本文共分六章十七節： 第一章 瞿秋白的早年時期（一八九九─一九二０）：（一）家；（二）文人書生； （三）北京時期。本章記敘睢秋白的家世背景和早年生活。 第二章 瞿秋白的轉變（一九二０─一九二七、八）：（一）餓鄉；（二）歸國；（ 三）五全大會前後。本章記敘瞿秋白赴俄經過及歸國後的政治活動。 第三章 瞿秋白的政治活動（一九二七、八─一九三０）：（一）盲動主義；（盲動 主義的檢討；（三）六次大會與調和主義；（四）四中全會的鬥爭。本章記敘瞿秋白 領導的盲動路線及四中全會鬥爭失敗的結果。 第四章 瞿秋白的文學活動：（一）早期的文學活動；（二）左聯時期的文學活動； （三）筆名、別名的使用。本章記敘瞿秋白早期文學和左聯時期的文藝統戰。 第五章 瞿秋白的被補（一九三四─一九三五、六、七、八）：（一）瑞金逃亡；（ 二）獄中告別。本章記敘瞿秋白在瑞金的活動及其被補經過。 第六章 瞿秋白的身後議論：（一）由烈士成叛徒；（二）歷史的誤會。本章記敘匪 黨先後對瞿秋白的評價。

In 1923 Qu Qiu-bai returned from Soviet Russia to China and gradually aligned himself with the power nucleus of Chinese Communist Party as an important political theorist within the Party. Much of the polyphonic elements exemplary in Qu's thoughts, as seen in his earlier writings, had given way noticeably. As purported by mainstream academic queries, Qu's metamorphosis into a Bolshevik had often been accounted for his nevertheless brief stay at the Soviet Russia. The present study, however, confers a dissimilar view in attempting to locate the polyphonic registers in Qu's thoughts. It is found that Qu's thoughts had been characterized by a strong sense of polyphonic nature throughout, whether in his earlier or later works. / In resembling the overlooked complexity of Qu's thoughts, Chapter 3 goes on to inquire how Qu's construction of subjectivity is determined by his specific perspective of history---one which comprised of a synthesis of Creative Evolutionism and Dialectic Materialism. Such construction of subjectivity is important in understanding Qu's contested presence and agency in revolutionary political situations of the early 20th century. Chapter 3.1, thereafter, locates the relevance of Qu's construction of subjectivity to his notion of "orphan pushed away from track" in a re-reading of his widely acknowledged essay "Preface to Lu Xun's Collected Essays." This reading is coupled with a discussion of Qu's "Travel Notes on New Russia" through which Qu's specifications of "suicide" and spatial imagery of the heterotopias will be expounded. Working upon research outcome of this coupled query, a close reading of Qu's confessional note "Superfluous Words" will serves to elucidate Qu's proposition of a negated subjectivity. Chapter 3.4 gives a comparative analysis of the later political lives of Qu and Nikolai Bukharin. It attempts to establish that the outright negation of subjectivity is an implicit tendency in historical materialism. Lastly, Chapter 4 attempts to illustrate Qu's revolutionary subjectivity and his specific notion of pendulum time in recourse to the tropes of pendulum movements: "Revolution/Work," and "Love/Freedom." / The study begins with a topic of research that mainstream academic queries left mostly unanswered: namely, Qu's appropriations of Bergonism, the Yogacara School and Anarchism exemplary in his early writings. This line of query delineates how the 3 major traditions of thoughts compositely engaged Qu in his approach of Bolshevik political practices and Dialectic Materialism. On the basis of this, the study further examines the trajectory how Qu observed in his endorsement of Dialectic Materialism over Bergon's Creative Evolutionism (L'evolution Cretienne). The study also finds that such a pendulum movement from Philosophy of Life towards Dialectic Materialism largely concurred the thoughts and discourses of Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, a contemporary of Qu. Following this, the study compares the two men's notions and problematic of "the Intellectuals". A comparative analysis of Qu's theorization of the "Historical Tool" and Gramsci's "The Modern Prince" is offered at this part of study. / 張歷君. / Adviser: Lee Ou-Fan; Wang Wai Ching. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3146. / Thesis (doctoral)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 243-256). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / School code: 1307. / Zhang Lijun.

No description available.

as English abstract / Oppressed by the severe surveillance of the Japanese police in Taiwan, short-lived Taiwanese Communist Party (TCP) (1928-1931) marked a significant step in the Taiwan’s anti-Japanese movement and social thought. The TCP was the first political organization in Taiwan to put forward the slogan of Taiwan’s independence. Following the Comintern’s activation in the East in 1920s, the first contacts between the Taiwan’s leftists and the Comintern representatives took place in early 1920s. Starting from 1927, the Comintern pursued the policy of activation of the communist movement in the colonies and establishment of communist parties in these countries. Established on the Comintern directive in Shanghai with the help of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and being subordinated to the Japanese Communist Party (JCP), the TCP was developing quite independently under the leadership of Xie Xuehong and in the close alliance with the Taiwan Cultural Association and the Taiwan Peasants Union, until the end of 1930 when the TCP established a contact with the Far Eastern Bureau (FEB) of the Comintern through the TCP Shanghai representative, Weng Zesheng, who served as liaison with the Comintern. As the result, the Comintern activated its work toward Taiwan, started dispatching emissaries to Taiwan who in the framework of the Comintern’s rhetoric of that time promoted the Party’s reform to eliminate the “opportunistic errors”. The activation of the Party’s work followed, the Union for Reorganization was established. The Comintern did not have chance to adjust the activity of the reformed TCP as within few months after the beginning of actual interaction between the Comintern and the TCP, the TCP was destroyed by arrests. The thesis is devoted to the Comintern’s role in the TCP’s establishment, development, reform, establishment of the Union for Reorganization, the Party’s activation and destruction. The research is based on the TCP files deposited in the former archive of the Comintern. The documents include the correspondence of the representative of the TCP, Weng Zesheng, with the Comintern FEB. The correspondence between Weng Zesheng and the FEB sheds light on the inner-party processes in the TCP, clarifies the essence of the inner-party struggle and reform, and explores the role of personal relations in the inner-party struggle which resulted in the UFR establishment without direct involvement of the Comintern. The available now text of the consultations of Weng Zesheng with the CCP representative Qu Qiubai makes it possible to clarify the CCP’s involvement in the TCP’s development and reform and to conclude as to whose directive it was to commence the struggle against Xie Xuehong. The TCP’s history was short but very intensive. Abandoned by its superior, the JCP, and not having relations with the international communist leadership, the TCP suffered lack of the financial and ideological support, and was left for the mercy of unpredictable fate of the exhausting inner factional struggle, still was able to survive under the “white terror” until the Party’s reorganization in 1931. According to the research results, the TCP inner-party struggles during 1928-1931 were in fact the result of resistance to emigrant party groupings who were attempting to take control over the TCP’s Taiwan based Party organization. Neither the JCP and the CCP, nor the Comintern had a real opportunity to influence the activities of the Taiwan-based communists. Taiwan’s communists overseas used the Comintern’s rhetoric and their contacts with the Comintern and the CCP to promote their agenda in the inner-party struggle. The implementation of the plans of Weng Zesheng and the opponents of Xie Xuehong in Taiwan on the Party’s reform and activation led to the Party’s destruction by the Japanese administration.