Submitted by Fabio Sobreira Campos da Costa (fabio.sobreira@ufpe.br) on 2017-07-07T14:11:36Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) SILVA, Kleber Clementino da. Política e historiografia nas narrativas lusocastelhanas seiscentistas da guerra holandesa n~1.pdf: 2284154 bytes, checksum: 4de9f163d5d43bf6daf660b5201e418b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-07T14:11:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) SILVA, Kleber Clementino da. Política e historiografia nas narrativas lusocastelhanas seiscentistas da guerra holandesa n~1.pdf: 2284154 bytes, checksum: 4de9f163d5d43bf6daf660b5201e418b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-25 / CAPES / A tese de doutoramenmto ora apresentada centra-se nas obras que conformaram o discurso historiográfico ibérico acerca da guerra travada neerlandeses na América e na África Ocidental (1624-1654). Tais narrativas (concebidas no interior dos gêneros "relação de sucessos", "relação historial" e "história"), vêm a lume num intervalo de cerca de sete décadas (1625-1698), pelo trabalho de autores de diversas origens e trajetórias situados em diferentes espaços dos impérios ibéricos. Procede-se à análise do conteúdo destes escritos à luz das distintas conjunturas surgidas na península Ibérica ao longo do período e, igualmente, das vertentes historiográficas em vigor. Conceitos como "sucesso" e "história perfeita", bem como a historiografia da emergência do livro no cenário cultural europeu moderno da Ars historica foram fulcrais ao trabalho. Mostra-se possível, a partir dessa aparelhagem teórico-metodológica, demostrar primeiramente como narrativa histórica, no Seiscentos, dialogava com os contextos no interior dos quais era produzida, quer nas cortes e centro de poderes peninsulares, quer em meios às disputas nas zonas ultramarinas. Para além disso, discuti-se a mobilização da historiografia como ferramenta de intervenção política, de visibilização de sujeitos e "partidos", de emissão de contradiscursos. A metáfora da "relação" e da "história" como armas viceja no período. Desse modo, tanto as cortes ibéricas (por meio da alta nobreza e mesmo das casas reinantes) quanto grupos políticos emponderados no ultramar põe em ação o instituto do patronato, a imprensa em expansão, os recursos da publicística e o prestígio do gênero histórico para o fim de fixar uma memória conveniente dos eventos da guerra holandesa. Glorificam suas próprias façanhas, bem como aquelas de seus clientes e correligionários, em vistas de recompensas materiais e simbólicas presentes e futuras. Prêmio que aliás, nem sempre alcançam. No primeiro capítulo, apresentam-se as narrativas a serem analisadas e discute sua atribulada recepção nos séculos XVIII, XIX, XX. Em seguida, a produção das "relações de sucessos" e sua colaboração historicização do conflito, ao longo dos reinados Felipe IV e d. João IV. No terceiro capítulo, o foco volta-se para o gênero denominado "relação historial", intermediário entre "relação de sucesso" e a "história". No quarto e último capítulo, discute-se como todo esse repertório informativo, na Espanha e sobretudo em Portugal, é empregado como fonte para a escrita de “histórias perfeitas”, enaltecedoras tanto dos “heróis” na campanha quanto das coroas glorificadas por meio das vitórias descritas. / The doctoral thesis presented here focuses on the works that shaped the Iberian historiographic discourse on the war waged in the Americas in North America and West Africa (1624-1654). Such narratives (conceived within the genres of "relationship of successes", "historical relation" and "history"), come to light in a period of about seven decades (1625-1698), by the work of authors of diverse origins and trajectories located In different spaces of the Iberian empires. The contents of these writings are analyzed in the light of the different conjunctures that appeared in the Iberian peninsula throughout the period and also of the historiographic facets in force. Concepts such as "success" and "perfect story," as well as the historiography of the emergence of the book in the modern European cultural scene of Ars historica were central to the work. It is possible, from this theoretical-methodological apparatus, to demonstrate first as a historical narrative, in the Sixties, a dialogue with the contexts within which it was produced, both in the courts and center of peninsular powers, and in means to disputes in the overseas zones . In addition, we discussed the mobilization of historiography as a tool for political intervention, for the visibility of subjects and "parties", for the issuing of counter-speeches. The metaphor of "relation" and "history" as weapons leaps in the period. In this way, both the Iberian courts (through the high nobility and even of the reigning houses) and political groups empordered overseas, put into action the institute of patronage, the expanding press, the resources of the public and the prestige of the historical genre for the Order to secure a convenient memory of the events of the Dutch War. They glorify their own exploits, as well as those of their clients and co-religionists, in view of material and symbolic rewards present and future. A prize that, incidentally, does not always reach. In the first chapter, we present the narratives to be analyzed and discusses his troubled reception in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries. Then the production of "success relationships" and their historicizing collaboration of the conflict, throughout the reigns of Philip IV and d. John IV. In the third chapter, the focus is on the genre called "historical relationship," the intermediate between "success relationship" and "history." In the fourth and last chapter, it is discussed how all this informative repertoire, in Spain and especially in Portugal, is used as a source for the writing of "perfect stories", exalting both the "heroes" in the campaign and the glorified crowns through the Described victories.

