• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 9
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 18
  • 18
  • 18
  • 9
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

The legal philosophy of Ronald Dworkin : no right answer

Conter, David, 1951- January 1980 (has links)
No description available.
2

The legal philosophy of Ronald Dworkin : no right answer

Conter, David, 1951- January 1980 (has links)
No description available.
3

The legal philosophy of Ronald Dworkin.

Karlsson, Gial Victoria 01 January 1977 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
4

Human dignity : autonomy, sacredness and the international human rights instruments /

Tonti-Filippini, Nicholas. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Melbourne, Dept. of Philosophy, 2001. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references.
5

For a critical theory of law : a Levinasian critique of Dworkin's theory of law as integrity and Habermas's discourse theory of law /

Leung, Kwan-yuen, Physer. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 259-275).
6

Ronald Dworkin : la thèse de la bonne réponse dans les rets du scepticisme : réflexions sur l'interprétativisme dworkinien et l'indétermination de la loi

Plamondon, Frédérick 24 April 2018 (has links)
La thèse de la bonne réponse s'inscrit dans la foulée de la discussion portant sur l'indétermination de la loi et sur la capacité de cette dernière à contraindre l'adjudication lors de causes difficiles. Se distinguant du réalisme juridique et du positivisme légal, qui défendent que la législation judiciaire est nécessaire, Dworkin postule qu'il est possible d'obtenir des jugements objectifs à condition d'admettre qu'il est impossible d'avoir une perspective moralement neutre. Selon lui, l'interprétation de la loi doit tenir compte de la cohérence formelle du système légal, mais aussi de son intégrité avec l'éthos qui justifie le contrat social d'une communauté. Cependant, il appert que la thèse dworkinienne suppose la cohérence de cet éthos, mais ne la démontre pas. Par ailleurs, l'analyse dworkinienne de l'indétermination de la loi ne porte que sur une de ses sources et en néglige une autre, qui nous apparaît toute aussi importante, soit l'indétermination dispositionnelle. Il faut conclure que l'approche dworkinienne, quoique riche et élégante, ne fournit pas de solution suffisante aux problèmes de l'indétermination de la loi et de la législation judiciaire.
7

Equality, resources and primary goods: Ronald Dworkin and John Rawls on the currency of egalitarianism

May, Simon James Peter January 1996 (has links)
In this thesis I compare the work of Ronald Dworkin and John Rawls within the context of the 'equality of what?' debate. I argue that the Rawlsian paradigm offers a much more flexible defence of a resourcist approach to egalitarianism than Dworkin's theoI)' of' equality of resources'. I argue that Dworkin's fundamental distinction between persons and circumstances is flawed because it involves commitment to a view of the person which belongs in the realm of' comprehensive moral doctrines', rather than in the realm of a political theory of justice. I also argue that an alternative distinction between choice and luck, expressed in the 'luck-neutralising aim' of egalitarianism, is inappropriate since it too involves transgressing political constraints on theories of justice. Rawls's utilisation of primary goods in his theory of justice is supported by considerations derived from the work of Thomas Scanlon. The schematic picture of relative urgency which Scanlon advances provides the rationale for the use of primary goods, and also allows us to discriminate . between compensation for handicaps and compensation for expensive tastes. Scanlon's schematic picture also frees the utilisation of primary goods from criticisms raised by Amartya Sen. Lastly, I discuss arguments advanced by Susan Hurley which enable an interpretation of Rawls's original position device which is independent of the luck-neutralising aim. Her arguments are extended as a criticism of Dworkin's hypothetical insurance market.
8

