Martin Buber was an internationally known scholar, teacher, and author whose works covered education, communication, politics, theology, philosophy, counseling, and related fields. The purpose of this study was to discover the implications of Buber's philosophy of education for the student services profession. Previous attempts to relate Martin Buber's philosophy to student services were reviewed and a "Buber Primer" of useful terms for the student services professional was presented. The implications of education of character, dialogue, and educator-student relationship for four central questions for the student services profession were addressed: (1) Who are we as professionals?; (2) What are we supposed to do; (3) How?; and (4) Why? Buber proposes that education is essentially the education of character. Student services professionals should define themselves as educators; persons concerned with the development of the whole student. Buber defines dialogue as a seven step process: a turning of the being, confirmation, a sense of empathy, authenticity, common fruitfulness, silence, and commitment. Professional educators are encouraged to engage students in dialogue. Dialogue is defined as the delivery mechanism for developmentally based student services and for the education of character. Buber's concepts were related to the various activities of student services. Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue and his 'education of character' should enhance the ability of professionals in student services to serve all students more intelligently and effectively. This study concluded that Martin Buber's philosophy belongs both in the vocabulary and the practice of student services. / Graduation date: 1990

Thesis--Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-255).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 1994. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-127).

Diss.--Philosophie--Zürich--Philosophische Fakultät I, 1986. / Bibliogr. p. 323-330.

Habilitationsschrift--Freiburg i. B. / Bibliography: p. 380-391.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duquesne University, 2005. / Title from document title page. Abstract included in electronic submission form. Includes bibliographical references (p. 595-621) and index.

The thesis deals with psychosomatical studies and mainly studies of the Acting with the Inner Partner discipline by Ivan Vyskočil. In connection with the theoretical dialogue principle in the work of Martin Buber and out of her own reflections of practical studies, the author tries to touch spiritual lapping such disciplines might offer. Through an essayistic form she is also looking around her own spiritual life path and is asking about how much does one's experiencing of the spiritual grow out of his own body awareness.

Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-07T18:55:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 000398361-Texto+Completo-0.pdf: 621535 bytes, checksum: e9aa930f68a7ba9b7ae22e4013cda635 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 / This research aims to analyse the central contribution of the thought of Buber: the dialogical relation and the discovery of the “zwischen”. The “between” that Buber works, will be the category, fruit of the dialogical relation. This dialogical relation may happen of two ways: the first one as I-Thou, in which a man places himself before another man in a posture of respect, mutuality, presence; without prejudice or advantage. However, this relation may also happen in a level of smaller perfection with things or objects. The second way in which this relation may happen is the similarity of the connoisseur, in which the man does not place himself before the other one in a free and disinterested attitude, but with the aim to discover, to grasp or to pick up something with intentionality. These relations, in their perfection, when they are extended, they cross each other, and this case Buber calls the “Eternal-You” relation: Eternal-I-Thou. The dialogical relation happens without mediations. The word, defined as primary word, or as I-Thou, IIt, is the relation itself, the man does not need anything as mediation so that the relation happens. Nevertheless, between the I and You appears something that Buber calls the “zwischen”, or just “between” / Esta pesquisa objetiva analisar a contribuição central do pensamento de Buber: a Relação dialógica e a descoberta do Zwischen. O “entre-dois”, que Buber trabalha, será a categoria que nasce na relação dialógica. Esta relação dialógica pode acontecer de duas maneiras: a primeira como Eu-Tu, onde um homem se coloca diante de outro homem em uma atitude de respeito, mutualidade, presença e sem preconceitos ou interesses. Contudo, esta relação ainda pode acontecer em um grau de perfeição menor com coisas ou objetos. O segundo modo da relação acontecer é a semelhança do sujeito conhecedor, onde o homem não se coloca diante do outro em uma atitude livre e desinteressada, mas com o objetivo de conhecer, de apreender ou de captar algo de quem está em relação. Neste caso existe um sujeito com intencionalidade. Estas relações, na sua perfeição, quando prolongadas se entrecruzam com o que Buber chama de Tu Eterno que, por sua vez, podem gerar uma terceira modalidade de relação dialógica: Eu-Tu Eterno. A relação dialógica acontece sem mediações. A palavra, definida como palavra-princípio ou como Eu-Tu, Eu-Isso, é a própria relação. O homem não precisa de nada como mediação para que a relação aconteça. No entanto, entre o Eu e o Tu surge algo que Buber chama de zwischen, ou simplesmente “entre”.