François-Henri de Montmorency-Bouteville, maréchal-duc de Luxembourg (1628-1695), connut une longue carrière d’officier général, de la fin de la guerre de Trente Ans à celle de la Ligue d’Augsbourg, et un parcours contrasté, marqué par les inconstances de la faveur et de la fortune des armes. Engagé dans la Fronde auprès de son parent, le prince de Condé, qui lui obtint en 1661 la main de l’héritière de la pairie de Luxembourg, il revint au service lors de la guerre de Dévolution. Ayant acquis la protection de Louvois, il commanda en Hollande en 1672, puis devint capitaine des gardes du corps avant d’obtenir le bâton de maréchal de France en 1675. Impliqué dans l’affaire des Poisons, il fut écarté des commandements et dut attendre la campagne de 1690 pour retrouver la direction de l’armée de Flandre, qu’il commanda jusqu’en 1694. Ses victoires, pourtant peu exploitées, lui valurent une gloire inégalée en son temps et le surnom de Tapissier de Notre-Dame ; elles en firent également l’un des généraux les plus influents à la cour de Louis XIV, qui favorisa l’élévation de sa maison. L’étude de sa carrière apporte une contribution de premier plan à l’histoire de la collaboration intéressée entre la grande noblesse et la monarchie absolutiste, et de la place des généraux dans l’État et le gouvernement du royaume. L’analyse de ses campagnes et de son expérience du commandement dévoile l’évolution de la conduite de la guerre et des opérations, au temps de la stratégie de cabinet et des conflits limités, aussi bien que les transformations progressives des pratiques de la guerre et du combat. / François-Henri de Montmorency-Bouteville, marshal-duke of Luxembourg (1628-1695), followed a long career of general officer, from the end of the Thirty Years’ War till the Nine Years’ War, and had a contrasted life marked by the inconstancies of the favour and the fortune of war. Committed in the Fronde with his relative, the prince of Condé, who obtained for him in 1661 the hand of the heiress of the “pairie” of Luxembourg, he returned to the service during the War of Devolution. Having acquired the protection of Louvois, he commanded in Holland in 1672, then became captain of a company of “gardes du corps”, before becoming marshal of France in 1675. Involved in the Affair of the Poisons, he was pushed aside from commands and had to wait for the campaign of 1690 to find back the direction of the army of Flanders, which he commanded until 1694. His victories, although not totally exploited, were worth to him an unequalled glory at that time, and the nickname of “The Tapissier de Notre-Dame” ; they also made him one of the most powerful generals in the court of Louis XIV, which favored the rise of his family. The study of his career contributes remarkably to the history of the interested collaboration between the high nobility and the absolutist monarchy, and of the place of the generals in the State and the kingdom’s government. The analysis of his campaigns and his experience of command reveals the evolution of warfare, in the time of the “stratégie de cabinet” and the limited conflicts, as well as the progressive transformations of the practice of war and fighting.

An international maritime labour market study, the thesis focuses on the Dutch naval labour market, analysing wartime Zeeland admiralty crews. The research is based primarily on unique naval pay sources. Analysis of crew compositions has not been made on this scale in the period before. The 1667 Dutch Medway Raid is the starting point, where a few British played a leading role – amongst many others reported on the Dutch side. Pepys and Marvell primarily blamed their joining the enemy on the lure of superior Dutch payment. The thesis asks how many British there were really, how they came to be in Dutch service, and whether this involvement occurred, as indicated, at other times too. Part One is thematic and explores the background mechanisms of the maritime environment in detail, determining causation. First, the two naval recruitment systems are compared and completely reassessed in the light of state intervention in the trade sphere. Two new sets of ‘control’ data – naval wages and foreign shipping – are amongst the incentives and routes determined. British expatriate communities are examined as conduits for the supply of naval labour and civilian support. British personnel are compared and contrasted with other foreigners, against the background of Anglo-Dutch interlinkage and political transition from neutrality through conflict to alliance. Part Two is chronological, covering four major wars in three chapters. Micro-case studies assembled from the scattered record streams enable analysis of the crews of particular officers and ships. Seamen were an occupation that made them a very little known group: the thesis examines the different career types of British personnel of many different ranks, shedding light on their everyday lives. The thesis shows that British personnel were an integral part of Dutch crews throughout the period, even when the two nations were fighting each other. The basic need of subsistence labour for employment took precedence over allegiance to nation/ideology, demonstrating limitations in state power and the continual interdependence forced on the maritime powers through the realities of the labour market.

No description available.