11 |
成功校長領導行為研究 / A research on the leadership behavior of outstanding principals溫子欣, Wen, Tzu Hsing Unknown Date (has links)
本研究以兩位成功校長為研究對象,透過質性研究的厚實敘寫以及理論與實務的反覆對照深化,深度探索校長成功領導學校的領導行為與實踐,並分別歸納出具體可行的原則與作法,以及對於校長領導實務、領導理論以及未來研究的建議。透過訪談與分析,本研究獲得如下的分析結果與結論:首先,孔校長的成功領導以分層負責以及完全授權為核心,以走動領導與啟發式溝通為實踐的方法,透過各處室能力的提升,培育各處室獨立作戰與問題解決的能力,學校進入穩定成長期之後,各處室能力皆已成熟,孔校長則以無為而治的領導風格進行學校領導。程校長的領導以教學領導與學習型組織為核心,以教育愛為堅實之理念基礎,透過不斷的問題解決歷程以及環境要素的改善與提供,提升教師的教育信念與教學能力,同時亦提升學生的學習態度、方法與自信,造就學校經營效能飛越式的進步。
本研究對於領導的結論與實務建議如下:(一)欲成為校長的教育工作者應對於自我的特質深切省察;(二)清廉是校長成功領導的基礎條件;(三)善用學校既存問題的解決機會展現校長領導能力;(四)理念正確與堅持力是校長領導成功的致勝關鍵;(五)與學校成員理念與價值觀的溝通應先於(優於)命令與規定;(六)校長在學校組織成員心中未建立信賴感或心服感之前避免躁進;(七)校長應忽略自己的面子問題,並能夠謹慎處理部屬的面子問題;(八)要成為成功校長之前必須先學會如何避免誤觸導致失敗的領導地雷;(九)民主化校園中,校長必需強化本身的溝通能力;(十)成功校長需有能力將關懷行為作為一種倡導行為使用;(十一)成功校長具備優異的問題解決能力;(十二)成功校長需具備消解學校派系的能力;(十三)成功校長能夠掌握各領導理論的基本精神並靈活綜合運用,而非僵化的施行單一領導理論;(十四)成功校長能夠提升學校成員的道德判斷層次並以高層次需求為訴求;(十五)校長對於組織成員個別要求與態度應「知所權變」;(十六)學校變革宜溫和,「在和諧中求進步」;(十七)以環境與風氣改變部屬是至柔且最易成功的領導作法。 / The main participants of this study are the two successful principal in Taiwan’s middle school. Using a qualitative research approach, analysis was done regarding both theoretical and practical applications of school leadership. In-depth exploration of successful leadership of the school principal's leadership behavior and practice were also accomplished. Results were then classify and organized into principles and practices. Recommendations were done on the practice for the leadership of principals, leadership theory, and future researchers. Results are as follows: (1) Principal Kong’s leadership is decentralized and fully authorized as core, leadership by walking around and inspiring communication as a technique, enhancing the ability of each school administrative departments and nurture their independent operation and problem solving capability, hence, the school shall goes into a stage of long-term stability. Principal Kong’s leadership style is a low intervention but decentralized and fully authorized. (2) Principal Cheng’s leadership is focused on instructional leadership and learning organization as the core to school leadership, in addition of the solid foundation in the concept of education love, and through the continuous process improvement and problem-solving with the improvement of school environment, hence upgrade the educational beliefs of teachers and teaching ability, which also enhance the students learning attitude, methods and self-confidence, resulting in the swift operating performance and advancement of the school.
