Au XIXe siècle, la science et le fantastique produisent le même effet chez les gens : en mettant ceux-ci en contact avec des phénomènes inouïs, ils les inscrivent dans un rapport dialectique – entre le connu et l’inconnu – qui doit déboucher sur le non-encore-connu, comme s’ils recelaient la promesse d’une révélation. En effet, à la fois les sciences de l’esprit et le récit fantastique permettent de franchir les frontières entre le moi et l’autre, la vie et la mort, le corps et l’esprit. Explorant autant de domaines inconnus relatifs à l’homme, ils redéfinissent les contours de celui-ci. C’est donc en tant que moyens de savoir que ce mémoire met en relation ces sciences (psychiatrie, psychophysiologie, hypnotisme…) et trois récits fantastiques, « Onuphrius » de Théophile Gautier, « La Mort d’Olivier Bécaille » d’Émile Zola et « L’Homme voilé » de Marcel Schwob, où une crise de catalepsie subie par le héros déclenche le processus dialectique. / In the 19th century, science and the fantastic generated the same effect in people’s minds: by making them encounter incredible phenomena, they place them in a dialectical relation – between what is known and the unknown – which leads to the not-yet-known, as if they were concealing a promise of revelation. Indeed, both sciences of the mind and fantastic narratives enable the crossing of frontiers between the self and the other, life and death, body and mind. Exploring all these unknown territories related to man, they redefine his contours. Therefore, it is as means of knowledge that this dissertation is establishing a link between these sciences (psychiatry, psychophysiology, hypnotism...) and three fantastic narratives, “Onuphrius” by Théophile Gautier, “La Mort d’Olivier Bécaille” by Émile Zola and “L’Homme voilé” by Marcel Schwob, where catalepsy crises trigger the dialectical process.

The thesis deals with shapes of the Slovene fantastic tale in the 1945-1975's and looks into the roles which have been assigned to it by it's authors. The thesis assumes that during this period, there were three basic types of authorial approach: fantastic tale in the service of the state ideology, fantastic tale as a free play of imagination and fantastic tale with overlap. These three roles are analyzed on the example of nine fantastic tales, most of them being from the literary canon of the Slovene children's literature: Udarna brigada (Anton Ingolič), Zgode in nezgode kraljevskega dvora (Milan Šega), Drejček in trije Marsovčki (Vid Pečjak), Moj dežnik je lahko balon (Ela Peroci), Strah ima velike oči (Marjan Marinc), Kosovirja na leteči žlici (Svetlana Makarovič), Potovanje v tisočera mesta (Vitomil Zupan), Deklica Delfina in lisica Zvitorepka (Kristina Brenkova) and Avtomoto mravlje (Jože Snoj).

The present dissertation investigates the use of the fantastic and its functions in contemporary prose, the initial hypothesis being that the fantastic is not historically exhausted, but continues to be productive. The major part of this study consists of a close reading of four novels printed between 1995 and 2001: Marie Hermanson’s Värddjuret (1995), Majgull Axelsson’s Aprilhäxan (1997), Karen Duve’s Regenroman (1999) and Elfriede Kern’s Schwarze Lämmer (2001). Tzvetan Todorov’s definition of the fantastic as structural ambiguity is fundamental to the dissertation. In order not to bind the definition to a normative concept of genre, the fantastic is in this study considered as a narrative strategy. The dissertation’s analyses demonstrate that in these contemporary novels there is considerable variation of narrative devices, as well as of intertextual motifs deriving from the ‘archive’ provided by the tradition of the fantastic. The fantastic is to a great extent intertextual, but does not merely function as a “signal of fiction” in a postmodern game where ambiguity is no longer relevant. Instead, the narrated world in these novels is characterized by a deeply-rooted ambivalence, heterogeneity and instability. Both attractive and dangerous, the fantastic corresponds to a meeting with “the other” and the unknown, while dampening the conflict between the supernatural and the natural so clearly seen in Todorov. What is central is not the crisis of perception undergone by the novel’s characters as they choose between two opposing views of reality, but their mental state of mind. These characters are in a condition of “betwixt and between”, which in all four novels is linked to the theme of the artist. Via the fantastic, Regenroman initiates a confrontation with male myths of the artist and images of women. Schwarze Lämmer also engages the romantic fantastic tradition and investigates the link between adolescent delusions of grandeur and artistic creativity. Värddjuret, on the other hand, depicts the genesis of a female artist, while Aprilhäxan presents the female artist’s monstrous image of herself and fantasies of omnipotence. An additional function of the fantastic in these four novels is to thematize a concept of reality that is based, not on the contrast between the natural and the supernatural, but on the possibility of several different realities.

