Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:31:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2009-03-27Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:01:45Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 dias_att_dr_arafcl.pdf: 1236121 bytes, checksum: 0e0bc1d4fefef17d27810850e3b47bf1 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Partindo da gênese da relação família-escola na Idade Moderna e tendo como base o referencial da História da educação, configurou-se uma problemática que interroga o conjunto de teses e dissertações produzidas no âmbito dos programas de pós-graduação brasileiros. O principal questionamento refere-se ao modo como os trabalhos realizados nas universidades, loci fundamental da pesquisa em nosso país, construíram o conhecimento acerca da relação família-escola, através de seus pressupostos teóricos e de seus métodos, procurando perceber como caracterizaram a relação através de seus resultados e propostas, e como captaram as perenes tensões próprias desse tipo de relação. Para responder as questões da pesquisa foi delineado e executado, em 2008, um estudo bibliográfico sobre as teses e dissertações produzidas nos programas de pós-graduação brasileiros, composto de um levantamento bibliográfico, uma análise bibliométrica, e uma avaliação de textos completos. Os principais objetivos foram: Identificar as teses e dissertações produzidas em Programas de Pós-Graduação Brasileiros nas áreas de Educação, Psicologia e Sociologia buscando sintetizar as principais características dessa produção; Identificar os diferentes tipos de estudo empreendidos, segundo seus pressupostos e métodos; Identificar os pressupostos da produção científica eleita visando assinalar a presença das teorias sociológicas ou das teorias psicológicas; Identificar nos estudos os dados empíricos que avaliam a relação verificando que tipos de práticas relacionais emergem dos mesmos; Identificar os resultados/achados e as propostas decorrentes dos estudos da relação família-escola. Os principais resultados subdividem-se no que tange ao método adotado e na temática que era objeto dos estudos analisados. Destacando-se: o método de pesquisa bibliográfica revelou-se produtivo... / Paulista „Júlio de Mesquita Filho‟ – São Paulo. From the genesis of the Family-School Relationship in Modern Age, and based on the History of Education benchmark, an issue was raised to inquire the set of the theses and dissertations produced in Brazilian Graduation Programs. The main question is related to how the papers produced in universities, the main loci of research in our country, built on the knowledge of the Family-School Relationship, through their theoretical assumptions and their methods, trying to understand how the relationship was characterized by their results and proposals, and trying to capture the perennial tensions inherent in this type of relationship. To answer the research questions, a bibliographic study was designed and carried out on theses and dissertations produced in Graduation Programs in Brazil, consisting of a bibliography collection, a bibliometric analysis, and full texts evaluation. The main goals were: to identify the theses and dissertations produced in the Graduate Programs in Brazil in the areas of Education, Psychology and Sociology seeking to summarize the main characteristics of this production; to identify the different types of studies undertaken, according to their assumptions and methods; to identify the assumptions of the chosen scientific production trying to signalize the presence of the sociological or psychological theories; to identify the empirical evidence in the studies that allow them to evaluate the relationship, noting which relational forms of practice emerge from them; to identify the results/findings and proposals arising from the studies of the Family-School Relationship. The main results were subdivided with regard to the method used and according to the thematic that was object of the analyzed studies. Standing out: the bibliographic research method has proved to be productive in achieving the goals... (Complete abstract click electronic access below) / Partiendo de la génesis de la relación familia-escuela en la Edad Moderna y teniendo como base el referencial de la Historia de la educación, se configuró una problemática que interroga el conjunto de tesis y disertaciones producidas en el ámbito de los programas de pos-grado brasileños. El principal cuestionamiento se refiere al modo como los trabajos realizados en las universidades, loci fundamental de la investigación en nuestro país, construyeron el conocimiento acerca de la relación familia-escuela através de los presupuestos teóricos y de sus métodos, buscando reconocer cómo caracterizan la relación a través de sus resultados y propuestas y cómo captaran las perennes tensiones propias de ese tipo de relación. Para contestar las cuestiones de la pesquisa fue delineado y desarrollado, en 2008, un estudio bibliográfico sobre las tesis y disertaciones producidas en los programas de pos-grado brasileños, compuesto por un levantamiento bibliográfico, una análisis bibliométrica, y una evaluación de textos completos. Los objetivos principales fueron: Identificar las tesis y disertaciones producidas en Programas de Pos-grado Brasileños en el área de Educación, Psicología y Sociología, buscando sintetizar las principales características de esa producción; Identificar los diferentes tipos de estudio emprendidos, según sus presupuestos y métodos, Identificar los presupuestos de la producción científica visando señalar la presencia de teorías sociológicas o de las teorías psicológicas. Identificar en los estudios los dados empíricos que evalúan la relación verificando qué tipos de prácticas relacionales emergen de los mismos. Identificar los resultados/hallazgos y las propuestas decurrentes de los estudios de la relación familia-escuela. Los principales resultados se subdividen en el que rige el método adoptado y la temática que era objeto... (Resumen completo clicar acceso eletrônico abajo)

