No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

When the Great White Fleet visited Australia in 1908 it became the focal point of an on-going test of wills between Britain and Australia. Relations between the two countries had become increasingly strained since Britain’s decision in the mid-nineteenth century to establish a new kind of relationship with its colonies. For the Australian colonies this meant moving towards independence within the Empire framework and assuming more responsibility for their own defence. This change had serious repercussions for the Australian colonies and British-Australian relations. Politically and psychologically the Australian colonies had developed an image of themselves as the inferior daughters of the superior and protective Mother Country. By changing the nature of the British-Australian colonial relationship, Britain not only challenged this Australian colonial self-image, it also heightened existing divisions among the Australian colonists. Anglo- Australian loyalists, enamoured of things British, clung to the established colonial image and remained subservient to Imperial wishes. Australian nationalists, on the other hand, tried to establish a new relationship with Britain, one in which Australian colonial concerns would have a greater voice. (For complete abstract open document)

Diss.--Literaturwissenschaft--Zürich. / Bibliogr. p. 80-86.

Inaug.-Diss.--Uppsala. / Sonderabdruck aus: 'Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse der Schwedischen südpolarexpedition" 1901-1902.' bd. v. "Litteraturverzeichnis" : p. 113-115.

Akademisk avhandling--Stockholm, 1997. / Résumé en anglais. Bibliogr. p. 374-381. Index.

No description available.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:26:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012-04-26Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:54:48Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 franzolin_jac_me_assis_parcial.pdf: 55115 bytes, checksum: 671c22de18cfb330a69e487c28753377 (MD5) Bitstreams deleted on 2015-06-30T11:22:14Z: franzolin_jac_me_assis_parcial.pdf,. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-06-30T11:23:08Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000689786_20170715.pdf: 54911 bytes, checksum: ea4bb8034533f88d97fc11e273ef43c6 (MD5) Bitstreams deleted on 2017-07-24T11:34:18Z: 000689786_20170715.pdf,. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2017-07-24T11:35:25Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000689786.pdf: 1283077 bytes, checksum: 1339b3212778b342c7b896634e642e61 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / O trabalho tem como fonte e objeto o jornal Meio-Dia, que circulou durante os anos de 1939 a 1942, sob direção de Joaquim Inojosa, expoente do modernismo pernambucano. A linha editorial do periódico sofreu alterações ao longo da circulação, mas distinguiu-se por apoiar, na maior parte de sua existência, a Alemanha nazista, enquanto a quase totalidade dos órgãos da grande imprensa, então submetida ao controle do Departamento de Imprensa e Propaganda (DIP) e do Conselho Nacional de Imprensa (CNI), apoiava a causa aliada. A pesquisa teve por meta analisar sistematicamente como, no jornal Meio-Dia, exceção dentre os periódicos brasileiros de então, construíram-se representações acerca do Estado Novo e dos países participantes da Segunda Guerra Mundial, temas que dominaram editoriais e artigos de seu fundador e proprietário, Joaquim Inojosa, cujas opiniões variaram ao longo do período de publicação da folha. Assim, de uma posição de neutralidade, adotada ao longo de 1939, o jornal passou a atacar de forma impiedosa a Inglaterra e louvar a Alemanha e seu regime, postura que vigorou ao longo dos anos de 1940 e 1941. A mudança da posição do Brasil a partir de janeiro de 1942 afetou diretamente o vespertino, que mudou novamente de posição e enfrentou dificuldades crescentes, que acabaram por levar ao encerramento de suas atividades. A consulta aos arquivos do Departamento de Ordem Política e Social (DOPS) revelou indícios das conexões do jornal com a Embaixada da Alemanha e empresas germânicas, além de tornarem patente que o jornal e o seu proprietário eram observados de perto / The work has, as its source and object, the Meio-Dia newspaper, which was published during the years 1939-1942 under the administration of Joaquim Inojosa, exponent of modernism in Pernambuco. The newspaper’s opinion has changed over the years, but distinguished itself because of its support of Nazi Germany in most of its existence, while almost all the organs of the mainstream media, then under control of the Departmento de Imprensa e Propaganda (DIP) and the Conselho Nacional de Imprensa (CNI), supported the allied cause. The research goal was to systematically analyze how, in the MeioDia newspaper, exception among Brazilian journals of the time, were made representations about the Estado Novo and the participating countries in the Second World War, themes that dominated editorials and articles of its founder and owner, Joaquim Inojosa, whose opinions varied during the publication of the paper. Thus, from a position of neutrality, adopted during 1939, the newspaper went on to attack mercilessly England and praise Germany’s regime, a stance that prevailed during the years 1940 and 1941. The change of Brazil’s position in January 1942 directly affected the journal, which again changed side and faced increasing difficulties, which eventually led to the end of its activities. The consult of the Departamento de Ordem Política e Social’s (DOPS) files revealed evidence of the newspaper’s connections with the German Embassy and German companies, and make clear that the journal and its owner were closely surveilled

