胡麗華. / "2006年12月" / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2006. / 參考文獻(leaves 133-139). / "2006 nian 12 yue" / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Hu Lihua. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2006. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 133-139). / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節： --- 硏究緣起 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節： --- 前人研究述評 --- p.2 / Chapter 第三節： --- 硏究目標及方法 --- p.8 / Chapter 第二章 --- 王鵬運生平及治詞歷程 --- p.10 / Chapter 第一節： --- 生平槪述 --- p.10 / Chapter 第二節： --- 治詞歷程 --- p.17 / Chapter 第三章 --- 王鵬運詞之題材內容 --- p.36 / Chapter 第一節： --- 半塘詞各集名命意義及主題簡介 --- p.36 / Chapter ´ؤ、 --- 各集命名意義 --- p.36 / Chapter 二、 --- 各集主題簡介 --- p.38 / 小結 --- p.46 / Chapter 第二節： --- 半塘詞分期 --- p.47 / Chapter 一、 --- 初期-個人情志之作 --- p.47 / Chapter 二、 --- 中期-憂時念亂、忠憤之志 --- p.50 / Chapter 三、 --- 後期-南潛歸隱之作 --- p.58 / 小結 --- p.59 / Chapter 第三節： --- 題材內容 --- p.60 / Chapter 一、 --- 懷人之作 --- p.61 / Chapter 二、 --- 贈別之作 --- p.67 / Chapter 三、 --- 思鄉之作 --- p.72 / Chapter 四、 --- 詠物之作 --- p.76 / Chapter 五、 --- 國是之作 --- p.80 / 小結 --- p.87 / Chapter 第四章 --- 王鵬運詞之藝術采光 --- p.89 / Chapter 第一節： --- 「芒角撐腸」、「獨來獨往」一一王鵬運詞之愁苦主調及其意象運用 --- p.89 / Chapter ´ؤ、 --- 歌哭無端、墨痕和淚´ؤ煙 、塵´Ø淚之意象 --- p.89 / Chapter 二、 --- 醉夢之間、尋找依歸-夢、醉之意象 --- p.92 / Chapter 三、 --- 王氏詞悲苦主調的形成原因 --- p.96 / 小結 --- p.97 / Chapter 第二節： --- 「流轉任風光」、「一笑襟塵灑」一一王鵬運詞別調之風格 --- p.98 / Chapter 一、 --- 輕鬆歡愉之情 --- p.98 / Chapter 二、 --- 開豁振作之意 --- p.99 / 小結 --- p.100 / Chapter 第五章 --- 王鵬運詞論 --- p.101 / Chapter 第一節： --- 詞學觀念 --- p.101 / Chapter 一、 --- 「重」、「拙」、「大」之說 --- p.102 / Chapter 二、 --- 體格 --- p.105 / Chapter 三、 --- 詞體發展論 --- p.109 / Chapter 四、 --- 聲律之說 --- p.111 / 小結 --- p.113 / Chapter 第二節： --- 校讎詞籍體例 --- p.113 / Chapter 一、 --- 版本考訂 --- p.114 / Chapter 二、 --- 建立體例 --- p.117 / 小結 --- p.119 / Chapter 第六章 --- 王鵬運於「臨桂詞派」創派之說 --- p.121 / Chapter 第一節： --- 「臨桂派」之說起源 --- p.121 / Chapter 第二節： --- 「臨桂詞派」及王鵬運創派之說 --- p.122 / Chapter 一、 --- 臨桂詞人的活動聯繫 --- p.122 / Chapter 二、 --- 創作取向 --- p.124 / Chapter 三、 --- 理論建立 --- p.126 / 小結 --- p.128 / Chapter 第三節： --- 臨桂詞人群與浙、常二派之分野 --- p.128 / 小結 --- p.130 / Chapter 第七章 --- 總結 --- p.131 / 參考書目 --- p.133 / 附錄 --- p.140 / 附錄一：〈王鵬運生平簡表〉 --- p.140 / 附錄二：〈王鵬運交游詞作一覽表〉 --- p.154

This study has presented a different characterization of the delegates working within the Frankfurt Assembly during the Revolutions of 1848. The evidence suggests that instead of the delegates being naïve and idle in their pursuit for legitimacy, the assembly was systematic in its endeavor to achieve sovereignty and unify the German states. Through the correspondences of Andrew J. Donelson, this study revealed the competency of the delegates to act as the governing authority of the various German states. The assembly successfully negotiated with the United States and acquired a fully armed war steamer that would benefit the newly created Reichsflotte (German Navy). Establishing a system of defense would protect any legislation produced. The delegates should not be faulted with the ultimate rise of authoritarianism, but rather celebrated for their serious effort made towards democracy. / The Frankfurt Parliament -- The mad year -- The United States of Germany -- New legacy. / Department of History

The late chromatic music of Chopin is often difficult to analyze, particularly with a system of Roman numerals. The study examines Schoenberg's Grundgestalt concept as a strategy for explaining Chopin's chromatic musical style. Two short Chopin works, Nocturne in E-flat major. Op. 9, No. 2, and Etude in E major, Op. 10, No. 3, serve as models in which the analytic method is formulated. Root analysis, in the manner of eighteenth-century theorist Simon Sechter, is utilized to facilitate harmonic analysis of chromatic passages. Based upon the analytic method developed, the study analyzes the last three polonaises of Chopin: Polonaise in F-sharp minor, Op. 44, Polonaise in A-flat major, Op. 53, and Polonaise-Fantasie in A-flat major, Op. 61. The Grundgestalt-based analysis shows harmonic, melodic and rhythmic connections in order to view Chopin's chromaticism and formal structure from a new perspective. With this approach, the chromaticism is viewed as essential to the larger form.