L’anesthésie-réanimation est une discipline qui n’a acquis son autonomie que récemment. Jadis sous la direction du chirurgien, l’anesthésiste-réanimateur est, comme son nom l’indique, au cœur d’une profession multidisciplinaire. Si l’acte anesthésique suppose, en aval, l’application de techniques de réanimation, l’inverse n’est pas systématiquement le cas. En effet, l’anesthésiste-réanimateur peut être confronté, dans sa fonction de réanimateur, à la problématique du prélèvement d’organes dont la pratique fait appel à la définition de la mort, définition nécessairement sujette à discussion. Par son objet même, le contentieux civil en anesthésie-réanimation est particulièrement vaste. Son étude mettra en évidence l’élaboration des normes encadrant la discipline, sur laquelle le contexte professionnel exerce une influence déterminante, leur mise en pratique par l’anesthésiste-réanimateur, puis leur adéquation au cas clinique par le juge civil, lorsqu’un patient exercera une action en responsabilité / Anaesthetics and intensive care are closely linked in the French health care system and are always carried out by the same professional. Anaesthetics and intensive care thus form a common discipline which has acquired only recently its autonomy. Formerly under the direction of the surgeon, the anaesthetist is at the core of a multidisciplinary profession. If the anaesthetic treatment supposes, down the line, application of techniques of intensive care, the opposite is not systematically true. Indeed, the anaesthetist, taken as a member of an intensive care unit, can be confronted with the issue of organ removal which practice necessarily relates back to the difficult definition of death. Concerning its object itself, civil dispute regarding anaesthetics and intensive care covers a large-scale field. This in-depth study would highlight the drafting of norms ruling the discipline upon which the professional context has a decisive influence, then their practice by the anaesthetist itself, and finally their appropriateness to the clinical case as considered by the civil judge whenever a patient had brought legal action in responsibility before a tribunal

Submitted by FABIO MESQUITA RIBEIRO (fabio@mesquitaribeiro.com.br) on 2017-10-10T18:14:42Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Mestrado - FGV.pdf: 1129098 bytes, checksum: 7b2c4b642acd5d7e8632c8d56dae0185 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Thais Oliveira (thais.oliveira@fgv.br) on 2017-10-10T18:41:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Mestrado - FGV.pdf: 1129098 bytes, checksum: 7b2c4b642acd5d7e8632c8d56dae0185 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-11T12:20:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Mestrado - FGV.pdf: 1129098 bytes, checksum: 7b2c4b642acd5d7e8632c8d56dae0185 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-09-21 / This paper aims to study in detail the invalidity regime, applicable to corporate law and, in particular, to the approval of accounts, making it possible to file a claim of liability against the trustee who acts guilty or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties. The choice of topic came after an analysis of a court decision that seems to be unfair and inappropriate. Hence, when we study the subject more often, we come to the conclusion that the question has been very little explored in our doctrine and, indeed, applied by our jurisprudence without the care and depth that we understand it should be, thus, arising the motivation for the choice of the theme. The study seeks to demonstrate that, in relation to the invalidity regime, it is not possible to speak of a modern and fairer corporate law, following the current dictates of objective good faith, without considering the application of the nullity regime, when the concrete case demand. / O presente trabalho tem por objetivo o estudo aprofundado do regime de invalidades, aplicável ao direito societário e, em especial, à deliberação de aprovação de contas, viabilizando propositura de ação de responsabilidade contra o administrador que age com culpa ou dolo no exercício de suas funções. A escolha do tema se deu após a análise de uma decisão judicial que nos pareceu injusta e descabida. Daí, ao estudar o assunto mais amiúde, chegamos à conclusão de que a questão tem sido muito pouco explorada em nossa doutrina e, deveras, aplicada por nossa jurisprudência sem o cuidado e profundidade que entendemos devida, surgindo, então, a motivação para a escolha do tema. O estudo realizado procura demonstrar que, em relação ao regime de invalidades, não é possível se falar num direito societário moderno e mais justo, seguindo os atuais ditames da boa-fé objetiva, sem pensar na aplicação do regime de nulidades, quando o caso concreto o exigir.

The subject of this work is a long-term debate about the collective responsibility which occurs between two opposite opinions on social phenomenon above all. The methodical individualists interpret the social phenomenons with reference to individuals, whereas the methodical holists assert that these cannot be reduced to phenomenons of individuals without any rest. Methodical individualists lean on the classic conception of the moral responsibility which is based on the intended agency in causal connection with the moral wrong. This conception is connected with human beings in its nature, but there is countless of thinkers who bring arguments in favour of the collective moral responsibility which is thought to bring about more good in the world. We will try to introduce this debate in its complexity and its most interesting and important arguments. Within the frame of debate about moral responsibility of collectives, we can meet with the notion of shared responsibility, distributive collective responsibility, non-distributive collective responsibility connected with the organized collectives, the responsibility for historic injusticies and with the conception of moral taint. All of notions will be the subject of this work. The biggest interest is put on the responsibility of politic communities. In...