1 |
王世貞詩論與其杜詩學 = Analysing Wang Shih-chen's theories of Shih-poetry and his study of Tu Fu陳少芳, 01 January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
王世貞詩文論研究朴均雨, PU,JUN-YU Unknown Date (has links)
王世貞是明代嘉、隆、萬三朝間文壇之領導人物。本論文的主要觀點, 認為他的詩文
論應分為二個不同的階段, 即中年時期之熱烈主張復古、與晚年時期為統合文壇而主
張調和論。然而一般的研究往往誤解世貞, 以為他僅僅是一個復古主義者, 因此, 本
文以分析的方法來探討世貞之詩文論與詩文觀轉變之過程。
本論文共分六章, 前有緒言, 說明研究動機與方法。玆概述各章內容如下:
第一章: 「生平、著作、學術思想」。簡述世貞的生平、論詩文之著作、對於經學與
詩文的態度, 以及對儒、道、佛的看法。
第二章: 「世貞文學思想之時代背景」。略述世貞所處時代的科舉文風、哲學思想、
文壇狀況, 藉以尋找有關世貞文學思想形成之因素。
第三、四章: 「詩文論之基本架構」 (上、下) 。分別析論世貞對詩文本質之認識、
格調說、法與變、對模擬的看法、實際批評上的主要觀點等, 以考究其詩文論的基本
架構。世貞雖重視格調而又能包容一些類似性靈、神韻說的見解; 他重視格調故注重
法度, 但對法的態度並不拘泥, 因為講法度過於具體, 有時又難免產生呆滯刻板之幣
, 所以, 提出「離合」和「悟」的概念, 作為學習古人, 掌握古法的原則和方法。復
古主義者一般主張以模擬為創作的途徑, 世貞亦不排斥模擬, 但與一般復古主義者 ,
略有不同, 要求靈活的模擬, 甚至有許多反對刻意模擬的言論, 重要的是必須掌握古
法。
第五章: 「詩文觀轉變與調和論」。此章詳細論述世貞詩文觀轉變的過程、轉變的時
期及其調和論。其調和論部分, 首先說明他主張調和論的理由, 其次以南方文學與北
方文學的折衷、古與今的折衷、復古派與唐宋派的折衷等來論證他超越復古派的立場
, 而主張調和論。
第六章: 「結論」。綜述世貞詩文論的重點, 並考察其影響及後人對他的詩文論的批
評。
|
3 |
王世貞研究提要--以其生平及學術為中心黃志民, HUANG, ZHI-MIN Unknown Date (has links)
李何王李,乃明代文學復古之中堅,而太倉王世貞元美,匯萃眾說,持論圓融,才力
富健,學殖深厚,尤稱翹楚焉。藝世貞早登宦籍,供職京師,與前輩名家,結社倡和
,夙受推挹,及與濟南李攀龍等倡等七子之社,紹述何李,修復西京大曆以上詩文,
以號令一世,名日益噪。攀龍既歿,世貞獨操文柄,翕張賢豪,吹噓才俊,地望之高
,聲價之重,有明文人,無出其右;復古之風,籠罩海內,臻於高潮,唯是盛極而衰
,其機亦見,毀譽歙集,彈射四起。然則以世貞為風會轉移之關鍵人物,庶幾近之;
而於其人之考察,進而窺知當日文壇之動向,亦一重要之課題也。
本文凡五章,日年譜,日交遊,日著述,日文學論評,交遊以篇幅較長,析為上下焉
。
年譜之作,據所知有世貞之孫瑞國所為瑯琊鳳麟兩公年譜合編,今為世貞年譜,以其
生平事蹟為主,其時事及右人事蹟之相關者,依次附列,本文之前,略考述其也系,
庶幾家世時代,及其本人,能為整體之考察與理解;資料以見世貞著述者為主,參以
上述諸家,年經月緯,略依先後,力求完備。
二、三章交遊,凡父執、親族、鄉黨、詩文、宦途、方外、其他,共七目。人物以見
於世貞詩文者為主,間及其他;其先後則依年齒、科名、行輩,或世貞詩文中原有之
次第,各有義例。
四章著述,所以明其學術。
末章述其文學論評,以藝苑*言為主,其見於集中序跋書牘者輔之。 /
|
4 |
製作明代前後七子-以清初中期三書為探討核心 / Seven production before and after the Ming Dynasty - the three books of the mid-Qing of the core謝佩真 Unknown Date (has links)
弘治、正德時期以李夢陽、何景明為首的文學復古運動,統治文壇約一世紀左右,然《明史》以「文必秦漢,詩必盛唐」來簡化其成就,甚而一般中國文學史、批評史對於明代前後七子模擬剽竊的師古途徑,多予以負面評價。本文欲藉由比對錢謙益《列朝詩集小傳》與具有官方意識《明史》及《四庫全書總目》三書,從中釐清清人製作前後七子形象的過程,試圖進入原先歷史文化語境,以梳理清初、中期如何來看待前後七子之議題,為本文研究的目的。本論文在第一章說明研究動機與目的、研究範圍、前人研究成果及研究方法。
第二章以《列朝詩集小傳》、《明史》、《四庫全書總目》三書對於前後七子述評為基本架構,從中可見三書抨擊的對象鎖定在幾個特定的復古派領袖人物身上,如李夢陽、何景明、李攀龍及王世貞等人。第三章在比較清初、中期三書之異同,相同觀點包括抨擊七子內部成員相互標榜、排擠之陋習與簡化復古內容及剽竊模擬之弊病;相異觀點則包括《四庫全書總目》對於李夢陽、李攀龍提振文風之肯定與錢謙益強烈抨擊何景明於〈與李空同論詩書〉所提詩文理論,而漠視其「擬議以成其變化」的原意及《明史‧何景明傳》「夢陽主模仿,景明主創造」之述評,造就後世對於李、何的刻版印象,此外尚包括《四庫全書總目》對於謝榛詩論提出「迂謬」、「語似高而實謬」的評述。
第四章論述清初、中期三書文學標準與評價之得失,可見三書評述七子的主觀標準,且多半否定前後七子的貢獻。清初、中期三書述評評價的優點是在明確反思明代剽竊模擬、門戶之見所衍生的弊端中,同時展開屬於清人詩學的理論框架,顯見清人對於詩文創作有了更清楚的認知。三書述評評價的缺失則是包括多半持著於否定性的評價與過於簡化前後七子的復古內容及強調七子相互標榜排擠的陋習,以及有意識忽略其他面向之探討,如前後七子對於模擬剽竊的反省與真實情感的重視等層面。第五章回顧本文主要內容。
|
5 |
王世貞(1526-1590)藝術贊助的研究. / Wang Shizhen (1526-1590): a study of patronage in art / 王世貞藝術贊助的研究 / Study of patronage in art / CUHK electronic theses & dissertations collection / Wang Shizhen (1526-1590) yi shu zan zhu de yan jiu. / Wang Shizhen yi shu zan zhu de yan jiuJanuary 2006 (has links)