Lei Muwaji: dos discursos do enfrentamento aos diálogos do reconhecimento

SÁ JUNIOR, Adalberto Fernandes 28 June 2013 (has links)
Submitted by Edisangela Bastos (edisangela@ufpa.br) on 2017-01-20T14:11:25Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_LeiMuwajiDiscursos.pdf: 1218589 bytes, checksum: 2962f6afecf374f2900213672e2428a8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Edisangela Bastos (edisangela@ufpa.br) on 2017-01-23T12:04:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_LeiMuwajiDiscursos.pdf: 1218589 bytes, checksum: 2962f6afecf374f2900213672e2428a8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-23T12:04:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_LeiMuwajiDiscursos.pdf: 1218589 bytes, checksum: 2962f6afecf374f2900213672e2428a8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-28 / CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Esta dissertação tem por objetivo analisar a constitucionalidade do Projeto de Lei nº 1.057/2007, mais conhecido como Lei Muwaji, o qual dispõe sobre a criminalização e o combate às práticas tradicionais dos povos indígenas que, de acordo com o seu texto, são “nocivas” aos direitos humanos das crianças. Chegamos à conclusão de que o referido projeto é inconstitucional, por desrespeitar o direito à autodeterminação daqueles povos. Primeiramente, fere o princípio da igualdade, o direito à não-discriminação e a convenção do mútuo reconhecimento. Trata as minorias indígenas de maneira discriminatória. Em segundo lugar, não são respeitados o princípio da equidade, o direito ao autogoverno e a convenção do consentimento. Os povos indígenas não participaram devidamente dos processos de deliberação política. Por fim, não são levados em consideração o princípio da integridade, o direito à integridade cultural e a convenção da continuidade. As perspectivas ameríndias sobre a infância não são respeitadas. Como método, utilizamos a teoria do direito como integridade de Ronald Dworkin. / This dissertation analyses the constitutionality of the legal project nº 1.057/2007, mostly known as Muwaji Law, that deals with, according to its text, the struggle against indigenous peoples’ traditional customs that are “harmful” to the human rights of children. We concluded that this project is unconstitutional for disrespecting the self-determination right of these peoples. First, it undermines the equality principle, the right to non-discrimination and the mutual recognition convention. The indigenous minorities are treated in a discriminatory manner. Secondly, the fairness principle, the self-government right and the convention of consent are not respected. Indigenous peoples did not participate in due processes of political deliberation. Finally, the integrity principle, the right to cultural integrity and the convention of continuity are not taken into account. The Amerindian perspectives on childhood are not respected. As a method, we use the theory of law as integrity by Ronald Dworkin.
9

Imperio do 'Genio Maligno' : analise da tese contida em O imperio do direito, de Ronald Dworkin / 'Evil Genius' empire : analysis of the thesis contained in Ronald Dwkin's Law's Empire

Dawe Junior, Frank Tessier 11 December 2008 (has links)
Orientador: Roberto Romano da Silva / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-12T21:51:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DaweJunior_FrankTessier_M.pdf: 573061 bytes, checksum: c730e42f831cb4bdd67b40f7f0a3bc74 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Resumo: O presente trabalho se propõe a realizar uma análise da tese contida na obra O império do direito, de Ronald Dworkin, em que esse autor desenvolve uma teoria do direito baseada nas premissas da interpretação construtiva dos textos e práticas legais, e da integridade tanto moral quanto político-social, propondo-a como a melhor solução para o debate sobre o aperfeiçoamento das doutrinas jurídicas. A análise infere que há incompletude na primeira premissa e inconsistência na segunda, apresentando-se portanto a teoria elaborada pelo autor como não suficiente para seu propósito de servir de referência para as decisões jurídicas. Verifica-se, portanto, a existência de uma propensão ao engano tanto nas doutrinas jurídicas correntes quanto na própria tese de Dworkin, e o 'Gênio Maligno' do título refere-se à personagem fictícia e metafórica criada por Descartes, cuja função é justamente a de induzir-nos ao erro, numa clara referência aos equívocos conceituais que genericamente ocorrem na área da Justiça e do Direito / Abstract: This paper is designed to analyze the thesis produced by Ronald Dworkin in his book Law's Empire, where the author develops a theory of law that is based on the premises of (i) constructive interpretation of law texts and practices and (ii) moral, political and social integrity, and proposes that they are the best solution for the debate on the improvement of law doctrines. After an analysis, one can perceive that the first premise lacks completeness and the second consistency. Therefore, the theory set forth by the author is regarded as not sufficient to fulfill its purpose to be used as a reference for juridical decisions. One can identify that there is a tendency for inaccurate explanation of both current law doctrines and Dworkin's own thesis, while the Evil Genius in the title refers to a metaphor and fictitious character created by Descartes whose role is to induce readers to conceptual misconstructions as a reference to misinterpretations that usually take place in the areas of Justice and Law / Mestrado / Mestre em Filosofia
10