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Frances Hodgson Burnett’s life revolved around her love of story-telling, her sons, nature, and the idealized notion of childhood. Burnett had an ability to recapture universal aspects of childhood and transform them into realistic stories containing elements of the fantastic or fairy tales. Her ability to tell stories started at a young age when she and her sisters were given permission to write on old pieces of paper. Burnett’s love for storytelling, reading, and writing was fostered in her parents’ household, in which a young Burnett was given free reign to explore her parents’ book collection and also left unhindered to imagine and act out stories by herself and with her sisters and close friends. Later her love for telling tales became a means of providing for her family—beginning with short story submissions to magazines. Although Burnett did not necessarily start out writing for children her career ended up along that path after the success in 1886 of her first children’s book, Little Lord Fauntleroy. After this success, she was a recognizable author on both sides of the Atlantic. Sara Crewe; or, What Happened at Miss Minchin’s, the 1887–88 serial publication in St. Nicholas magazine and the 1888 short story publication both were titled the same, and the subsequent reworkings of Sara’s world in the forms of two plays, A little un-fairy princess (England, 1902), and A Little Princess; Being the Whole Story of Sara Crewe, Now Told for the First Time (United States, 1903), and the 1905 full-length novel which retained the American 1903 play’s title, outlines the creative process that Burnett undertook while exploring the world of Sara Crewe. By examining the above forms, readers and scholars gain an insight into not only the differences between the forms, but also a view of how the author approached adapting an already published work, and the influence of editors on an authors work. The examination of the development of Sara’s timeline will bring light onto Burnett’s growth as a writer and specifically her transition into her role as a children’s literature author.

Thomas Lovell Beddoes' female dramatic characters are, for the most part, objectified and static, but these passive women perform a crucial narrative and thematic function in the plays. Alongside the destructive activity of the male characters, they dramatize masculine-feminine unions as idealized and contrived and, thus, unstable. Desire, power and influence, as well as the constrictive aspects of physicality, all become gendered concepts in Beddoes' plays, and socially normative relationships between men and women, including heterosexual courtship and marriage, are scrutinized and found wanting. In The Brides' Tragedy, Floribel and Olivia, the eponymous brides, represent archetypes of innocence, purity, and Romantic nature. Their bridegroom, Hesperus, embodies Romantic masculinity, desiring the feminine and aspiring to androgyny, but ultimately unable to relinquish masculine power. The consequences of Hesperus' attempts to unite with the feminine other are the destruction of that other and of himself, with no hope for the spiritual union in death that the Romantic Hesperus espouses as his ultimate desire. Death's Jest-Book expands upon the theme of male-female incompatibility, presenting heterosexual relationships in the context of triangulated desire. The erotic triangles created by Melveric, Sibylla, and Wolfram and Athulf, Amala, and Adalmar are inherently unstable, because they depend upon the rivalries between the males. Once those rivalries end, with the deaths of Wolfram and Athulf, respectively, Sibylla and Amala fade into nothing, their function as conduits for male homosocial relations at an end. In effect, these failed heterosexual triangles function as a backdrop for the idealized relationship between Melveric and Wolfram, whose desire for each other is mediated through their common pursuit of Sibylla, as well as through their blood-brotherhood. Once Wolfram's physical masculinity is deferred through death, the mixing of his ashes with those of Melveric's dead wife, and reanimation, Melveric and Wolfram descend into the tomb together, united for eternity.

<p>Средином 19. века настављају се<br />европски револуционарни процеси који су<br />захватили и просторе Хабзбуршке<br />монархије. У овим процесима нашао се и<br />српски народ који је, својом<br />&bdquo;густином&ldquo;,заузимао јужни део<br />Mонархије.Захваљујући привилегијама<br />добијеним од аустријског цара Леополда I, а<br />које је &bdquo;заслужио&ldquo; српски патријарх Арсеније<br />III Чарнојевић, Срби су се у политичком<br />смислупоставиликао верски одређен народ.<br />У периоду од 1690. до 1918. године српска<br />црквена хијерархија, српски политички<br />прваци и други значајни представници<br />српског народа трудили су се да очувају<br />статус и права српског становништва. Са<br />своје стране, бечке власти су константно<br />настојале да српске привилегије сузе и<br />оспоре, да би их пред крај Монархије и<br />потпуно укидале. Било је то питање<br />опстанка и очувања верског, националног и<br />културног идентитета српског народа,најпре<br />у Хабзбуршкој монархији, а 60-их година 19.<br />века у Аустроугарској. Надолазећи догађаји<br />који су 1848-1849. године усталасали средњу<br />Европу, прелили су се и на аустријску<br />царевину. Она није била национално<br />компактна држава, већ је у свом саставу<br />имала разне народе (Мађари, Чеси, Словаци,<br />Срби, Румуни...), који су бројчано<br />надмашили немачко становништво. У овим<br />догађајима, који су у суштини део<br />историјских токова,значајну, а неретко и<br />пресудну улогу, имају личности које се у таквим околностима појављују на</p><p>политичкој сцени.