Chapter 1 reviews the background to the rise of art patronage studies and their development and its influence on studies of Chinese art history. It also provides alternative approaches to studying activities related to patronage and their influence and role in Chinese art history by criticising traditional analysis of Chinese art based on social and economic theories. / Chapter 2 examines the life of Wang and explores the intentions and meaning to his patronage activities through studying his political involvement, literary activities and his social background and connections. / Chapter 3 discusses how Wang, given his knowledge in history and passion for art and its collection, reinterprets art history with reference to his private collection of art, and thereby consolidating his status as a leading figure of literary and cultural circle of his time. / Chapter 4 explains and reflects on the formation of the "artist-patron" relationship through examining the relationship and interaction between Wang and the literary circle and by appraising the financial background and standing of artists and calligraphers at the time. / Chapter 5 examines the direct impact that Wang, as a literary leader and patron of the art, has on the styles and subject matter of art work by examining and decoding several pieces of art commissioned by himself, thus revealing a distinct mechanism in which art was produced at the time. / Chapter 6 discusses the "artist-patron" relationship and the "trading of cultural resources" by examining diverse pieces of art work given to Wang as gifts by different individual artists and calligraphers. / Chapter 7 analyses the significance of the patronage activities of Wang and provides a new approach to understanding the issue of traditional Chinese art patronage in Chinese art history. / Through a case study of the life of Wang Shizhen, this research attempts to analyse the influence of literary leader and patron of the arts on the development of painting and calligraphy during the mid-Ming period. By analysing the "artist-patron" relationship, this paper attempts to explain alternative mechanism through which traditional Chinese art was produced. The thesis also examines art patronage activities in Suzhou during the sixteenth century and thereby attempts to examine these activities from the broader cultural and historical context at the time. This paper is divided into seven chapters: / 鄧民亮. / 論文(哲學博士)--香港中文大學, 2006. / 參考文獻(p. 298-320). / Advisers: Tsung-i Jao; Kar Leung Mok. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-02, Section: A, page: 0378. / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / School code: 1307. / Lun wen (zhe xue bo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2006. / Can kao wen xian (p. 298-320). / Deng Minliang.
|
Page generated in 0.0219 seconds