Bochum, Universiẗat, Diss., 2008.

Thesis (M.C.S.)--Regent College, Vancouver, BC, 1993. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 108-111).

Treatise (D.M.A.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2001. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Available also from UMI Company.

Thesis (M.A.)--Catholic Theological Union, 1978. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 110-111).

Thesis (M.A.)--Baylor University, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 122-129).

Em 2005, o pedagogo e violinista Eric Rosenblith foi convidado por seu ex-aluno Fredi Gerling para dar uma série de Master-classes em Porto Alegre, Brasil. Na ocasião, Rosenblith deu um total de 36 aulas de violino para 26 participantes. Todas as aulas foram filmadas gerando um total de 22 horas de vídeo. Aproveitando o potencial pedagógico do material, escolhi cinco aulas específicas para estudar em profundidade a metodologia do professor, aplicando metodologias de análises de aulas gravadas em vídeo utilizadas por pesquisadores como Robert Duke e Elaine Colprit. Dessa forma, o principal objetivo da presente pesquisa é analisar as práticas pedagógicas de Rosenblith com o intuito de contribuir com o campo da pesquisa relacionada ao ensino de instrumentos musicais no contexto de Master-class, a partir da análise dos padrões de comportamentos do professor e da análise do conteúdo de suas falas. / In 2005, violin pedagogue Eric Rosenblith was invited by former student Fredi Gerling to give a series of master classes in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In that occasion, Rosenblith gave a total of 36 violin lessons to 26 participants. All lessons were filmed and generated a total of 22 hours of video. Exploring the educational potential of the material, I have chosen five classes to do an in depth study of the teacher's methodology, applying analyzes methodologies for videotaped classes used by researchers like Robert Duke and Elaine Colprit. Thereby, the main goal of the present research is to analyze Rosenblith’s pedagogical practices, contributing to the research field related to teaching of musical instruments in the Master class context, using analysis of teacher behavior patterns and analysis of the content of teacher verbalization.

Em 2005, o pedagogo e violinista Eric Rosenblith foi convidado por seu ex-aluno Fredi Gerling para dar uma série de Master-classes em Porto Alegre, Brasil. Na ocasião, Rosenblith deu um total de 36 aulas de violino para 26 participantes. Todas as aulas foram filmadas gerando um total de 22 horas de vídeo. Aproveitando o potencial pedagógico do material, escolhi cinco aulas específicas para estudar em profundidade a metodologia do professor, aplicando metodologias de análises de aulas gravadas em vídeo utilizadas por pesquisadores como Robert Duke e Elaine Colprit. Dessa forma, o principal objetivo da presente pesquisa é analisar as práticas pedagógicas de Rosenblith com o intuito de contribuir com o campo da pesquisa relacionada ao ensino de instrumentos musicais no contexto de Master-class, a partir da análise dos padrões de comportamentos do professor e da análise do conteúdo de suas falas. / In 2005, violin pedagogue Eric Rosenblith was invited by former student Fredi Gerling to give a series of master classes in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In that occasion, Rosenblith gave a total of 36 violin lessons to 26 participants. All lessons were filmed and generated a total of 22 hours of video. Exploring the educational potential of the material, I have chosen five classes to do an in depth study of the teacher's methodology, applying analyzes methodologies for videotaped classes used by researchers like Robert Duke and Elaine Colprit. Thereby, the main goal of the present research is to analyze Rosenblith’s pedagogical practices, contributing to the research field related to teaching of musical instruments in the Master class context, using analysis of teacher behavior patterns and analysis of the content of teacher verbalization.

