The world of precision medicine was revolutionized by the discovery of CRISPR-Cas systems. In particular, the capabilities of the programmable nuclease Cas9 and its derivatives have unlocked a world in which applied genome engineering to cure human disease is a reality being pursued in patient clinical trials. Gene editing via the induction of programmable, site-specific double strand breaks (DSBs) has been revolutionary for the precision medicine field. However, there are many safety concerns centered on the induction of DSBs causing potential undesirable on- and off-target consequences, particularly for in vivo CRISPR applications. To circumvent these warranted concerns, many groups have attempted to repurpose recombinases or engineer new fusion systems to perform programmable genome engineering without the induction of DSBs. This dissertation will first highlight the development of recombinases for programmable DNA insertions over the course of decades, including efforts to evolve novel DNA recognition sequences, efforts to tether recombinases to programmable DNA-binding proteins, and the recent discovery of naturally occurring RNA-guided DNA transposition systems. This dissertation will then highlight the development of CRISPR-associated transposases (CASTs) as DSB-independent programmable mammalian gene editing tools capable of integrating large DNA cargos, as well as the future directions that may further enhance CAST activity in human cells. The works in this dissertation detail the initial efforts to engineer and optimize a new class of genome manipulation tools that were previously absent from the gene editing toolkit.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous lesions cells encounter, given that DSBs can lead to genomic instability and cell death if not repaired properly. Cells have two primary pathways to repair DSBs: Homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR is the high-fidelity branch of the DSB repair pathway since it employs a process of homology search and synthesis from a homologous template. The homology search is carried out by ssDNA that is generated on either side of the DSB by end resection. End resection occurs via a two-step mechanism involving resection initiation, followed by long-range resection. Previous work has revealed that long-range resection is dispensable for some cases of HR; however, it is currently unclear why the requirement for long-range resection is context- dependent. Furthermore, it is not completely clear how the mechanisms of HR, including requirements for long-range resection, apply to single-ended DSBs (seDSBs) arising during replication. Therefore, we defined the role of long-range resection in two-ended DSB repair in different chromosomal contexts. We also established a Cas9 nickase (Cas9n) system to study seDSB repair and defined genetic requirements for repair. To study the requirement for long-range resection in HR, we employed inter- and intrachromosomal genetic recombination assays in haploid yeast. We found that long-range resection is required for interchromosomal HR, but not for intrachromosomal HR. This difference is linked to the observation that the DNA damage checkpoint, which is deficient in the absence of long-range resection, is activated in interchromosomal HR, but not intrachromosomal HR. The DNA damage checkpoint has also previously been implicated in promoting chromosome mobility. Therefore, we reason that the requirement for long-range resection in interchromosomal repair is due to a need to activate the DNA damage checkpoint and chromosome mobility, specifically during slower repair events. To study seDSB repair, we implemented Cas9n, which creates nicks that can cause replication fork collapse. We demonstrated that expression of Cas9n with an efficient gRNA can induce replication fork collapse and that repair of these seDSBs breaks is dependent on the HR machinery. A genome-wide screen using Cas9n revealed a requirement for replication-coupled nucleosome assembly (RCNA) in repair of seDSBs, specifically in replication origin-deplete regions of the genome. Consistent with the model of seDSB repair, we found that Cas9n-induced seDSBs preferentially undergo sister chromatid recombination. This preference was altered in the absence of Mre11, which we hypothesize is due to a role of MRX in sister chromatid tethering. Altogether, the results presented in this thesis offer a different perspective on the role of long-range resection in two-ended DSB repair and establish a Cas9n-based system to better study single-ended DSB repair.

