[pt] O presente trabalho teve por objeto a investigação e análise de audiências de conciliação envolvendo lides de consumo. O corpus foi composto por seis audiências gravadas e transcritas na íntegra. O objetivo geral do estudo foi o exame dos modos de apresentação do self projetados pelas partes, assim como das faces atribuídas e reivindicadas pelas mesmas e dos papéis co-construídos. No entanto, o objetivo específico foi ver como essas categorias analíticas se mostravam relevantes para a tomada do acordo. Uma vez eleita esta última meta, apenas três audiências foram analisadas verticalmente, posto que só aquelas com acordo interessavam ao estudo. Essas audiências foram segmentadas e descritas em fases – desde o relato até a reparação do dano através do termo do acordo. Uma fase, entretanto, interessou mais a este trabalho. Trata-se da fase da proposta resolutória, em que o mediador tenta chegar a uma proposta comum para reclamante e reclamado. Neste momento interacional, o papel do mediador se mostrou central. As faces construídas e as apresentações de self dos demais interagentes emergiram como projeção do mediador ou como contraponto ao que era por ele estabelecido. Na análise pormenorizada de cada audiência, verificou-se a emergência de formatos de papel fundamentais à tomada do acordo. Um destes formatos foi o da cidadania, através do qual a mediadora desempenhou o papel de intérprete e aplicadora da lei. O outro formato foi o do personalismo, em que a mediadora desempenhou um papel de facilitadora do acordo. Neste último caso, um diálogo com teorias antropológicas sobre o Brasil fez-se imprescindível para a compreensão do aqui e agora interacional. A categoria do jeitinho emergiu como estratégia para garantir o acordo e até mesmo o exercício do direito. / [en] The present work aims at investigating and analyzing conciliation hearings which involve consumption conflicts. The data is composed by six hearings entirely recorded and transcribed. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the forms of presentation of self projected by the parties, as well as of faces assigned and claimed by them and their co-constructed roles. However, our specific objective was to see how these analytical categories would appear relevant to the agreement-making process. Once this last aim had been established, we analyzed just three hearings, since we were only interested in those where an agreement had been reached. Those hearings were divided and described in phases – from the report until the action for damages as established by the agreement. One phase, however, seemed to be more interesting to this study. It was the resolutory proposal phase, in which the mediator tried to establish a common proposal for both responded and complainant. In this interactional moment, the mediator’s role was of utmost importance. The constructed faces and the presentations of the other interactants’ selves emerged as a projection of the mediator or as a counterpoint to what had been established by him/her. In the detailed analysis of each hearing, we have observed the emergence of role formats essential to the agreement-making process. One of these formats was that of citizenship, through which the mediator played the role of spokeswoman and law enforcer. The other form was that of personalization, in which the mediator played the role of an agreement facilitator. In this last case, a dialogue with anthropological theories about Brazil was indispensable to the understanding of the interactional here and now. The category of jeitinho has emerged as a strategy to secure the agreement and even the practice of law.

Aims: to explore if the consumption of pornography have influence on a relationship, if the consumption of pornography have a negative impact on a first intercourse and on a initial masturbation behavior, to find out if it is a difference between younger and older women in the frequency of pornography consumption, explore if religiosity have some impact on frequency of pornography consumption and one of the aims is to disrupt the myth about primary pornography consumption by men. Method: the representative data vere collected from 413 Slovak women, the data were based on a quota sampling by agency 2muse according to three categories (age, education and address), the sample age was from 18 to 77 years old and average age was 40 years old (SD±14,62). Results: average age of first pornography consumption is 20,01 years old (SD±7,56), the most interesting age of pornography consumption is 23,44 (SD±9,12). The frequency of pornography consummation is couple of times per year for 107 (25,9%) respondents and most often is watching less than 5 minutes per day. Religiosity has a protective factor of frequency of pornography consumption depending of strengths of religious beliefs and the frequency of implementation of religious requirements. Pornography is not an accelerating factor an initial masturbating...

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcia Helena Bosch.pdf: 739158 bytes, checksum: 55c87b3680615726d128025b118acd08 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-05-06 / This study aims to demonstrate that the idea which seems right on the exclusive responsibility of the relations of consumption that is the view that if the code of consumer protection does not expressly contemplate the fortuitous event and force majeure as the exclusive responsibility, not it is for the interpreter do it. Also discusses the fact that in cases of force majeure and fortuitous event refers, in fact, the fault of the agent (and not the causal link) and the code is the responsibility of consumer protection, as a rule, objective, which investigates the fault is not the best exegesis seems once again be the case that excludes the fortuitous and exclusive as forces greater responsibility in the relations between suppliers and consumers / O presente trabalho tem por finalidade demonstrar que a ideia que mais parece acertada sobre as excludentes de responsabilidade nas relações de consumo é a que defende que se o Código de Defesa do Consumidor não contemplou expressamente o caso fortuito e a força maior como excludentes de responsabilidade, não cabe ao intérprete fazê-lo. Também discorre sobre o fato de que nas hipóteses de caso fortuito e força maior se cogita, na verdade, a culpa do agente (e não o rompimento do nexo de causalidade) e sendo a responsabilidade no Código de Defesa do Consumidor, em regra, objetiva, onde não se investiga a culpa, a melhor exegese parece mais uma vez ser a que exclui o caso fortuito e a força maior como excludentes de responsabilidade nas relações entre fornecedores e consumidores