This study was designed to analyze the effects of nicotine on yawning behavior and neurotrophin content in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of D2-receptor primed female adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were neonatally treated with quinpirole, a dopamine (DA) D2/D3 agonist, from postnatal day 1-21 (P1-21) and raised to P60 and administered nicotine tartarate (0.3 mg/kg free base) or saline twice daily for 14 days. One day after nicotine treatment had ceased, the number of yawns was recorded for 1 h in response to an acute injection of quinpirole (i.p., 100 microg/kg). Yawning is a D2-receptor mediated event. D2-primed rats demonstrated a significant increase in yawning in response to acute quinpirole compared with that of controls, but nicotine did not alleviate this effect. Neonatal quinpirole treatment produced a significant decrease of nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hippocampus that was alleviated by adulthood nicotine treatment. Interestingly, nicotine treatment to controls produced a significant increase of NGF in the frontal cortex, but a significant decrease of both NGF and BDNF in the hippocampus and BDNF in the frontal cortex. The decreases shown in NGF and BDNF is contrary to past findings that have shown nicotine to produce significant increases of hippocampal NGF and BDNF, but these past studies utilized male rats or mice or were performed in vitro. This study shows that nicotine has complex interactions with NGF and BDNF in D2-primed and control animals, and emphasizes the importance of gender differences when analyzing nicotine's effects on neurotrophins.

RATIONALE: Increases in dopamine D2-like receptor function are common in several psychological disorders that demonstrate a four to five fold increase in nicotine abuse compared to the general population.OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the interaction of sex differences and sensitization to nicotine in rats D2 receptor primed as neonates.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 male and 32 female Sprague-Dawley rats derived from eight litters were ontogenetically treated with quinpirole (1 mg/kg) or saline from postnatal days (P) 1-21 and raised to adulthood. At P60, all animals were given an acute injection of quinpirole HCl (100 microg/kg) and yawns were counted for 1 h. Yawning has been shown to be a behavioral event mediated by D2-like receptors. Beginning on P61-65, animals were habituated to a locomotor arena and subsequently administered either nicotine (0.5 mg/kg free base) or saline (intraperitoneal) every second day for 3 weeks. Approximately 15 min after each injection, animals were placed into the arena and horizontal activity and vertical rears were recorded.RESULTS: A robust increase of yawning was observed at P60 in D2 primed as compared to saline controls. Priming of D2-like receptors increased the locomotor response to nicotine in horizontal activity in both males and females, but females demonstrated a more robust hypoactive locomotor response to initial nicotine treatment when compared to saline-treated females. Nicotine also produced a significant decrease of vertical rearing in both males and females.CONCLUSIONS: It appears that D2 receptor priming enhances sensitization to nicotine in adult rats, and females may be more behaviorally sensitive to nicotine than males.

No description available.

A filamina A (FLNA) é uma proteína de citoesqueleto com diversas funções, dentre as quais estão motilidade celular e ancoragem de receptores de membrana. A alteração de sua expressão foi anteriormente descrita em diversos tipos de neoplasia. Em tumores hipofisários, demonstrou-se que sua expressão se correlacionou à expressão de receptores de dopamina tipo 2 (DRD2) em prolactinomas, e com a sinalização intracelular do receptor de somatostatina tipo 2 (SSTR2) após ativação por agonista, em somatotropinomas. Neste estudo, avalariam-se a expressão da FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 em diversos tumores hipofisários: prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas e adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF). Avaliou-se também a correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e resposta aos tratamentos medicamentosos, com agonista dopaminérgico (AD) ou com ligantes do receptor de somatostatina (LRS), e entre FLNA e as características de invasividade e/ou agressividade tumorais. Houve correlação entre a expressão de FLNA e a expressão de DRD2 e, entre FLNA e a resposta ao AD, nos ACNFs. Nos corticotropinomas, houve correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e critérios de invasividade tumoral. Portanto, o papel da FLNA nos tumores hipofisários pode depender do tipo celular implicado. Além disso, o envolvimento da FLNA nos mecanismos de resistência aos medicamentos utilizados nos tumores hipofisários, AD ou LRS, não deve estar relacionado apenas à sua ação na ancoragem e reciclagem dos receptores DRD2 e SSTRs, mas também à sua ação na motilidade celular, propiciando caratecterísticas de invasividade / Filamin A (FLNA) is a cytoskeletal protein with a variety of functions, including cell motility and membrane receptor anchorage. Changes in FLNA expression has already been described in several types of neoplasia. In pituitary tumors, its expression has been shown to correlate with the expression of dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) in prolactinomas and with intracellular somatostatin type 2 receptor (SSTR2) signaling after agonist activation in somatotropinomas. The expression of FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 and SSTR5 in different pituitary tumors: prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas, corticotrophinomas and clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (CNFA) were evaluated. We also correlate FLNA expression to sensibility to drug treatments with dopamin agonists (DA) or somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL), and to tumor invasiveness and/or aggressiveness. Positive correlation between FLNA expression and DRD2 expression and between FLNA and DA response were found in CNFA. In corticotrophinomas, there was correlation between FLNA expression and tumor invasiveness. Therefore, the role of FLNA in pituitary tumors seems to depend on the cell type involved. Additionally, FLNA involvement in the mechanisms of drug (DA or SRL) resistance in pituitary tumors could not be related only to its action in the anchoring and recycling of DRD2 and SSTR receptors, but also to its action on cellular motility and invasiveness

