• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

上市建設公司營運績效評等之研究 / The performance grading of construction firm in Taiwan stock exchange market

施旻孝, Shin, Min-Hsiao Unknown Date (has links)
在房地產生命週期中,建設公司扮演了土地取得、資金籌措、個案企畫、規劃興建、銷售與管理維護等角色,可說是房地產相關行業中最主要之關鍵;因此包括購屋者、股票購買者、公司管理階層、金融機構、證券管理機構等,皆必須以不同的角度來關切個別建設公司的經營績效,以供其行為決策的參考。 基於此,本研究第一部份先運用模糊理論衍生之模糊綜合評估法對上市建設公司的財務績效等相關指標進行各種綜合評估,並以劃分為「劣」、「普」、「良」、「優」四個級距的方式對公司進行評等。第二部份則搭配定性描述的產品績效予以交叉探討,以進一步了解不同類型建設公司的經營特質,共獲致以下結論。 在公司財務績效評等方面,相較於傳統簡單加權法,模糊綜合評估法因搭配權重的不同而在測試考驗上有較大落差;不過就評估結果而言,幾種評估權重的一致程度皆相當高,其中以同時考量到建築投資業產業特質(如高負債比率、低周轉率、經營規模成長快等)與員工生產力的評等模式穫得了最佳的測試成績。在該評估模式下,八十三年第四季至八十六年第三季各公司的評等結果分別為:「劣」等級包括宏福、宏總等兩家;「普」等級包括潤建、龍邦、長谷、緯城、仁翔等五家;「良」等級包括國揚、太設、太子、長億、寶祥、宏璟、皇普、昱成、春池等九家;「優」等級包括國建、寶建、冠德、華建、三采、尖美、宏盛、宏普、基泰等九家。 而在上市建設公司財務績效與產品績效交叉探討的部份:本研究從公司上市時間、成立時間、資本額,存貨內涵、政府認證等幾個角度做為產品績效的測試基準,有以下三點重要發現: 1.財務表現優良的上市建設公司亦有不錯的股價表現,至於財務表現不良的公司股價表現相對較差。 2.財務表現優良的公司平均上市時問較短,財務表現不良的公司平均上市時間則較長。 3.財務表現優良的公司帳面上的養地比率較高,財務表現不良的公司帳面上養地比率則較低。
2

