京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(理学) / 甲第21590号 / 理博第4497号 / 新制||理||1646(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院理学研究科化学専攻 / (主査)教授 寺西 利治, 教授 島川 祐一, 教授 吉村 一良 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Science / Kyoto University / DGAM

No description available.

Foram preparados eletrocatalisadores PtSnCu/C (com diferentes razões atômicas Pt:Sn:Cu) e PtSn/C (50:50) com 20 % em massa de metais pelos métodos da redução por borohidreto (IRB) e redução por álcool (RA). Utilizou-se H2PtCl6.6H2O, SnCl2.2H2O e CuCl2.2H2O como fonte de metais, NaBH4 e etilenoglicol como agentes redutores, 2-propanol e etilenoglicol/água como solventes e carbono como suporte. Numa segunda etapa, estes eletrocatalisadores foram ativados pelos processos de dealloying químico (DQ), por tratamento com HNO3 e dealloying eletroquímico (DE), utilizando a técnica de eletrodo de camada fina porosa. Os materiais obtidos foram caracterizados por energia dispersiva de raios-X (EDX), difração de raios-X (DRX), microscopia eletrônica de transmissão (MET), energia dispersiva de raios-X de varredura linear (EDX-VL) e voltametria cíclica (VC). Estudos eletroquímicos para a oxidação eletroquímica do etanol foram realizados por voltametria cíclica, cronoamperometria e células unitárias (conjunto eletrodos/membrana). Os efluentes anódicos provenientes dos testes em células unitárias foram analisados por cromatografia a gás de alta eficiência (CG). Os difratogramas de raios-X dos eletrocatalisadores sintetizados mostraram a típica estrutura cúbica de face centrada (CFC) de liga de platina e após tratamento por dealloying, observou-se que a estrutura (CFC) foi preservada. O tamanho de cristalito dos eletrocatalisadores como preparados variou na ordem de 2 nm a 3 nm e, após processos de dealloying, não foram observadas variações de tamanho significativas. Análises por EDX dos eletrocatalisadores como preparados mostraram similaridade entra a razão atômica Pt:Sn e Pt:Sn:Cu obtida e a nominal. Após dealloying químico e eletroquímico, observou-se variação nas razões atômicas Pt:Sn e Pt:Sn:Cu, indicando a remoção parcial de Cu e Sn. Contudo, o processo de dealloying químico mostrou-se mais eficiente para a remoção de Cu e o dealloying eletroquímico para a remoção de Sn. As análises por EDX-VL mostraram que os processos de dealloying foram efetivos na remoção dos átomos mais superficiais de Cu e/ou Sn da estrutura CFC da Pt. Os resultados obtidos por cronoamperometria e voltametria cíclica mostraram que os eletrocatalisadores com teores de Pt maiores ou iguais a 30 %, após dealloying químico e eletroquímico apresentaram melhora significativa na atividade eletrocatalítica para a oxidação eletroquímica do etanol no potencial de interesse (0,5 V). Os eletrocatalisadores que apresentaram maior eficiência para oxidação eletroquímica do etanol foram PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DE > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DE > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ. Foram testados em células unitárias alimentadas diretamente com etanol os eletrocatalisadores PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DQ, PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ, PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DQ e os eletrocatalisadores comerciais Pt/C BASF e PtSn/C (75:25) BASF. Os eletrocatalisadores apresentaram a seguinte ordem de desempenho: PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DQ > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DQ > PtSn/C (75:25) BASF > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ > Pt/C BASF. Análises por cromatografia gasosa dos efluentes anódicos desses eletrocatalisadores mostraram formação de ácido acético e acetaldeído como produtos principais. / PtSnCu/C (with different Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios) and PtSn/C (50:50) electrocatalysts were prepared by borohydride (BR) and alcohol-reduction (AR) processes using H2PtCl6.6H2O, SnCl2.2H2O and CuCl2.2H2O as metal sources, NaBH4 and ethylene glycol as reducing agents, 2-propanol and ethylene glycol/water as solvents and carbon black as support. In a further step, these electrocatalysts were activated by chemical (CD) and electrochemical (ED) dealloying processes through acid treatment and thin porous coating technique, respectively. These materials were characterized by energy dispersive X-ray, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, line scan energy dispersive X-ray and cyclic voltammetry. Electrochemical studies for