The thesis deals with the Equitable division of real estate property - estates with a residential object, the objective of the thesis is to assess the possibility of equitable division of property - estates with a residential building as a solution of the settlement of ownership of property among the co-owners. A part of the thesis is a proposal for solving an equitable division of a residential building. The thesis consists of two parts: the first part summarizes theoretical background of equitable division of property - estate with a residential building. The second, practical part deals with the proposal for equitable division of property, estates and a residential building, including a proposal for necessary construction alterations and assessment of estate prices and construction of residential building before and after the division, a part of the thesis is also the design of ownership and financial settlement of property between co-owners with regard to size of their shares.

The aim of this master thesis is assessing the possibility of a real division of the office building in Brno as a solution of the settlement of ownership of property among the co-owners. Firstly, in the theoretical part of the study, important terms which are related to the topic are summarised, and also possibilities of settlement of co-ownership, assumptions of the real estate division and approach of valuation are handled. Secondly, in the practical part of the thesis, the description of the office building and assessment of possibility of real division in all aspects are provided. Moreover, the valuation of the office building before the division is discussed, as well as quantification of the height of costs for real division and valuation of newly established immovable properties after the division based on proprietary proportions. The study is finished with the suggestion of settlement according to the amount of proprietary proportions.

The right of ownership of a unit and the possibilities of its transfer after recodification This thesis deals with the right of ownership of a unit by the act No. 89/2012 Coll. (the civil code) with emphasis on the possibilities of its transfer. I chose the topic because of great practical importance of the issue and many changes brought by recodification of the civil law. This thesis is based on comparative method - the previous legislation by the act No. 40/1964 Coll. (the civil code) and by the act No. 72/1994 Coll. (about ownership of flats) is compared with current legislation. The main aim of the thesis is to clearly describe the most significant changes in the rules of ownership of a unit and its transfer and to point out the benefit of the new regulation as well as its weaknesses and eventual practical problems. This thesis is composed of eight separate chapters, each of them includes several subsections. First chapter contains an introduction to the issue of the ownership of flats and a brief description of the historical development of ownership of flats in the Czech Republic. Chapter two describes the basic concept of ownership of flats by the repealed legislation, followed by chapter three describing the same basic concept by the new legislation and highlighting the most important...

The reason why I chose this topic for my master's degree thesis is its currency, which results from the recodification of the Czech civil law. The topic is also interesting and useful. I also live in two Flat Owners Associations (FOA), so it may have influenced my option. The aim of the thesis is to describe and explain the basic institutes of FOA. I put some emphasis on its bodies, while trying not to avoid the interpretative disputable areas. I will be grateful if this thesis helps some FOAs in their everyday problems. The thesis is divided into twelve chapters. After the introductory, theoretical and historical chapters, there follows the fourth chapter, which deals with the two fundamental terms - the administration of the house and the common parts of the realty. The fifth chapter describes FOA as an artificial legal person. It also deals with the founding and establishment of FOA. The next chapter focuses on the articles - the very important instrument for FOA's operation and management. The seventh chapter characterizes the rights and duties of the owners of the flats. The bodies of FOA and the judicial intervention into its decision-making process are analyzed in chapters eight and nine. The task of the tenth chapter is to describe the special form of (the) decision-making of the owners of...

Thesis abstrakt Legal institute of settlement The aim of the thesis is to characterize the legal institute of settlement from a general viewpoint, as well as to describe the most common situations where the institute of settlement is applied according to Civil Code. The thesis is composed of five chapters. The chapter One is introductory and characterizes the settlement as a process, in which the existing relations between subjects are liquidated while new ones are formed concurrently. The following chapter is divided into four subchapters relating to the settlement of common property. The first of them explains what the co-ownership means in Civil law. Then the both ways of termination and settlement of common property are described, i.e. the termination of a settlement of common property by an agreement of co-owners and by a decision of court. The last subchapter is devoted to legal regulations of co-ownership in new Civil Code which is expected to be passed. The chapter Three is focused on the settlement of community property. The property relations between spouses are mostly necessarily settled when the marriage has terminated by death or by dissolution of marriage. In two specific cases the community property terminates and must be settled, although the marriage still exists. It occurs in case of...