Desacordos teóricos na filosofia do direito contemporânea: a influência da filosofia da linguagem no debate Hart-Dworkin e a tentativa de sua superação através da teoria dos planos de Scott Shapiro

RODRIGUES, Filipe Augusto Oliveira 08 February 2018 (has links)
Submitted by Rosana Moreira (rosanapsm@outlook.com) on 2018-08-22T20:22:43Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_DesacordosTeoricosFilosofia.pdf: 629038 bytes, checksum: fbf07a8526fd7a52db00d338b40453a0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Edisangela Bastos (edisangela@ufpa.br) on 2018-08-27T18:49:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_DesacordosTeoricosFilosofia.pdf: 629038 bytes, checksum: fbf07a8526fd7a52db00d338b40453a0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-27T18:49:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertacao_DesacordosTeoricosFilosofia.pdf: 629038 bytes, checksum: fbf07a8526fd7a52db00d338b40453a0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-08 / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Este trabalho tem como objetivo geral analisar influência da filosofia da linguagem no debate Hart-Dworkin e a tentativa de sua superação através da teoria dos planos de Scott Shapiro enfocando os desacordos teóricos. Este objetivo é buscado sempre pela mistura ou dialética de dois elementos ou dimensões. Em primeiro lugar, a exploração dos argumentos existentes na teoria do direito. Em segundo lugar, a relação destes argumentos com aqueles apresentados em campos da filosofia da linguagem. Nossa hipótese é a de que o estudo deste debate e desta relação nos mostra que a teoria dos desacordos de Dworkin é a melhor explicação do problema, mas, ao mesmo tempo, as teorias adversárias escolhidas utilizam de diversos elementos metodológicos que representam avanços que foram realizados na filosofia geral, como a perspectiva dos planos proposta por Michael Bratman. Tentamos demonstrar esta hipótese por meio da análise de quatro autores e suas influências. Estes autores são Ronald Dworkin, H. L. A. Hart, Jules Coleman e Scott Shapiro. Por meio desta análise, esperamos demonstrar como os fundamentos das teorias propostas foram se modificando da filosofia da linguagem para outros campos e qual é o estado da teoria do direito com este avanço. Como resultado, defendemos que a hipótese está certa e que mesmo sem ter a melhor capacidade explicativa, as novas teorias do direito precisam ser melhor analisadas e seus ganhos melhor considerados. / This work has as general objective to analyze the influence of philosophy of language on the Hart – Dworkin Debate and the overcoming tried by the planning theory of Scott Shapiro, focusing the theoretical disagreements. This objective is always sought by the mixture of two elements. In the first place, the exploration of the existing arguments in legal theory. Secondly, the relation of these arguments to those presented in fields of general philosophy. Our hypothesis is that the study of this debate and relationship show us that Dworkin's theory of disagreements is the best explanation of the problem, but at the same time the opposing theories chosen are using several methodological elements that represent advances that have been made in general philosophy, such as the perspective of the plans proposed by Michael Bratman. We attempt to demonstrate this hypothesis through the principal analysis of four authors and their influences, namely Ronald Dworkin, H.L.A. Hart, Jules Coleman, and Scott Shapiro. Through this analysis we hope to demonstrate how the foundations of the proposed theories have been changing the focus from philosophy of language to other fields and which is the state of legal theory with this advance. As result, we defend the point that the hypothesis is right and even without the best explanatory capacity, the new theories of law need to be better analyzed and their earnings better considered.

Page generated in 0.0261 seconds