ethanol electro-oxidation were performed by cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry and in single Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell using Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA). The anodic efluents were analised by gas chromatrography. The X-ray diffractograms of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts showed the typical face-centered cubic structure (FCC) of platinum and its alloys. After dealloying, the X-ray diffractograms showed that the Pt FCC structure was preserved. The crystallite sizes of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts were in the range of 2 nm to 3 nm and after dealloying there were no significant variations in sizes. The energy dispersive X-ray analysis of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts showed a Pt:Sn and Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios similar to the nominal values. After chemical and electrochemical dealloying of the electrocatalysts the ranged Pt:Sn and Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios showed that Cu and Sn atoms were removed. However, chemical dealloying process proved to be more efficient for removing Cu and electrochemical dealloying for removing Sn. The line scan energy dispersive X-ray analysis showed that acid and electrochemichel treatments were efficient to dealloying Cu and/or Sn superficial atoms of the FCC structure of Pt. The results obtained by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry showed that electrocatalysts containing 30 at % or more of platinum, after chemical and electrochemical dealloying had significant improvement in electrocatalytic activity for ethanol electro-oxidation in the potential of interest. The electrocatalysts with higher efficiency for electrochemical oxidation of ethanol were PtSn/C (50:50) BR/ED > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/ED > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD. PtSn/C (50:50) BR/CD, PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD, PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/CD electrocatalysts and Pt/C BASF, PtSn/C (75:25) BASF commercial electrocatalysts were tested in single Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell. The results showed the following peformance for ethanol electro-oxidation: PtSn/C (50:50) BR/CD > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/CD > PtSnCu/C > PtSn/C (75:25) BASF > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD > Pt/C BASF.

Foram preparados eletrocatalisadores PtSnCu/C (com diferentes razões atômicas Pt:Sn:Cu) e PtSn/C (50:50) com 20 % em massa de metais pelos métodos da redução por borohidreto (IRB) e redução por álcool (RA). Utilizou-se H2PtCl6.6H2O, SnCl2.2H2O e CuCl2.2H2O como fonte de metais, NaBH4 e etilenoglicol como agentes redutores, 2-propanol e etilenoglicol/água como solventes e carbono como suporte. Numa segunda etapa, estes eletrocatalisadores foram ativados pelos processos de dealloying químico (DQ), por tratamento com HNO3 e dealloying eletroquímico (DE), utilizando a técnica de eletrodo de camada fina porosa. Os materiais obtidos foram caracterizados por energia dispersiva de raios-X (EDX), difração de raios-X (DRX), microscopia eletrônica de transmissão (MET), energia dispersiva de raios-X de varredura linear (EDX-VL) e voltametria cíclica (VC). Estudos eletroquímicos para a oxidação eletroquímica do etanol foram realizados por voltametria cíclica, cronoamperometria e células unitárias (conjunto eletrodos/membrana). Os efluentes anódicos provenientes dos testes em células unitárias foram analisados por cromatografia a gás de alta eficiência (CG). Os difratogramas de raios-X dos eletrocatalisadores sintetizados mostraram a típica estrutura cúbica de face centrada (CFC) de liga de platina e após tratamento por dealloying, observou-se que a estrutura (CFC) foi preservada. O tamanho de cristalito dos eletrocatalisadores como preparados variou na ordem de 2 nm a 3 nm e, após processos de dealloying, não foram observadas variações de tamanho significativas. Análises por EDX dos eletrocatalisadores como preparados mostraram similaridade entra a razão atômica Pt:Sn e Pt:Sn:Cu obtida e a nominal. Após dealloying químico e eletroquímico, observou-se variação nas razões atômicas Pt:Sn e Pt:Sn:Cu, indicando a remoção parcial de Cu e Sn. Contudo, o processo de dealloying químico mostrou-se mais eficiente para a remoção de Cu e o dealloying eletroquímico para a remoção de Sn. As análises por EDX-VL mostraram que os processos de dealloying foram efetivos na