Spelling suggestions: "subject:"aesthetic regime off art"" "subject:"aesthetic regime oof art""
1 |
O Cinema e a Grande Guerra (1914-1918): os filmes sob as perspectivas do regime estético das artes de Jacques Rancière e dromologia em Paul VirilioSousa Júnior, Maurício José de 08 August 2014 (has links)
The Great War (1914-1918) caused important changes in space and the sensory-motor apparatus of men. Technological advances and experiences of transformation of perception added to the war and cinema space articulate extremely rich interpretative possibilities. We understand these modifications as an aesthetic problem. From this, we make movies about the war of 1914-1918, object of our analysis. To this, approach the thought of Jacques Rancière, the concept of aesthetic regime of art and the visibilities brought by Paul Virilio, with the concept of dromologia . / A Grande Guerra (1914-1918) provocou alterações importantes no espaço e no aparelho sensório-motor do homem. Os avanços tecnológicos e as experiências de transformação da percepção somadas ao espaço da guerra e do cinema articulam possibilidades interpretativas extremamente ricas. Entendemos essas modificações como um problema estético. A partir disso, fazemos dos filmes sobre a guerra de 1914-1918, objeto de nossa análise. Para tal, nos aproximamos do pensamento de Jacques Rancière, no conceito de regime estético das artes e das visibilidades interpostas por Paul Virilio, com o conceito de dromologia . / Mestre em História
|
2 |
Écritures dramatiques et romanesques des XXe et XXIe siècles à l’épreuve des arts non verbaux. Modèles et dispositifs / Dramatic and Novelistic Writings of 20th and 21st centuries in relation with non-verbal arts. Models, Patterns and DevicesRascle, Floriane 09 December 2016 (has links)
L’observation de la présence des arts non verbaux au cœur des œuvres de Marguerite Duras, Lawrence Durrell, Elfriede Jelinek et Péter Nádas nous invite à considérer la musicalité et l’iconicité des écritures dramatiques et romanesques contemporaines en termes de modèle mais aussi de dispositif. Des phénomènes de dialogue, d’hybridation, de polyphonie, de dialogisme, d’intermédialité, de ce que Jacques Rancière nomme « l’impurification » au cœur d’un « régime esthétique de l’art » révèlent les rêves, désirs et pulsions du verbal pour d’autres arts, mais aussi pour des représentations à l’artisticité discutable. La fabrique d’un corps organique, sexuel, érotique voire pornographique par les écritures contemporaines nous convie à envisager le métissage entre art et non-art en termes de dispositif performatif et à proposer une lecture queer des œuvres. À l’heure du postmodernisme, le recours des écritures au non-verbal se donne à lire à la fois comme la manifestation d’une crise du logos et de la représentation et comme l’enjeu d’une rénovation esthétique et politique de la littérature. Qu’ils modélisent le verbal ou fassent brutalement irruption et déchirure en son sein, les arts non verbaux concourent au renouvellement des formes littéraires, mais aussi à leur politicité et au renouveau de la fiction. Cette étude ambitionne donc d’explorer le carrefour esthético-politique que dessinent, entre le milieu du XXe siècle et ce début de XXIe siècle, les relations plurielles entre les arts verbaux et non verbaux dans l’art verbal par excellence, la littérature. / The observation of the presence of non verbal arts within the works of Marguerite Duras, Lawrence Durrell, Elfriede Jelinek and Péter Nádas leads us to examine the musicality and the iconicity of contemporary dramatic and novelistic writings in terms of model, pattern and devices. Dialogue, hybridization, polyphony, dialogism, intermediality, and what Jacques Rancière calls “impurification” within the “Aesthetic Regime of Art”, display the dreams, desires and longings of verbal art for other arts, but also for representations whose artistic content is arguable. The fact that contemporary writings produce an organic, sexual, erotic, even pornographic body invites us to focus on the interactions between arts and non-arts with regard to their performative devices and to propose a queer reading of the works. In Postmodernism, the fact that writings draw on non verbal forms can be understood as the expression of the failure of Logos – both language and reason – and of representation. Moreover, what is also at stake is an aesthetic and political reform of literature. Whether they tend to impose new verbal models or break into them, non verbal arts contribute not only to reshape literary forms but also to emphasize their political substance and renew their fictional content. This dissertation aims to investigate the crossroads between aesthetics and politics that the various relationships between verbal and non-verbal arts display, from mid-20th century to the beginning of the 21st century, within Literature, the verbal art par excellence.
|
Page generated in 0.0605 seconds