<br />Таква личност у српском народу био је<br />и Ђорђе Стратимировић. Потицао је из<br />значајне српске породице Стратимировић,<br />која своје порекло води из Херцеговине.<br />Родоначелници ове породице били су Петар<br />Стратимировић и његов син Вучко<br />Петровић-Стратимировић. Вучков син био је<br />Богић Вучковић - Стратимировић.<br />Окончањем првог аустро-турског рата<br />Пожаревачким миром 1718. године,<br />порастао је углед Аустрије међу Србима у<br />Херцеговини, тако да у следећем аустро-<br />турском рату 1737-1739. године, Срби нуде<br />своје услуге и узимају учешће у рату. Богић<br />Стратимировић је,1737. године,заповеднику<br />грофу Херберштајну понудио 30.000 војника<br />за рат против Турака. Ипак, цео пројекат се<br />није остварио због мира који је 1739. године<br />склопљен између Аустрије и Турске. Након<br />тога, у периоду од 1743-1745. године, Богић<br />и његов брат Никола преговарају у Бечу о<br />насељавању Стратимировића у Аустрији.<br />Најпре им је додељена пустара Сириг у<br />Бачкој, а када је тај посед предат бачком<br />владики, Богић и његова три брата (Јован,<br />Тома и Никола) у замену су добили посед<br />Кулпин. Када је царица Марија Терезија<br />отпочела са интензивнијим издавањем<br />племићких диплома знаменитијим српским<br />породицама, са циљем да их придобијеза<br />своје војне и друге планове, племство је<br />стекла и породица Стратимировић.Из ове<br />породице је знаменити и утицајни<br />карловачки митрополит Стефан<br />Стратимировић, стриц Ђорђа<br />Стратимировића, што је, како се<br />испоставило, било итекако важно за будућу<br />судбину и улогу Ђорђа у наступајућим<br />историјским догађајима.<br />Ђорђе пл. Стратимировић рођен је 19.<br />фебруара 1822. године у Новом Саду, у кући<br />свог деде по мајци Јована Петровића. Његов<br />отац Василије био је &bdquo;миран и озбиљан<br />човек&ldquo;, кулпински велепоседник уз то и<br />образован. Слободно време проводио је<br />читајући научну литературу. Радио је и као<br />фишкал (адвокат) фрушкогорских<br />манастира. Мати му је рано преминула 1841. године.Школовао се у Кулпину, уз надзор</p><p>лутеранског свештеника Словака Рохоњија и<br />кућног пријатеља познатог српског писца<br />Милована Видаковића. Снажне утиске на<br />младог Ђорђа остављале су приче о<br />херојским подвизима из јуначког рода<br />Стратимировића и живо сећање, на истина<br />ретке, али упечатљиве доласке митрополита<br />Стратимировића у Кулпин. И поред<br />противљења родитеља определио се за<br />војнички позив који је тада између осталог<br />нудио прилику за брзо напредовање,<br />посебно Србина племенитог рода. Похађао је<br />нижу Евангелистичку гимназију у Новом<br />Врбасу. Након изненадне смрти оца,поред<br />попустљиве мајке,испунила му се жеља да<br />постане војник. Похађање академије у<br />Тителу, на кадетском курсу (тзв.<br />математика), омогућило му је да буде одмах<br />примљен у други разред инжењеријске<br />академије у Бечу. Тамо је провео следећих<br />пет година, од 1837. до 1841.,где је као<br />узоран ученик стекао многобројне<br />пријатеље. Један од најбољих другова био<br />му је Фердинанд Бауер, који је касније<br />постао барон и министар рата. Из академије<br />је изашао у чину потпоручника дакле постао<br />је официр. Био је распоређен на службу у<br />регименту у Милану, где је био омиљен<br />међу својим колегама. Истицао се као частан<br />и храбар човек. Ускоро је стицајем пре свега<br />приватних разлога 1843. године напустио<br />војну службу.<br />Већ почетком бурних догађаја 1848.<br />године Стратимировић је узео активно<br />учешће у њима. Образован, родољубив, млад<br />и пун енергије а при томе разумевајући<br />политичку и друштвену ситуацију и стање у<br />коме се нашао српски народ пре свега у<br />односу на Мађаре био је одмах између<br />осталог и захваљујући свом пореклу<br />прихваћен од српских првака и српског<br />народа. Након састанка српске делегације<br />чији је био члан са Лајошем Кошутом и<br />Мађарима у Пешти 1848. године,стекао је<br />велике симпатије и поверење народа. Његово<br />војничко умеће, храброст, способност и<br />неоспорна харизма показали су се већ у<br />првом значајнијем сукобу Срба и Мађара,<br />приликом напада генерала Храбовског на Сремске Карловце 12. јуна 1848. године.</p><p>Тада је, захваљујући енергичној команди<br />Ђорђа Стратимировића, овај напад је<br />одбијен, а Мађари су претрпели свој први<br />пораз. То је Стратимировићу у народу<br />донело велики углед и титулу &bdquo;вожда&ldquo;.<br />Доказао се Стратимировић и у многим<br />будућим биткама и догађајима,али је ова<br />популарност,са друге, стране навукла и<br />омразу, пре свега духовног поглавара Срба у<br />монархији патријарха Јосифа Рајачића и<br />његовог утицајног окружења. У том сукобу<br />са конзервативним делом српског друштва,<br />Стратимировић није имао успеха као на<br />бојном пољу, на челу српске војске.