El objetivo de esta investigación es describir las construcciones teóricas de Jacques Lacan y André Green sobre la transferencia en la cura psicoanalítica. Ambos autores tienen un origen teórico común en tanto sus constructos están basados en la obra de S. Freud. Sobre este punto de partida encuentro dos usos muy distintos de la transferencia en la búsqueda de una cura que mantiene características comunes. La principal diferencia está en que A. Green usa la contra transferencia como parte de su interpretación en transferencia. Mientras Lacan, en el sentido indicado por Freud, descarta el uso de la contra transferencia atribuyéndosela al propio analista. En estos dos usos de la contra transferencia encuentro que para Green el analista reconoce la tremenda influencia que tiene sobre el analizado y la utiliza para buscar su cura, mientras que Lacan propone un psicoanálisis que se sustenta en no usar este poder y orienta su final, su cura, a un analizante que se libera de la influencia del psicoanalista. / The objective of this research is to describe the theoretical constructs of Jacques Lacan and André Green on transfer in psychoanalytic cure. Both authors find a common origin in both their theoretical constructs are based on the work of S. Freud. On this point I find two very different uses of the transfer in the search for a cure that maintains common characteristics. The main difference is that A. Green uses to transfer as part of his performance in transfer. While Lacan, in the direction indicated by Freud, discarded the use of transfer against attributing the analyst himself. In these two uses of the transfer contract I find that for Green analyst recognizes the tremendous influence it has on the analyzed and La transferencia en la cura de Lacan y Green used to find a cure. While Lacan proposes a psychoanalysis that is based on not use this power and orients its end, its cure, an analizante released from the influence of the analyst / Tesis

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This thesis attempts a Buddhist interpretation, commentary and reflection on a lecture by Louis I. Kahn (1901--1974) at Pratt Institute, entitled "1973: Brooklyn, New York." This lecture provides the framework and point of departure for a discussion of Kahn's philosophy. With the aid of Buddhist thought, this investigation argues that the ethical function of architecture begins with the effort of the architect to know his or her self. The juxtaposition of Buddhist philosophy and Kahn's lecture on architecture also seeks to present a way in which Buddhist thought might engage and illuminate the issues of ethical action in architecture. In doing so, the possible contributions of Buddhist thought to contemporary architectural discourse may present themselves.

No abstract available. / Thesis (M.Mus.)-University of Natal, Durban, 1982.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.