Colitis can be a life-threatening immune-related adverse event (irAE) for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade, a new anti-cancer immunotherapy. With the increasing use of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, particularly in combination in melanoma and other cancers, timely and accurate diagnosis of colitis will become increasingly important for oncologists. The main goal of this study is to understand the clinical presentation of ipilimumab-induced colitis and to validate the use of CT scans as a safe and effective diagnostic tool. We analyzed a cohort of 303 patients who received ipilimumab at Dana Farber Cancer Institute on an expanded access protocol or standard of care between the years of 2008 and 2015. Age, number of doses and frequency of ipilimumab doses were found to be clinical characteristics which could help differentiate patients who develop ipilimumab induced colitis from those who only present with diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Of the 303 patients, 100 (33%) developed diarrhea and 43 (14%) received treatment with corticosteroids for ipilimumab-induced colitis. For all patients with suspected immune-related colitis, an effort was made to firmly establish the diagnosis prior to or immediately after initiation of treatment. Forty-one of 43 patients (95%) who received steroids for presumed immune-related colitis had a colonoscopy and 27 of 43 (63%) patients had both computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen/pelvis and a colonoscopy including biopsy. In the 31 patients with a CT and biopsy, CT was highly predictive of the presence of colitis on biopsy (sensitivity 85%, specificity 75%, PPV 96%) and the absence of CT findings was predictive of a negative biopsy (negative LR 0.2). In the 44 patients who had symptoms and CT evaluation, CT was highly predictive of the need for steroids to reach resolution of symptoms (sensitivity 85%, specificity 88%, PPV 92%, positive LR 7.3). Fifteen of the 17 patients with negative CT findings did not require steroids to reach resolution of symptoms. In conclusion, CT of the abdomen/pelvis is a fast, reliable, and non-invasive mode of diagnosing ipilimumab-induced immune-related colitis, whereas colonoscopy may not be needed to firmly establish that diagnosis