<br />У суштини, Ђорђе Стратимировић се,<br />обзиром на своје младе године, веома добро<br />носио са проблемима у овим тешким<br />исудбоносним догађајима. Показао се као<br />успешан стратег и командант. Добро се<br />снашао и у замршеним политичким играма и<br />при томе је дао велики допринос стварању<br />Српске Војводине и поред свих потешкоћа<br />којима је био изложен српски народ на<br />просторима Јужне Угарске.<br />У раду су коришћени постојећа литература,<br />објављена и необјављена, а пре свега богата<br />архивска грађавезана за револуционарне<br />догађаје 1848. и 1849. године и активности<br />Ђорђа Стратимировића у њима, затим<br />успомене савременика, посебно Ђорђа<br />Стратимировића, домаћа и страна<br />периодика, посебно немачка, српска и<br />мађарска, архивска грађа. Рад је организован<br />по тематско-хронолошком принципу уз<br />оцену кључних односа Ђорђа<br />Стратимировића са патријархом Рајачићем и<br />Стеваном Книћанином.</p> / <p>Sredinom 19. veka nastavljaju se<br />evropski revolucionarni procesi koji su<br />zahvatili i prostore Habzburške<br />monarhije. U ovim procesima našao se i<br />srpski narod koji je, svojom<br />&bdquo;gustinom&ldquo;,zauzimao južni deo<br />Monarhije.Zahvaljujući privilegijama<br />dobijenim od austrijskog cara Leopolda I, a<br />koje je &bdquo;zaslužio&ldquo; srpski patrijarh Arsenije<br />III Čarnojević, Srbi su se u političkom<br />smislupostavilikao verski određen narod.<br />U periodu od 1690. do 1918. godine srpska<br />crkvena hijerarhija, srpski politički<br />prvaci i drugi značajni predstavnici<br />srpskog naroda trudili su se da očuvaju<br />status i prava srpskog stanovništva. Sa<br />svoje strane, bečke vlasti su konstantno<br />nastojale da srpske privilegije suze i<br />ospore, da bi ih pred kraj Monarhije i<br />potpuno ukidale. Bilo je to pitanje<br />opstanka i očuvanja verskog, nacionalnog i<br />kulturnog identiteta srpskog naroda,najpre<br />u Habzburškoj monarhiji, a 60-ih godina 19.<br />veka u Austrougarskoj. Nadolazeći događaji<br />koji su 1848-1849. godine ustalasali srednju<br />Evropu, prelili su se i na austrijsku<br />carevinu. Ona nije bila nacionalno<br />kompaktna država, već je u svom sastavu<br />imala razne narode (Mađari, Česi, Slovaci,<br />Srbi, Rumuni...), koji su brojčano<br />nadmašili nemačko stanovništvo. U ovim<br />događajima, koji su u suštini deo<br />istorijskih tokova,značajnu, a neretko i<br />presudnu ulogu, imaju ličnosti koje se u takvim okolnostima pojavljuju na</p><p>političkoj sceni.<br />Takva ličnost u srpskom narodu bio je<br />i Đorđe Stratimirović. Poticao je iz<br />značajne srpske porodice Stratimirović,<br />koja svoje poreklo vodi iz Hercegovine.<br />Rodonačelnici ove porodice bili su Petar<br />Stratimirović i njegov sin Vučko<br />Petrović-Stratimirović. Vučkov sin bio je<br />Bogić Vučković - Stratimirović.<br />Okončanjem prvog austro-turskog rata<br />Požarevačkim mirom 1718. godine,<br />porastao je ugled Austrije među Srbima u<br />Hercegovini, tako da u sledećem austro-<br />turskom ratu 1737-1739. godine, Srbi nude<br />svoje usluge i uzimaju učešće u ratu. Bogić<br />Stratimirović je,1737. godine,zapovedniku<br />grofu Herberštajnu ponudio 30.000 vojnika<br />za rat protiv Turaka. Ipak, ceo projekat se<br />nije ostvario zbog mira koji je 1739. godine<br />sklopljen između Austrije i Turske. Nakon<br />toga, u periodu od 1743-1745. godine, Bogić<br />i njegov brat Nikola pregovaraju u Beču o<br />naseljavanju Stratimirovića u Austriji.<br />Najpre im je dodeljena pustara Sirig u<br />Bačkoj, a kada je taj posed predat bačkom<br />vladiki, Bogić i njegova tri brata (Jovan,<br />Toma i Nikola) u zamenu su dobili posed<br />Kulpin. Kada je carica Marija Terezija<br />otpočela sa intenzivnijim izdavanjem<br />plemićkih diploma znamenitijim srpskim<br />porodicama, sa ciljem da ih pridobijeza<br />svoje vojne i druge planove, plemstvo je<br />stekla i porodica Stratimirović.Iz ove<br />porodice je znameniti i uticajni<br />karlovački mitropolit Stefan<br />Stratimirović, stric Đorđa<br />Stratimirovića, što je, kako se<br />ispostavilo, bilo itekako važno za buduću<br />sudbinu i ulogu Đorđa u nastupajućim<br />istorijskim događajima.<br />Đorđe pl. Stratimirović rođen je 19.<br />februara 1822. godine u Novom Sadu, u kući<br />svog dede po majci Jovana Petrovića. NJegov<br />otac Vasilije bio je &bdquo;miran i ozbiljan<br />čovek&ldquo;, kulpinski veleposednik uz to i<br />obrazovan. Slobodno vreme provodio je<br />čitajući naučnu literaturu. Radio je i kao<br />fiškal (advokat) fruškogorskih<br />manastira. Mati mu je rano preminula 1841. godine.