|
12 |
競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為 、學校組織文化與教學效能關係之研究 / A study on the relationships among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture and teaching effectiveness in elementary schools:an application of competing values framework張伯瑲 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在探討競值架構下國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與教師教學效能之間的關聯。研究採用調查研究法,以新北市公立國民小學教師為對象,共發出748份問卷,共獲得有效問卷646份,有效問卷回收率為86.36%。正式問卷回收之後,分別以描述統計、t考驗、單因子單變量變異數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析及結構方程模式等統計方式對回收資料進行分析。
本研究獲得以下十一項結論:
一、國民小學校長領導行為在中上水準,以競爭層面表現較突出。
二、國民小學組織文化表現達中上水準,趨向於團隊和層級層面。
三、國民小學教師教學效能平均達高表現水準,以良好學習氣氛得分最高、教學計畫準備得分最低,且顯著低於其他四個教學效能層面。
四、國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織文化以右上象限層面得分均低。
五、教師職務在校長領導行為方面有差異、教師年齡、學歷、服務年資與職務在教學效能上有差異。
六、校長年齡在校長領導行為與學校組織文化方面有差異。
七、學校規模、所在地、校齡在校長領導行為、學校組織文化與教師教學效能均有顯著差異。
八、校長領導行為、學校組織文化與教師教學效能之間具有顯著正相關。
九、校長領導行為、學校組織文化與教師教學效能之間具有顯著預測力。
十、校長領導行為與學校組織文化不僅與對應象限的分層面有正相關與預
測力,與非對應象限甚至對立象限的層面也有顯著正相關與預測力。
十一、校長領導行為可顯著影響教師教學效能,也可透過學校組織文化的
中介作用,正向影響教師教學效能。
本研究分別就實務應用及未來研究兩方面提出如下建議:
一、實務應用方面:
(一) 建立回饋機制,使校長瞭解自身領導風格,靈活轉換各種領導行為,並善用競爭領導優勢,成為學校成員學習的榜樣。
(二) 校長應瞭解並協助學校成員認識學校組織文化類型,透過形塑願景與組織對話,使組織在文化生命週期中有效能的運作。
(三) 教師應兼顧每一個教學效能層面,並加強提升教學計畫準備。
(四) 校長應培養創新的領導能力,帶動發展革新求變的組織文化氛圍。
(五) 校內應建立教師教學對話與教學研討機制,藉以傳承資深優良教師教學經驗與觀摩學習。
(六) 校長對於經營校務發展應勇於任事、完全承擔,不應因性別、年齡、學歷、到任時間自我設限,虛與尾蛇。
(七) 校長與學校成員應詳加瞭解所處學校環境,研擬策略面對學校所處位置之有利與不利條件,以營造學校文化及提升教學效能。
(八) 校長應不斷強化自身領導的能力與行為複雜度,並且形塑優質學 校組織文化,以提升教師教學效能表現。
(九) 校長與學校成員應建立深厚的教育夥伴情感,體認共享學校教 育成果之重要性與榮辱休戚與共的使命感,以提供良好教育環境。
(十) 校長應展現兼容並蓄的多元領導風格,以面對諸多領導弔詭與兩 難的困境。
(十一) 營造兼容並蓄學校組織文化,發揮促進教師教學效能中介效果。
二、未來研究方面:
本研究分別就研究對象、研究變項、研究方法,對未來研究提出建議。 / The objective of this study is to understand the relationships among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture and teaching effectiveness in elementary schools by Competing Values Framework. Study on survey research. A total of 646 usable questionnaires were collected from 748 teachers of public elementary schools in New Taipei City. The effective response rate was 86.36%. The statistical techniques applied to this study such as: “describing statistics”, “t-test”, “one-way ANOVA”, “one-way MANOVA”, “Pearson product-moment correlation”, “stepwise multiple regression analysis” and “structural equation modeling”.
With the data analysis result, researcher reached the conclusions as following:
1.Principal’s leadership behavior performance of public elementary schools achieves upper-moderate level, and “Compete” is the highlight among all of the dimensions.
2.School organizational culture performance of public elementary schools achieves upper-moderate level, and “Clan” and “Hierarchy” are the highlight among all of the dimensions.
3.The perception of teacher’s teaching effectiveness gets high score level, and “Good instructional climate ” is the highlight among all of the dimensions of teaching effectiveness, and "teaching plan preparation" is significantly weaker than the others four dimensions.
4.Both of principal’s leadership behavior and school organizational culture of public elementary schools in upper right quadrant of CVF scores are low.
5.There is a significantly divergence for “teacher job position” in principal’s leadership behavior and such as teachers’ “age”, “education”, “srevice year” and “job position”, there is a significant divergence in teaching
effectiveness.
