarchical Superior, who revoked the first degree sentence and declared the claim founded. / Trabajo de suficiencia profesional
2

[pt] A INTERPRETAÇÃO DO SILÊNCIO NO NEGÓCIO JURÍDICO / [en] THE MEANING OF THE SILENCE IN A BUSINESS TRANSACTION

PEDRO MOURA GUTIERREZ Y SACK 03 July 2023 (has links)
[pt] A presente dissertação tem como objeto o estudo do silêncio previsto no artigo 111 do Código Civil de 2002, isto é, o silêncio enquanto comportamento apto a qualificar manifestação de vontade para o negócio jurídico, segundo seus pressupostos legais. Diz o referido artigo que [o] silêncio importa anuência, quando as circunstâncias ou os usos o autorizarem, e não for necessária a declaração de vontade expressa. Sendo assim, este trabalho, limitado ao âmbito do Direito Civil brasileiro, procura estabelecer, com clareza, quais são os pressupostos de aplicação do silêncio enquanto instituto jurídico, à luz da norma que orienta a sua interpretação no caso concreto. O trabalho parte da análise de dois julgados do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, que mencionam o artigo 111 do Código Civil de 2002, sem, contudo, observar os aspectos fundamentais do instituto. Em seguida, o texto se volta para a investigação dos significados dos silêncios mencionados nos Códigos Civis de 1916 e 2002, procurando discernir o seu conteúdo normativo, passando, ato contínuo, para a análise da importante obra desenvolvida por Miguel Maria de Serpa Lopes, jurista brasileiro que mais aprofundou os estudos sobre o silêncio no Direito Civil, em 1937. Na sequência, o texto procura estabelecer dogmaticamente as premissas sobre as quais opera a manifestação de vontade por meio do silêncio, para qualificá-lo, estabelecendo seu melhor termo e sugerindo identidade própria para sua forma. Após, portanto, definir o que é o silêncio previsto no artigo 111 do Código Civil de 2002, este trabalho se propõe a estabelecer o que ele não é, ou seja, cuida de discernir o silêncio de outros institutos comportamentais (i.e. reserva mental, boa-fé objetiva, nemo potest venire contra factum proprium, suppressio e abuso do direito), ocasião em que são citadas diversas decisões judiciais para ilustrar como os tribunais confundem o silêncio previsto no artigo 111 do Código Civil com outras figuras de Direito Civil. Por fim, esta dissertação esclarece o conteúdo dos pressupostos necessários à qualificação do silêncio enquanto comportamento apto a manifestar vontade, para que o intérprete possa, mediante os corretos instrumentos, valer-se da norma específica com tanta história, notadamente relevante para os negócios jurídicos. / [en] The objective of this master thesis is to analyze the meaning of the party s silence under the article 111 of the Brazilian Civil Code of 2002; i.e., silence as a behavior capable of qualifying an expression of a party s will for a legal transaction, considering the legal requirements applicable thereto. The aforementioned article states that [t]he silence implies consent, when circumstances or habits and customs authorize it, and an express declaration of will is not necessary. Therefore, this work, limited to the scope of Brazilian Civil Code, seeks to clearly establish what are the assumptions for the application of silence as a legal institute, according to the legal norm that guides its interpretation in the specific case. The thesis departs from the analysis of two cases ruled by the Superior Court of Justice, in which article 111 of the Civil Code of 2002, was mentioned without observing its essential aspects. Following that, the thesis investigates the meanings of the silence element provided for in the Civil Codes of 1916 and 2002, discerning its normative content. Then, it reviews the literature of Miguel Maria de Serpa Lopes, a brazilian jurist who has developed the most complete study on meaning of silence in Civil Law, in 1937. Subsequently, the text seeks to dogmatically establish the premises to qualify the expression of will through silence, establishing its best terms and suggesting its own identity for its form. After defining the true meaning of silence provided for in article 111 of the Civil Code of 2002, this work proposes to distinguish the silence from other behavioral doctrines (i.e. mental reserve, good faith, nemo potest venire contra factum proprium, suppressio and abuse of law). In this context, several court decisions are mentioned to illustrate how the courts confuse the silence doctrine set forth in article 111 of the Civil Code with other figures of Civil Law. Finally, this dissertation clarifies the content of the assumptions necessary for the qualification of silence as a behavior capable of expressing will, to make the specific norm useful in practice.

Page generated in 0.0208 seconds