Školovao se u Kulpinu, uz nadzor</p><p>luteranskog sveštenika Slovaka Rohonjija i<br />kućnog prijatelja poznatog srpskog pisca<br />Milovana Vidakovića. Snažne utiske na<br />mladog Đorđa ostavljale su priče o<br />herojskim podvizima iz junačkog roda<br />Stratimirovića i živo sećanje, na istina<br />retke, ali upečatljive dolaske mitropolita<br />Stratimirovića u Kulpin. I pored<br />protivljenja roditelja opredelio se za<br />vojnički poziv koji je tada između ostalog<br />nudio priliku za brzo napredovanje,<br />posebno Srbina plemenitog roda. Pohađao je<br />nižu Evangelističku gimnaziju u Novom<br />Vrbasu. Nakon iznenadne smrti oca,pored<br />popustljive majke,ispunila mu se želja da<br />postane vojnik. Pohađanje akademije u<br />Titelu, na kadetskom kursu (tzv.<br />matematika), omogućilo mu je da bude odmah<br />primljen u drugi razred inženjerijske<br />akademije u Beču. Tamo je proveo sledećih<br />pet godina, od 1837. do 1841.,gde je kao<br />uzoran učenik stekao mnogobrojne<br />prijatelje. Jedan od najboljih drugova bio<br />mu je Ferdinand Bauer, koji je kasnije<br />postao baron i ministar rata. Iz akademije<br />je izašao u činu potporučnika dakle postao<br />je oficir. Bio je raspoređen na službu u<br />regimentu u Milanu, gde je bio omiljen<br />među svojim kolegama. Isticao se kao častan<br />i hrabar čovek. Uskoro je sticajem pre svega<br />privatnih razloga 1843. godine napustio<br />vojnu službu.<br />Već početkom burnih događaja 1848.<br />godine Stratimirović je uzeo aktivno<br />učešće u njima. Obrazovan, rodoljubiv, mlad<br />i pun energije a pri tome razumevajući<br />političku i društvenu situaciju i stanje u<br />kome se našao srpski narod pre svega u<br />odnosu na Mađare bio je odmah između<br />ostalog i zahvaljujući svom poreklu<br />prihvaćen od srpskih prvaka i srpskog<br />naroda. Nakon sastanka srpske delegacije<br />čiji je bio član sa Lajošem Košutom i<br />Mađarima u Pešti 1848. godine,stekao je<br />velike simpatije i poverenje naroda. NJegovo<br />vojničko umeće, hrabrost, sposobnost i<br />neosporna harizma pokazali su se već u<br />prvom značajnijem sukobu Srba i Mađara,<br />prilikom napada generala Hrabovskog na Sremske Karlovce 12. juna 1848. godine.</p><p>Tada je, zahvaljujući energičnoj komandi<br />Đorđa Stratimirovića, ovaj napad je<br />odbijen, a Mađari su pretrpeli svoj prvi<br />poraz. To je Stratimiroviću u narodu<br />donelo veliki ugled i titulu &bdquo;vožda&ldquo;.<br />Dokazao se Stratimirović i u mnogim<br />budućim bitkama i događajima,ali je ova<br />popularnost,sa druge, strane navukla i<br />omrazu, pre svega duhovnog poglavara Srba u<br />monarhiji patrijarha Josifa Rajačića i<br />njegovog uticajnog okruženja. U tom sukobu<br />sa konzervativnim delom srpskog društva,<br />Stratimirović nije imao uspeha kao na<br />bojnom polju, na čelu srpske vojske.<br />U suštini, Đorđe Stratimirović se,<br />obzirom na svoje mlade godine, veoma dobro<br />nosio sa problemima u ovim teškim<br />isudbonosnim događajima. Pokazao se kao<br />uspešan strateg i komandant. Dobro se<br />snašao i u zamršenim političkim igrama i<br />pri tome je dao veliki doprinos stvaranju<br />Srpske Vojvodine i pored svih poteškoća<br />kojima je bio izložen srpski narod na<br />prostorima Južne Ugarske.<br />U radu su korišćeni postojeća literatura,<br />objavljena i neobjavljena, a pre svega bogata<br />arhivska građavezana za revolucionarne<br />događaje 1848. i 1849. godine i aktivnosti<br />Đorđa Stratimirovića u njima, zatim<br />uspomene savremenika, posebno Đorđa<br />Stratimirovića, domaća i strana<br />periodika, posebno nemačka, srpska i<br />mađarska, arhivska građa. Rad je organizovan<br />po tematsko-hronološkom principu uz<br />ocenu ključnih odnosa Đorđa<br />Stratimirovića sa patrijarhom Rajačićem i<br />Stevanom Knićaninom.</p> / <p>In the mid-19th century, the ongoing European<br />revolutionary processes spread out to the area of<br />the Habsburg Monarchy. The Serbian nation<br />found itself amidst these processes, being<br />densely populated in the southern region of the<br />Monarchy. Thanks to the privileges granted by<br />the Austrian Emperor Leopold I, and which<br />were &ldquo;deserved&rdquo; by the Serbian patriarch<br />Arsenije III Čarnojević, the Serbs imposed<br />themselves in a political sense as a religiously<br />determined nation. In the period between 1690<br />and 1918, the Serbian church hierarchy, the<br />Serbian political leaders and other significant<br />representatives of the Serbian nation strived to<br />keep the status and rights of the Serbian<br />population. The Viennese authorities, however,<br />on their side made every effort to cut and deny<br />privileges, and finally abolished them<br />completely before the fall of the Monarchy. It<br />was a question of survival and preservation of<br />the religious, national and cultural identity of<br />the Serbian nation, first in the Habsburg<br />Monarchy, and later in the 1860s in Austro-<br />Hungary. The ensuing events which in 1848-<br />1849 shook Central Europe affected the<br />Austrian Empire too. It was not a nationally<br />homogenous country but it consisted of several<br />nations (Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs,<br />Romanians&hellip;) that outnumbered the German<br />population. In these events, which were<br />essentially parts of historical processes,<br />important roles, and often decisive ones, were<br />held by people who in such circumstances<br />appear on the political scene.