Le transport et la traduction localisée des ARN messagers sont observés chez plusieurs organismes et sont requis pour de multiples phénomènes tels la mémoire, la division cellulaire asymétrique et l’établissement des axes durant le développement. Staufen, une protéine liant l’ARN double-brin, a été identifié dans un premier temps chez la mouche à fruits Drosophila melanogaster. Il a été montré, chez cet organisme, que Staufen est requis pour la localisation des messagers bicoid et oskar aux pôles antérieur et postérieur de l’ovocyte, respectivement. Également, Staufen est requis afin que la répression traductionnelle du messager oskar soit levée une fois qu’il est bien localisé. Chez les mammifères, Stau1 est une protéine ubiquiste qui est présente dans des complexes prenant la forme de granules dans les dendrites des neurones. Également, Stau1 peut interagir de façon indépendante de l’ARN avec le ribosome et cofractionner tant avec la sous-unité 40S qu’avec la sous-unité 60S du ribosome dans un gradient de saccharose. L’implication de Stau1 dans un mécanisme permettant la dérépression traductionnelle de certains ARNm chez les mammifères était donc une voie d’investigation intéressante. Nous avons donc décidé de vérifier si Stau1 mammifère avait la capacité de stimuler la traduction d’un ARNm cellulaire via un mécanisme régulé. Au moment où cette thèse a été entreprise, aucun ARNm cellulaire lié par Stau1 n’avait été identifié chez les mammifères. Des structures d’ARN double-brin ont donc été employées afin de réprimer la traduction d’un ARNm rapporteur. C’est ainsi que nous avons montré que Stau1 peut stimuler la traduction d’un ARNm lorsqu’il lie celui-ci dans sa région 5’ non-traduite. Par la suite, en employant des micropuces d’ADN, nous avons identifié des messagers cellulaires dont la distribution dans les polysomes lourds est modifiée par Stau1. En effet, un groupe de messagers est enrichi dans les polysomes lourds suite à une surexpression de Stau1, ce qui suggère que Stau1 stimule la traduction de cette population d’ARNm. Afin d’identifier un mécanisme potentiel de régulation de l’activité traductionnelle de Stau1, nous nous sommes intéressés à la capacité d’auto-association de cette protéine. Nous avons montré que Stau1, tout comme plusieurs protéines liant l’ARN double-brin, est en mesure de s’associer à lui-même, et ce, d’une façon indépendante de l’ARN. Nous avons identifié les déterminants impliqués mettant ainsi au jour un nouveau mécanisme pouvant influencer les activités cellulaires de Stau1. Les résultats présentés dans cette thèse suggèrent donc que Stau1 est en mesure de stimuler la traduction d’une sous-population précise d’ARN messagers au sein de la cellule permettant ainsi de jeter un regard nouveau sur l’implication de cette protéine dans divers phénomènes au sein de l’organisme. / Transport and local translation of RNA are found in several organisms and are required for multiple phenomena such as memory, asymmetric cell division and establishment of the axis during development. Staufen, a double-stranded RNA binding protein, was first identified in Drosophila melanogaster. In the fruitfly, it was shown that Staufen is required for the proper localization of the bicoid and oskar transcripts to the anterior and posterior ends of the oocyte, respectively. It was also found that Staufen is important for the translational derepression of oskar once it is adequately localized. In mammals, Stau1 is a ubiquitous protein found in granules in the dendrites of neurons. Also, Stau1 can bind the ribosome in a RNA-independent manner and cofractionates with both ribosomal subunits in a sucrose gradient. The implication of Stau1 in a mechanism allowing translational derepression of certain RNAs in mammals was therefore an interesting path to explore. Accordingly, we decided to verify if mammalian Stau1 had the capacity to stimulate the translation of cellular RNAs through a regulated mechanism. When this thesis was initiated, no cellular RNA target of Stau1 had been identified in mammals. Therefore, double-stranded RNA structures were used to repress the translation of a reporter mRNA. With this model, we showed that Stau1 can stimulate the translation of a transcript when it is bound to its 5’ UTR. With the use of DNA microarrays, we identified cellular mRNAs which distribution in heavy polysomes was altered by Stau1. When Stau1 is overexpressed, this group of mRNAs is enriched heavy polysomes, suggesting a translational stimulation of this population by Stau1. To identify a regulatory mechanism that could influence Stau1’s translational activity, we studied the self-association capacity of this protein. We showed that Stau1, like several double-stranded RNA binding proteins, can self-associate in a RNA-independent manner. We have identified the determinants required for this interaction that as the potential to be important for the regulation of the cellular activities of Stau1. The results presented in this thesis suggest that Stau1 can stimulate the translation of a specific subset of mRNAs in the cell, letting us look at Stau1’s implication in different processes from a new point of view.