6.There is a significant divergence for “principal age” between principal’s leadership behaviors and school organizational cultural.
7.Such as “ school size”, “ location” and “school history”, there are significant divergences among principal’s leadership behaviors , school organizational cultural and teaching effectiveness.
8.There are significant positive correlation among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture and teaching effectiveness.
9.There are significant predictive power among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture and teaching effectiveness.
10.Between principal’s leadership behavior and school organizational culture are not only the corresponding quadrant, but also the non- corresponding and even opposing corresponding quadrants, and there are significant positive correlation and predictive power.
11.Principal’s leadership behavior could positively affect teaching effectiveness through the mediate effect of school organizational culture.
Otherwise, this study provides suggestions of practical application and future study respectively.
|
13 |
國民小學學校型態實驗教育的創新經營與組織效能關係之研究-以校長領導行為為中介變項 / A study on the relationship between innovative management and organizational effectiveness in the school-based experimental education- the principal’s leadership behavior as the mediator高韻曲 Unknown Date (has links)
摘要
本研究旨在瞭解國民小學學校型態實驗教育的創新經營、組織效能與校長領導行為之內涵與現況,探討其關係,進而建構與驗證三者之互動模式,最後依據研究結果提出建議。本研究採用文件分析與調查研究法,以台灣地區105學年度公辦公營之國民小學學校型態實驗教育學校教師為研究對象,總共發出335份問卷,問卷回收率為91.94%,有效問卷則為89.55%。正式問卷回收後,分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關以及結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析。
依據研究結果與分析歸納,獲得結論如下:
一、國民小學學校型態實驗教育在學校創新經營現況呈現中高程度發展。
二、國民小學學校型態實驗教育在學校組織效能現況呈現中高程度發展。
三、國民小學學校型態實驗教育在校長領導行為現況呈現中高程度發展。
四、在國民小學學校型態實驗教育之教育人員的背景變項中, 不同職務、校長在該校服務年資、不同學校規模等,在創新經營得分之差異達顯著水準。
五、在國民小學學校型態實驗教育之教育人員的背景變項中, 不同職務、校長在該校服務年資、不同學校規模等,在學校組織效能得分之差異達顯著水準。
六、在國民小學學校型態實驗教育之教育人員的背景變項中,不同服務年資、不同職務、校長在該校服務年資、不同學校規模等,在校長領導行為得分之差異達顯著水準。
七、整體學校創新經營與整體學校組織效能間呈顯著的正相關,且與「學生學習」及「學生展能」之相關程度最高。
八、整體校長領導行為與整體學校組織效能間呈顯著的正相關,且與「行政領導」及「控制」之相關程度最高。
九、整體校長領導行為與整體學校創新經營間呈顯著的正相關,且與「行政管理」及「控制」之相關程度最高。
十、學校創新經營透過校長領導行為影響學校組織效能,校長領導行為具有部分中介效果。
本研究根據以上結論,提出相關建議,俾供主管教育行政機關、學校教育人員及後續研究之參考。 / Abstract
This study aims to understand the connotations and status of the innovative operation, organizational effectiveness and the dean’s leadership in primary schools under the school-pattern experimental education, probe into their relations so as to construct and validate the patterns of interactions between these three aspects and finally propose suggestions based on the research results. The document analysis and survey method is adopted for the study purpose and the objects are the teachers in public primary schools that apply school-pattern experimental education in 2016. A total of 335 questionnaires were issued, with a response rate of 91.94% and a valid response rate of 89.55%. The collected questionnaires were analyzed with such statistic methods as descriptive statistics, T-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlations, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
The study came to the following conclusions based on the findings and analytic induction:
1.The school-pattern experimental education in primary schools shows a medium to high level of development in the school’ s innovative operation.
2.The school-pattern experimental education in primary schools shows a medium to high level of development in the school’ s organizational effectiveness.
3.The school-pattern experimental education in primary schools shows a medium to high level of development in the principal’s leadership.
4.Among the background variables of educators in primary schools applying school-type experimental education, such variables as the educators’ titles, the principal’s seniority in the school as well as the size of the school would bring significant differences in the scores of the school’s innovation operation.