<br />Among the Serbs, such a remarkable<br />personality was Djordje Stratimirović. He came<br />from the prosperous Serbian Stratimirovic<br />family originating from Herzegovina. His<br />forefathers were Petar Stratimirović and his son<br />Vučko Petrović-Stratimirović. Vučko&rsquo;s son was<br />Bogić Vučković-Stratimirović. With the end of<br />the Austrian-Turkish war and signing the<br />Požarevac peace treaty in 1718, Austria&rsquo;s<br />population increased among the Serbs in<br />Herzegovina, so in the next Austrian-Turkish<br />war in 137-1739, the Serbs rendered their<br />services and participated in the war. In 1737,<br />Bogić Stratimirović offered 30,000 soldiers to<br />Commander Count Herberstein for the war<br />against the Turks. Nevertheless, the whole<br />project failed due to the peace agreement signed<br />by Austria and Turkey in 1739. Afterwards, in<br />the period between 1743-1745, Bogić and his<br />brother Nikola negotiated in Vienna on settling<br />the Stratimirović family in Austria. First the<br />family received a piece of dry land Sirig in<br />Bačka, but when that property was given to the<br />Bishop of Bačka, Bogić and his three brothers<br />(Jovan, Toma and Nikola) got property in<br />Kulpin in exchange. When Empress Mary<br />Therese commenced a widespread grant of<br />nobility charters to prosperous Serbian families,<br />with the aim of gaining their services for<br />military and other purposes, the Stratimirović<br />family was also granted nobility. The eminent<br />and influential Metropolitan of Sremski<br />Karlovci Stefan Stratimirović, uncle to Djordje<br />Stratimirović, was also from this family, which<br />was &ndash; as it turned out &ndash; particularly important<br />for Djordje&rsquo;s the future role in the upcoming<br />historical events.<br />Djordje Stratimirović was born on 19th<br />February 1822 in Novi Sad, in his the house of<br />his grandfather on his mother&rsquo;s side, Jovan<br />Petrović. His father Vasilije was a &ldquo;timid and<br />serious man,&rdquo; a landowner from Kulpin, and an<br />educated one. He spent his leisure time reading<br />scientific literature. He worked as a lawyer of<br />the monasteries in Fru&scaron;ka Gora. His mother died<br />very early, in 1841. He was educated in Kulpin<br />under the guidance of a Slovak Lutheran priest<br />Rohonji, a family friend of the famous Serbian<br />poet Milovan Vidaković. The young Djordje<br />was deeply impressed by the stories of the<br />heroic deeds of the Stratimirović ancestors, as<br />well as by the vivid memories of the rare but<br />noteworthy visits of Metropolitan Stratimirović<br />to Kulpin. Against his parents&rsquo; wish, he opted<br />for military service, which at the time, among<br />others, offered an opportunity of fast prosperity,<br />especially for a Serb of noble origin. He<br />attended the lower Evangelist Gymnasium in<br />Novi Vrbas. After his father&rsquo;s sudden death,<br />thanks to his mother&rsquo;s conciliatory nature, he<br />fulfilled his wish to become a soldier. Attending<br />the cadet course (the so-called &ldquo;matematika&rdquo;) at<br />the military academy in Titel, enabled him<br />direct admittance to the second grade of<br />engineering academy in Vienna. He spent the<br />following five years there, from 1837 to 1841,<br />where as an outstanding student he made<br />numerous friends. One of his best friends was<br />Ferdinand Bauer, who later became a baron and<br />War Minister. He left the academy with the rank<br />of lieutenant, in other words he became a<br />military officer. He was assigned to the service<br />of the regiment in Milan, where he was highly<br />respected by his fellow officers. He excelled as<br />an honorable and courageous man. Soon, as a<br />result of personal reasons, he left military<br />service in 1843.<br />At the very beginning of the turbulent<br />events of 1848, Stratimirović took an active role<br />in them. Educated, patriotic, young and full of<br />energy, he well understood the political and social circumstances and the situation in which</p><p>the Serbian nation was primarily in relation to<br />the Hungarians, he was immediately accepted<br />among the Serbian leaders and nation owing to<br />his family background, among other reasons. As<br />a member of the Serbian delegation, he met<br />with Lajos Kossuth and the Hungarians in Pest<br />in 1848, and deserved approval and confidence<br />of his own nation. His military skills, courage,<br />abilities and undeniable charismatic personality<br />became prominent in the first battle between the<br />Serbs and Hungarians, on the occasion of<br />General Hrabovsky&rsquo;s attack on Sremski<br />Karlovci on 12th June 1848. Owing to Djordje<br />Stratimirović&rsquo;s energetic command, this attack<br />was resisted and the Hungarians suffered their<br />first defeat. This brought Stratimirović immense<br />reputation and the title of Supreme Leader.