Le choix de l’immeuble au sein duquel s’exercera l’activité économique conditionne son attractivité, laquelle est déterminante pour la réussite du projet entrepreneurial du commerçant. Au-delà des critères inhérents à l’emplacement et aux caractéristiques physiques du local, le commerçant doit être suffisamment avisé quant au statut applicable à l’entier immeuble. Ce dernier, dès lors qu’il se trouve régi par le statut de la copropriété, va directement impacter les prérogatives de l’exploitant. En ce sens, l’exercice d’une activité commerciale en copropriété immobilière souffre, d’une part, de restrictions issues des documents contractuels inhérents à l’immeuble. Ces obstacles à l’exercice d’une activité commerciale au sein de l’immeuble collectif, bien qu’apparents, n’en sont pas moins complexes. L’exploitation commerciale rencontre, d’autre part, des obstacles issus d’exigences légales, règlementaires, mais également prétoriennes, dont la prévisibilité se révèle difficile, voire impossible, en raison de leur diversité. Partant, malgré la valeur constitutionnelle octroyée à la liberté du commerce et de l’industrie, ce principe n’en est pas moins restreint dès lors que le siège de l’activité se situe au sein d’un immeuble soumis au statut de la copropriété. Les difficultés rencontrées par l’exploitant démontrent la nécessité d’engager une démarche globale, de mener une réflexion juridique désectorisée pour aboutir à un équilibre entre plusieurs domaines impératifs du droit. La maîtrise des différentes branches du droit applicable à l’immeuble s’avère dès lors fondamentale dans le cadre d’un processus d’unité et d’harmonisation / The choice of the building in which the economic activity will take place shapes its attractiveness, which is essential for the merchant’s entrepreneurial project success. Beyond the inherent criteria associated to the location and to the premises’ physical features, the merchant must be enough provided with information on the status which is applicable to the entire building. From the moment it is governed by the co-ownership status, the latter will directly affect the merchant’s right. That is to say, on the one hand, the practice of a commercial activity within a building co-ownership suffers from restrictions coming from the contractual documents which are linked to the building. These barriers which stop the merchant to properly practice his activity within the collective building, although obvious, are quite sensitive. Moreover, commercial exploitation meets obstacles arising from legal, regulatory, but also praetorian requirements, some happenings which are quite impossible to anticipate because of their diversity. Thus, despite the constitutional value granted to the freedom of trade and industry, this principle is restricted since the head office of the activity is located in a building which is subject to the co-ownership status. The difficulties that the merchant meets demonstrate the need to take a global approach and to lead a legal reflection so that a balance between several priorities areas of law can be reached. The mastery of the different branches of the law which are applicable to the building is therefore a fundamental need in the context of unity process and harmonization