5.Among the background variables of educators in primary schools applying school-type experimental education, such variables as the educators’ titles, the principal’s seniority in the school as well as the size of the school would bring significant differences in the scores of the school’s organizational effectiveness.
6.Among the background variables of educators in primary schools applying school-type experimental education, such variables as the educators’ seniority and titles, the principal’s seniority in the school as well as the size of the school would bring significant differences in the scores of the principal’s leadership.
7.The school’s overall innovative operation has a significant positive correlation with its organizational effectiveness, with the highest degree of correlation with “students’ study” and “students’ performance”.
8.The principal’s overall leadership has a significant positive correlation with the school’s organizational effectiveness, with the highest degree of correlation with “administrative leadership” and “control”.
9.The principal’s overall leadership has a significant positive correlation with the school’s innovative operation, with the highest degree of correlation with “administrative management” and “control”.
10.The school’s innovative operations would influence its organizational effectiveness through the principal’s leadership, which embodies a partial medium effect. Based on the above conclusions, this study proposed related suggestions for the reference of competent educational and administrative authorities, the school educators as well as future studies.
|
14 |
競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究 / A Study on the Application of Competing Values Framework on the Relationships among Principal’s Leadership Behavior, School Organizational Culture and Organizational Effectiveness in Elementary Schools.吳勁甫 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在應用競值架構探討國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與學校組織效能之間的關聯性。研究採用調查研究法,以台灣地區公立國民小學教師為對象,總共發出1060份問卷,問卷回收率為89.91%,有效問卷回收率則為84.81%。正式問卷回收之後,分別以單因子單變量變異數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析、集群分析、區別分析、皮爾森積差相關、迴歸分析(簡單、多元及調節迴歸)、階層線性模式及結構方程模式等統計方式對回收資料進行分析。
本研究獲得以下九項結論:
一、國民小學校長領導行為在競爭行為層面上的表現最突出。
二、國民小學組織文化特性趨向層級節制和朋黨組織文化。
三、國民小學學校組織效能在內部過程模式上的表現最佳。
四、校長領導行為、學校組織文化與學校組織效能之間具有正向關聯。
五、校長領導行為表現愈佳及複雜性愈高,有助於塑造學校組織文化與提升
學校組織效能。
六、學校組織文化的特性愈強及複雜性愈高,能促使學校組織效能之表現愈
佳。
七、校長領導行為與學校組織文化之趨同程度愈高,學校組織效能之表現並未
愈佳。
八、校長領導行為與學校組織效能之關聯是否受學校組織文化所調節,須視學
校組織文化之分析層次而定。
九、校長領導行為可透過學校組織文化的中介作用,正向影響學校組織效能。
本研究分別就實務應用及未來研究兩方面提出如下建議:
一、實務應用方面
(一)以競值架構之量表診斷學校組織行為
(二)展現兼容並蓄之領導作風
(三)提升領導行為之複雜性
(四)著重組織文化之型塑
(五)營造兼容並包的組織文化
(六)各種組織效能模式應兼籌並顧
二、未來研究方面
分別就研究對象、研究變項、研究方法、統計分析方法以及行為複雜性之檢測方式等方面,對未來的研究提出建議。 / The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture, and school organizational effectiveness by utilizing competing values framework. The research method this study adopted is survey research. Data were collected from 1060 teachers of elementary schools in Taiwan. The response rates were 89.91%; the usable rates were 84.81%. The collected data were analyzed by using the statistical methods of one-way ANOVA, one-way MANOVA, cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, Pearson product-moment correlation, regression analysis (simple regression, multiple regression, and moderated regression), hierarchical linear modeling, and structural equation modeling.
The conclusions of this study are:
1.Among all of the dimensions of principal’s leadership behavior, “Compete” is the dominant in the elementary schools.
2.Among all of the dimensions of school organizational culture, “Hierarchy” and “Clan” are the dominant in the elementary schools.
3.Among all of the dimensions of school organizational effectiveness, “Internal Process” is the dominant in the elementary schools.
4.There are positive relationships among principal’s leadership behavior, school organizational culture, and school organizational effectiveness.
5.The principals with better leadership performances and higher behavioral complexity tend to shape school organizational culture and enhance school organizational effectiveness.