Le transport et la traduction localisée des ARN messagers sont observés chez plusieurs organismes et sont requis pour de multiples phénomènes tels la mémoire, la division cellulaire asymétrique et l’établissement des axes durant le développement. Staufen, une protéine liant l’ARN double-brin, a été identifié dans un premier temps chez la mouche à fruits Drosophila melanogaster. Il a été montré, chez cet organisme, que Staufen est requis pour la localisation des messagers bicoid et oskar aux pôles antérieur et postérieur de l’ovocyte, respectivement. Également, Staufen est requis afin que la répression traductionnelle du messager oskar soit levée une fois qu’il est bien localisé. Chez les mammifères, Stau1 est une protéine ubiquiste qui est présente dans des complexes prenant la forme de granules dans les dendrites des neurones. Également, Stau1 peut interagir de façon indépendante de l’ARN avec le ribosome et cofractionner tant avec la sous-unité 40S qu’avec la sous-unité 60S du ribosome dans un gradient de saccharose. L’implication de Stau1 dans un mécanisme permettant la dérépression traductionnelle de certains ARNm chez les mammifères était donc une voie d’investigation intéressante. Nous avons donc décidé de vérifier si Stau1 mammifère avait la capacité de stimuler la traduction d’un ARNm cellulaire via un mécanisme régulé. Au moment où cette thèse a été entreprise, aucun ARNm cellulaire lié par Stau1 n’avait été identifié chez les mammifères. Des structures d’ARN double-brin ont donc été employées afin de réprimer la traduction d’un ARNm rapporteur. C’est ainsi que nous avons montré que Stau1 peut stimuler la traduction d’un ARNm lorsqu’il lie celui-ci dans sa région 5’ non-traduite. Par la suite, en employant des micropuces d’ADN, nous avons identifié des messagers cellulaires dont la distribution dans les polysomes lourds est modifiée par Stau1. En effet, un groupe de messagers est enrichi dans les polysomes lourds suite à une surexpression de Stau1, ce qui suggère que Stau1 stimule la traduction de cette population d’ARNm. Afin d’identifier un mécanisme potentiel de régulation de l’activité traductionnelle de Stau1, nous nous sommes intéressés à la capacité d’auto-association de cette protéine. Nous avons montré que Stau1, tout comme plusieurs protéines liant l’ARN double-brin, est en mesure de s’associer à lui-même, et ce, d’une façon indépendante de l’ARN. Nous avons identifié les déterminants impliqués mettant ainsi au jour un nouveau mécanisme pouvant influencer les activités cellulaires de Stau1. Les résultats présentés dans cette thèse suggèrent donc que Stau1 est en mesure de stimuler la traduction d’une sous-population précise d’ARN messagers au sein de la cellule permettant ainsi de jeter un regard nouveau sur l’implication de cette protéine dans divers phénomènes au sein de l’organisme. / Transport and local translation of RNA are found in several organisms and are required for multiple phenomena such as memory, asymmetric cell division and establishment of the axis during development. Staufen, a double-stranded RNA binding protein, was first identified in Drosophila melanogaster. In the fruitfly, it was shown that Staufen is required for the proper localization of the bicoid and oskar transcripts to the anterior and posterior ends of the oocyte, respectively. It was also found that Staufen is important for the translational derepression of oskar once it is adequately localized. In mammals, Stau1 is a ubiquitous protein found in granules in the dendrites of neurons. Also, Stau1 can bind the ribosome in a RNA-independent manner and cofractionates with both ribosomal subunits in a sucrose gradient. The implication of Stau1 in a mechanism allowing translational derepression of certain RNAs in mammals was therefore an interesting path to explore. Accordingly, we decided to verify if mammalian Stau1 had the capacity to stimulate the translation of cellular RNAs through a regulated mechanism. When this thesis was initiated, no cellular RNA target of Stau1 had been identified in mammals. Therefore, double-stranded RNA structures were used to repress the translation of a reporter mRNA. With this model, we showed that Stau1 can stimulate the translation of a transcript when it is bound to its 5’ UTR. With the use of DNA microarrays, we identified cellular mRNAs which distribution in heavy polysomes was altered by Stau1. When Stau1 is overexpressed, this group of mRNAs is enriched heavy polysomes, suggesting a translational stimulation of this population by Stau1. To identify a regulatory mechanism that could influence Stau1’s translational activity, we studied the self-association capacity of this protein. We showed that Stau1, like several double-stranded RNA binding proteins, can self-associate in a RNA-independent manner. We have identified the determinants required for this interaction that as the potential to be important for the regulation of the cellular activities of Stau1. The results presented in this thesis suggest that Stau1 can stimulate the translation of a specific subset of mRNAs in the cell, letting us look at Stau1’s implication in different processes from a new point of view.