remoção dos átomos mais superficiais de Cu e/ou Sn da estrutura CFC da Pt. Os resultados obtidos por cronoamperometria e voltametria cíclica mostraram que os eletrocatalisadores com teores de Pt maiores ou iguais a 30 %, após dealloying químico e eletroquímico apresentaram melhora significativa na atividade eletrocatalítica para a oxidação eletroquímica do etanol no potencial de interesse (0,5 V). Os eletrocatalisadores que apresentaram maior eficiência para oxidação eletroquímica do etanol foram PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DE > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DE > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ. Foram testados em células unitárias alimentadas diretamente com etanol os eletrocatalisadores PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DQ, PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ, PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DQ e os eletrocatalisadores comerciais Pt/C BASF e PtSn/C (75:25) BASF. Os eletrocatalisadores apresentaram a seguinte ordem de desempenho: PtSn/C (50:50) IRB/DQ > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) RA/DQ > PtSn/C (75:25) BASF > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) IRB/DQ > Pt/C BASF. Análises por cromatografia gasosa dos efluentes anódicos desses eletrocatalisadores mostraram formação de ácido acético e acetaldeído como produtos principais. / PtSnCu/C (with different Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios) and PtSn/C (50:50) electrocatalysts were prepared by borohydride (BR) and alcohol-reduction (AR) processes using H2PtCl6.6H2O, SnCl2.2H2O and CuCl2.2H2O as metal sources, NaBH4 and ethylene glycol as reducing agents, 2-propanol and ethylene glycol/water as solvents and carbon black as support. In a further step, these electrocatalysts were activated by chemical (CD) and electrochemical (ED) dealloying processes through acid treatment and thin porous coating technique, respectively. These materials were characterized by energy dispersive X-ray, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, line scan energy dispersive X-ray and cyclic voltammetry. Electrochemical studies for ethanol electro-oxidation were performed by cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry and in single Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell using Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA). The anodic efluents were analised by gas chromatrography. The X-ray diffractograms of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts showed the typical face-centered cubic structure (FCC) of platinum and its alloys. After dealloying, the X-ray diffractograms showed that the Pt FCC structure was preserved. The crystallite sizes of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts were in the range of 2 nm to 3 nm and after dealloying there were no significant variations in sizes. The energy dispersive X-ray analysis of the as-synthesized electrocatalysts showed a Pt:Sn and Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios similar to the nominal values. After chemical and electrochemical dealloying of the electrocatalysts the ranged Pt:Sn and Pt:Sn:Cu atomic ratios showed that Cu and Sn atoms were removed. However, chemical dealloying process proved to be more efficient for removing Cu and electrochemical dealloying for removing Sn. The line scan energy dispersive X-ray analysis showed that acid and electrochemichel treatments were efficient to dealloying Cu and/or Sn superficial atoms of the FCC structure of Pt. The results obtained by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry showed that electrocatalysts containing 30 at % or more of platinum, after chemical and electrochemical dealloying had significant improvement in electrocatalytic activity for ethanol electro-oxidation in the potential of interest. The electrocatalysts with higher efficiency for electrochemical oxidation of ethanol were PtSn/C (50:50) BR/ED > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/ED > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD. PtSn/C (50:50) BR/CD, PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD, PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/CD electrocatalysts and Pt/C BASF, PtSn/C (75:25) BASF commercial electrocatalysts were tested in single Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell. The results showed the following peformance for ethanol electro-oxidation: PtSn/C (50:50) BR/CD > PtSnCu/C (50:40:10) AR/CD > PtSnCu/C > PtSn/C (75:25) BASF > PtSnCu/C (50:10:40) BR/CD > Pt/C BASF.