6.The schools with stronger organizational cultures and higher cultural complexity could improve school organizational effectiveness.
7.The hypothesis that the higher the congruence between principal’s leadership behavior and school organizational culture is, the better the school organizational effectiveness is could not be supported.
8.Whether the relationship between principal’s leadership behavior and school organizational effectiveness could be moderated by school organizational culture depends on the level of analysis of school organizational culture.
9.The principal’s leadership behavior could positively affect school organizational effectiveness through the mediated effect of school organizational culture.
In addition, this study provides suggestions respectively on the aspect of practical application and future study.
|
15 |
臺灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式、教師工作滿意度之關係研究閻自安 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究主要目的為:一、了解學校本位決策的意義、目的、特色、原則與倡導理由,以及哲學、社會學與心裡學理論基礎。二、探索學校本位決策的歷史沿革與典範轉移。三、分析國內外學校本位決策的實施概況與困境,並探索推動學校本位決策的可行策略。四、找出可供檢視學校本位決策符合程度的因素,並探討此因素與校長領導方式、教師工作滿意度的關係。五、根據學校本位決策的相關文獻與國內學校本位決策情形的實證研究,提出可供參考的建議。
本研究以自編「學校本位決策工作環境知覺問卷」為工具,抽取臺灣地區160所公、私立國民小學973位教師為對象,調查其所任教學校符合學校本位決策的現況,以及校長領導方式、教師工滿意度的情形,並探究三者間的關係。本研究將學校本位決策分為「決策參與」、「決策自主」、「決策尊重」、「團體決策」與「家長參與」等五個向度,將校長領導方式分為「民主」與「威權」兩個向度,而將教師工作滿意度區分為「行政管理」、「工作本身」、「校長領導」與「同僚關係」等四個向度。
本研究主要研究發現如下:
一、國小校務決策方式符合學校本位決策的程度
1.學校本位決策情形大致符合。
2.決策自主程度最高,決策尊重程度最低。
3.參與班級事務的決策較多,參與學校事務的決策較少。
4.小型學校的學校本位決策程度高於中、大型學校。
5.女校長領導的學校,其學校本位決策程度高於男校長領導的學校。
6.院轄市的學校,其學校本位決策情形高於省縣轄市與鄉鎮離島的學校。
二、校長領導方式與學校本位決策的關係
1.校長領導方式愈民主,則學校本位決策愈易塑造。
2.校長領導方式愈威權,則學校本位決策愈難塑造。
三、學校本位決策與教師工作滿意度的關係
1.學校本位決策程度愈高,則教師的工作滿意度也愈高。
2.學校決策參與的程度愈高,則教師對行政管理與校長領導的滿意度也愈高。
3.學校決策自主的程度愈高,則教師對行政管理、工作本身、校長領導與同僚關係的滿意度也愈高。
4.學校愈尊重教師的決策,則教師對行政管理與校長領導的滿意度也愈高。
5.學校採用團體決策的程度愈高,則教師對行政管理、工作本身與同僚關係的滿意度也愈高。
6.家長參與學校決策的程度愈高,則教師對校長領導的滿意度也就愈低。
四、校長領導方式、學校本位決策與教師工作滿意度的整體關係
1.校長的民主領導取向會影響學校本位決策情形,而學校本位決策情形也會影響教師的工作滿意度。
2.民主領導較會影響決策參與、自主、尊重、團體決策與家長參與,而威權領導僅會影響決策參與和尊重。
3.決策自主較會影響教師對行政管理、工作本身、校長領導與同僚關係的滿意度,而團體決策影響教師對同僚關係的滿意度,家長參與會影響教師對校長領導的滿意度。
本研究並對學校、教育行政單位與未來研究方向提供以下幾點建議:
一、對學校的建議:
1.領導者應加強民主領導能力的培養,避免採用威權的領導方式;2.給予教師更多自主決策的空間,以提升教師的工作滿意度;3.加強團隊合作,以提高教師的工作滿意度;4.鼓勵家長適度參與,建立親師合作的伙伴關係;5.調整校長的角色扮演,以利學校本位決策的實施;6.授權教師或學生參與決策,減少行政管理上的衝突。
二、對教育行政單位的建議:
1.實施學校本位決策,以提升教師工作滿意度;2.發展小型學校,以利學校本位決策的推行;3.提高非都市地區的決策自主與家長參與,以均衡城鄉決策品質的差異;4.實施學校本位決策時,應以學生學習效果的提高為目標,而非爭奪權力;5.確立中央、地方與學校的權限與責任劃分;6.在開放參與的同時,應強化配套措施的設計。
三、對未來研究的建議:
1.在研究對象方面--擴大研究的群體;2.在研究方法方面--深化研究的脈絡;3.在研究工具方面--增加決策的向度;4.在研究變項方面--探討其他變項的關連。 / The purposes of the study were (1) to understand meanings, objectives, characteristics, principles, reasons of advocacy and theoretical perspectives of school-based decision making(SBDM); (2) to inquiry into the historical development of SBDM;(3) to analyze its difficulties and strategies when implementing SBDM; (4) to address the relationships among SBDM, the principal's leadership, and teachers' job satisfaction; (5) to propose suggestions based on results.
