This study presents the results of an evaluation of the 24/7 Sobriety Program in Cass County, North Dakota, looking specifically at participants’ likelihood of receiving a conviction of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) both during and after exiting the program. Data was collected of participants who have been enrolled in the program from the start of the program in 2010 through 2018 and matched to public criminal records searches of each participant. Several analyses were run to determine whether substance choice (alcohol vs. drugs), gender (male vs. female), and duration in program influence a participant’s likelihood to recidivate. Findings for each measure are presented including potential changes that could be made, as well as, limitations of the study.

Ethnic/racial minorities in the United States are overrepresented in fatalities from motor vehicle crashes (MVC). Growing evidence indicates that there are differences among racial/ethnic groups in risk of involvement in fatal crashes. Based on previous research, numerous factors may be involved in high racial/ethnic fatality rates from MVCs, including failure to use safety equipment, driving while under the influence of alcohol/drug, red light running, and speeding. Using data from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) and the FR300P Police Crash Report, this project explores differences in variables associated with traffic safety behavior and traffic law obedience between non-White and White road users (drivers, passengers, and pedestrians). Results indicate that there is a significant association between race/ethnicity and driving while under the influence of alcohol/drugs (DUI). Those endeavoring to develop more effective traffic safety prevention and education programs may consider the effect of social/cultural factors in future efforts.

Alcohol-impaired driving is a major cause of motor vehicle accident and death in the United States. People who are arrested for DUI (Driving under the Influence) are at high risk to reoffend; approximately one in three of these individuals will commit another DUI offense in the three years following their first conviction (Nochajski & Stasiewicz, 2006). This high risk for recidivism in these individuals suggests that cognitive characteristics may contribute to a pattern of pathological decision making leading to impaired driving. Indeed, individuals with a history of DUI report higher rates of impulsiveness and behavioral dysregulation compared to their nonoffending peers. Relatively little research, however, has used laboratory methods to identify the specific behavioral characteristics, such as poor inhibitory control or heightened sensitivity to immediate reward, which may differentiate DUI offenders from nonoffenders. Further, little is known about how individuals with a history of DUI respond following an acute dose of alcohol. Study 1 examined impulsivity in 20 adults with a recent DUI conviction and 20 adults with no history of DUI using self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. This study also used a novel decision-making paradigm to examine how different levels of risk and reward influenced the decision to drive after drinking in both groups. Results of this study found that DUI offenders did not differ from controls in their performance on behavioral measures of impulsivity. They did, however, report higher levels of impulsivity and demonstrated a greater willingness to tolerate higher levels of risk for more modest rewards. Study 2 examined the acute effects of alcohol and expectancy manipulation on driving performance and decision making in the same group of participants. Neither alcohol nor expectancy manipulation exerted a systematic effect on decision making in either group. Alcohol impaired driving performance equally in both groups, but the DUI group perceived themselves as less impaired by alcohol. Expectancy manipulation eliminated this group difference in perceived driving ability. Taken together, these findings identify processes that risk of impaired driving in DUI offenders. They may perceive themselves as less impaired by alcohol, leading to risky decision making when drinking. Expectancy manipulation may be a viable method of reducing risky decision making in DUI offenders.

EN: The misdemeanor of endangering under the influence of addictive substance is one of the most frequently occurring criminal offenses that the Czech society encounters. I have divided my thesis into nine chapters. The first chapter deals with elements of the criminal offense under the influence of addictive substance as divided by legal theory. The second chapter describes the issue of the unlawfulness of the deed. The third chapter deals with an analysis of qualifying circumstances that legislature provided in the second paragraph of the misdemeanor of endangerment under the influence of drugs. The fourth chapter describes the issue and the conditions of participation of persons other than the principal perpetrator of the deed. The sixth chapter deals with the most common criminal offenses that occur along with the abovementioned misdemeanor. The seventh chapter is devoted to the new phenomenon of proving a condition that excludes competence in cases of influencing other addictive substance. In the eighth chapter I focus on the issue of showing of various types of sentences with regard to current practice in relation to sentencing for the deed in question under Section 274 of the Criminal Code. The ninth chapter describes various forms of so-called special methods of proceedings which are used in the...

Washington State and Colorado were the first states to legalize recreational marijuana. According to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, the number of drivers who tested positive for marijuana in traffic fatalities increased 48% from 2013 to 2014, and marijuana legalization may have influenced this increase. Since marijuana legalization is new to the United States, the effects of this change in policy are untested in the literature. The purpose of this quantitative study using a regression point displacement design was to examine the relationship between traffic fatalities involving cannabinoids in Washington State before and after marijuana legalization. Rational choice theory and perceptual deterrence theory provided the framework for the study. Existing state level data of traffic fatalities from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System were analyzed using regression point displacement. Pre and post legalization Washington state fatalities were compared against 43 control groups where marijuana has not been legalized for recreational use. Results from ANCOVA analysis indicated no statistical difference between Washington State and other nonlegalized states in traffic fatalities involving cannabinoids. This is one of the first studies exploring the effects of marijuana legalization on public safety. These results suggest marijuana legalization may not contribute to the increase in traffic fatalities. Findings may provide legislators and traffic safety stakeholders with information in creating legislation legalizing marijuana as well as strategy and a research agenda to address traffic fatalities.

