Thesis (M.A.)--University of Queensland, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D. in English)--Vanderbilt University, Dec. 2008. / Title from title screen. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2004. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 174-177). Also available on the Internet.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2004. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 174-177). Also available on the Internet.

This thesis examines the various "signature" threads that are present within the "oeuvre" of the Hollywood filmmaker Adrian Lyne. The goal of this thesis is to showcase both how and why Lyne can be thought of as an auteur and to open up his films to new and previously unexplored meanings. Lyne's eight feature films are analyzed in-depth individually and in comparison to one another from a variety of theoretical frameworks and points of focus in each of the body chapters.

<p>In this paper, I have examined if and how Saul Bass adapts his title sequences to the respective film in the matter of genre, plot, milieu, feeling and appearance. Saul Bass was really a graphic artist who has made himself a long career in film production, foremost as a creator of title sequences. Of all the films Bass has created title sequences to, I’ve chosen six films, whose title sequences I analyse more thoroughly. I do this to point out the differences between them and thus also show how Bass adapt them to the individual work. To do this I’ve used an auteuristic perspective. The analysis I’ve made of the six films points to that Bass adapts his title sequences to the respective films. I have for instance found that certain title sequences is an integrated part of the film itself, others work as a prologue to the plot of the movie, and others present the genre, the plot or a specific theme. Most of the title sequences also introduce a fundamental feeling, that follows the viewer throughout the whole film. However, it has also come forth certain likenesses in his work, certain images and themes. Despite this, I believe that Saul Bass designs his title sequences according to the specific work and not according to his personal style.</p> / <p>I denna uppsats har jag undersökt om och hur Saul Bass anpassar sina förtexter till respektive film ifråga om genre, handling, miljö, känsla eller utseende. Saul Bass var i grunden en grafisk designer som har gjort sig en lång karriär inom filmproduktionen, och då främst som skapare av förtexter. Av alla filmer som Bass har gjort förtexter till har jag valt ut sex filmer, vars förtexter jag analyserar mer ingående. Detta gör jag för att belysa olikheterna dem emellan och därmed också hur Bass anpassar dem efter det individuella verket. Till detta använder jag mig av ett auteuristiskt perspektiv. De analyser jag har gjort av de sex filmerna pekar på att Bass verkligen anpassar sina förtexter till respektive film. Jag har till exempel funnit att vissa förtexter är en integrerad del av själva filmen, vissa fungerar som prologer till filmens handling och vissa presenterar genren, handlingen eller ett specifikt tema. De allra flesta av förtexterna introducerar även en grundläggande känsla, som sedan följer med åskådaren genom hela filmen. Dock har det även dykt upp vissa likheter i hans arbeten, vissa bilder och teman. Detta till trots anser jag att Saul Bass utformar sina förtexter med tanke på det specifika verket och inte med tanke på hans personliga stil.</p>

In this paper, I have examined if and how Saul Bass adapts his title sequences to the respective film in the matter of genre, plot, milieu, feeling and appearance. Saul Bass was really a graphic artist who has made himself a long career in film production, foremost as a creator of title sequences. Of all the films Bass has created title sequences to, I’ve chosen six films, whose title sequences I analyse more thoroughly. I do this to point out the differences between them and thus also show how Bass adapt them to the individual work. To do this I’ve used an auteuristic perspective. The analysis I’ve made of the six films points to that Bass adapts his title sequences to the respective films. I have for instance found that certain title sequences is an integrated part of the film itself, others work as a prologue to the plot of the movie, and others present the genre, the plot or a specific theme. Most of the title sequences also introduce a fundamental feeling, that follows the viewer throughout the whole film. However, it has also come forth certain likenesses in his work, certain images and themes. Despite this, I believe that Saul Bass designs his title sequences according to the specific work and not according to his personal style. / I denna uppsats har jag undersökt om och hur Saul Bass anpassar sina förtexter till respektive film ifråga om genre, handling, miljö, känsla eller utseende. Saul Bass var i grunden en grafisk designer som har gjort sig en lång karriär inom filmproduktionen, och då främst som skapare av förtexter. Av alla filmer som Bass har gjort förtexter till har jag valt ut sex filmer, vars förtexter jag analyserar mer ingående. Detta gör jag för att belysa olikheterna dem emellan och därmed också hur Bass anpassar dem efter det individuella verket. Till detta använder jag mig av ett auteuristiskt perspektiv. De analyser jag har gjort av de sex filmerna pekar på att Bass verkligen anpassar sina förtexter till respektive film. Jag har till exempel funnit att vissa förtexter är en integrerad del av själva filmen, vissa fungerar som prologer till filmens handling och vissa presenterar genren, handlingen eller ett specifikt tema. De allra flesta av förtexterna introducerar även en grundläggande känsla, som sedan följer med åskådaren genom hela filmen. Dock har det även dykt upp vissa likheter i hans arbeten, vissa bilder och teman. Detta till trots anser jag att Saul Bass utformar sina förtexter med tanke på det specifika verket och inte med tanke på hans personliga stil.