A questionnaire developed in the study was mailed to a total sample of 973 respondents in 160 elementary schools. The relationships among SBDM, principal's leadership style, and teachers' job satisfaction were inquired.
From the statistical analysis of the results, the main findings of this study were drawn:
1.It accords with SBDM above average level in the elementary school. Teachers get the most autonomy and the least respect in the process of participation in school decision making. Teachers participate in work-level decisions more than organizational-level decisions. Small schools are more accordant with SBDM than middle schools and large schools. A schools led by a female principal is more accordant with SBDM than a school led by a male principal. Schools in metropolitans are more accordant with SBDM than schools in prefectures, cities, towns, and islands.
2.A principal is more democratic, the school led by him is more accordant with SBDM. Adversely, a principal is more authoritative, the school led by him is less accordant with SBDM.
3.It is more accordant with SBDM in the elementary school, teachers' job satisfaction is greater. Teachers participate in decision making more often, and they feel more satisfactory about school administrative management and principal's leadership. Teachers participate in decision making more autonomous, and they feel more satisfactory about school administrative management, work, principal's leadership, and colleague relationships. Teachers have the respect of the school to participate in decision making more often, and teachers feel more satisfactory about school administrative management and principal's leadership. Teachers make decision through teamwork more often, and they feel more satisfactory about school administrative management, work, and colleague relationships. Parents participate in decision making more often, but teachers feel less satisfactory about school administrative management, work, and colleague relationships.
4.Democratic leadership influences the success of SBDM, and the implementation of SBDM influences teachers' job satisfaction. Democratic leadership increases participative decision making, autonomous decision making, respectful decision making, group decision making, and parents participation. Authoritative leadership decreases participative decision making and respectful decision making. Autonomous decision making influences teachers' job satisfaction about school administrative management, work, principal leadership, and colleague relationship. Group decision making influences teachers' job satisfaction about colleague relationships. Parents participation influences teachers' job satisfaction about principal's leadership.
Suggestions for the elementary schools, educational administrative institutions, and future study are provided.
Firstly, six suggestions for the elementary schools are as follow:
1.Cultivate democratic leadership;2.Make teachers participate in decision making more autonomous;3.Encourage teamwork;4.Let parents participate in decision making moderately, so build parents-teacher partnership;5.Adjust the principal leadership to feminine leadership style. 6. Include teachers and students in the decision making processes of schooling.
Secondly, six suggestions for educational administrative institutions are as follow:
1.Implement SBDM to increase teachers' job satisfaction;2.Diminish scale of a school to make SBDM succeed more easily;3.Let decision making more autonomous and parents participation more often in non-metropolitans;4.Focus the main goal of SBDM on increasing student learning;5.Identify authority and power of the central office, local areas, and schools;6.Implement SBDM along with other relative policies.
Finally, four suggestions for future study are as follow:
1.Enlarge scopes of population;2.Adopt much more 0research methods;3.Increase dimensions of participation;4.Study more relative variables with SBDM.
|
Page generated in 0.0168 seconds