Orientador: Suzi Frankl Sperber / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-12T21:07:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Andrade_LeoAgapejevde_M.pdf: 1021111 bytes, checksum: ad51bff5f5132dd98bae89cce692ca39 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: Proponho o estudo das anedotas compiladas por Martin Buber em Histórias do Rabi à luz da filosofia do diálogo, concebida pelo próprio Buber, principalmente à luz das palavras-princípio Eu-Tu e Eu-Isso. Como pano de fundo e substrato cultural, tomo o universo cultural hassídico polonês, cujo auge se deu na Europa oriental, do começo do séc. XVIII ao final do séc. XIX, e que influenciou essencialmente a filosofia de Buber em sua visão de uma ética das relações humanas, baseada em sua peculiar visão do Hassidismo polonês. Na presente dissertação, pesquiso a aplicação literária da filosofia de Buber como conseqüência do papel das narrativas hassídicas na vida comunitária e nas experiências interpessoais (essencialmente baseadas na relação Eu-Tu), e vice-versa: ou seja, como essas narrativas determinam as relações interpessoais e sua relação com experiências com o sagrado, entre os hassidim. Teço essas considerações sob o pressuposto de que as narrativas hassídicas e seus aspectos poéticos estão intimamente relacionados aos modos como as experiências pessoais com a Divindade são transmitidas / Abstract: I intend to study the hassidic stories colected by Martin Buber on a book titled Die Erzählungen der Chassidim, under the principles of Buber's Dialogic Philosophy, mainly the principle-words I-Thou and I-It. As a cultural substract, I deal with the polish hassidic cultural environment on early 18th and late 19th centuries, in East and Middle Europe. This emphasis on Hassidism justified by the fact that this jewish "sect" has essentialy influenced Buber's philosophy on an ethic view on human and communitarian relationships. On this master thesis, I research the literary application of Buber's philosophy as a consequence of how the hassidic stories and its function on communitary life determinates interpersonal experience (essentially based on I-Thou relationship) and vice-versa: I mean, how these stories determinate interpersonal experiences and its relation to sacred experiences among the hassidim, after considering that hassidic stories and its / Mestrado / Literatura e Outras Produções Culturais / Mestre em Teoria e História Literária

Dans ce travail nous avons d’abord cherché à présenter la psychose. Nous avons fait appel à deux symptômes cardinaux, le délire et l'hallucination, et à deux catégories nosoiogiques traditionnelles, la paranoïa et la schizophrénie. A ces concepts classiques nous avons tenté d’insuffler une dynamique et une extension philosophiques en citant des auteurs et des travaux qui se situent à la jonction des deux disciplines (psychiatrie et philosophie). La rencontre psychiatrique est une forme particulière de relation interpersonnelle. Par souci de clarté, nous avons distingué la rencontre diagnostique de la rencontre thérapeutique qui représentent deux scènes séparées où les enjeux théoriques de l’interaction se posent en termes différents. Pour la rencontre diagnostique, une analyse épistémologique a été proposée, faisant appel à la distinction husserlienne des attitudes naturaliste et personnaliste. La rencontre thérapeutique a été envisagée à partir d’un modèle qui distingue quatre approches principales : objective-descriptive, psy chanalytique, phénoménologique-existentielle et interpersonnelle. L’analyse a été ensuite étendue au cas particulier de la psychose et aux formes contemporaines de psychothérapie. La psychose n ’est-elle pas un obstacle insurmontable à cette qualité de communication qu’on appelle le dialogue? Pour répondre à cette question, nous avons interrogé deux philosophes du XXe siècle, Martin Buber et Emmanuel Lévinas. Buber décrit deux manières de communiquer. La première privilégie la proximité et l’unité, la seconde consent à la distance et à la séparation. Dire Tu, c’est sortir de soi, engager la totalité de son être, assumer flimmédiateté de la relation. Dire Cela, c’est rester confiné à l’intérieur de soi, refuser la présence et la réciprocité. Lévinas conçoit la relation avec autrui comme une responsabilité sans limite. L’égalité et la symétrie sont des illusions néfastes. Le tiers introduit une contradiction dans l’asymétrie de la relation et rend possible la justice, la réciprocité des droits et des devoirs. Toute rencontre véritable confronte le patient psychotique à un dédoublement de sa vie relationnelle, à une mise en concurrence des interlocuteurs. Nous avons appliqué les catégories bubériennes et l’éthique lévinassienne à la situation particulière de la rencontre psychiatrique avec un sujet psychotique. L’épisode fécond ne témoigne-t-il pas aussi des dangers du Je-Tu? Le handicap social du schizophrène ne se manifeste-t-il pas d’abord dans la sphère, plus précieuse qu’il ne paraît, du Je-Cela? Les intuitions de Lévinas, sa conception de la subjectivité comme responsabilité unilatérale et illimitée, comme otage, révèlent à leur tour 1’ « incondition » du psychotique. La psychose est à la fois une expérience relationnelle et une pathologie de la relation. Celle-ci affecte la communication avec soi, avec le monde et avec autrui. Ce travail vise à clarifier les multiples facettes de l’expérience psychotique, à rendre compte de la diversité des points de vue et des savoirs. Il offre ensuite une analyse épistémologique de la rencontre psychiatrique avec un sujet psychotique en distinguant les deux étapes de la relation : celle du diagnostic et celle du traitement. Il interpelle enfin deux philosophes du dialogue, Martin Buber et Emmanuel Lévinas, avec, en toile de fond, cette question préliminaire : la psychose n’est-elle pas un obstacle insurmontable à cette qualité de la relation qu’on appelle le dialogue? Nous montrerons que toute rencontre véritable confronte le patient psychotique à un dédoublement de sa vie relationnelle mais que malgré les obstacles, un travail de rapprochement demeure toujours possible.