Doctor of Philosophy / Department of Biology / Susan J. Brown / RNA interference (RNAi) is a natural gene-silencing phenomenon triggered by dsRNA (dsRNA). While RNAi is an endogenous process that plays essential roles in regulating gene expression it can also be harnessed as a tool for the study of gene function. Introducing dsRNA that is homologous to target mRNA into a cell triggers the RNAi response causing the destruction of the homologous mRNA and a loss of function phenotype. In some organisms, such as the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, once dsRNA is introduced into the body cavity, the RNAi effect is seen throughout the organism because the dsRNA is taken up by individual cells and is then spread from cell to cell. This process has been termed the systemic RNAi response. For other organisms, such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, introduction of dsRNA into the body cavity does not result in a systemic RNAi response. This may be due to the cell’s inability to take up dsRNA or spread that dsRNA from cell to cell. For other organisms, including mammals, introduction of dsRNA into the body cavity does not result in a systemic RNAi response because the immune response causes dsRNA destruction before it can be utilized in the RNAi pathway. For organisms that do not exhibit a systemic RNAi response, complex genetic methods are needed to introduce dsRNA into cells to induce the RNAi response. Therefore, one of the challenges in utilizing RNAi as a genetic tool is introducing the dsRNA into individual cells. In recent years, systemic RNAi responses have been documented in both model and non-model organisms, making RNAi an accessible genetic tool. The red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum is an emerging model organism that has a robust systemic RNAi response. However, the mechanism of systemic RNAi and the specific parameters required to obtain a strong systemic RNAi response in this organism have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this work is to provide data that can allow RNAi to be better utilized as a genetic tool in Tribolium and to use this information as a basis for the use of RNAi in other insects in which it can be performed. Specifically we provide data on the essential parameters necessary to achieve an effective systemic response in Tribolium, we describe differences in the systemic RNAi response between Drosophila and Tribolium, we analyze the conservation and function of RNAi machinery genes in Tribolium and we provide information on the genes critical for a systemic RNAi response in Tribolium.