Au Québec, l’enfant est actuellement au centre de son éducation. Les intervenants gravitant autour de lui sont donc appelés à collaborer tout au long de son parcours scolaire afin de l’aider à atteindre son plein potentiel. Cette dynamique de collaboration est d’autant plus nécessaire lorsqu’il s’agit d’élève handicapé ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage (ÉHDAA) pour qui la réussite éducative n’est pas toujours évidente. Le régime pédagogique de l’éducation préscolaire, de l’enseignement primaire et de l’enseignement secondaire du Québec (Gouvernement du Québec, 2020a) prescrit que des renseignements doivent être fournis une fois par mois aux parents d’enfants ayant des difficultés. Cette transmission de renseignements a pour but de favoriser la collaboration des parents et de l’école. Malheureusement, cette collaboration n’est pas toujours effective et de nombreux facteurs d’obstacles entravent la relation école-famille (Bouchard, St-Amant et coll., 2000 et Kalubi et Lesieux, 2006). Toutefois, en milieu scolaire, le plan d’intervention (PI) est un outil reconnu pour aider l’élève HDAA dans son cheminement scolaire puisqu’il incite, entre autres, à la collaboration entre l’école et la famille et demande l’implication des parents (Gouvernement du Québec, 2004). À cet égard, le PI est une démarche qui s’inscrit dans un « cycle de vie d’un PI dynamique et continu (Myara, 2017, p.52) », au travers d’une collaboration-école-famille permettant de mieux identifier les besoins de l’élève HDAA et d’y répondre. Cette recherche a pour but d’identifier les différentes formes de collaboration-école-famille qui existent entre les enseignants et les parents lors du cycle de vie d’un PI et de déterminer si le programme de formation et d’accompagnement à l’élaboration des PI (FADéPI) permet aux parents de s’y impliquer davantage. Ce faisant, nous avons adopté une approche de recherche mixte qui a été menée auprès de cinq intervenants scolaires et de deux parents d’élèves HDAA. Les données ont été recueillies par le biais d’analyse de canevas de PI, de questionnaires et d’inventaires. L’analyse des résultats semble révéler que bien que les parents participent habituellement aux rencontres de PI, ils n’arrivent pas toujours préparés comme le souhaiteraient les intervenants scolaires. De plus, bien que la littérature soutienne que la collaboration est essentielle à la réussite éducative de l’élève, elle ne semble pas toujours facile à obtenir. Toutefois, il existe diverses formes et périodes de collaboration, divers modes de collaboration et différents niveaux de collaboration, à l’intérieur de la démarche de PI, qui varient selon le degré de relation, le niveau de compétence de l’élève et de la complexité de ses besoins. Quant à l’impact du programme FADéPI sur l’implication parentale, il semble d’une part qu’il pourrait faciliter la participation et l’implication parentale de différentes façons. Toutefois, cette participation ne serait pas nécessairement active et ne découlerait pas d’un véritable partenariat (Bouchard et coll., 1996 et Deslandes, 1999), puisque malgré le désir d’atteindre un but commun et la confiance mutuelle, il ne semblerait pas y avoir une réelle recherche de consensus dans la prise de décision ni même une reconnaissance réciproque d’expertise qui permettrait de créer une relation d’égalité entre les participants. D’autre part, nous avons remarqué que l’accès à un canevas de PI, sur une plateforme, qui documente des objectifs observables, mesurables, qui met en exergue la progression des apprentissages de l’élève, et donne la possibilité aux parents de communiquer en mode synchrone ou asynchrone, favorise les connaissances des parents relatifs au PI de leur enfant et facilite la communication. / In the province of Quebec, children are the focal point of their own education. Teachers and professionals surrounding the student are called upon to collaborate throughout the her or his academic experience in order to help her or him reach their full potential. This collaborative dynamic is even more so essential when it comes to students with a disabilities or for whom educational success is not always obvious. The basic education regulation for preschool, elementary and secondary education in Quebec (Gouvernement du Québec, 2020a) requires that information be provided at least once a month to parents of children with different needs. The purpose of shared information is to encourage collaboration between parents and the school. Unfortunately, this collaboration is not always efficient and many factors hinder a fruitful relationship between the student’s school and family (Bouchard, St-Amant et al., 2000 and Kalubi and Lesieux, 2006). In a school environment, the individualized education program (IEP) is a recognized tool for helping the because students with different needs, it stimulates, among other things, collaboration between the school and the family and requires parent involvement (Government of Quebec, 2004). Actually an IEP is a process which takes part of a dynamic and continuous IEP life cycle (Myara, 2017, p.52)”, throughout a school-family collaboration allowing one to identify and respond to students different needs. This research aims to identify the different forms and modes of school-family collaboration that exist between IEP team members and parents during an IEP life cycle of and determine whether or not the training and support program for IEP development of IEPs (TSIEP) Program allows parents to become more involved. In our method, we adopted a mixed research approach. This was done with the participation of five school resource members and two parents of students with different needs. Data was collected through the analysis of IEPs documents, questionnaires and inventories. The results seems to reveal that although parents usually attend IEP meetings, they do not always arrive as prepared as the school counselors would like. Additionally, although the literature argues that collaboration is essential to a student's educational success, it does not always seem easy to achieve it. However, there are various forms, modes, levels and periods of collaboration during the IEP process, which vary according to the degree of the different relationships, the students competencies and the complexity of her or his needs. As for the impact of the FADéPI program on parental involvement, it seems on the one hand that it could facilitate parental participation and involvement in different ways. However, this participation would not necessarily be proactive and would not result from a true partnership (Bouchard et al., 1996 and Deslandes, 1999), since despite the desire to achieve a common goal and mutual trust, it would not seem there is a real search for consensus in decision-making or even a reciprocal recognition of expertise which would make it possible to create an equal relationship between the participants. On the other hand, we noticed that access to an online IEP template or model, which documents observable, measurable goals, highlights students progress and provides parents with the opportunity to communicate in synchronous or asynchronous mode, promotes parents' knowledge of their child's IEP and facilitates communication.