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2005. / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.

A filamina A (FLNA) é uma proteína de citoesqueleto com diversas funções, dentre as quais estão motilidade celular e ancoragem de receptores de membrana. A alteração de sua expressão foi anteriormente descrita em diversos tipos de neoplasia. Em tumores hipofisários, demonstrou-se que sua expressão se correlacionou à expressão de receptores de dopamina tipo 2 (DRD2) em prolactinomas, e com a sinalização intracelular do receptor de somatostatina tipo 2 (SSTR2) após ativação por agonista, em somatotropinomas. Neste estudo, avalariam-se a expressão da FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 em diversos tumores hipofisários: prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas e adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF). Avaliou-se também a correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e resposta aos tratamentos medicamentosos, com agonista dopaminérgico (AD) ou com ligantes do receptor de somatostatina (LRS), e entre FLNA e as características de invasividade e/ou agressividade tumorais. Houve correlação entre a expressão de FLNA e a expressão de DRD2 e, entre FLNA e a resposta ao AD, nos ACNFs. Nos corticotropinomas, houve correlação entre a expressão da FLNA e critérios de invasividade tumoral. Portanto, o papel da FLNA nos tumores hipofisários pode depender do tipo celular implicado. Além disso, o envolvimento da FLNA nos mecanismos de resistência aos medicamentos utilizados nos tumores hipofisários, AD ou LRS, não deve estar relacionado apenas à sua ação na ancoragem e reciclagem dos receptores DRD2 e SSTRs, mas também à sua ação na motilidade celular, propiciando caratecterísticas de invasividade / Filamin A (FLNA) is a cytoskeletal protein with a variety of functions, including cell motility and membrane receptor anchorage. Changes in FLNA expression has already been described in several types of neoplasia. In pituitary tumors, its expression has been shown to correlate with the expression of dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) in prolactinomas and with intracellular somatostatin type 2 receptor (SSTR2) signaling after agonist activation in somatotropinomas. The expression of FLNA, DRD2, SSTR2 and SSTR5 in different pituitary tumors: prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas, corticotrophinomas and clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (CNFA) were evaluated. We also correlate FLNA expression to sensibility to drug treatments with dopamin agonists (DA) or somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL), and to tumor invasiveness and/or aggressiveness. Positive correlation between FLNA expression and DRD2 expression and between FLNA and DA response were found in CNFA. In corticotrophinomas, there was correlation between FLNA expression and tumor invasiveness. Therefore, the role of FLNA in pituitary tumors seems to depend on the cell type involved. Additionally, FLNA involvement in the mechanisms of drug (DA or SRL) resistance in pituitary tumors could not be related only to its action in the anchoring and recycling of DRD2 and SSTR receptors, but also to its action on cellular motility and invasiveness

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a partial D₂-like dopamine agonist (i.e. terguride) would block the induction or expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in pre-weanling rats. The ability of terguride to induce behavioral sensitization was also examined, as partial D₂-like agonists have agonistic actions in cases of low dopaminergic tone.