本研究以擇定之檢索策略，自ERIC資料庫取得38,230筆領導主題文獻，利用書目計量分析方法，探討ERIC資料庫時間範圍是「最早至2009年」之領導主題文獻特性，包括文獻之年代、語言、教育階段、出版類型，以及適合讀者的分布；再以布萊德福定律和布萊德福─齊夫定律圖解，驗證領導主題期刊文獻的分布情形，並分析領導主題核心期刊之特色；最後統計核心期刊1980年至2009年間刊載的文章中，於摘要明顯提及的領導理論或名詞，以找出新近領導主題的研究焦點，進而掌握未來領導研究的趨勢。 根據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸納如下： 一、領導主題文獻呈現穩定成長，其成長模式為指數模式。 二、英文是領導主題文獻的主要使用語言。 三、中小學教育乃是領導主題文獻最為關注的教育階段。 四、研究報告為領導主題文獻的主要傳播媒介。 五、實踐者是領導主題文獻最主要的適合讀者。 六、領導主題期刊文獻分布不符合布萊德福定律，但與布萊德福─齊夫定律圖解法相符，求得之核心期刊共有十三種。 七、核心期刊有出版國家和學科主題集中的情形。 八、教學領導、分散領導、教師領導、轉型領導、道德領導，以及交易領導為新近領導主題的焦點。 最後，本研究依據研究結果，針對資料庫製作者、圖書資訊服務界、研究者，以及未來研究等四方面，提出相關建議。 / The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of leadership topics literature from earliest to 2009 based on the theoretical perspectives of the bibliometrics. Five fields are used to compile statistics, including publication year, language, education level, publication type, and target audience. The scattering of leadership topics journal articles is examined by Bradford’s Law and Bradford-Zipf law, and the characteristics of core journals are analyzed. Finally, the study counts the leadership theories or ideas explicitly mentioned in abstracts of articles published by core journals from 1980 to 2009 to find out the focuses of the lately leadership topics, and have a better understanding of the developments and trends in leadership research. A total of 38,230 bibliographic records are retrieved from ERIC database. The study concludes as follows: 1.The overall growth of the leadership topics literature is stable, and the growth curve fits exponential growth. 2.English is the most often used language in leadership topics literature. 3.Elementary Secondary Education is the education level that leadership topics literature most concerns. 4.Reports are the major publication type of leadership topics literature. 5.Practitioners are the primary target audience of leadership topics literature. 6.The scattering of leadership topics journal articles doesn’t fit Bradford’s Law, but it fits the S-shaped curve of Bradford-Zipf law. According to Bradford’s verbal expression, there are 13 core journals in this study. 7.The core journals have the publication country and the discipline subject centralized situation. 8.The focuses of the lately leadership topics are instructional leadership, distributed leadership, teacher leadership, transformational leadership, moral leadership, and transactional leadership. According to the results, some suggestions were given for database provider, libraries or information service institutions, researchers, and further research.

<p><strong>Syfte:</strong> Syftet med uppsatsen är att genom empirisk undersökning besvara frågan vilken mätbar effekt sponsring har på varumärkets värde, Brand Equity. Genom att besvara den frågan är också syftet att utveckla en modell som visar vilka faktorer samt vilka delar i varumärket som påverkas av sponsring.</p><p><strong>Metod:</strong> Vi har valt att genomföra detta arbete genom att använda fallstudier. Dessa har vi genomfört med hjälp av kvalitativa intervjuer med representanter för Gevalia, Läkerol och Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg, vilka samtliga sponsrar Brynäs. Vi har bearbetat intervjuerna för att sedan analysera dem mot vår teoretiska referensram. Vi har valt att dela upp analyserna efter huvudområden som rör sponsring och varumärke.</p><p><strong>Resultat & slutsats: </strong>Vi har utvecklat en modell som visar sponsringens effekter på Brand Equity, men dessa är dock inga tydliga mätbara effekter då vi inte kunnat uttyda några genom studien. Modellen bygger istället på antaganden som vi kommit fram till genom vår forskning. Modellen visar kopplingar mellan A-ERIC modellen och Brand Equity. Den visar också hur ett varumärke kan påverkas av sponsringen, bland annat genom att associationer skapas via upplevelsen i samband med ett event och att medvetenheten ökar genom exponering.  </p><p><strong>Förslag till fortsatt forskning: </strong>Som fortsatta studier tycker vi att det skulle vara intressant att göra en jämförande studie för att kunna bekräfta eventuella samband mellan sponsring och dess påverkan på Brand Equity.  </p><p><strong>Uppsatsens bidrag:</strong> Studien bidrar till en ökad kunskap om samspelat mellan sponsring och Brand Equity. Studien bidrar också till kännedom om Gevalias, Läkerols och Länsförsäkringar Gävleborgs sponsringsrelation till Brynäs samt hur detta påverkar respektive varumärke.<strong> </strong></p> / <p><strong>Aim:</strong> The purpose of this study is to answer, through an empirical research, which measurable effects sponsorships have on Brand Equity. The purpose is also to develop a model that shows the effects.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> We have chosen to use case-studies in this research. We have done them through qualitative interviews with representatives for Gevalia, Läkerol and Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg, who are all sponsors of Brynäs IF. We have processed the interviews to be able to analyze them against our theory. We have chosen to divide the analysis into main parts according to sponsoring and brands.   </p><p><strong>Findings & Conclusions:</strong> We have developed a model that shows the sponsoring effect on Brand Equity, but those are not clearly measurable because we didn't find any in the study. The model is instead developed through assumptions that we have found in our research. The model clarifies connections between the A-ERIC model and Brand Equity. It also shows how a brand can be affected through sponsorship, e.g. by associations that are created through the experience of an event and that the awareness increases through exposure.         </p><p><strong>Suggestions for future research:</strong> For further research we suggest a comparative study in order to confirm possible connections between the sponsoring effect and Brand Equity.</p><p><strong>Contribution of the thesis: </strong>This<strong> </strong>study has in particular conduced to knowledge about the connection between sponsoring and Brand Equity. The study also gains knowledge about Gevalia's, Läkerols's and Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg's sponsoring relationship to Brynäs IF and how that influences the brands.</p>

