No description available.

Published Article / Reflection and reflective practice as a method to inform facilitators' teaching and learning practices has been in use for a long time. It was first introduced by Dewy in 1933. The methodology consisted of a qualitative approach supported by a quantitative analysis and was prompted by a number of questions pertaining to reflective teaching. This article communicates how reflective teaching was embedded in the Radiographic Pathology module for undergraduates in 2007 as well as the outcomes of the process.

No description available.

The purpose of this study was to identify selected criteria in teacher effectiveness in the secondary science classrooms to find out how students feel about these criteria as compared with the opinions of science teachers and administrators.The following criteria were selected:1. Teacher's abilities in lecturing2. Abilities in laboratory teaching3. Abilities in leading discussions4. Abilities in maintaining good discipline5. Fairness in dealing with students6. Understanding of student problems7. Use of multi-media presentations.A forty-one item questionnaire based on the above mentioned criteria with two opinion questions was formulated.The population for the study consisted of 32 administrators, 34 secondary science teachers, and 747 secondary science students from 15 high schools of three sizes (small, medium, and large) in Indiana. The questionnaire was administered on-site, and the return rate for each respective group in the sample was 100 percent.One way analysis of variance was used at the .05 significance level statistically to interpret the data.Findings1. There was a significant difference found among the responses of students, teachers, and administrators for lecturing, laboratory teaching, leading discussions, maintaining good discipline, and use of multi-media presentations, but there was no significant difference found for fairness, and understanding of student problems.2. Based upon the sex of the students, there was no significant difference found for laboratory teaching and multi-media presentations, but there was a significant difference found for lecturing, discussions, discipline, fairness, and understanding of student problems.3. Based upon the grade level of students, there was a significant difference found in lecturing and laboratory teaching, but there was no significant difference found for discussions, discipline, fairness, understanding of student problems, and use of media.4. Based upon the years of teaching experience, there was a significant difference found in the opinions of teachers and administrators for lecturing, maintaining good discipline, and multi-media presentations, but no significant difference was found for laboratory, discussions, fairness, and understanding of student problems.5. The years of administrative experience had no significant effect on the opinions of administrators.6. There was no significant difference found among the opinions of administrators, teachers, and students related to the size of schools.

This study compared two representations for teaching fraction equivalence. It traced the implications of both representations on the student’s comprehension of fractions as well as their ability to perform operations with fractions. The participants in the study included 65 sixth grade students in three extant classrooms. Two classes were instructed using the textbook representation while the third class received instruction using a representation presented by Van de Walle and recommended by the National Council for Teaching Mathematics. Data were collected from pre-tests, post-tests, student work samples, field notes and a semi-structured interview. Qualitative analyses were used to analyze the data. Items were coded for procedural and conceptual understanding and categorized into levels of proficiency. Additionally, items involving operations with fractions were coded for error patterns. Conclusions were drawn about how the different representations affected student comprehension and faculty with fractions.

Exploring school advisors' practices: Dwelling in/between the tectonic spaces is a story about three teachers assisting their student teachers in becoming teachers, and my safari through their landscapes; what i describe as dwelling in/between the tectonic spaces. Those spaces between school advising and student teaching, desire and fear, comfortable and uncomfortable, predictable and unpredictable, all speak to the fact that school advising is a complex phenomena. The exploration began with two research questions that guided the study: what is the school advisor's understanding of her practice? What is the school advisor's understanding of how one becomes a teacher? i worked with three school advisors from two large urban secondary schools during the 13 week secondary student teaching practicum in the 1994/95 school year. Diane and Jill came from Maskini Secondary School. They worked with one student teacher, Betty. Jessica came from Lord Cook Secondary School, and worked with two student teachers, Chety and Tiany. Several data generating procedures were integrated and a co-researching relationship fostered between the school advisors and me. The data generating procedures were conversations, participant observations, video and audio-taping. Student teacher assessment forms written by the school advisors were part of the data; and i kept a journal throughout the study. As i became immersed in the study, listened to several conferences between school advisors and student teachers, and held various conversations-on-actions with the school advisors, i realized i was dealing with a very complex phenomenon. Interpreting the data from the point of view of the two research questions that i began with, and trying to understand the school advisors' practices and their understanding of how one becomes a teacher from that view, would have meant camouflaging the dynamics and conflictual nature of such practices. Asking a what is question demanded that i objectify the school advisors. That would have meant sealing myself off from the atmosphere that i inhabited in those classrooms, the sounds of pedagogy that i heard, and the smiles that radiated the rooms. That would have meant not acknowledging what it was like for me inhabiting places full of love and hope. It would have also meant blocking off the painful moments that were evident at times. The moments and situations speak of what and how school advising was like and could be like. The data transformed the research questions. The complexity of school advising needed to be spoken of according to what it was like and could be like. Thus, what school advising was like and can be like or what the 1994/95 practicum was like for the school advisors is told in narratives and metaphors generated from the various conversations. The narratives, the situations, and the metaphors speak about what we have to grasp as a whole. They help us understand each advising of a student teacher by a school advisor on a certain day, in the tone of a previous incident, reminder, and suggestion. The narrative fragments and the synopsis make sense in the whole. Like parables they constitute what Paul Ricouer calls "networks of intersignifications." i have used geographical terms such as safari, tectonic, landscape, terrain, and paths, to communicate what the practicum was like for us as co-researchers. This study assists us in understanding what school advising could be like by offering accounts of what it was like for the co-researchers, Jill, Jessica, Diane, and myself. These accounts describe school advising and student teaching as processes of reorientation by disorientation which can be tectonic. For student teachers, the practicum is a reorientation to what was familiar when they were secondary students. For school advisors, the practicum is familiar because it is a yearly occurrence. However, this study found that student teaching and school advising can be very disorienting processes to the parties involved. The tectonicness highlight the need to nurture relationships in teacher education programs which include pedagogical relationships in the classrooms, triadic relationships during the practicum, student teacher-student teacher relationships, and, school advisor-student teacher relationships.

There is no abstract available for this dissertation.

This study is an investigation of methods of teaching and learning in the A-level English curriculum consisting both of the traditional A-level English literature and the more recent arrival of A-level English language. It is generally assumed in commentaries on A-level English teaching that language is taught differently from literature because of differences in aims, content and ideology. English language is seen as a deliberate move away from the more 'pure' academic study of literary texts and towards more 'applied' and even partly 'vocational' study in which independent and collaborative forms of learning are strongly encouraged. There is, however, little empirical evidence about how students are taught and how they learn in these different courses. The study addresses these limitations by carrying out an intensive, qualitative study of the teaching styles of ten teachers who teach across the two A-level English subjects. Video recordings of twenty complete lessons (i. e. 10 English language and 10 English literature) were analysed using a formal framework of analysis adapted from the study of discourse analysis. This system identifies the organisation of the classroom discourse so as to allow for a comparison of the patterning of teaching exchanges across the two subjects. The study also investigates, using semi-structured interviews, how the teachers perceive the learning objectives of the two subjects, and the match between those objectives and the teaching and learning methods used to achieve them. The findings suggest that teachers do not vary their teaching style when teaching across the two English subjects at A-levels supporting an extensive statistical study of students' perceptions of the instructional practices employed by teachers which also found a lack of pedagogic distinctiveness between the two subjects. The analysis revealed that teacher-led recitation is a prominent feature of the discourse in both A-level English language and literature.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1952.

Thesis (M. Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1995. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 94-98).