No description available.

No description available.

La modernité cinématographique désigne une remise en cause de la représentation classique au moment de la Seconde Guerre mondiale qui se manifeste par un retour au documentaire. Celui-ci se traduit de deux manières : au sein du cinéma hollywoodien, comme en témoignent la fin du Dictateur de Charlie Chaplin et le début de Citizen Kane d’Orson Welles; et dans l’Europe de l’après-guerre avec le néo-réalisme italien. Dans ce contexte, la critique cinématographique définit l’essai comme une des finalités du cinéma moderne alliant ontologie et langage comme en témoignent les textes d’Alexandre Astruc, André Bazin ou Jacques Rivette. Au milieu des années 1950, le cinéma moderne propose une épure de ces formes cinématographiques avec, d’une part, Nuit et Brouillard d’Alain Resnais, film emblématique de « l’école française du court métrage » et, d’autre part, Voyage en Italie de Roberto Rossellini, affirmation d’un « néo-réalisme plus pur », selon les termes de son auteur. En 1963, deux films français sont à la fois les héritiers du cinéma classique américain et le point de départ d’une réflexion plus approfondie sur l’essai cinématographique, il s’agit de La Jetée de Chris Marker et du Mépris de Jean-Luc Godard. C’est à travers l’étude comparée du parcours de ces deux cinéastes que nous nous proposons de définir l’essai cinématographique comme une forme liée à l’histoire d’un art à un moment particulier. C’est ainsi que l’essai qui connaît ses premières grandes réussites dans les années 1960 se développera dans les années 1990 autour du centenaire du cinéma. De nouveaux enjeux associés à la modernité cinématographique se dessinent alors entre le Nord et le Sud, l’Est et l’Ouest, dans ce passage d’un siècle à l’autre du cinéma. / In the field of cinematic studies, modernity refers to the attempts to challenge classical modes of representations at the time of the Second World War, which take the form of a return to the documentary. This process takes two expressions: one runs through Hollywood productions, for instance the opening scene of Chaplin’s Great Dictator and the conclusion of Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane; the other is apparent in post-war Europe with Italian neorealism. In this context, film criticism defines the essay as one of the objects of modern cinema, joining ontology to language, as described in the works of Alexandre Astruc, André Bazin or Jacques Rivette. In the middle of the 1950s, modern cinema offers striking examples of these cinematographic forms with, on the one hand Alain Resnais’ Night and Fog, a film which is typical of “the French school of short films”, and on the other hand Roberto Rossellini’s Journey to Italy, which its author has described as the expression of “a refine form of neorealism”. In 1963, two French films are at once heirs to the tradition of classic American cinema and the start of a deeper reflection on the cinematographic essay, Chris Marker’s The Jetty and Jean-Luc Godard’s Contempt. By comparing the evolution of both these directors we will attempt to define the cinematographic essay as form closely linked to a certain moment in the history of cinema. Thus the essay, after producing its first major works in the 1960s will develop during the 1990s around the time of the hundredth anniversary of cinema. New stakes arise at that time to define cinematographic modernity between North and South, East and West, as cinema enters a new century.