Bakgrunn: Sentralvenøse katetre (SVK) er et tilbud til mange pasientgrupper når det foreligger indikasjoner. Dette medfører at SVK håndteres av helsepersonell på alle enheter i helsetjenesten. Samtidig som SVK er livgivende, kan anvendelse av katetre i blodbanen resultere i alvorlige blodbaneinfeksjoner (SVK-BBI). Blodbaneinfeksjoner assosiert med innleggelse og håndtering av SVK, er en av de alvorligste komplikasjonene som kan oppstå. Fokus på forebygging av SVK-BBI har spredd seg fra å gjelde intensivavdelinger tilå gjelde hele helsetjenesten. Hensikten med denne studien erå se på etterlevelse av infeksjonsforebyggende retningslinjer for å forebygge SVK-BBI utenom intensivavdelinger. Fokuseropplæring, aseptisk teknikk, håndhygiene ogdesinfeksjon av koblingene. Metode: Studien er en tverrsnittsstudie hvor det gjennomføres observasjoner av etterlevelse av håndtering og stell av SVK,samten spørreundersøkelse som kartlegger opplæringav helsepersonelli forhold tildette. 40 sykepleiere deltar i observasjonsstudien og 112 helsepersonelldeltar i spørreundersøkelsen. Hovedresultat: Etterlevelse av aseptisk teknikk under prosedyre var 72,5 %.Etterlevelse av håndhygiene før SVK-prosedyre var 42%. Etterlevelse av desinfeksjon før tilgang/ skifte av koblinger var 89,6 %. 96 % av desom håndterte SVK,har fått opplæring. 68 % er opplært med multimodale metoder. Konklusjon: Studien viser at defleste som håndterteSVK har hatt opplæring. Kommentarene til spørreundersøkelsen viser likevel at det etterlyses bedre opplæring hvor praktisk trening og oppdatering av kunnskap er vektlagt. Til tross for stort fokus på opplæring viser observasjonene av etterlevelse av SVK-prosedyren at vesentlige infekjsonsforebyggende tiltak svikter. / Background:Central venous catheters (CVCs) are usedfor a wide range of indications and handled by health care professionals throughout the hospital. While CVCsare life-giving, their use may result in serious bloodstream infections. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are among the most serious complications in health care. Consequently, hospitals now focus on CRBSIs prevention throughout the entire hospital. Aim. The purpose of this study is to look at adherence to infection control guidelines for preventing CRBSIs outside intensive care units. Studied issues are education/ training of health care workers, aseptic technique, hand hygiene and disinfection of the hubs/ connections prior to use. Method.This cross-sectional study aimed to observe guideline compliance by 40 nurses during handling procedures and care of CVCs. We also conducted a sample survey of healthcare workers (n=112) to map the training of healthcare workers handling CVCs. Main results. Adherence to aseptic technique during the procedure was 72.5%, and compliance with hand hygiene before CVCs procedure was 42%. Compliance with use of disinfectant prior to access/change of hubs/connections was 89.6%. The survey revealed that 96% of respondents had been trained in properly handling CVCs; 68 % were trained with multimodal methods. Conclusion. Most healthcare workers were trained to handle CVCs. Some workers requested better training that emphasizes practical issues and updated knowledge. Despite a strong focus on education/training, our observations show that many healthcare workersremain noncompliant in CVC procedure / <p>ISBN 978-91-86739-76-8</p>

Les cathéters veineux centraux sont utilisés pour des traitements dont la chimiothérapie, l’hydratation, l’antibiothérapie et la nutrition parentérale chez les patients ayant un cancer. Cependant, ces cathéters sont responsables de graves complications dont les infections. Elles peuvent entraîner la suspension ou l’arrêt des traitements et peuvent engager le pronostic vital des patients. Le taux d’incidence et les facteurs de risque des infections liées aux cathéters veineux centraux (ILCVC) en oncologie restent mal connus. Une étude prospective menée pendant 5 ans à l’hôpital Edouard Herriot et à l’hôpital de la Croix Rousse nous a permis de décrire les ILCVC chez 425 patients ayant un cancer digestif. Nous avons d’abord estimé le taux d’incidence des ILCVC selon la localisation du cancer primitif. Ensuite, nous avons analysé les facteurs de risque. Pour mieux estimer l’impact de la nutrition parentérale sur le risque d’ILCVC, nous avons utilisé le score de propension pour imiter certaines caractéristiques d’un essai randomisé. Enfin, nous avons analysé la mortalité dans les 30 jours qui ont suivi l’ILCVC. Les résultats ont montré que le taux d’incidence des ILCVC était plus élevé chez les patients ayant un cancer pancréas ou un cancer de l’œsophage que ceux qui ont un cancer colorectal. Les facteurs de risque indépendamment associés à une ILCVC étaient le performance status, les journées d’utilisation du cathéter, le cancer du pancréas et la nutrition parentérale. Le risque d’ILCVC était supérieur à 5 chez les patients qui recevaient de la nutrition parentérale associée à la chimiothérapie intraveineuse. Le diabète était un facteur de risque indépendamment associé à la mortalité dans les 30 jours qui suivent la survenue l’ILCVC. / Central venous catheters are commonly used in cancer patients for administration of chemotherapy, hydration, parenteral nutrition and antibiotic. However, their use is associated with complications such as infections. An often serious complication is bloodstream infections. This can cause a suspending of cancer treatment. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections also contribute to increased mortality in theses patients. The incidence rates and CVC-RBSI risk factors are not well known in patients with cancer. Then in a prospective study conducted during 5 years, we have analysed data from 425 patients with digestive cancer. Study took place at Edouard Herriot Hospital and Croix Rousse Hospital in Lyon. First, we estimated rate of CVC-RBSI according to the location of primary cancer. To the best estimation of parenteral nutrition effect on the risk of CVC-RBSI, we performed the propensity score analysis, which can mimic some characteristics of randomized trial. Finally, we analyzed the 30-day mortality after CVC-BSI. The results showed that the infection rate was higher in pancreatic and oesophageal cancer patients, compared with colorectal cancer patients. The risk factors independently associated with CVC-RBSI were pancreatic cancer, performance status, cumulative catheter utilization-days and parenteral nutrition. The risk of CVC-RBSI was at least 5 times greater in patients with parenteral nutrition. Attributable mortality rate within 1 month of CVC-RBSI was 16.6%. Diabetes mellitus was independently associated with death.