La propriété privée est souvent assimilée à la seule propriété individuelle. Pourtant, le droit positif connaît de nombreuses institutions permettant d'assurer une appropriation en commun, qu'il y ait ou non personne morale (indivision, communauté entre époux, sociétés, copropriétés spéciales, cotitularité, etc.). L'objet de la thèse est de faire apparaître la propriété commune en tant que catégorie autonome, comprenant toutes les institutions juridiques organisant une concurrence de droits analogues sur une même chose. La situation de concurrence entre propriétaires engendre nécessairement ses propres problématiques. Il faut par exemple définir un statut pour les biens communs ou répartir les prérogatives juridiques et économiques dévolues à chacun. Par exemple, que deviennent les fruits des biens communs ? Qui peut disposer de ces biens ? Ces problèmes apparaissent dans toutes les formes : ils créent un« besoin de droit » que le régime de chaque institution essaye de combler. C'est donc ce fonds commun de problèmes qui fait l'unité de la catégorie. L'identité des problèmes n'entraîne pas l'identité des solutions. On n'organise pas de la même manière des biens communs entre époux, la cour d'un immeuble ou les ressources d'une entreprise. Les profondes différences de régime entre les institutions ne sont cependant pas arbitraires. Elles peuvent s'expliquer notamment par le nombre de propriétaires, la nature sociologique de leurs relations et le but qu'ils poursuivent. Cette rationalité sous-jacente aux règles révèle la propriété commune comme un "pluralisme ordonné", permettant de proposer des analogies ou des régimes communs. / Private property is often reduced simply to individual property. However, every legal system also recognizes several institutions that organize co-ownership, sometimes through a legaJ person (e.g., joint tenancy, community property, condominiums, companies, joint and several obligation, etc.). This dissertation recognizes and studies co-ownership as ageneral legal category, as each institution provides concurrent property rights over a particular object. Concurrence is in the core of co-ownership while also constituting ils main problem. Co-ownership must be organized by a set of rules defining powers and duties, delineating how common income should be distributed, who bas the authority to make decisions, etc. This need for organization is the common tliread between ail co-ownership institutions. However, white this legal framework is mandatory, it can be provided for in various ways. We don't organize, say, marital community property in the same way as a condominium or the common assets of a company are organired. But these differences are not arbitrary. They can be explained by a certain set of parameters: the number of owners, the natun of their sociological links, and the aim they are jointly pursuing. This underlying rationality reveals co-ownership as an "ordered pluralism", illuminating each institution and allowing for some analogies to be drawn between them.

Shrnutí v anglickém jazyce: The aim of this thesis is to describe and analyse legal regulation of the association of unit owners and the related practical issues using the comparison of the antecedent effective legal regulation and the current effective legal regulation, to define the deficiencies of the current legal regulation and to propose possible solution. The thesis is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter is introductory and consists of short historical overview and definition of this thesis aim as well. The second chapter describes the legislation which governs the legal regulation of the association of unit owners and devotes to the transitional provisions of the Civil Code and application of the provisions on associations with the necessary modifications. The third chapter focuses on the association of unit owners as legal person, including its formation, incorporation, dissolution and termination. The fourth chapter deals with the articles of the association of unit owners, the primary document of the association of unit owners, the process of its acceptance and change. The fifth chapter pursues the bodies of the association of unit owners - the assembly as the supreme body of the association of unit owners, including the court review of its decision, the governing body and other...

1 ÚVOD ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1 BYTOVÉ SPOLUVLASTNICTVÍ .............................................................................................. 3 1 BYTOVÉ SPOLUVLASTNICTVÍ .............................................................................................. 3 1.1 STRUČNÝ NÁHLED DO VÝVOJE BYTOVÉHO SPOLUVLASTNICTVÍ ........................................ 3 1.2 SOUČASNÁ KONCEPCE BYTOVÉHO SPOLUVLASTNICTVÍ ...................................................... 5 1.3 KLÍČOVÉ POJMY BYTOVÉHO SPOLUVLASTNICTVÍ A JEJICH VYMEZENÍ .............................. 8 1.3.1 Jednotka.............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3.2 Byt, nebytový prostor, dům .............................................................................................. 9 1.3.3 Společné části .................................................................................................................. 10 1.4 VZNIK JEDNOTKY .................................................................................................................. 13 1.4.1...

Residential co-ownership - common areas Abstract The diploma thesis deals with the legal regulation of residential co-ownership contained in the Civil Code, with an emphasis on the common areas of an immovable thing. The aim of the thesis was to focus and discuss some issues of residential co-ownership, which are not completely clarified and cause interpretation difficulties. As the institute of residential co-ownership is relatively new and constantly evolving, there is indeed a wide range of topics that could be discussed. Therefore, due to the breadth of the topic, the thesis focuses on issues related to common areas. The subject of the thesis is also to shed some light on important changes adopted by the Act No. 163/2020 Coll. The diploma thesis itself is divided into five chapters. The first chapter offers a historical development of the institute of residential co-ownership together with an introduction to general theoretical concepts on which residential co-ownership may be based. The second chapter then describes the institute of residential co-ownership in the Civil Code in general, but above all it defines the basic legal concepts on which the regulation of residential co-ownership is based. In particular, it is a matter of defining the unit and the method of its creation, although this is limited...