Dissertação (mestrado)-Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Psicologia Clínica, 2009. / Submitted by samara castro (sammy_roberta7@hotmail.com) on 2011-04-07T18:29:11Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2009_JoanaPantojaScharinger.pdf: 752473 bytes, checksum: 57ca33e4090134d48cf5725f0fe2c25e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Daniel Ribeiro(daniel@bce.unb.br) on 2011-04-12T00:24:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2009_JoanaPantojaScharinger.pdf: 752473 bytes, checksum: 57ca33e4090134d48cf5725f0fe2c25e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2011-04-12T00:24:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2009_JoanaPantojaScharinger.pdf: 752473 bytes, checksum: 57ca33e4090134d48cf5725f0fe2c25e (MD5) / Este trabalho aborda o tema da alteridade em sua relação com a psicanálise. O objeto de estudo aqui proposto foi delimitado pelas seguintes perguntas: Como falar de alteridade em psicanálise? Como compreender o conceito de outro, quando nos referimos a esfera do psíquico? A partir da teoria lacaniana buscou-se a base para esta investigação. Foi traçado um percurso com o objetivo de identificar as diferentes modalidades de outrem que Lacan abordou. Este percurso foi organizado de modo a abordar cada um de seus registros - imaginário, simbólico e real. No registro do imaginário identificou-se a noção de pequeno outro. Compreendeu-se que nesta condição imaginária o outro está muito vinculado ao eu, numa relação de semelhança e ambigüidade. O registro do simbólico, por estar vinculado ao universo da linguagem possibilita ao ser humano constituir-se sujeito. O conceito relacionado a este registro, portanto, é o grande Outro. Já no registro do real alcançamos dois conceitos de alteridade. São eles o objeto pequeno a e o Outro gozo. O primeiro remete a um objeto faltoso, perdido. Trata-se do objeto causa do desejo, objeto que não existe. O segundo conceito está relacionado ao Outro sexo, esfera do gozo feminino. Inclui-se aí a lógica do Heteros. Buscou-se analisar em que medida cada um dos conceitos mencionados realizam uma abertura para a diferença. Observou-se que alguns conceitos alcançam menos esta condição do que outros. De qualquer modo, todos se referem a uma dimensão de alteridade. Por fim, se o sujeito lacaniano se constitui nos enlaces destes três registros, a experiência de alteridade faz parte da condição de ser sujeito. _________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT / This research work focus on the topic of alterity, and its relation to psychoanalysis. The object of study proposed was defined by the following questions: How to discuss alterity in psychoanalysis? How to understand the concept of other, when we refer to the psychism? The Lacan´s theory was the basis for this research. The proposal was to draw a theoretical path in Lacan´s theory to identify the different concepts of others that he analyzed. The intention was to study Lacan´s three dimensions - imaginary, symbolic and real. In the dimension of imaginary the notion of small other was identified. It was understood that in the imaginary condition the other is very tied to the ego, within a relationship of similarity and ambiguity. The symbolic order is related to the language what allows the human being to become a subject. The concept of alterity in simbolyc is the great Other. In the real dimension there are two concepts of alterity: the object a, and the Other jouissance. The first one refers to a lost object. It is the object cause of desire, which does not exist. The second concept is related to the other sex. We tried to examine how each of the concepts mentioned held an opening for difference. It was noted that some concepts achieve this condition less than others. Anyway, all of them refer to a mode of alterity. Finally, if the Lacan´s theory is related to these three dimensions, the experience of alterity is part of the condition of being a subject.