In recent years an emphasis has been placed on the development of alternative and clean energy sources to reduce the global use of fossil fuels. One of these alternatives entails the use of H2 as an energy carrier, which can be obtained amongst others using thermochemical processes, for example the hybrid sulphur process (HyS). The HyS process is based on the thermal decomposition of sulphuric acid into water, sulphur dioxide and oxygen. The subsequent chemical conversion of the sulphur dioxide saturated water back to sulphuric acid and hydrogen is achieved in an electrolyser using a platinum coated proton exchange membrane. This depolarised electrolysis requires a theoretical voltage of only 0.158 V compared to water electrolysis requiring approximately 1.23 V. One of the steps in the development of this technology at the North-West University, entailed the establishment of the platinum coating technology which entailed two steps; firstly using newly obtained equipment to manufacture the membrane electro catalyst assemblies (MEA’s) and gas diffusion electrodes (GDE’s) and secondly to test these MEA’s and GDE’s using sulphur dioxide depolarized electrolysis by comparing the manufactured MEA’s and GDE’s to commercially available MEA’s and GDE’s. Different MEA’s and GDE’s were manufactured using both a screen printing (for the microporous layer deposition) and a spraying technique. The catalyst loadings were varied as well as the type and thickness of the proton exchange membranes used. The proton exchange membranes that were included in this study were Nafion 117®, sPSU-PBIOO and SfS-PBIOO membranes whereas the gas diffusion layer consisted of carbon paper with varying thicknesses (EC-TP01-030 – 0.11 mm and EC-TP01-060 – 0.19mm). MEA and GDE were prepared by first preparing an ink that was used both for MEA and GDE spraying. The MEA’s were prepared by spraying various catalyst coatings onto the proton exchange membranes containing 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 mg/cm2 platinum respectively. The GDE’s were first coated by a micro porous carbon layer using the screen printing technique in order to attain a suitable surface for catalyst deposition. Using the spraying technique GDE’s containing 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 mg/cm2 platinum were prepared. After SEM analysis, the MEA’s and GDE’s performance was measured using SO2 depolarized electrolysis. From the electrolysis experiments, the voltage vs. current density generated during operation, the hydrogen production, the sulphuric acid generation and the hydrogen production efficiency was obtained. From the results it became clear that while the catalyst loading had little effect on performance there were a number of factors that did have a significant influence. These included the type of proton exchange membrane, the membrane thickness and whether the catalyst coating was applied to the proton exchange membrane (MEA) or to the gas diffusion layer (GDE). During SO2 depolarized electrolysis VI curves were generated which gave an indication of the performance of the GDE’s and MEA’s. The best preforming GDE was GDE-3 (0.46V @ 320 mA/cm2), which included a GDE EC-TP01-060, while the best preforming MEA’s were NAF-4 (0.69V @ 320mA/cm2) consisting of a Nafion117 based MEA and PBI-1 (0.43V @ 320mA/cm2) made from a sPSU-PBIOO blended membrane. During hydrogen production it became clear that the GDE’s produced the most hydrogen (best was GDE-02 a in house manufactured GDE yielding 67.3 mL/min @ 0.8V), followed by the Nafion® MEA’s (best was NAF-4 a commercial MEA yielding 57.61 mL/min @ 0.74V) and the PBI based MEA’s. , (best was PBI-2 with 67.11 mL/min @ 0.88V). Due to the small amounts of acid produced and the SO2 crossover, a significant error margin was observed when measuring the amount of sulphuric acid produced. Nonetheless, a direct correlation could still be seen between the acid and the hydrogen production as had been expected from literature. The highest sulphuric acid concentrations produced