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are key mediators of gene expression and, thus, major regulators of cell function. As such, HDACs play a role in orchestrating tumor biology, and the use of small inhibitors targeting theses proteins is attractive for the field of cancer therapy. Indeed, several HDAC inhibitors have received FDA-approval for the treatment of malignancies, while a myriad of these compounds continue to be evaluated in clinical trials. Besides their direct impact on tumor growth, HDAC inhibitors have been shown to increase immunogenicity of cancer cells, facilitating generation of a productive immune response against tumors. Immunotherapeutic approaches take advantage of the intrinsic ability of the immune system to manifest an anti-tumor response. Mechanisms of immune escape are often developed by cancer cells, neutralizing activity of the immune system. For example, upregulation of the PD1 ligands PDL1 and PDL2 by tumor cells negatively regulates the anti-tumor functions of PD1-expressing infiltrating T-cells. Importantly, strategies targeting this inhibitory axis have shown outstanding clinical benefit for the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies. The mechanisms by which HDAC inhibitors modulate tumor and immune cells biology were explored herein. Initially, treatment of melanoma cells with pan- and class I-selective HDAC inhibitors resulted in upregulation of PDL1 and PDL2 molecules. These effects were observed in mouse and human cell lines, as well as in tumor cells resected from metastatic melanoma patients. This upregulation was robust and sustained, lasting at least 96 hours in vitro, and validated in vivo using a B16F10 syngeneic mouse model. Enhanced expression of PDL1 mediated by HDAC inhibitors was found to result from enhanced histone acetylation at the PDL1 gene promoter region. Combination therapy of HDAC inhibition and PD1 blockade was explored in the tumor setting, leading to synergistic effects in terms of reducing melanoma progression and increasing survival of B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice. These data provide a clinical rationale for combination therapy of epigenetic modifiers (e.g. HDAC inhibitors) and PD1 blockade as means to augment cancer immunotherapy, improving patient outcomes. As a second pillar of this research, the impacts of HDAC-selective inhibition were explored on immune cell biology, since the broad nature of pan-HDAC inhibitors was shown to be detrimental to T-cells in vitro and in vivo. Based on screening assay results, novel implications of treating melanoma patient T-cells ex vivo with the HDAC6-selective inhibitor ACY1215 were investigated. Treatment with this compound was unique among pan- and isotype-selective HDAC inhibitors in modulating T-cell cytokine production and showing minimal impact of T-cell viability. ACY1215 tempered Th2 cytokine production (i.e. IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10), and maintained Th1 effector cytokines (e.g. IFNγ and IL-2). Furthermore, ACY1215 increased expression of surface markers, including CD69 activation marker and ICOS co-stimulatory molecule. In addition, ACY1215 treatment enhanced accumulation of central memory T-cells during ex vivo expansion of tumor infiltrating T-cells harvested from resected tumors of metastatic melanoma patients. Importantly, ACY1215-mediated inhibition improved tumor-killing capacity of T-cells. These results highlight an unexplored ability of selective HDAC inhibitor ACY1215 to augment T-cell expansion during protocols of adoptive cell therapy. While the discoveries presented here warrant further investigation of cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with ACY1215-treated T-cells, the clinic implications are clear and rapidly translatable.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a diverse group of cancers that originate from mesenchymal tissue and are estimated to result in 13,130 new cases and 5,350 deaths this year. These neoplasms are hard to detect, which results in physicians struggling to treat late-stage STSs with a limited number of ineffective treatments. Currently, surgical excision is the primary treatment with radiation therapy administered when possible. However, even with optimal margins, the rate of recurrence is high, and the overall survival is low. There is a desperate need for new, more effective treatments. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has recently had widespread success in treating melanoma, and in recent trials, SARC028 and Alliance A091401, have shown demonstrated activity of ICBs in STS in the neoadjuvant setting. Two histological subtypes of STS showed more promise than others: dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Another issue plaguing the field of STS is that there is no universal indicator of response. The percentage of hyalinization found within the tumor was recently identified as a better marker of response than radiographic imaging or percent viable tumor. METHODS: This study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized, open-label, phase II study (NCT03307616), in which 23 patients with either DDLPS of the retroperitoneum (RP) or UPS of the extremity/trunk (ET) were separated by disease into Cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Subjects in each cohort were randomized into two neoadjuvant treatment arms per cohort. Arm A (n=7) of Cohort 1 received nivolumab (anti-PD-1) monotherapy, while Arm B (n=7) of Cohort 1 received nivolumab and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) combination therapy. Arm C (n=5) of Cohort 2 received nivolumab monotherapy and radiation therapy, whereas Arm D (n=4) of Cohort 2 received nivolumab/ipilimumab combination therapy and radiation therapy. A tumor biopsy was obtained before treatment, and another sample was taken during the primary treatment of surgical excision. These samples were processed and analyzed by a pathologist who determined the percentage of viable tumor, hyalinization, and necrosis in each sample. Radiographic imaging was also taken throughout to make RECIST 1.1 response determinations. RESULTS: The average treatment response (1 - % viable tumor) for Cohort 1 was 25 ± 23 and there was no difference between Arm A and Arm B, p=0.48. The average treatment response in Cohort 2 was higher at 85 ± 27, but there was also no significant difference between the arms, p = 0.46. The mean percent hyalinization for Cohort 1 was 13 ± 13%, and for Cohort 2 was 69 ± 35%. Again, there was no significant difference between the arms in the Cohort 1 or 2, p = 0.45 and p = 0.54, respectively. Lastly, the mean % necrosis in Cohort 1 was 13 ± 13 %, and in Cohort 2 was 17 ± 24%, and neither had significantly different results in the arms, p = 0.60 and p = 0.92. The RECIST 1.1 results were independent of the arms of the study, and the radiographic response (percent image change) did not correlate to any metric of histologic response. Those who received Ipilimumab had higher rates of adverse events. CONCLUSION: There is significant evidence that ICBs elicited a response in RP DDLPS and ET UPS, and the response of ET UPS was profound. However, there was no apparent benefit from the combination therapy compared to the monotherapy in either cohort. The higher response in ET UPS may be due to the additional radiation therapy or to the nature of UPS itself. Finally, radiographic imaging does not show the response which is apparent at the histological level, so treatment regimens and future experiments should no longer rely on radiographic imaging as a marker for response. / 2021-06-07T00:00:00Z

No description available.