Chez la plupart des eucaryotes, la présence d’ARN double brin induit la mise en place de mécanismes qui peuvent inhiber l’expression de gènes sur la base d’une complémentarité de séquence. L’exemple le mieux connu est le cas de l’interférence par l’ARN telle qu’elle a été décrite initialement chez C. elegans, où les ARN double brin génèrent une endonucléase spécifique de séquence qui dégrade tout ARN parfaitement complémentaire du petit ARN guide contenu dans le complexe RISC. En plus de cette activité post-transcriptionnelle, il a été observé chez de nombreux eucaryotes l’existence de mécanismes apparentés à l’interférence par l’ARN et qui inhibent la transcription en agissant au niveau de la chromatine. Si ces mécanismes ont été clairement mis en évidence chez les plantes et les champignons il n’existe que quelques exemples de ce type de régulation chez les mammifères. De manière inattendue, le fait de cibler le promoteur d’un gène avec de petits ARN double brin peut conduire à une augmentation de son expression. Cette réponse paradoxale n’a été observée jusqu’à présent que dans des cellules de mammifère, et si elle suscite un intérêt en particulier pour stimuler l’expression de gènes suppresseurs de tumeurs, son mécanisme est encore inconnu.Mes travaux ont porté sur l’étude de l’induction de l’expression par des petits ARN. Ils reposent tout d’abord sur le développement d’une approche expérimentale qui permet de suivre l’activité du promoteur du gène ciblé. Pour cela, j’ai utilisé des constructions indicatrices organisées autour d’un promoteur bidirectionnel qui contrôle l’expression de deux protéines fluorescentes. Lorsque l’on cible le messager de l’une de ces protéines, l’expression de l’autre est augmentée et j’ai pu montrer que ceci corrèle avec la quantité d’ARN messager et de polymérase II présente sur le promoteur bidirectionnel. Ainsi, l’utilisation d’un promoteur bidirectionnel permet effectivement de suivre le niveau de transcription du gène ciblé par le petit ARN.Cette induction de l’expression détectée de manière « controlatérale » n’est pas due à un effet hors cible des petits ARN car elle nécessite la présence de la séquence cible sur l’un des transcrits de la construction indicatrice. L’induction peut être observée avec de nombreux petits ARN différents, y compris s’ils interagissent comme des micro ARN. Les constructions indicatrices que j’ai développées sont donc biaisées en faveur d’une réponse de type induction transcriptionnelle enréponse à un silencing. L’utilisation d’un promoteur bidirectionnel est probablement à l’origine de ce biais à travers la possibilité d’induire une transcription convergente sur les plasmides lorsqu’ils sont circulaires. De fait, la linéarisation de la construction indicatrice supprime l’induction, du moins pour les constructions les plus simples.Si le coeur du complexe RISC, la protéine Ago2, est nécessaire au silencing et à l’induction, j’ai pu montrer que dans le deuxième cas c’était en fait pour guider le complexe RISC sur les transcrits et non pas pour les couper. En effet, le silencing des protéines TNRC6A et B diminue fortement l’induction sans toucher au silencing s’il procède en mode siRNA. De plus l’ancrage sur le transcrit EGFP induit une réponse de même type que le petit ARN (silencing et induction). Cette approche d’ancrage m’a permis d’identifier les domaines nécessaires au silencing et à l’induction et de montrer qu’ils sont distincts.Ce travail permet donc de mettre en évidence que l’induction transcriptionnelle observée sur nos constructions indicatrices est due à une activité des partenaires des protéines Argonaute, la famille GW182/TNRC6. Cette observation ouvre la voie à une caractérisation du mécanisme de cette induction en montrant qu’elle relève d’une activité spécifique du complexe RISC. / In the majority of the eucaryote, the presence of double-strands RNA induce the inhibition of gene expression base on the complementary of sequence. The best known example is the case of RNA interference in C. elegans which is the first model described, in which the double-strands RNA generate an specific endonuclease who degrade all RNA complementary perfectly to the small RNA guide included in the complex RISC. In addition to this post-transcriptional activity, it has been observed in many eukaryotes the existence of mechanisms related to RNA interference and it inhibit transcription by acting at the chromatin. If these mechanisms have been clearly demonstrated in plants, fungi, there are only several examples of this type of regulation in mammals. Unexpectedly, the