using the tested GDE’s and MEA’s from this study were the in-house manufactured GDE-01 (3.572mol/L @ 0.8V), the commercial NAF-4 (4.456mol/L @ 0.64V) and the in-house manufactured PBI-2 (3.344mol/L @ 0.8V). The overall efficiency of the GDE’s were similar, ranging from less than 10% at low voltages (± 0.6V) increasing to approximately 60% at ± 0.8V. For the MEA’s larger variation was observed with NAF-4 reaching efficiencies of nearly 80% at 0.7V. In terms of consistency of performance it was shown that the Nafion MEA’s preformed most consistently followed by the GDE’s and lastly the PBI based MEA’s which for the PBI based membranes can probably be ascribed to the significant difference in thickness of the thin PBI vs. the Nafion based membranes. In summary the study has shown the results between the commercially obtained and the in-house manufactured GDE’s and MEA’s were comparable confirming the suitability of the coating techniques evaluated in this study. / MSc (Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

In recent years an emphasis has been placed on the development of alternative and clean energy sources to reduce the global use of fossil fuels. One of these alternatives entails the use of H2 as an energy carrier, which can be obtained amongst others using thermochemical processes, for example the hybrid sulphur process (HyS). The HyS process is based on the thermal decomposition of sulphuric acid into water, sulphur dioxide and oxygen. The subsequent chemical conversion of the sulphur dioxide saturated water back to sulphuric acid and hydrogen is achieved in an electrolyser using a platinum coated proton exchange membrane. This depolarised electrolysis requires a theoretical voltage of only 0.158 V compared to water electrolysis requiring approximately 1.23 V. One of the steps in the development of this technology at the North-West University, entailed the establishment of the platinum coating technology which entailed two steps; firstly using newly obtained equipment to manufacture the membrane electro catalyst assemblies (MEA’s) and gas diffusion electrodes (GDE’s) and secondly to test these MEA’s and GDE’s using sulphur dioxide depolarized electrolysis by comparing the manufactured MEA’s and GDE’s to commercially available MEA’s and GDE’s. Different MEA’s and GDE’s were manufactured using both a screen printing (for the microporous layer deposition) and a spraying technique. The catalyst loadings were varied as well as the type and thickness of the proton exchange membranes used. The proton exchange membranes that were included in this study were Nafion 117®, sPSU-PBIOO and SfS-PBIOO membranes whereas the gas diffusion layer consisted of carbon paper with varying thicknesses (EC-TP01-030 – 0.11 mm and EC-TP01-060 – 0.19mm). MEA and GDE were prepared by first preparing an ink that was used both for MEA and GDE spraying. The MEA’s were prepared by spraying various catalyst coatings onto the proton exchange membranes containing 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 mg/cm2 platinum respectively. The GDE’s were first coated by a micro porous carbon layer using the screen printing technique in order to attain a suitable surface for catalyst deposition. Using the spraying technique GDE’s containing 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 mg/cm2 platinum were prepared. After SEM analysis, the MEA’s and GDE’s performance was measured using SO2 depolarized electrolysis. From the electrolysis experiments, the voltage vs. current density generated during operation, the hydrogen production, the sulphuric acid generation and the hydrogen production efficiency was obtained. From the results it became clear that while the catalyst loading had little effect on performance there were a number of factors that did have a significant influence. These included the type of proton exchange membrane, the membrane thickness and whether the catalyst coating was applied to the proton exchange membrane (MEA) or to the gas diffusion layer (GDE). During SO2 depolarized