The purpose of the essay is to see if the pupils of Ross Tensta Gymnasium feel it is necessary to have an existing cooperation between the police and Ross Tensta Gymnasium. I would like to know how the cooperation works between Ross Tensta Gymnasium and the police and also if the cooperation is visible for the pupils. Furthermore I would like to know if it is necessary to have cooperation between schools and the police even though there are not any obligations to have any. The methodology I have been using is a qualitative analysis. The entire essay is based on interviews which I have recorded and later transcript it into writing. The theories which I have been using are Wacquant’s use of territorial stigma and also the concept of us and the others in which Stuart Hall explains. The questions I have to help me find the answers to my purpose of investigation are: In which way is the cooperation visible for the pupils of Ross Tensta Gymnasium? How does the relationship work between the pupils of Ross Tensta Gymnasium and the police? What part has the school in the relationship between the police and the pupils?

Denna studie syftade till att jämföra dagspressens konstruktioner av två gärningspersoner med olika etniska tillhörigheter, den ena svensk och den andra uzbekisk. Vid urvalet av tidningsartiklar inkluderades samtliga användbara artiklar som publicerats under en tidsperiod på sju dagar. Artiklarna studerades därefter genom en kvalitativ innehållsanalys. Av detta återfanns att dagspressen genomgående konstruerade gärningspersonerna på olikartade sätt med fokus på den svenska gärningspersonens normalitet och den uzbekiska gärningspersonens utifrånskap. Resultatet analyserades med hjälp av det teoretiska förhållningssättet Orientalismen och begreppsparen “Vi” och “De andra”. En återkommande slutsats var attdagspressen rapporterade om den svenska gärningspersonen på ett tilltalande sätt vilket kunde uppfattas som “Vi” medan den uzbekiska gärningspersonen framställdes med en negativ betoning, förenligt med “De andra”. Sammantaget kunde etnicitet förstås ha varit en betydande faktor vid dagspressens konstruktion av dessa gärningspersoner. / The aim of this study was to compare the daily press’ constructions of two culprits with diverse ethnicities, one Swedish and one Uzbek. When sampling for news articles, all usable ones that were published within a time span of seven days were included. The articles were studied through a qualitative content analysis. The main result was that the daily press consistently constructed the culprits in different ways, by focusing on the normality of the Swedish and on the alienation of the Uzbek. The result was analyzed using the theoretical perspective Orientalism as well as the concept pair of “Us” and “The others”. A recurring conclusion was that the daily press presented the Swedish culprit in a pleasant way which could be understood as “Us” while the Uzbek culprit was described in negative manners, consistent with “The others”. Altogether, ethnicity could be understood as a considerable factor in the daily press’ constructions of these culprits.