No description available.

Cancer, historically considered a genetic disease, is currently acknowledged to affect the whole body. Our immune system is one key player that can elicit a response against malignant cells but can also promote tumorigenesis. Tumors avoid immune recognition by creating a suppressive microenvironment and inducing tolerance. T-cells are regarded a major effector cell type in tumor immunotherapy. An important ”switch” needed for T-cell activation involves so-called costimulatory and coinhibitory receptors. In this thesis, experimental tumor models were used to investigate the potential of immunomodulatory antibodies to stimulate immune cells and subsequently eliminate tumors. First, systemic antibody blockade of two negative checkpoint regulators (CTLA-4 and PD-1) present on T-cells was evaluated in combination with local CpG therapy or standard BCG treatment. Indeed, this combinatorial therapy with CpG augmented anti-tumor effects with increased levels of tumor-directed T-cells and reduced tumor-infiltrating Tregs. Secondly, as these immunomodulatory antibodies elicit severe side effects in patients, a local low-dose delivery regimen was explored as an alternative to systemic bolus treatment. Our results demonstrated that an approximately seven times lower dose of aCTLA-4, compared to systemic delivery, could eradicate both primary and distant tumors. CD40-expressing APCs are another potential target in antibody-mediated cancer therapy. CD40-stimulated dendritic cells (DCs) have the capability to activate tumor-directed T-cells to kill tumor cells. We next sought to investigate agonistic CD40 antibody efficacy and in vivo biodistribution when delivered locally compared to the equivalent systemic dose. Anti-tumor effects were dependent on CD8+ T-cells, host CD40 expression and the presence of tumor antigen at the injection site. CD40 antibodies were cleared from the circulation and accumulated in lymphoid organs, where, upon repeated aCD40 dosing, target APC populations increased in numbers and upregulated their surface CD40 expression. Lastly, CD40 agonist antibodies were mixed with nanoparticles to enhance their stimulatory properties. B-cells demonstrated increased proliferative capacity and DCs became more activated when exposed to the cocktail. Further, this combination reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to plain antibodies.       The results herein advocate further exploratory studies of the delivery of monoclonal antibodies at the tumor site in order to improve anti-tumor effects and reduce toxicity.