國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究

吳政達 Unknown Date (has links)
自Zadeh(1965)提出模糊集合論,將集合論之二值邏輯擴充至多值邏輯後,使得集合論更為完善,能更精確地描述實際問題之特性。由於教師評鑑的規準建構與測量方法皆深具模糊性,因此有必要針對評鑑問題之模糊特性,選擇適當之模糊理論。本研究以模糊德菲法以整合專家意見以建構評鑑指標,續以模糊層級分析法計算各指標間的相對權重。教師評鑑除考量量化指標外,由於質化指標常以語意詞句(linguistic terms)表達,故採取Chen和Hwang (1992)所提之轉換法將模糊評語集轉換為明確得點值(crisp score)。並利用模糊綜合評估以從事實際教師評鑑之結果分析,其中涉及不同運算算子間的差異比較。 本研究結果發現:教師評鑑指標體系包括教師評鑑指標共可區分為九大類主指標四十一項次指標。其主指標分別為「專業知識」、「教學準備能力」、「教學策略與實施能力」、「教學評量能力」、「運用教學資源能力」、「班級經營能力」、「專業責任」、「校務參與及服務績效」與「人際溝通能力」等九類;「專業知識類」次指標包括「任教科目的專門知識(含提供完整的知識架構)」、「教學方法的專業知識(含清楚教導概念)」、「課程與教材方面的知識(包括清楚目前的學習內容與先前的學習內容及未來的學習內容之間的關連)」、「教學情境的專業知識」、「輔導方面的知識(包括了解學生的心理)」與「學習與發展方面的知識(包括精熟學生背景知識和經驗)」等六項,「教學準備能力類」次指標包括「訂定教學計畫,妥善準備教具」、「根據學生學習需求及課程標準,訂定適合的教學目標」等兩項,「教學策略與實施能力類」次指標包括「教導認知、情意及動作技能的學習與遷移」、「教材展示精確又清楚」、「運用適當教學方法的技巧」、「對教學內容的解釋、舉例之能力」、「教學內容組織能力」、「引起並維持學生的學習動機與注意力」、「教學表達能力」、「傾聽兒童說話的技巧」、「促使學生延展其思考」等九項,「教學評量能力類」次指標包括「評量兒童表現並提供回饋與指導」、「根據評量結果改進教學歷程」、「適時而正確地評估學生進步情形」等三項,「運用教學資源能力類」次指標包括「妥善佈置教學環境」、「運用多樣教學資源」等兩項,「班級經營能力類」包括「輔導學生的能力(包括輔導學生因學業及日常生活所產生的困擾)」、「指導學生遵守生活常規,養成良好行為習慣」、「教室管理的技巧(包括建立愉快的班級氣氛、建立教室常規和程序)」、「有效運用獎懲手段」、「訂定適切的班級規範」與「創造適當的學習環境」等六項,「專業責任類」次指標包括「關懷與瞭解學生」、「工作勤惰」、「教學認真」、「教育信念」、「研究進修」與「敬業精神」等六項,「校務參與及服務績效類」次指標包括「主動積極協助校務推展」、「配合學校行政詳建各項學生檔案」、「對學校活動積極參與」等三項,「人際溝通能力類」包括「同儕教師溝通交流分享互動之能力」、「和家長保持溝通互動以維持良好的親師關係」、「建立和維持師生關係」、「教師能公平、公正地對待全部學生」等四項,合計四十一項次指標。 / Since Zadeh(1965) proposed the fuzzy sets theorem and further developed the theorem from two-value logic to continues multi-value logic, the assembly theorem had become more completed and was capable of depicting the characteristics of real problem more specifically. Because the standard structure and measuring method of teacher appraisal are both ambiguous, it is necessary to adopt an suitable fuzzy theorem for this ambiguous characteristic of teacher appraisal. The study incorporated the opinions of specialists into structural evaluation indicator based upon Fuzzy Delphi and further calculated the relative weights among each indicator by Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. The teacher appraisal not only need to quantify the indicator but also to qualify them using linguistic terms to express. Therefore, the study adopted the Chen-Hwang (1992) transfer method to transform the ambiguous evaluation terms into specific crisp scores and used the composite of fuzzy evaluation to engage the analysis of real teacher appraisal involving differentiated comparison among individual operants. The outcomes of the study demonstrated that the indicator system of teacher appraisal including teacher appraisal indicator consist of 9 major indicator and 41 minor indicator. The 9 major indicator were professional knowledge, capability of teaching preparation, teaching strategy and implementation ability, capability of teaching assessment , capability of employing teaching resource, capability of class management, professional duty, involvement of school managing and service achievement, and capability of interpersonal communication. The 6 sub-indicator in the professional knowledge category includes professional knowledge of the specific discipline with a comprehensive knowledge structure, professional knowledge of teaching methods included a lucid teaching concept, professional knowledge of class and teaching material included understanding of the connection between the current and future learning contents. professional knowledge of teaching situations, professional knowledge of consulting included understanding of student psychology and professional knowledge of learning and developing included awareness of student background knowledge and experiences. There were two sub-indicator in the capability of teaching preparation (making a teaching agenda and preparing teaching tools, and planing a proper teaching goal based upon student learning need and class standard. The 9 sub-indicator in the teaching strategy and implementation ability were, understanding of guidance and learning and transferring of mental and physical skills, demonstration of teaching material precisely and clearly, employment of proper teaching skills, the interpretation of teaching contents and exemplification faculty, ability to organize teaching contents, inspire and maintain learning motivation and attention of student, faculty of teaching expression, listening skills concerning the child talk, and stimulate the extension of student thinking. The 3 sub-indicator in capability of teaching evaluation were, evaluation of child perfor-mance in order to render guidance and feedback, rescheduling the teaching agenda according to the evaluation outcomes, and accurately and timely evaluating student progression . The capability of employing teaching resource category consisted of implementing teaching environment congruently and adopting diversified teaching resources. The 6 sub-indicator in capability of class management were faculty of student guidance (consulting the student problems causing by class-learning and everyday activities), lead students to fellow the normal rules and to keep righteous behavior habits, class room managing skills ( establish an amicable classroom atermosphere and the classroom guidelines and procedures), proper employing award/ punish system, making the proper classroom paradigm, and create suitable learning environment. The 6 subindicator in professional duty were concerning and understanding students, working habits, teaching sincerity, teaching believe, advancing research, reverence to occupation, The 3 subin-dicator in involvement of school administration and service achievement were, actively assisting the school administration to implement, cooperating the school administration to establish the student records, actively engaging the school activities. The capability of interpersonal communication category composed of 4 subindicator, capability of communicating and interacting with teaching colleagues, capability of communicating and interacting with student parents and maintain a good teacher-parent relationship, establishing and keeping the teacher-student relationship, treating all student with equality and fairness. The grand total of sub-indicator were 41.

Page generated in 0.0183 seconds