L’action collective urbaine est confrontée à une double injonction potentiellement contradictoire en matière de mobilité quotidienne. Elle doit garantir l’accès à la mobilité pour tous et réduire les mobilités individuelles motorisées. Avec la pluralisation des politiques urbaines, cet enjeu de cohérence se double d’un enjeu de coordination, qui subsume la traditionnelle cohérence urbanisme-transport.Cette thèse interroge la conciliation des enjeux d’accès à la mobilité et de mobilité durable. L’étude analyse la prise en compte des inégalités d’accès à la mobilité dans les politiques urbaines de la Communauté Urbaine de Lyon. Les aides à la mobilité des politiques de retour à l’emploi et les Plans de déplacement inter-entreprises portés par la politique temporelle, sont comparés à la tarification sociale et l’amélioration de la desserte des quartiers défavorisés de la politique de transport.Les résultats montrent que les enjeux sociaux n’ont jamais fait l’objet d’une attention aussi grande, avec le passage d’un droit au transport pour tous à un droit au transport ciblé et l’émergence de droits à la mobilité. Mais, la conciliation entre les enjeux potentiellement contradictoires d’accès à la mobilité pour tous et de mobilité durable est difficile à l’échelle d’agglomération, ces enjeux étant concurrents lorsque sont arbitrés les choix politiques et financiers. La prise en compte des enjeux sociaux est retardée, limitée, voire oubliée en cours de route, la stratégie d’agglomération étant orientée vers l’attractivité économique et l’exemplarité en matière de développement durable. / Urban policies have to conciliate the paradoxical stakes that are access to mobility for everyone on one hand and personal car use reduction on the other hand. Considering the pluralisation of urban policies, this issue is not only a matter of coherence but also of coordination that subsumes the coordination of land-use planning and transport.This study examines how urban policies conciliate access to mobility and sustainable mobility. It analyzes how urban policies take into account access to mobility inequalities in the Greater Lyon. Innovative mobility services (access to work initiatives and Inter-Companies Commuter Plans) are compared with transport policies.The unprecedented focus on social issues results of the shift from a right to transport to a targeted right to transport and the joint emergence of rights to mobility. But, since they are competing when political and financial choices are arbitrated, conciliating these potentially contradictory issues is difficult at the local urban scale. Social issues are taken into account with delay or limited or forgotten with the Greater Lyon’ strategies being concentrated on economic competitiveness and sustainable development exemplarity.

[pt] A discussão sobre mobilidade urbana foi crescentemente alargada frente às necessidades populacionais e econômicas das metrópoles, sendo um tema essencial quando se discute direito à cidade. Considerando o aspecto constitutivo e inescapável dos deslocamentos diários e as múltiplas experiências deste trânsito, a mobilidade não se confunde com o direito social ao transporte, mas se configura como um direito em si. Contudo, não é a mesma para todos os corpos que transitam pelas vias urbanas, sendo indissociável dos marcadores que atravessam e constituem estes corpos. Quem chega, onde chega e como chega são questões fundamentais na alocação diferenciada das condições de precariedade tanto espacial quanto subjetivamente. A mobilidade de mulheres, subconsiderada no planejamento urbano patriarcal, permite entrever outros percursos e desenhos de cidade. Ainda, perceber como estas mulheres são igualmente atravessadas por estruturas de poder – tais quais raça e classe- que tanto as forjam quanto delineiam qual enquadramento de cidade se configurará nos seus movimentos, torna visíveis as fronteiras e fraturas que desenham a urbe. Este trabalho insere-se, assim, nas propostas de um feminismo intersecional corporificado para delinear o que seria um direito fundamental à mobilidade. Construído com uma pesquisa etnográfica do/em movimento, o direito à mobilidade tem como espectros incontornáveis a mobilidade como um lugar, a gestão do tempo, a eleição de modais e o reconhecimento dos níveis de mobilidade, constituindo continuamente formas de ser e estar nos quadros de cidade. / [en] Given the populational and economical needs of the metropolises, the discussion on urban mobility has largely grown into an essential subject on the debates pertaining the right to the city. Considering the constitutive and inescapable aspect of the daily commutes and the multiple experiences of this flow, mobility cannot be mistaken for the social right to transportation, thus shaping into a right of its own. However, this mobility is not the same to all the bodies moving through the urban paths, being indissociable from the markers which cross and constitute these bodies. Who reaches , where they reach and how they reach there are fundamental questions on the distinct arrangement of the conditions of precarity, both spatially and subjectively. The mobility of women, underconsidered by the patriarchal urban planning, allows us to perceive other paths and drawings of city. Moreover, realizing how these women are equally affected by power structures – such as race and class – which carve them as much as shape the frame of city that will appear on their movements, make visible the fractures and frontiers that design the borough. Therefore, this work is inserted on the proposals of a corporified intersectional feminism aiming to delineate what would be a fundamental right to mobility. Built upon an ethnographic research of/in movement, the right to mobility has as indispensable specters the mobility as a place, time management, the election of modes and the acknowledgement of mobility levels, continually composing ways of being and passing through the frames of city/ being in the frames of city.