Thomas G. Brown, Ph.D., co-directeur de recherche / Objectifs : La capacité en matière de prise de décisions des récidivistes de conduite avec capacités affaiblies (CCA) semble les distinguer des non-contrevenants, particulièrement dans des situations ambiguës à haut risque, telles que la CCA. Cette étude exploratoire vise à vérifier l’hypothèse selon laquelle les récidivistes de CCA (R) auraient une moins bonne capacité de prise de décisions et une plus faible réponse de conductibilité électrodermale par anticipation à la tâche Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) que les non-contrevenants (C). Méthode : Vingt-trois récidivistes et 24 non-contrevenants ont été recrutés. Leur âge moyen (± É.T.) était 44.17(10.03) et 37.29 (10.60) ans respectivement. Les participants devaient être âgés de 18 ans ou plus, et avoir eu deux condamnations pour CCA ou plus pour le groupe R, et zéro CCA et un permis de conduire pour le groupe C. Les participants ont effectué I’IGT, une tâche neurocognitive de prise de décisions comprenant 100 sélections de cartes divisées en cinq blocs pour les analyses. On a comparé la performance du groupe R versus le groupe C à l’aide d’une ANOVA à mesures répétées [2 (groupe) x 5 (blocs)]. On a évalué la performance durant les blocs 1 & 2 (décisions dans l’ambiguïté) et blocs 3-5 (décisions sous haut risque) en utilisant des tests t post-hoc. Finalement, on a mesuré leur réponse de conductibilité électrodermale (RCEA) durant l’IGT. Résultats : L’ANOVA à mesures répétées des blocs 1 à 5 a révélé un effet significatif de l’interaction groupe par bloc, F(1,45)=5.28, p=.03, état carré =.11. Les tests t post hoc ont révélé une différence significative entre les groupes pour la combinaison des blocs 3 à 5, t(45) = 3.38, p = .002. Un effet d’interaction significatif a été détecté pour la RCEA des récidivistes de CCA versus celle des non-contrevenants, F(8,160)=2.33, p=.02, état carré =.10. Conclusion : Les récidivistes de CCA performent moins bien que les non-contrevenants à l’IGT. Ils persistent à prendre des décisions basées sur le potentiel de gains immédiats et négligent donc les risques de pertes. Ceci suggère qu’ils ont des déficits en matière de prise de décision, ce qui, en tant que groupe, les différencie des non-contrevenants. Une difficulté en matière de prise de décisions pourrait expliquer en partie le comportement impulsif fréquemment associé au récidivisme de CCA. Finalement, puisque les analyses de RCEA manquaient de puissance statistique, il est possible que de plus grands échantillons puissent permettre d’observer des différences entre les groupes de participants dans l’analyse de RCEA. / Objectives: Poor decision making in ambiguous high-risk situations, such as driving while impaired (DWI) by alcohol, may differentiate DWI recidivists from non-offenders. In this study, we test the hypothesis that DWI recidivists (R) will exhibit poorer decision-making performance on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), and in line with the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, weaker anticipatory somatic activation (using skin conductance response as index) than non-offenders (C, comparison group). Methods: DWI recidivists and non-DWI control drivers were recruited, [R (n=23) and C (n=24), mean ages (± SD) 44.17(10.03) and 37.29 (10.60) years respectively]. Participant selection criteria included ≥ 18 years old and ≥2 DWI convictions for group R and 0 DWI convictions lifetime and a driver’s license for group C. The participants performed the IGT, a decision-making neurocognitive task containing 100 card selection trials that we divided into 5 blocks for analyses. A 2 (group) x 5 (blocks) repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare group R performance on the IGT versus group C, followed by post hoc independent t-tests on aggregated blocks 1-2 (decision under ambiguity) & 3-5 (decision under high risk) to identify the source of group X block significant interactions. Two 3 (group) x 5 (blocks) repeated measures ANOVAs (for good decks and for bad decks) were used to compare the aSCR of groups C and R. Results: ANOVA repeated measures on blocks 1 to 5 produced a significant effect of group by block interaction F(1,45)=5.28, p=.03, partial ƞ2 =.11. Post hoc t-tests on aggregated blocks 3 to 5 were statistically significant, t(45) = 3.38, p = .002. A significant group x block interaction effect was found for good decks aSCR, F(8,160)=2.33, p=.02, partial ƞ2 =.10 . Conclusion: DWI recidivists performed more poorly than controls on the IGT, persistently making decisions based on potential immediate gains and neglecting associated loss risks and long-term outcome. This suggests they have reduced neurocognitive decision-making capacities distinguishable from the general population. While DWI recidivists’ behaviour appears as impulsive, these results suggest that their behaviour pattern involves decision-making difficulties. Larger sample sizes may be needed to detect a between-group effect in the aSCR analyses, as they were considerably underpowered.