<br />Stratimirović approved himself in many<br />successive battles and events, but this<br />popularity, on the other hand, brought along<br />certain enmity, primarily of the spiritual leader<br />of Serbs in the Monarchy, Patriarch Josif<br />Rajačić and his influential circle. In this conflict<br />with the conservative fraction of Serbian<br />society, Stratimirović did not win as he did in<br />the battlefield as the leader of the Serbian army.<br />Essentially, regarding his young age,<br />Djordje Stratimirović dealt with problems<br />skillfully in those difficult and ominous times.<br />He proved a successful strategist and<br />commander. He handled the intricate political<br />games well, and at the same time contributed<br />greatly to the creation of Serbian Vojvodina,<br />despite all the hardships the Serbian nation was<br />facing in the region of Southern Hungary.<br />For the purpose of this study various<br />existing literature has been used, both published<br />and not published, but predominantly archival<br />materials in connection with the Revolution of<br />1848 and 1849, and regarding the activities of<br />Djordje Stratimirović in it. Other sources<br />included the memories of his contemporaries,<br />and especially those of Djordje Stratimirović;<br />Serbian and foreign periodicals; archival<br />sources, predominantly German, Serbian and<br />Hungarian. The paper is organized and based on<br />a thematic-chronological principle, with the<br />assessment of the relationship between Djordje<br />Stratimirović with Patriarch Rajačić and Stevan&nbsp;Knićanin.</p>

The study focuses on the manners of representations of Czechs and other nations/ethnicities in the journalist work of Karel Havlíček Borovský before and after the 1848-9 revolution. Its methodology is based on concepts and approaches elaborated in the area of literary imagology. The theoretical part of the study deals with the issue of emergence of images, their stereotypical components and the mutual relations between self-image and hetero-image. It also describes the features, functions and the process of formation of national stereotypes. The following chapter describes the development of national-political tendencies emerging in the Czechs lands and corresponding to five different concepts of a nation (Austrianness, Germanness, Slavness, Bohemism and Czechness). The following chapter depicts the course of the revolution, where tensions between the individual national-political tendencies were increasing, and Havlíček's work before and during the revolution. The next chapter analyses the individual stereotypical character features of Czechs and other nations in Havlíček's journalist work in 1846-50. This imagological analysis shows that when constructing the Czech character, Havlíček uses older stereotypical qualities of Slavs (justice, peacefulness, their fundamental democratic nature,...

Diploma thesis deals with theme of family in Czech patriotic circles in the 19th century, example of family of Václav Staněk, Doctor of Medicine and patriot. Václav Staněk was a friend of Josef Frič and František Ladislav Čelakovský, their families were very close. While Fritč's and Čelakovský's families appear very often in different works about 19th century, Staněk's family was almost forgot. This thesis deals with public activities of the family, in the time before the revolution 1848 it's the Czech "salon" which was also one of the first platforms for women interested in education and during the revolution in 1848 - 1849 the engagement of Václav Staněk at parliament in Vienna and Kroměříž. Thorough attention is paid to the family connections among members of the family, especially to relationships between wife and husband and relationships among parents and children. The source is rich and yet not used correspondence of the family which allows insight to the political as well to the family business.