targeting the promoter of a gene with small double-stranded RNA can lead to increased expression. This paradoxical response has not been observed so far in mammalian cells, but it raises interest particularly to stimulate the expression of tumor suppressor genes, unfortunely the mechanism is still unknown.My work has focused on studying the induction of expression by small RNAs. They are based first on the development of an experimental approach that allows to monitor the promoter activity of the targeted gene. To do this I used indicator constructions organized around a bidirectional promoter that controls the expression of two fluorescent proteins. When targeting the messenger of one of these proteins, the expression of the other is increased and I was able to show that thisincrease correlates with the amount of RNA messenger polymerase II presented on the bidirectional promoter. Thus, the use of a bidirectional promoter can effectively monitor the level of transcription of the gene targeted by the small RNA. This induction of expression detected in a "contralateral" is not due to an off-target effect of siRNA because it requires the presence of the target sequence on one of the transcripts of the construction indicator. The induction can be observed with many different small RNAs, including the interact as micro RNA. Thus the construction indicator that I developed are biased in an induction response transcriptionally in response to a silencing. The use of a bidirectional promoter is probably the origin of this bias through the possibility of inducing a convergent transcription when the plasmids are circular. In fact, the linearization of the construction indicator removes the induction, at least for the simplest constructions. If the heart of the complex RISC is the protein Ago2, is necessary for the silencing and the induction, I was able to show that in the second case Ago2 was in fact to guide the RISC complex on the transcripts but not to cut it. Indeed, the silencing of proteins TNRC6A and B reduces induction significantly without affecting the silencing if it processe in the siRNA model. Also anchoring the transcript EGFP induces a response similar to the small RNA (silencing and induction). This anchor approach allowed me to identify domaines necessary for silencing and induction and show that they are distinct. This work makes it possible to demonstrate that the transcriptional induction observed in our constructions indicator is due to a activity partner ofArgonaute proteins, the GW182/TNRC6 family. This observation open the way for characterization of the mechanism of this induction by showing that it belongs to a specific activity of the RISC complex.

Four type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems were previously identified in Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243. Type II TA toxins are able to induce cell growth arrest or death by interfering with key processes within the organism. BPSS0390-0391 is one of the TA systems previously identified and has homology to hicBA system in Acinetobacter baumannii. B. pseudomallei HicA is able to cause a reduction in the number of culturable cells after expression in E. coli. This study aimed to characterise B. pseudomallei HicA in three ways: by inducing expression of HicA in bacterial species other than E. coli, by identifying amino acids in HicA involved in toxicity and neutralisation by the antitoxin HicB and by examining the interaction of HicA with other TA antitoxins identified within B. pseudomallei genome. A broad host range plasmid encoding BPSS0390 was transformed into a range of Gram negative bacteria including Yersinia pseudotuberculosis IP32953, Vibrio vulnificus E64MW, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1344 and Burkholderia thailandensis E264. Expression of BPSS0390 was toxic in all bacterial species tested, despite the presence of antitoxin BPSS0391 homologues in some species. Unregulated expression in E. coli resulted in the appearance of escape mutants encoding non-toxic variants of HicA. An alanine scanning mutagenesis study of HicA identified 20 mutants where toxicity was abolished despite high levels of expression, but identified no mutants that affected TA complex formation. Finally an existing co-expression assay was modified to examine interactions between HicA and other type II TA antitoxins in B. pseudomallei. The assay revealed no interaction between HicA and non-cognate antitoxins and clarified the role of IPTG as an inhibitor of PBAD promoter on the arabinose operon.

No description available.