Syfte: Syftet med uppsatsen är att genom empirisk undersökning besvara frågan vilken mätbar effekt sponsring har på varumärkets värde, Brand Equity. Genom att besvara den frågan är också syftet att utveckla en modell som visar vilka faktorer samt vilka delar i varumärket som påverkas av sponsring. Metod: Vi har valt att genomföra detta arbete genom att använda fallstudier. Dessa har vi genomfört med hjälp av kvalitativa intervjuer med representanter för Gevalia, Läkerol och Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg, vilka samtliga sponsrar Brynäs. Vi har bearbetat intervjuerna för att sedan analysera dem mot vår teoretiska referensram. Vi har valt att dela upp analyserna efter huvudområden som rör sponsring och varumärke. Resultat &amp; slutsats: Vi har utvecklat en modell som visar sponsringens effekter på Brand Equity, men dessa är dock inga tydliga mätbara effekter då vi inte kunnat uttyda några genom studien. Modellen bygger istället på antaganden som vi kommit fram till genom vår forskning. Modellen visar kopplingar mellan A-ERIC modellen och Brand Equity. Den visar också hur ett varumärke kan påverkas av sponsringen, bland annat genom att associationer skapas via upplevelsen i samband med ett event och att medvetenheten ökar genom exponering.   Förslag till fortsatt forskning: Som fortsatta studier tycker vi att det skulle vara intressant att göra en jämförande studie för att kunna bekräfta eventuella samband mellan sponsring och dess påverkan på Brand Equity.   Uppsatsens bidrag: Studien bidrar till en ökad kunskap om samspelat mellan sponsring och Brand Equity. Studien bidrar också till kännedom om Gevalias, Läkerols och Länsförsäkringar Gävleborgs sponsringsrelation till Brynäs samt hur detta påverkar respektive varumärke. / Aim: The purpose of this study is to answer, through an empirical research, which measurable effects sponsorships have on Brand Equity. The purpose is also to develop a model that shows the effects. Method: We have chosen to use case-studies in this research. We have done them through qualitative interviews with representatives for Gevalia, Läkerol and Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg, who are all sponsors of Brynäs IF. We have processed the interviews to be able to analyze them against our theory. We have chosen to divide the analysis into main parts according to sponsoring and brands.    Findings &amp; Conclusions: We have developed a model that shows the sponsoring effect on Brand Equity, but those are not clearly measurable because we didn't find any in the study. The model is instead developed through assumptions that we have found in our research. The model clarifies connections between the A-ERIC model and Brand Equity. It also shows how a brand can be affected through sponsorship, e.g. by associations that are created through the experience of an event and that the awareness increases through exposure.          Suggestions for future research: For further research we suggest a comparative study in order to confirm possible connections between the sponsoring effect and Brand Equity. Contribution of the thesis: This study has in particular conduced to knowledge about the connection between sponsoring and Brand Equity. The study also gains knowledge about Gevalia's, Läkerols's and Länsförsäkringar Gävleborg's sponsoring relationship to Brynäs IF and how that influences the brands.