L'apport des anticorps immunomodulateurs ciblant PD-1, PD-L1 et CTLA-4 ont récemment révolutionné la prise en charge thérapeutique du cancer. Cependant, seule une minorité de patients développent des réponses objectives à ces traitements. Par conséquent, de nouvelles innovation thérapeutiques sont nécessaires afin d'augmenter l'immunogénicité des tumeurs et de surmonter la résistance à la thérapie contre les anticorps immunomodulateurs. Les propriétés oncolytiques de certains virus peuvent être exploitées afin de permettre un amorçage de l'immunité anti-tumorale. Différents virus oncolytiques (OVS) sont actuellement en développement clinique intense en combinaison avec des thérapies par anticorps immunomodulateurs. Nous avons trouvé qu'un vaccin viral pédiatrique disponible dans le commerce a des propriétés oncolytiques. Ce virus pédiatrique peut tuer directement les cellules cancéreuses, avec des caractéristiques de mort cellulaire immunogène. De plus, ce virus a des propriétés pro-inflammatoires et peut activer la voie NF-kB indépendamment des voies de danger cellulaire (TLR et IRF). Ces propriétés biologiques in vitro se traduisent in vivo en une activité anti-tumorale. L'Injection intra-tumorale du vaccin a des effets anti-tumoraux directs mais également à médiation immunitaire. De façon intéressante, dans des modèles de souris immunocompétentes porteuses de tumeurs murines, l'injection intra-tumorale de vaccin a un effet synergique avec des anti CTLA-4 permettant la guérison de 100% des souris. Les vaccins sont des produits pédiatriques et adultes de grade clinique. Par conséquent, des stratégies de vaccination in situ par injection intra-tumorale pourraient être rapidement mises en clinique / Immune checkpoint targeted therapies against PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are currently revolutionizing cancer care. However, only a minority of patients develop objective responses with these treatments. Therefore, new therapeutic interventions are needed to increase the immunogenicity of tumors in order to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Oncolytic properties of common viruses can be exploited for the priming of anti-tumor immunity and such oncolytic viruses (OVs) are currently in intense clinical development in combination with immune checkpoint targeted therapies. We have found that commercially available virus vaccines do have oncolytic properties. These pediatric vaccine virus can directly kill cancer cells with features of immunogenic cell death. Moreover, it has pro-inflammatory properties and can activate the NF-Kb pathway in a toll-like receptor and IRF3 independent manner. These in vitro biological properties translate in vivo into anti-tumor activity. Intra-tumoral vaccine therapy has anti-tumor effects which are partly immune mediated. Interestingly, in immunocompetent murine pediatric tumor models, intra-tumoral injection overcome resistance and synergize with immune checkpoint targeted therapy. Vaccines are pediatric and adult clinical grade products. Therefore, in situ intra-tumoral immunization strategies could be implemented quickly in the clinic

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) shows remarkable clinical effects in patients with metastatic microsatellite-unstable (MSI) cancer. However, markers identifying potential non-responders are missing. We examined the prevalence of Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) mutations, a common immune evasion mechanism, in stage IV MSI gastrointestinal cancer and its influence on metastatic pattern and patients’ survival under ICB. Twentyfive patients with metastatic, MSI gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma were included. Eighteen patients received ICB with pembrolizumab and one patient with nivolumab/ ipilimumab. Sequencing was performed to determine B2M mutation status. B2M mutations and loss of B2M expression were detected in 6 out of 25 stage IV MSI cancers. B2M mutations were strongly associated with exclusively peritoneal/peritoneal and lymph node metastases (p=0.0055). However, no significant differences in therapy response (25% vs. 46.6%, p>0.99) and survival (median PFS: 19.5 vs 33.0 months, p=0.74; median OS 39 months vs. not reached, p>0.99) were observed between B2Mmutant and B2M-wild type tumor patients. Among metastatic MSI GI cancers, B2Mmutant tumors represent a biologically distinct disease with distinct metastatic patterns. To assess ICB response in B2M-mutant MSI cancer patients, future studies need to account for the fact that baseline survival of patients with B2M-mutant MSI cancer may be longer than of patients with B2M-wild type MSI cancer.

No description available.

New diagnostic methods and novel therapeutic agents spawn additional and heterogeneous information, leading to an increasingly complex decision-making process for optimal treatment of cancer. A great amount of information is collected in organ-specific multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs). By considering the patient’s tumor properties, molecular pathological test results, and comorbidities, the MDTB has to consent an evidence-based treatment decision. Immunotherapies are increasingly important in today’s cancer treatment, resulting in detailed information that influences the decision-making process. Clinical decision support systems can facilitate a better understanding via processing of multiple datasets of oncological cases and molecular genetic information, potentially fostering transparency and comprehensibility of available information, eventually leading to an optimum treatment decision for the individual patient. We constructed a digital patient model based on Bayesian networks to combine the relevant patient-specific and molecular data with depended probabilities derived from pertinent studies and clinical guidelines to calculate treatment decisions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In a validation analysis, the model can provide guidance within the growing subject of immunotherapy in HNSCC and, based on its ability to calculate reliable probabilities, facilitates estimation of suitable therapy options. We compared actual treatment decisions of 25 patients with the calculated recommendations of our model and found significant concordance (Cohen’s κ = 0.505, p = 0.009) and 84% accuracy.