- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 61 to 70 of 2233 (0.042 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] SEMANTICS"" "subject:"[enn] SEMANTICS""
| 61 |
The time course of processing of natural language quantificationPaterson, Kevin Brisbane January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 62 |
Essential indexicalityThomson, E. N. S. January 1984 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 63 |
Acquiring and grounding a lexicon with art : towards robotic systems that understand languageChandler, Nathan James January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 64 |
Time and tenseTaylor, John January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 65 |
Abstract entitiesTeichmann, Roger January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 66 |
Testing equivalences and fully abstract models for communicating processesNicola, R. de January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 67 |
Processing lexical ambiguity : the effects of meaning relatedness, word frequency, concreteness, and level of processingJager, Bernadet January 2012 (has links)
This thesis explores the processing of lexical ambiguity: words with several unrelated meanings (homonymy) or many related senses (polysemy). Chapter I provides a literature overview of studies investigating this topic. Chapters 2 and 3 pursue a first goal: to investigate whether effects are influenced by the methodology of defining lexical ambiguity. The results support the hypothesis (Rodd, Gaskell, & Marslen- Wilson, 2002) that studies using questionnaires to define lexical ambiguity (e.g. Rubenstein, Garfield, & Millikan, 1970) found a polysemy advantage rather than a homonymy advantage. Questionnaire-based ambiguity classifications are more similar to dictionary-defined polysemy than to homonymy (Experiment 1). Moreover, earlier findings (e.g. Rodd et al., 2002) of a polysemy advantage and homonymy disadvantage are replicated, and the questionnaire-based classifications result in effects more similar to the former than to the latter (Experiments 2 to 4). Chapters 4 to 6 pursue a second goal: to explore the effects of polysemy and homonymy with new stimuli. Chapters 4 and 5 indicate that polysemy effects are sensitive to concreteness (Experiments 5 & 6), frequency (Experiment 7), and level of processing (Experiment 8). Furthermore, polysemy effects seem to take place relatively late (Experiment 9). In contrast, Chapter 6 does not find any effects of homonymy (Experiments 10 to 12). Chapter 7 pursues a third goal: to test whether the relationship between senses plays a role in word processing. Sense relationship influences word recognition (Experiments 13 & 16), but not semantic categorization (Experiment 14). The temporal locus of the lexical decision effect cannot be determined (Experiment 15). Finally, Chapter 8 shows that the current findings fit reasonably well within an account by Rodd, Gaskell, and Marslen- Wilson (2004), and suggests possible directions for further research.
|
| 68 |
Semantics in a Frege structureKamareddine, Fairouz Dib January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 69 |
Incremental semantics and interactive syntactic processingHaddock, Nicholas John January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 70 |
A constructive theory of counterfactuality and other modalitiesTurner, Raymond January 1981 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0472 seconds