No autorizada por el autor para ser publicada a texto completo. / Memoria (licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales) / El objeto de este trabajo es hacer un análisis a los requisitos que la doctrina ha establecido para la dictación de las denominadas medidas restrictivas de derechos fundamentales, en el ámbito de las facultades que el DL 211 ha establecido para la Fiscalía Nacional Económica en la investigación de los ilícitos del artículo 3 a). En un primer capítulo hacemos una síntesis de la historia y modificación del DL 211 hasta la ley N°20.361 haciendo hincapié en los motivos que llevaron a la dictación de esta última ley, para finalmente hacernos cargo de las primeras críticas que se dieron a la incorporación de estas nuevas atribuciones.

This thesis explores the relationship between Thomas Hobbes and English deism. It seeks to show that Hobbes's work had a significant influence upon subsequent deists, namely, Charles Blount, John Toland, Matthew Tindal, and Anthony Collins. The thesis shows that these deists were influenced by certain distinctively Hobbesian anticlerical ideas, such as his biblical criticism, his materialism and determinism, his scepticism towards present revelation, and more. The deists, who were motivated by a similar form of anticlericalism, found in Hobbes a particularly resourceful ally. Furthermore, this thesis explores how some of Hobbes's political ideas influenced the deists: particularly his concerns regarding the dangerous role that priestly interests played in society and the instability that they generated. This thesis thus argues that Hobbes can be seen as a major influence upon English deism. Secondly, it offers an examination of Hobbes's concepts of God and reason. It shows that whilst Hobbes's accounts of God and reason were multilayered and at times perhaps underdeveloped, they contained significant elements that anticipated the later positions of the deists. Finally, this thesis argues that for Hobbes, the rational potential of humankind, implanted by God, could be cultivated and fulfilled once peace and security are guaranteed. Thus, this thesis attempts to recover some of the more utopian aspects of Hobbes's thought. It concludes that both Hobbes and the deists were part of a project of enlightenment, but one which was not aimed against religion as such. They attempted to liberate natural reason from the darkness of corrupt clerics and their false doctrines: this was an anticlerical enlightenment that was partly initiated by Hobbes and developed significantly by the deists.

Arthur V. Phelps, O.T. Fundingsland [and] Sanborn C. Brown. / "July 23, 1951." / Bibliography: p. 9. / Army Signal Corps Contract No. DA36-039 sc-100 Project No. 3-99-10-022. Dept. of the Army Project No. 3-99-10-022.

Memoria (licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales) / No autorizada por el autor para ser publicada a texto completo / El presente trabajo pretende hacer un análisis amplio de la doctrina de las facilidades esenciales, tanto en su papel de teoría dogmática como en el desarrollo que ha encontrado en la jurisprudencia. Para tales efectos, se ilustrará primera y sucintamente en lo qué ella consiste y cuáles son sus planteamientos, reseñando luego su historia en la jurisprudencia comparada (capítulo I). En seguida, se presentarán los presupuestos que se estiman como necesarios para que la doctrina en comento reciba aplicación, integrando las distintas posiciones y argumentos que se han generado en el debate. Lo anterior exigirá exponer las posturas a favor y en contra de la misma (capítulo II). Sobre ese precedente, se procederá a revisar la doctrina a la luz de nuestro ordenamiento jurídico, determinando el lugar que la doctrina de las facilidades esenciales ocupa en el derecho antimonopolios nacional, particularmente en el Decreto Ley Nº 211. De este modo, se pretenderá determinar si es que existen argumentos normativos para que ésta reciba aplicación por nuestros organismos de defensa de la libre competencia, y en definitiva, si es que efectivamente ésta ha tenido o no recepción en la práctica jurisprudencial (capítulo III). Con lo expuesto precedentemente, debe señalarse que la principal intención contenida en este trabajo es recoger con la mayor fidelidad posible los diversos conceptos y argumentos elaborados en el derecho comparado, a fin de contribuir a su promoción y a la mejor calidad de su examen

Calculate solutions of a dynamic MMC energy-based model, when the system variables, i.e. the voltages and currents, are given as periodic signals. The signals are represented by a finite number distinct frequency components. As a result, the arm energies and cell voltages are given in this signal domain and can easily be translated to time domain as well.:cplx_series.m cplx_series_demo.m energy_series.m denergy_series.m check_symmetry.m transf2arm.m LICENSE.GNU_AGPLv3 sconv2.m