Os adenomas hipofisários podem ser tratados clinicamente com agonistas dopaminérgicos (AD) e/ou ligantes dos receptores de somatostatina (LRS). Alguns estudos apontam para o papel de polimorfismos dos genes DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 na eficácia desses tratamentos clínicos. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o papel dos polimorfismos no gene DRD2 em pacientes com prolactinomas (n=118), corticotrofinomas (n=15), adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF) (n=35) e somatotrofinomas (n=40), bem como de polimorfismos nos genes SSTR2 e SSTR5 em pacientes com somatotrofinomas (n=88), na resposta ao tratamento clínico com AD e LRS. Adicionalmente, comparar a frequência desses polimorfismos em pacientes portadores de adenomas hipofisários, de diferentes naturezas, a indivíduos saudáveis. Os polimorfismos foram genotipados por PCR em tempo real (sistema TaqMan) e seqüenciamento automático (método Sanger). Todos os genótipos estavam em equilíbrio de Hardy-Weinberg. Em nosso estudo, não houve correlação entre os polimorfismos de DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 e a resposta ao tratamento clínico, com cabergolina (CAB) e/ou octreotida-LAR (OCT-LAR) respectivamente, em pacientes com prolactinomas, somatotrofinomas e corticotrofinomas. Nossos dados estão de acordo com estudos prévios em acromegálicos, no entanto não confirmaram associação de polimorfismo de DRD2 (rs6275) com resistência à CAB, anteriormente descrita em prolactinomas. Adicionalmente, os polimorfismos rs1800497 (alelo T) e rs1076560 (alelo A) de DRD2 foram correlacionados a macroadenomas, este último fator preditivo de resistência à CAB em prolactinomas. Quanto aos ACNF, nossos dados são inéditos e o polimorfismo rs6275 (alelo T) de DRD2 se correlacionou à progressão tumoral nos casos tratados com CAB. Comparando os adenomas hipofisários com indivíduos saudáveis, a presença do alelo raro A de rs1079597 de DRD2 foi inversamente associada à frequência de ACNF, enquanto que nos outros tipos tumorais não houve diferença. Em conclusão, os polimorfismos rs1079597 e rs6275 de DRD2 podem estar associados à tumorigênese e à resposta a CAB, no grupo ACNF respectivamente. Outros estudos ainda são necessários para definir o papel das variantes genéticas desses genes como um mecanismo envolvido na resistência aos AD e LRS e na tumorigênese hipofisária / Medical treatment of pituitary adenomas is mainly performed with dopamine agonist (DA) and/or somatostatin ligant receptor (SLR) drugs. In addition to dopamine receptor 2 (DRD2) and somatostatin receptors 2 and 5 (SSTR2 and SSTR5) tumor density, results of some studies pointed to the role of polymorphisms in the efficacy of clinical treatment. One of the goals of this study was to evaluate the association between DRD2 polymorphisms in patients with prolactinomas (n=118), corticotrophinomas (n=15), clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (CNFPA) (n=35) and somatotrophinoma (n=101) and polymorphisms in STTR2 and SSTR5, only in the last group; and response to treatment with DA and/or SLR. Another objective was to evaluate the frequency of polymorphisms in patients with different types of pituitary adenomas and compare them to healthy subjects. Polymorphisms were genotyped by real-time PCR (TaqMan system) and Sanger sequencing. All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In patients with prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas and corticotrophinomas there was no association between genetic variants in DRD2 and response to treatment, like data in literature. However, an association between rs6275 (allele T) in DRD2 and CAB resistance in prolactinomas has been proposed. In addition, there was an association betweenrs1800497 (allele T) and rs1076560 (alelle A) in DRD2 and macroprolactinomas, this one predictive factor related to CAB resistance. The presence of rs6275 (allele T) in DRD2 was correlated with tumoral progression in CNFPA treated with CAB, never published previously. Comparing pituitary adenomas and health subjects, the presence of rs1079597 (allele A) was inversely associated with the frequency of CNFPA, otherwise there was no association for others pituitary adenomas. In conclusion, rs1079597 and rs6275 DRD2 polymorphisms might have an influence in tumorigenesis and CAB efficacy in patients with CNFPA, respectively. However, the results in the literature are conflicting and more studies are necessary to determine the role of these genetic variants like a mechanism involving in dopamine and somatostatin resistance and pituitary tumorigenesis