本論文以「黃牧甫生平及篆刻藝術之研究」為題目，旨在對其生平及篆刻藝術作系統整理和討論。黃牧甫（1849-1908/1909），安徽黟縣人，為晚清最重要的篆刻家之一。由於家庭濡染，自幼便對篆學產生興趣，八、九歲始習刻印。後因太平軍與清軍戰，家園被毀，困苦失學，雙親亦相繼離世，為補生計，被迫離鄉到江西南昌謀生，曾於照相館工作，後遷廣州，改以鬻書治印自給。黃牧甫為晚清集大成的印人，尤對廣東印壇產生源遠的影響，故被譽為「嶺南派」之初袓。 / 黃牧甫初宗「鄧派」鄧石如（1743-1805）、吳讓之（1799-1870），後服膺於趙之謙（1829-1884）的印學主張，取徑「印外求印」，故面貌多樣，印文體勢獨特。又取法漢印模式，講究完整光潔，運以衝刀，不作斷續刻劃，點劃乾淨俐落。尤精於章法，平正而不落呆板，自創一格，繼「鄧派」後於晚清印壇上別樹一幟。 / 在黃印的整理方面，本研究主要以「摹擬期」、「蛻變期」、「成熟期」作為分期，以便探討其不同時期的篆刻特質。據本研究所搜集，黃氏存世印蛻約有二千四百方。它們被整合分析，編成年譜，建構一個系統、完備的資料庫。其中印款資料更提供了珍貴的第一手資料，增補了歷史文獻上的不足。 / 黃牧甫一生治印不斷，作品極豐，然卻失散各地，難以匯集。幸而，其印譜的流傳卻相對豐富，最重要的要數黃氏生前自輯《般若波羅蜜心經印譜》、《黃牧甫自存印譜》及《黃穆甫印存續補》，故印貌得以保存，為後世留下重要的研究資料。當中《黃穆甫印存續補》所錄印拓，更對研究黃氏「成熟期」印風非常重要。由於此譜為海外孤本，且尚未見世，所以目前有關黃牧甫的著述，均未能涵蓋這部重要資料。然在此論文發表前，因得機緣而認識收藏家林章松先生，得其不吝嗇借出此譜作研究之用，確為本研究提供有力依據和借鑒。 / 黃牧甫為晚清重要的篆刻家，具相當高的研究價值，更是探究流派篆刻由傳統走向當代的關鍵人物，惜至今其系統研究卻極之匱乏。本論文將綜合歷史、文化、社會及藝術等不同角度，並借鑒相關學術領域的研究方法和成果，透過文獻及視覺分析，對黃牧甫的生平和篆刻藝術作全面考述，從而建立一份可靠的研究資料，令篆刻藝術史有更大的發展空間。 / Entitled “A Study of Huang Mufu’s Life and Seal Engraving Art, this paper aims to investigate his life and art of seal engraving. Huang Mufu (1849-1908/1909), born in Anhui Province, was one of the most important seal engravers in the late Qing dynasty. / Huang Mufu first learned from Deng Shiru (1743-1805) and Wu Rangzhi (1799-1870) of the Deng school, and later followed the thinking of “seeking artistic links for seal making of Zhao Zhiqian (1829-1884). Therefore, his seals took on various forms and his seal inscriptions were unique. He also drew on the pattern of seals of the Han dynasty, which pursued tidiness and smoothness and applied Swift knife to create clean and neat strokes. He created his own style that was peculiar in the late Qing dynasty and had far-reaching influence on the seal engraving community of Guangdong Province, so he was renowned as the originator of the Lingnan school. / Huang made seals throughout his life and left over rich works. According to the information collected from this research, Huang has about 2,400 seals, which have been analyzed, integrated and chronicled into a systematic and complete database. Many of his seal impressions and colophons provide rare firsthand information for this paper, and hoped to serve as important materials for later studies. Based on the collected sources, this study divided Huang’s career into the imitation, transmutation and maturation stages, in order to discuss his seals’ characteristics in different periods. / There has been an extreme scarcity of studies on this topic. Therefore, this paper made a comprehensive study which involved a survey of the primary and secondary literature on Huang Mufu’s life and career. An analysis of the relevant sources enables his career to be reconstructed on a sound chronological basis, and allows his work to be seen in its proper context. / This study also made an important contribution to a relatively little-studied area of the history of Chinese art. It corrected a number of misconceptions in previous studies and make up literature deficiencies. The aim is to provide a set of reliable data that allows further development of the history of seal engraving art. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 劉浩敏. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-191) / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Liu Haomin. / Chapter 第一章 --- 導言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二章 --- 晚清文化和黃牧甫的早年生活 / Chapter 第一節 --- 清代美學觀念的轉化 --- p.11 / Chapter 第二節 --- 晚清以前印壇概況 --- p.20 / Chapter 第三節 --- 黃牧甫早年生活考證 --- p.34 / Chapter 第三章 --- 黃牧甫篆刻特質和他僑寓廣州的生活 / Chapter 第一節 --- 黃牧甫篆刻的師承淵源 --- p.51 / Chapter 第二節 --- 名流關係對黃牧甫印風形成的影響 --- p.60 / Chapter 第三節 --- 黃牧甫成熟期印風的主要特色 --- p.90 / Chapter 第四章 --- 黃牧甫晚年生活及其印跡流佈和遺存 / Chapter 第一節 --- 晚年生活和卒年考證 --- p.110 / Chapter 第二節 --- 黃牧甫印壇角色 --- p.118 / Chapter 第三節 --- 存世印跡資料彙整 --- p.130 / Chapter 第五章 --- 黃牧甫存世印譜匯考 --- p.146 / Chapter 第六章 --- 結語 --- p.171 / 參考書目 --- p.175 / Chapter 附錄一 --- 參考圖錄 --- p.192 / Chapter 附錄二 --- 黃牧甫篆刻作品全集 --- p.293

Music scholars have long been trying to determine the major influences on the Ballades of Fryderyk Chopin. Some, like Karol Berger, have pointed to ideological influences of the Polish emigration in Paris, while others, like James Parakilas, have given credit to the generic characteristics of the European literary ballad. In my own view, however, the most salient extra-musical factor in the background to Chopin's Ballades are Ballady, a series of poems by the 19th century Polish poet Adam Mickiewicz. / After Chopin's death, Mickiewicz's Ballady were frequently associated with Chopin's Ballades, and in the first chapter I demonstrate this by examining the reception history of these works. In the next chapter I analyze the ideology of the Polish emigration in Paris, including prominent themes of alienation, powerlessness, morbid anxiety, pilgrimage, and nostalgia, which were used by that expatriate society to identify itself. Finally, in the third chapter, I trace analogies between these themes and their manifestations in Mickiewicz's Ballady. This analysis of Mickiewicz's poems forms the basis of my interpretation of Chopin's Second Ballade, where I discuss how certain textual and thematic features of the poems taken as a group can be mapped onto the form and musical discourse of the piano piece. / In sum, although the associations between specific poems and Chopin's Ballades have been made by many authors, no one has distilled a single narrative archetype from the group of Mickiewicz's Ballady to apply to Chopin's works.