In 1940 the Museum of Modern Art, New York, (MoMA) became the first major American art museum to establish a curatorial department dedicated exclusively to photography. From the perspective of the photographers, curators, and critics who had sought institutional legitimacy for the medium, the founding of the Department of Photographs was a watershed event, marking the moment when photography finally came to be recognized as a museum subject equal to painting and sculpture. Although the department has since had a pervasive influence on the field and the history of photography, surprisingly little scholarship has addressed its contentious formation. This dissertation seeks to fill this significant gap in the literature by examining the department's inception and the six years Beaumont Newhall served as its curator.Of particular concern are the ideological battles waged over how photography would be presented at MoMA by Newhall, his wife Nancy--who served as acting curator when her husband enlisted in the army during World War II--and the department's co-founder and key advisor, Ansel Adams. As acolytes of the photographer and gallerist Alfred Stieglitz, who himself had long fought for the recognition of photography as a medium of art, the Newhalls and Adams took aesthetic quality as their guiding metric, asserting that in order to raise the profile of photographers, educate the public, and improve standards of taste, the museum should show only the very best work ever created--the "heavy cream" of photographic production. Their vision for photography at the museum was counterbalanced by that of the photographer Edward Steichen and many prominent writers and critics, who argued that MoMA should treat photography as a broad-ranging cultural phenomenon and means of communication, rather than merely as a medium of self expression. The debate between these two camps illustrates the considerable philosophical, interpretive, and museological challenges raised by photography's introduction into the museum, issues that remain as contentious as ever.

Th. Ph. D.--Faculty of the college of arts and sciences--Washington--American University, 1970. / Bibliogr. p. 338-345.

abstract: During the politically charged period between the 1950s and 1970s in the United States, Nancy Newhall emerged as an important advocate for open space. She began traveling to the West which encouraged her dedication to land preservation and invigorated her enthusiasm for photography. Newhall was already a respected curator and author addressing the communicative roles of photographs. After spearheading groundbreaking museum retrospectives of contemporary photographers she expanded her artistic vison to include conservation activism. The notable photographers, scholars, writers, and politicians with whom she collaborated often overshadowed her contributions, and they have been under celebrated until recently. My project studies her efforts on a quintessential Sierra Club publication from 1960. While considering her book titled This Is The American Earth I was led to insightful explorations of her unique approach to contextualizing photographs. My investigations revealed the impact that the work of Nancy Newhall had on land preservation, alongside her prolonged influence on the acceptance of photography as fine art and a resilient device of communication. In This Is The American Earth her calculated, inspired approach, attaching text to photos conveyed stirring messages to readers and forwarded an innovative use of a genre that the Sierra Club willingly embraced. Working with its president and Ansel Adams, she edited, wrote, and published several popular illustrated volumes which brought an interpretation of open space into American living rooms. Her efforts produced iconic picture books that remain memorable examples of the mid-20th century conservation movement. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Art History 2016

Syftet med detta arbete var att undersöka hur Ansel Adams (1902–1984) fotografier kan användas i interpretationen av stycket Visions of Light av Eric Ewazen (1954–), som är inspirerat av dessa fotografier. Studien bygger på en djupgående litteraturstudie kring de tre bilder som Ewazen inspirerades av: Monolith – the Face of Half Dome, Moonrise, Hermandez, New Mexico och Thunderclouds, White Mountain Range. Studien innehåller också en analys av stycket och en arbetsmetod för hur dessa fotografier kan användas i interpretationen presenteras där olika aspekter av fotografierna kopplas till stycket utifrån analysen. Slutligen diskuteras hur detta arbetssätt kan appliceras på annan musik, och hur det går att associera ens egna erfarenheter på musik som spelas för att skapa en bättre gestaltning. / <p>Program:</p><p>Frigyes Hidas - <em>Fantasia per Trombone</em></p><p>Eric Ewazen - <em>Visions of Light</em></p><p>Trad./arr. Lars Karlin - <em>A Paul Robeson Tribute</em></p><p>Per-Erik Moreaus/arr. Lars Karlin - <em>Koppången </em>ur <em>Three Swedish Songs</em></p><p></p><p>Medverkande:</p><p>Solotrombon: Ludvig Forslund</p><p>Piano: Katarina Ström-Harg</p><p>Alttrombon: Håkan Björkman</p><p>Tenortrombon: Gabriel Beck-Friis</p><p>Tenortrombon: Espen Hesthammer</p><p>Tenortrombon: Hjalmar Ljungberg</p><p>Tenortrombon: Elias Fridolfsson</p><p>Bastrombon: Elias Ukkonen Widding</p><p>Tuba: Kristian Prestbø</p><p></p><p>Inspelning:</p><p>Eric Ewazen - <em>Visions of Light</em></p><p>Trombon: Ludvig Forslund</p><p>Piano: Katarina Ström-Harg</p>

Reviewing Tarrah Krajnak’s exhibition at Huis Marseille in Amsterdam, I observe how for Krajnak, distorting Ansel Adams’ photography is an act of appreciation as much as it is an act of questioning the process of archiving and preserving his art. Rather than trying to preserve the intentions or essence of the art, Krajnak’s series challenges the very idea of an essential, immutable spirit that belongs to an artwork, opting instead to document how interacting with art dissolves the possibility of its fixed condition and involves an act of co-making. Moreover, as I will show, by bringing her videos into circulation on social media such as Instagram her work enhances the performativity of documentation through the audience’s (potential) engagement, but it also destabilizes documentation as a window into the past and hints toward how preservation has instability built into it.