Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1938. / Typescript. Includes abstract and vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 129-132).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 436-454). Abstract also available via World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 436-454). Also available on microfiche. Abstract also available via World Wide Web.

Thesis (M.A.)--Montana State University--Bozeman, 2005. / Typescript. Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Kirk Branch. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 82-84).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Brown University, 2005. / Vita. Thesis advisor: Summer B. Twiss. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 184-203). Also available online.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 2006. / "May, 2006." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-126). Online version available on the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Villanova University, 2006. / Philosophy Dept. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / The first aim of this dissertation is to trace the historical development of the concern of philosophers for Political Economy. The second aim is to explore the writings of four thinkers with differing philosophical and theological perspectives whose writings have illuminated the relationship of the economic order to the moral ideal: Maritain (neo-Thomist),Brunner (nee-orthodox), Dewey (naturalist), and Temple (Christian realist). What relationships can be discerned in their thinking about economic values? (1) There seems to be no particular correlation between the metaphysical position of these philosophers and their specific suggestions concerning economic values. (2) Differing views of reason, however, do seem to affect their suggestions about economic values. Brunner finds reason corrupted by sin, and therefore distrusts all human orders. Dewey trusts only scientific reasoning in the ordering of human values. Maritain and Temple have great confidence that the economic order can be vastly improved by the organization of values in accordance with a more comprehensive reason. [TRUNCATED]

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-03T11:52:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014-08-14Bitstream added on 2015-03-03T12:07:15Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000809374.pdf: 2425247 bytes, checksum: 856f717d42ca2d3d3d63410f271849a8 (MD5) / O movimento de revisão da teoria aristotélica desencadeado no século XX afastou Aristóteles de interpretações teológicas até então hegemônicas, permitindoo surgimento de investigações que relacionam a sua filosofia com as ideias de pensadores que o sucederam, como é o caso de John Dewey. Considerando que esse tema ainda requer aprofundamentos, em especial quanto às bases psicológicas que sustentam os dois filósofos, o presente trabalho focaliza o conceito de homem e de desenvolvimento humano nos discursos de Aristóteles e Dewey. Esta investigação utiliza a análise retórica oriunda de Chaïm Perelman, buscando compreender as estratégias argumentativas utilizadas pelos dois autores (definidos como oradores) para persuadir seus leitores (definidos como auditório).Foram examinados os escritos da maturidade de Aristóteles e vários textos de Dewey, a maioria deles elaborados durante o período em que o autor trabalhou em Chicago e Columbia. Os resultados da pesquisa estão organizados em quatro capítulos, sendo o primeiro deles referente às definições aristotélica e deweyana de ser humano; a análise utiliza o conceito de dissociação de noções. O segundo capítulo discorre sobre o processo de formação e desenvolvimento do homem, utilizando para isso a conceituação de metáfora. O terceiro discute o contexto propício à formação e ao desenvolvimento humano, recorrendo à noção de filosofia prática. O último capítulo apresenta a linguagem e os acordos linguísticos como fatores causais da definição de homem e da promoção do desenvolvimento humano. Todos os capítulos discutem a relação entre discurso e auditório em cada um dos filósofos. A conclusão defende que as semelhanças entre Aristóteles e Dewey são mais significativas do que as suas diferenças, especialmente porque ambos adotam concepções contrárias ao transcendentalismo, o que fica evidente em suas teorizações sobre a linguagem ... / The movement to reviewthe Aristotelian theory unleashed in the 20th centurydeviated Aristotle from theological interpretations hitherto hegemonic, allowing the emergenceof investigations that relate his philosophy to the ideas of thinkers who emerged after him, such as John Dewey.Considering that this subject still requires deepening, especially regardingthepsychological foundations that underlie the two philosophers, this paper focuses on the concept of man and human development in the speeches of Aristotle and Dewey. This research uses the rhetorical analysis from ChaïmPerelman, seekingto understand the argumentative strategies used by the two authors (defined as speakers) to persuade their readers (defined asauditorium).Writings of Aristotle’smaturity and several texts from Dewey were examined, most of them developed during the period in which the author worked in Chicago and Columbia. The results from this investigation are organized into four chapters, the first one referring to the Aristotelian and Deweyan definitions of being human; the analysis uses the concept of dissociation of notions. The second chapter talks aboutthe process of formation and development of man, using the conceptof metaphorin order to do it.The third chapter discusses the appropriate context to the human development and formation, usingthe concept of practical philosophy. The final chapter presents the language and linguistic arrangements as causesofthe definition of man and promotion of human development. All chapters discuss the relationship between speech and audience in each of the philosophers.Theconclusion argues that the similarities between Aristotle and Dewey are more meaningful than their differences, especially because both adopt ideas contrary to the transcendentalism, which is clearin their theorizationsabout language. Finally, the paperdiscusses the relevance of this conclusion for the field of education ...

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Artes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arte, 2016. / Submitted by Fernanda Percia França (fernandafranca@bce.unb.br) on 2016-09-08T19:03:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_LeandroGuilhermeOliveiradeMenezes.pdf: 1627337 bytes, checksum: c89b7e24221851631d3c392664355304 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Raquel Viana(raquelviana@bce.unb.br) on 2016-11-03T13:18:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_LeandroGuilhermeOliveiradeMenezes.pdf: 1627337 bytes, checksum: c89b7e24221851631d3c392664355304 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-03T13:18:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_LeandroGuilhermeOliveiradeMenezes.pdf: 1627337 bytes, checksum: c89b7e24221851631d3c392664355304 (MD5) / O presente trabalho é fruto de uma reflexão a partir das limitações e possibilidades dos educadores de Artes que compõem o quadro de professores do Distrito Federal na Regional da Samambaia de Ensino. São ainda propostas construções e definições para a experiência, saberes, formação do docente para justamente, adentrar o discurso de educadores que trazem à discussão as experiências e contribuições ao longo de suas carreiras. Esse estudo traz luz a um quadro sintomático de comportamentos, trajetórias semelhantes, possibilitando a formação de um perfil de um educador nesta regional. Para se chegar a essas questões, o estudo aborda o sujeito que sofre a experiência num diálogo entre Jorge Larossa e John Dewey, desencadeado em tipos de experiência num processo de remoldagem do ser humano, ou seja, a partir de suas experiências anteriores, questionar-se e transbordar-se em novos terrenos de experiência. Ao falar desse processo de construção com o meio gerando conhecimento, é apresentada a construção de um saber a partir de Maurice Tardiff e seu processo de formação do saber docente. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT / This work is the result of reflection from the limitations and possibilities of Arts educators who make up the teaching staff of the Federal District in the Regional Education Fern. It is also proposed constructions and definitions for the experience, knowledge, teacher's training to precisely enter the discourse of educators who bring to the discussion the experiences and contributions throughout their careers. This study brings light to a symptomatic picture of behaviors, similar trajectories, allowing the formation of a profile of an educator in this regional. To get to these questions, the study addresses the subject who suffers experience a dialogue between Jorge Larossa and John Dewey, triggered in types of experience in refolding process of human beings, that is, from their previous experiences, pose questions up and overflow into new land experience. When speaking of that building process with the means generating knowledge, the construction of knowledge from Maurice Tardiff and its formation process of teaching knowledge is presented.