Memoria (licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales) / No autorizada por el autor para ser publicada a texto completo / El penúltimo inciso del literal n) del artículo 39 del Decreto Ley N° 211 establece la llamada regla de exclusión en materia de libre competencia, al disponer que los resultados de las facultades investigativas duras de la Fiscalía Nacional Económica no podrán ser utilizados como medios de prueba en el procedimiento seguido ante el Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia cuando ella haya incurrido en ciertas causales de ilicitud. Considerando los escasos años que lleva vigente la norma y lo poco que se ha abordado este tema en la doctrina, el presente trabajo tiene por objetivo principal realizar un análisis procesal sobre la configuración de la prueba ilícita en el Decreto Ley N° 211, poniendo especial énfasis en aquélla obtenida como consecuencia del ejercicio de las diligencias intrusivas de la Fiscalía Nacional Económica. Con tal propósito, desarrollaremos una serie de instituciones relativas a la orgánica de la Fiscalía, la aplicación de las medidas intrusivas en esta sede y la teoría de la prueba ilícita en general, las cuales nos permitirán conocer la forma en que nuestra legislación reconoce y acoge la regla de exclusión del material probatorio producido con infracción de garantías fundamentales.

Tesis (magíster en derecho con mención en contratación comparada e internacional)

This dissertation analyzes the interplay between imperial messaging or self-representation and legal activity in the Roman Empire under the Severan dynasty. I discuss the unusual historical circumstances of Septimius Severus’ rise to power and the legitimacy crises faced by him and his successors, as well as those same emperors’ control of an increasingly complex legal bureaucracy and legislative apparatus. I describe how each of the four Severan rulers—Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Elagabalus, and Severus Alexander—employed different approaches to imperial legislation and adjudication in accordance with their idiosyncratic self-presentation and messaging styles, as well as how other actors within Roman legal culture responded to Severan political dynamics in their own work. In particular, this dissertation is concerned with a particularly—and increasingly—urgent problem in Roman elite political culture; the tension between theories of imperial power that centered upon rulers’ charismatic gifts or personal fitness to rule, and a more institutional, bureaucratized vision that placed the emperor at the center of broader networks of administrative control. While these two ideas of the Principate had always coexisted, the Severan period posed new challenges as innovations in imperial succession (such as more open military selection of emperors) called earlier legitimation strategies into question. I posit that Roman law, with its stated tendency towards regularized, impersonal processes, was a language in which the Severan state could more easily portray itself as a bureaucratic institution that might merit deference without a given leader being personally fit to rule. This dissertation begins by discussing the representational strategy of Septimius Severus, who deployed traditional imperial messaging tropes in strikingly legalistic forms. I then explore how this model of law as a venue for or language of state communication might explain otherwise idiosyncratic features of the constitutio Antoniniana, an edict promulgated by Septimius Severus’ son Caracalla that granted citizenship to all free inhabitants of the Empire. I next discuss two unusual features of the corpus of rescripts issued by Severus Alexander, the last Severan emperor: specifically, the relabeling of rescripts issued by Elagabalus, Alexander’s cousin and predecessor, as products of Alexander’s reign; and the idiosyncratic frequency with which rescripts issued under Alexander’s authority cite prior imperial (and particularly Severan) precedent. Finally, I discuss how jurists responded to Severan (and particularly late Severan) political and legal culture: late Severan jurists are particularly inclined to justify their legal decisionmaking in terms of the desirable consequences of a given decision’s universal promulgation, and similarly likely to justify their opinions by citing to an impersonal ‘imperial authority’ rather than to named figures. I argue that these changes reflect both state and scholarly attempts to wrestle with increasingly unstable imperial selection processes, and to articulate a vision of Roman governance that might function in the new world of the third century C.E.

Magíster en Derecho, con mención en derecho económico

During his reign from 193-211, Septimius Severus was responsible for a significant building programme in the city of Rome. This involved both new buildings and the restoration of existing structures. Previous scholarship, however, has tended to consider specific buildings of the period in isolation instead of analysing Severus' building programme as a whole. The purpose of the present study is to redress this by examining the overall programme in the historical context of Severus' reign through archaeological investigations, studies of art and architectural history, epigraphy, numismatics, and the literary record. A framework for the motivation behind Severus' building programme may be established by relating the types of buildings constructed anew or restored to what is known of his reign through other sources. Severus wished to portray himself as the rightful heir of the Antonines who had been chosen by divine providence to establish a renewed period of peace and prosperity. Through his building activity he exploited important institutions to underline this position and to legitimize his rule. By his concern for the physical fabric of the capital he at the same time reinforced the message that he had restored the prestige of the Empire. The importance attached to this restoration is attested by the numerous inscriptions placed throughout the city on the restored buildings and other structures proudly announcing the attentions of the new emperor. Much of the Severan enhancement and restoration seems to have been geared toward the celebration of the Secular Games in the capital, an event that heralded a new age of renewal and restoration. Severus' intention of establishing a new dynasty was also implicit in the creation of an architectural presence within the heritage of the imperial city. The use of a building programme within the capital to reinforce the policies of the emperor originated with the first emperor, Augustus. While not on the same scale as the Augustan redevelopment of the city, Severus' building activity followed this imperial tradition with a deliberate and concerted building programme that reflected his propagandistic aims.