Objectifs : La capacité en matière de prise de décisions des récidivistes de conduite avec capacités affaiblies (CCA) semble les distinguer des non-contrevenants, particulièrement dans des situations ambiguës à haut risque, telles que la CCA. Cette étude exploratoire vise à vérifier l’hypothèse selon laquelle les récidivistes de CCA (R) auraient une moins bonne capacité de prise de décisions et une plus faible réponse de conductibilité électrodermale par anticipation à la tâche Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) que les non-contrevenants (C). Méthode : Vingt-trois récidivistes et 24 non-contrevenants ont été recrutés. Leur âge moyen (± É.T.) était 44.17(10.03) et 37.29 (10.60) ans respectivement. Les participants devaient être âgés de 18 ans ou plus, et avoir eu deux condamnations pour CCA ou plus pour le groupe R, et zéro CCA et un permis de conduire pour le groupe C. Les participants ont effectué I’IGT, une tâche neurocognitive de prise de décisions comprenant 100 sélections de cartes divisées en cinq blocs pour les analyses. On a comparé la performance du groupe R versus le groupe C à l’aide d’une ANOVA à mesures répétées [2 (groupe) x 5 (blocs)]. On a évalué la performance durant les blocs 1 & 2 (décisions dans l’ambiguïté) et blocs 3-5 (décisions sous haut risque) en utilisant des tests t post-hoc. Finalement, on a mesuré leur réponse de conductibilité électrodermale (RCEA) durant l’IGT. Résultats : L’ANOVA à mesures répétées des blocs 1 à 5 a révélé un effet significatif de l’interaction groupe par bloc, F(1,45)=5.28, p=.03, état carré =.11. Les tests t post hoc ont révélé une différence significative entre les groupes pour la combinaison des blocs 3 à 5, t(45) = 3.38, p = .002. Un effet d’interaction significatif a été détecté pour la RCEA des récidivistes de CCA versus celle des non-contrevenants, F(8,160)=2.33, p=.02, état carré =.10. Conclusion : Les récidivistes de CCA performent moins bien que les non-contrevenants à l’IGT. Ils persistent à prendre des décisions basées sur le potentiel de gains immédiats et négligent donc les risques de pertes. Ceci suggère qu’ils ont des déficits en matière de prise de décision, ce qui, en tant que groupe, les différencie des non-contrevenants. Une difficulté en matière de prise de décisions pourrait expliquer en partie le comportement impulsif fréquemment associé au récidivisme de CCA. Finalement, puisque les analyses de RCEA manquaient de puissance statistique, il est possible que de plus grands échantillons puissent permettre d’observer des différences entre les groupes de participants dans l’analyse de RCEA. / Objectives: Poor decision making in ambiguous high-risk situations, such as driving while impaired (DWI) by alcohol, may differentiate DWI recidivists from non-offenders. In this study, we test the hypothesis that DWI recidivists (R) will exhibit poorer decision-making performance on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), and in line with the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, weaker anticipatory somatic activation (using skin conductance response as index) than non-offenders (C, comparison group). Methods: DWI recidivists and non-DWI control drivers were recruited, [R (n=23) and C (n=24), mean ages (± SD) 44.17(10.03) and 37.29 (10.60) years respectively]. Participant selection criteria included ≥ 18 years old and ≥2 DWI convictions for group R and 0 DWI convictions lifetime and a driver’s license for group C. The participants performed the IGT, a decision-making neurocognitive task containing 100 card selection trials that we divided into 5 blocks for analyses. A 2 (group) x 5 (blocks) repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare group R performance on the IGT versus group C, followed by post hoc independent t-tests on aggregated blocks 1-2 (decision under ambiguity) & 3-5 (decision under high risk) to identify the source of group X block significant interactions. Two 3 (group) x 5 (blocks) repeated measures ANOVAs (for good decks and for bad decks) were used to compare the aSCR of groups C and R. Results: ANOVA repeated measures on blocks 1 to 5 produced a significant effect of group by block interaction F(1,45)=5.28, p=.03, partial ƞ2 =.11. Post hoc t-tests on aggregated blocks 3 to 5 were statistically significant, t(45) = 3.38, p = .002. A significant group x block interaction effect was found for good decks aSCR, F(8,160)=2.33, p=.02, partial ƞ2 =.10 . Conclusion: DWI recidivists performed more poorly than controls on the IGT, persistently making decisions based on potential immediate gains and neglecting associated loss risks and long-term outcome. This suggests they have reduced neurocognitive decision-making capacities distinguishable from the general population. While DWI recidivists’ behaviour appears as impulsive, these results suggest that their behaviour pattern involves decision-making difficulties. Larger sample sizes may be needed to detect a between-group effect in the aSCR analyses, as they were considerably underpowered. / Thomas G. Brown, Ph.D., co-directeur de recherche

No description available.