Thèse--Droit--Lausanne, 1976. / Bibliogr. p. 172-189.

Thesis (D. Min.)--Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1992. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 234-238).

Thesis (M.Arch.)--University of Hong Kong, 1997. / Special report study entitled : Adaptability in convention and exhibition center. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print.

Thesis (B.A.)--Haverford College, Dept. of Philosophy, 2005. / Title, author from bound volume of Senior essays, Dept. of Philosophy. Includes bibliographical references.

Texte remanié de: Diss. (PhD)--Yale University. / Bibliogr. p. 229-236. Index.

Yes / The GENOVATE Convention took place at the Bradford University on 6th-8th March. During this Convention, the GENOVATE project was publicly presented to the Bradford University's academic staff and stakeholders and, for the first time, partners had the opportunity to meet personally and discuss in detail the Work Packages (WPs) they are each responsible for. The present report is aimed at briefly presenting the main topics and most relevant aspects that emerged during the three day meeting. The report is organized as follows: in Section 1 and 2 a brief overview is provided of the presentations at the GENOVATE Launch and at the International Women's Day Round Table. Section 3 reports on the International Advisory Board meeting; Section 4 describes the Change Academy Model presented on the second day of the Convention, while Section 5 is devoted to the consortium Leads' sessions. Finally, Section 6 reports on the Evaluation Workshop led by the Evaluation Team of UCM. / FP7

Trois pays d’Amérique latine – la Bolivie, l’Équateur et le Venezuela – ont dénoncé la Convention pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements entre États et ressortissants d’autres États. Cette « vague » de dénonciations témoigne d’un rejet du système d’arbitrage, créé par la Convention de Washington, considéré comme déséquilibré, antidémocratique, onéreux et discriminatoire. Aux yeux de l’Amérique latine, l’arbitrage CIRDI serait conçu pour bénéficier exclusivement aux investisseurs au détriment des États hôtes des investissements. Dans ce travail de recherche, l’approche de l’Amérique latine relative à la Convention de Washington sera présentée en deux étapes. D’abord, les évolutions liées au cadre économique et juridique latino-américain, des prémices de la Convention en 1964, jusqu’á son adoption définitive dans les années 90, seront analysées. Puis seront abordées les principales critiques émises actuellement contre le système d’arbitrage CIRDI. Quels sont les facteurs déterminants du changement dans les politiques en matière d’investissements étrangers en Amérique latine ? Les pays, qui ont dénoncé la Convention de Washington, ont-ils des raisons suffisamment valables de rejeter l’arbitrage transnational en matière d’investissements ? Le CIRDI a-t-il failli dans l’accomplissement de ses fonctions ? Ce travail de recherche vise à répondre à ces questions en analysant la Convention de Washington sous un angle latino-américain. / Three countries in Latin America - Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela - have denounced the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States. This "wave" of denunciations reflects a negative perception of the arbitration system created by the ICSID Convention, which is described as unbalanced, undemocratic, expensive and discriminatory. In Latin America’s view, ICSID arbitration was created to benefit only to investors at the expense of investments’ host states. This research focuses on the Latin America’s approach on the Washington Convention addressing it in two stages. First, the Latin American economic and legal framework in the early discussions on the draft of the Convention in 1964 and its subsequent adoption in the 1990s will be addressed. Secondly, the subjects that currently arouse the main criticisms to the ICSID arbitration system will be detailed. What are the reasons of change in foreign investment policies in Latin America? Do the countries that denounced the Washington Convention have acceptable reasons for rejecting investments’ transnational arbitration? Did ICSID failed in the performance of its duties? This research aims to answer these questions by analyzing the Washington Convention from the Latin American perspective.

Dissertation--Rechtswissenschaftliche Fakultät--Universität Freiburg Schweiz, 2005. / IZPR = internationales Zivilprozessrecht. Bibliogr. p. XVII- XXX.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oklahoma, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (D. Ed. Min.)--Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 125-128).