electrolysis VI curves were generated which gave an indication of the performance of the GDE’s and MEA’s. The best preforming GDE was GDE-3 (0.46V @ 320 mA/cm2), which included a GDE EC-TP01-060, while the best preforming MEA’s were NAF-4 (0.69V @ 320mA/cm2) consisting of a Nafion117 based MEA and PBI-1 (0.43V @ 320mA/cm2) made from a sPSU-PBIOO blended membrane. During hydrogen production it became clear that the GDE’s produced the most hydrogen (best was GDE-02 a in house manufactured GDE yielding 67.3 mL/min @ 0.8V), followed by the Nafion® MEA’s (best was NAF-4 a commercial MEA yielding 57.61 mL/min @ 0.74V) and the PBI based MEA’s. , (best was PBI-2 with 67.11 mL/min @ 0.88V). Due to the small amounts of acid produced and the SO2 crossover, a significant error margin was observed when measuring the amount of sulphuric acid produced. Nonetheless, a direct correlation could still be seen between the acid and the hydrogen production as had been expected from literature. The highest sulphuric acid concentrations produced using the tested GDE’s and MEA’s from this study were the in-house manufactured GDE-01 (3.572mol/L @ 0.8V), the commercial NAF-4 (4.456mol/L @ 0.64V) and the in-house manufactured PBI-2 (3.344mol/L @ 0.8V). The overall efficiency of the GDE’s were similar, ranging from less than 10% at low voltages (± 0.6V) increasing to approximately 60% at ± 0.8V. For the MEA’s larger variation was observed with NAF-4 reaching efficiencies of nearly 80% at 0.7V. In terms of consistency of performance it was shown that the Nafion MEA’s preformed most consistently followed by the GDE’s and lastly the PBI based MEA’s which for the PBI based membranes can probably be ascribed to the significant difference in thickness of the thin PBI vs. the Nafion based membranes. In summary the study has shown the results between the commercially obtained and the in-house manufactured GDE’s and MEA’s were comparable confirming the suitability of the coating techniques evaluated in this study. / MSc (Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

The desire for pure diatomic hydrogen gas, H2(g), has been on the rise since the concept of the hydrogen economy system was proposed back in 1970. The production of hydrogen has been extensively examined over 40 + years as the need to replace current fuel sources, hydrocarbons, has become more prevalent. Currently there are only two practical and renewable production methods of hydrogen; landfill gas and power to gas. This study focuses on the later method; using various renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaics, to provide off-peak energy to perform water electrolysis. Efficient electrolysis takes place in electrochemical cells which maximize performance efficiency with the use of noble metal electrocatalyst. Optimizing these electrocatalyst to be less material dependent, highly durable, and more efficient will support the implementation of power to gas electrolysis into the energy infrastructure. The main focus of this study is to explore RuO2 nanorods as a possible electrocatalyst for Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) water electrolysis. A PEM electrolyzer cell has been constructed and fitted with a RuO2 nanorod decorated, mixed metal oxide (MMO) ribbon mesh anode catalyst structure. The current density-voltage characteristics were measured for the RuO2 nanorod electrocatalyst while under water feed operation. The electrocatalytic behavior was compared to that of ribbon mesh anode catalyst structures not decorated with RuO2 nanorods; one coated with a Ir/Ta MMO catalyst, the other was stripped of the MMO coating resulting in a Ti ribbon mesh anode. The results of these experiments show increased activity with the RuO2 nanorod electrocatalyst corresponding to a decrease in electrochemical overpotential. Through the collection of experimental data from various electrolyzer cell configurations, these overpotenials were able to be identified, resulting in categorical attributions of the enhanced catalytic behavior examined.