Os adenomas hipofisários podem ser tratados clinicamente com agonistas dopaminérgicos (AD) e/ou ligantes dos receptores de somatostatina (LRS). Alguns estudos apontam para o papel de polimorfismos dos genes DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 na eficácia desses tratamentos clínicos. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o papel dos polimorfismos no gene DRD2 em pacientes com prolactinomas (n=118), corticotrofinomas (n=15), adenomas clinicamente não funcionantes (ACNF) (n=35) e somatotrofinomas (n=40), bem como de polimorfismos nos genes SSTR2 e SSTR5 em pacientes com somatotrofinomas (n=88), na resposta ao tratamento clínico com AD e LRS. Adicionalmente, comparar a frequência desses polimorfismos em pacientes portadores de adenomas hipofisários, de diferentes naturezas, a indivíduos saudáveis. Os polimorfismos foram genotipados por PCR em tempo real (sistema TaqMan) e seqüenciamento automático (método Sanger). Todos os genótipos estavam em equilíbrio de Hardy-Weinberg. Em nosso estudo, não houve correlação entre os polimorfismos de DRD2, SSTR2 e SSTR5 e a resposta ao tratamento clínico, com cabergolina (CAB) e/ou octreotida-LAR (OCT-LAR) respectivamente, em pacientes com prolactinomas, somatotrofinomas e corticotrofinomas. Nossos dados estão de acordo com estudos prévios em acromegálicos, no entanto não confirmaram associação de polimorfismo de DRD2 (rs6275) com resistência à CAB, anteriormente descrita em prolactinomas. Adicionalmente, os polimorfismos rs1800497 (alelo T) e rs1076560 (alelo A) de DRD2 foram correlacionados a macroadenomas, este último fator preditivo de resistência à CAB em prolactinomas. Quanto aos ACNF, nossos dados são inéditos e o polimorfismo rs6275 (alelo T) de DRD2 se correlacionou à progressão tumoral nos casos tratados com CAB. Comparando os adenomas hipofisários com indivíduos saudáveis, a presença do alelo raro A de rs1079597 de DRD2 foi inversamente associada à frequência de ACNF, enquanto que nos outros tipos tumorais não houve diferença. Em conclusão, os polimorfismos rs1079597 e rs6275 de DRD2 podem estar associados à tumorigênese e à resposta a CAB, no grupo ACNF respectivamente. Outros estudos ainda são necessários para definir o papel das variantes genéticas desses genes como um mecanismo envolvido na resistência aos AD e LRS e na tumorigênese hipofisária / Medical treatment of pituitary adenomas is mainly performed with dopamine agonist (DA) and/or somatostatin ligant receptor (SLR) drugs. In addition to dopamine receptor 2 (DRD2) and somatostatin receptors 2 and 5 (SSTR2 and SSTR5) tumor density, results of some studies pointed to the role of polymorphisms in the efficacy of clinical treatment. One of the goals of this study was to evaluate the association between DRD2 polymorphisms in patients with prolactinomas (n=118), corticotrophinomas (n=15), clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (CNFPA) (n=35) and somatotrophinoma (n=101) and polymorphisms in STTR2 and SSTR5, only in the last group; and response to treatment with DA and/or SLR. Another objective was to evaluate the frequency of polymorphisms in patients with different types of pituitary adenomas and compare them to healthy subjects. Polymorphisms were genotyped by real-time PCR (TaqMan system) and Sanger sequencing. All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In patients with prolactinomas, somatotrophinomas and corticotrophinomas there was no association between genetic variants in DRD2 and response to treatment, like data in literature. However, an association between rs6275 (allele T) in DRD2 and CAB resistance in prolactinomas has been proposed. In addition, there was an association betweenrs1800497 (allele T) and rs1076560 (alelle A) in DRD2 and macroprolactinomas, this one predictive factor related to CAB resistance. The presence of rs6275 (allele T) in DRD2 was correlated with tumoral progression in CNFPA treated with CAB, never published previously. Comparing pituitary adenomas and health subjects, the presence of rs1079597 (allele A) was inversely associated with the frequency of CNFPA, otherwise there was no association for others pituitary adenomas. In conclusion, rs1079597 and rs6275 DRD2 polymorphisms might have an influence in tumorigenesis and CAB efficacy in patients with CNFPA, respectively. However, the results in the literature are conflicting and more studies are necessary to determine the role of these genetic variants like a mechanism involving in dopamine and somatostatin resistance and pituitary tumorigenesis