Résumé : Chez toutes les cellules, une modulation précise de l’expression des gènes est essentielle afin de réguler adéquatement leur métabolisme et de s’adapter aux changements environnementaux. En effet, c’est l’expression des gènes, plutôt que la séquence d’ADN, qui détermine en grande partie la diversité et la complexité des organismes. Celle-ci dépend principalement des changements dans les niveaux d’ARNs cellulaires résultant de la modification de l’équilibre entre leurs taux relatifs de synthèse et de dégradation. Alors que la régulation transcriptionnelle a été largement étudiée par le passé, des études récentes révèlent que la stabilité de l’ARN joue aussi un rôle important dans le modelage du transcriptome. Toutefois, les mécanismes qui assurent la dégradation précise et sélective des ARNs sont globalement mal compris. Au cours de cette thèse, j’ai utilisé la ribonucléase III de levure Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Rnt1p) comme modèle pour étudier comment des transcrits spécifiques sont ciblés pour la dégradation et évaluer sa contribution à la régulation de l’expression génique. Les résultats indiquent que Rnt1p régule l’expression des gènes en utilisant une spécificité élargie pour des structures tige-boucles d’ARN. En effet, un nouveau motif structurel de Rnt1p permet la discrimination des tige-boucles ayant une séquence spécifique tout en bloquant la liaison à des hélices génériques d’ARN double-brin. D’un autre côté, l’identification des signaux de dégradation de Rnt1p à l’échelle du transcriptome a permis de révéler plus de 384 transcrits clivés par Rnt1p, dont la majorité sont des ARN messagers. En outre, l’impact de la délétion de RNT1 sur l’expression de ces gènes est influencé par les conditions de culture des cellules, ce qui suggère que Rnt1p est un important régulateur conditionnel de l’expression génique. Somme toute, les résultats présentés dans cette thèse démontrent comment des ARNs sont spécifiquement choisis pour la dégradation et soulignent l’importance de la dégradation nucléaire dans la régulation de l’expression génique en réponse à des changements environnementaux. // Abstract : Precise modulation of gene expression is essential for any cell in order to regulate its metabolism and adapt to environmental changes. In fact, it is gene expression, rather than DNA sequence alone, which mostly explains the functional diversity and complexity between the different cell types. As such, gene expression mainly results from changes in the levels of cellular RNAs which are, in turn, dependent on the equilibrium between their relative rates of synthesis and degradation. While transcriptional control has been largely studied in the past, recent publications reveal that changes in RNA stability also play an important role in shaping the transcriptome. Unfortunately though, the mechanisms ensuring precise and selective RNA degradation remains poorly understood. In this thesis, I have used the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribonuclease III (Rnt1p) as a model to study how specific transcripts are targeted for degradation and evaluate its contribution to the regulation of gene expression. The results indicate that Rnt1p regulates gene expression using a broad specificity for structured RNA stem loops. Indeed, a new structural motif of Rnt1p permits discrimination of hairpins with specific sequence while blocking the binding of the generic RNA duplexes recognized by other members of the RNase III family. This highly specific mode of substrate recognition was found to be easily modulated by a flexible network of protein RNA interactions. On the other hand, transcriptome-wide identification of Rnt1p degradation signals uncovered more than 384 transcripts, including 291 mRNAs. Interestingly, the impact of RNT1 deletion on mRNA expression is modulated by changes in the growth conditions of the cell, indicating that Rnt1p is an important regulator of conditional gene expression. Overall, the results presented in this thesis demonstrate how specific RNAs are selected for degradation and highlight the importance of nuclear RNA decay for fine tuning gene expression in response to changes in growth conditions.

<p>The innate host response to virus infection is largely dominated by the production of type I interferons (IFNs). Fibroblasts, considered nonprofessional immune cells, respond to virus infection after recognition of viral components such as double-stranded (ds)RNA. The constitutively expressed transcription factor IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) is rapidly activated and type I IFNs are produced. In the absence of IRF3, it was found that IFNs are still produced. This thesis identifies IRF9 as the transcription factor responsible for IFN production in the absence of IRF3 based on its ability to bind the murine (m)IFNβ promoter determined via oligonucleotide pull-down assays.</p> <p>In the absence of both IRF3 and IRF9, primary fibroblasts are deficient for IFN signalling. Surprisingly, significant inhibition of virus replication following dsRNA treatment of cells deficient for IRF3 and IFN signalling was recently observed with the large DNA virus herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) being more susceptible to inhibition than the small RNA virus vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). As nitric oxide is known for its nonspecific antiviral effects against DNA viruses, involvement of this molecule in the antiviral response to HSV-1 in the absence of IRF3 and type I IFN induction and signalling was investigated. Here it is shown that in the absence of IRF3 and IFN, nitric oxide constitutes a major component of the innate response against HSV-1 in response to dsRNA in primary fibroblasts. In these cells, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and IRF1 regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, subsequently producing nitric oxide. As most viruses encode strategies to render their environment IRF3 and/or IFN deficient, it appears that IRF9 and nitric oxide serve as secondary responses to protect the host against viral infection. These data emphasize the importance and requirement of the host to employ multiple strategies to overcome infection.</p> / Master of Science (MSc)