This thesis uses dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (dEIS) to study how nickel undergoes electrooxidation. An electropolishing step is used to make a clean surface, and then the transformation of nickel to α-Ni(OH)2 is studied, including how a holding potential affects the double layer capacitance, surface structure and charge transfer resistance. Also, NiOOH is grown on the surface by sweeping to more positive potentials, and the activity of NiOOH toward glycerol electrooxidation is studied. It is shown that the free water content decreases on the surface (all or some portions of the surface, or possibly one or two monolayers close to the nickel surface) during the potential hold as determined by the decrease in measured capacitance. Oxidation of glycerol to glyceraldehyde is found to be the main reaction and the reaction mechanism is discussed. / Graduate / 2019-10-23

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells are one of the most promising hydrogen energy conversion devices for portable, mobile and stationary applications. For wide spread usage to produce electricity platinum loading has to be decreased by using highly active electrocatalysts. Even 10 ppm carbon monoxide or higher than 30% carbon dioxide cause performance losses via deactivation which can be diminished by using binary catalysts. The aim of this thesis is to develop new platinum based electrocatalysts with high catalytic activity and to overcome the problems due to the deactivation. platinum and platinum-ruthenium based catalysts on different carbon supports have been prepared by supercritical carbon dioxide deposition and microwave irradiation methods. By using supercritical carbon dioxide deposition platinum on Vulcan XC72R (VXR), multi wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and Black Pearl 2000 (BP2000) catalysts were prepared and characterized by XRD, TEM and cyclic voltammetry (CV). XRD results showed that in catalysts prepared by using supercritical carbon dioxide deposition method, the particle sizes as low as 1-2 nm can be obtained. From the CV results the electrochemical surface areas obtained were Platinum/VXR&gt / Platinum/MWCNT&gt / PlatinumBP2000. By means of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), the number of electrons transferred per oxygen molecule was calculated as 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 for Platinum/BP2000, Platinum/VXR and Platinum/MWCNT, respectively. The microwave irradiation was used to prepare platinum on VX, Regal and BP2000 and platinum-ruthenium on VX. The effects of microwave duration, base concentration, carbon support used and surfactant/precursor ratios were investigated. The particle sizes of the catalysts were ranging between 2-6 nm. The prepared catalysts were characterized by XRD, XPS, and then PEMFC tests were performed. The performance was ordered as Platinum/VX&gt / Platinum/Regal&gt / Platinum/BP2000. The power losses arising from carbon dioxide in hydrogen feed were decreased by using prepared platinum-ruthenium based catalysts.

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell technology is promissing alternative solution to today&rsquo / s energy concerns providing clean environment and efficient system. Decreasing platinum (Pt) content of fuel cell is one of the main goals to reduce high costs of fuel cell technology in the way of commercialization. In this target, porous carbons provide an alternative solution as a support material for fuel cell electrocatalysts. It is also essential to increase surface area of carbon support material to have well dispersion of the Pt nanoparticles. The aim of this thesis is to synthesize mesoporous carbon supports named as hollow core mesoporous shell (HCMS) carbon and prepare their corresponding electrocatalysts with platinum impregnation method. HCMS carbon supports were synthesized by using two different carbon sources. As a first approach, phenol/paraformaldehyde couples were used and carbon source exhibited 1053 m 2 /g BET surface area and 1.046 nm BJH adsorption pore diameter. Second approach was to use divinylbenzene (DVB) as a carbon source with an initiator named as azo bis isobuytronitrile (AIBN) differing synthesis criteria. It is observed that using AIBN/DVB, pore sizes increased up to 3.44 nm. Platinum impregnation was conducted by microwave irradiation method using hydrogen hexachloroplatinate (IV) hydrate as a platinum precursor. The first achievement was to increase platinum loading up to 44 wt % on commercial Vulcan XC 72 by using ethylene glycol as a reducing agent. Using different reducing agents such as hydrazine, sodium borohydrate with a combination of ethylene glycol, platinum loading reached up to 34 wt % on HCMS carbon support. Accordingly, 34 wt %, 32 wt % and 28 wt % Pt/HCMS carbon supported electrodes preparation was achieved. The sizes of the platinum nanoparticles were calculated by XRD analysis as 4 nm, 4.2 nm and 4.5 nm for 28 wt %, 32 wt % and 34 wt % Pt/HCMS carbon supported electrodes respectively. Characterizations of catalysts were performed by ex situ (N 2 adsorption, TGA, SEM, TEM and Cyclic Voltammetry) and in situ (PEMFC tests) analysis.