Au XIXe siècle, la science et le fantastique produisent le même effet chez les gens : en mettant ceux-ci en contact avec des phénomènes inouïs, ils les inscrivent dans un rapport dialectique – entre le connu et l’inconnu – qui doit déboucher sur le non-encore-connu, comme s’ils recelaient la promesse d’une révélation. En effet, à la fois les sciences de l’esprit et le récit fantastique permettent de franchir les frontières entre le moi et l’autre, la vie et la mort, le corps et l’esprit. Explorant autant de domaines inconnus relatifs à l’homme, ils redéfinissent les contours de celui-ci. C’est donc en tant que moyens de savoir que ce mémoire met en relation ces sciences (psychiatrie, psychophysiologie, hypnotisme…) et trois récits fantastiques, « Onuphrius » de Théophile Gautier, « La Mort d’Olivier Bécaille » d’Émile Zola et « L’Homme voilé » de Marcel Schwob, où une crise de catalepsie subie par le héros déclenche le processus dialectique. / In the 19th century, science and the fantastic generated the same effect in people’s minds: by making them encounter incredible phenomena, they place them in a dialectical relation – between what is known and the unknown – which leads to the not-yet-known, as if they were concealing a promise of revelation. Indeed, both sciences of the mind and fantastic narratives enable the crossing of frontiers between the self and the other, life and death, body and mind. Exploring all these unknown territories related to man, they redefine his contours. Therefore, it is as means of knowledge that this dissertation is establishing a link between these sciences (psychiatry, psychophysiology, hypnotism...) and three fantastic narratives, “Onuphrius” by Théophile Gautier, “La Mort d’Olivier Bécaille” by Émile Zola and “L’Homme voilé” by Marcel Schwob, where catalepsy crises trigger the dialectical process.

No description available.

SUMÁRIO Esta dissertação busca demonstrar a presença do fantástico e do maravilhoso na narrativa de Mia Couto. Para tal, apresenta-se uma discussão teórica acerca desses dois géneros, retomando-se o que de mais importante se tem escrito sobre o assunto. A seguir, procede-se à análise do fantástico e do maravilhoso na narrativa de Mia Couto, recorrendo a exemplos dos seus contos e romances. Esta análise inclui uma definição de cada um destes géneros, adequada à especificidade da obra do escritor; um estudo dos temas fantásticos e maravilhosos mais frequentes; e, por fim, uma caracterização dos discursos fantástico e maravilhoso. SUMMARY This dissertation aims to demonstrate the presence of the fantastic and the marvellous in Mia Couto's narrative. In order to achieve these objectives, the first step is to contextualize these two genres, making a brief reflexion about the most important theories on this subject. After this theoretical chapter, this thesis analyses the fantastic and the marvellous in Mia Couto's work by giving examples from his short stories and novels. This chapter also includes a definition of each genre, specifically adapted to the writer's narrative; a study of most frequent fantastic and marvellous themes; and, finally, a description of fantastic and marvellous discursive features. / CLASSICS & WORLD LANGUAGES / MA(ROM LANG)- SPEC PORTUGUES

Patrick Chamoiseau is arguably the most prominent cultural personality from the French island of Martinique. His reputation is due to the worldwide success of his novels, especially Texaco, winner of the Prix Goncourt-award in 1992, but also to the fact that he is the leading theorist of the Créolité, an ideological movement whose aim is to preserve the character of Creole identity and culture against the threat of assimilation. Chamoiseau’s importance in an ideological context tends to overshadow his literary qualities, his novels being often seen as illustrations of his political ideas.Although Chamoiseau’s ideological views aren’t totally absent from his literary work, his novels strike the reader as extremely complex constructions, containing far more than a subversive aspect. An aspect that has been neglected by the critics is for example the supernatural. Probably because of the geographic vicinity to South America, Chamoiseau’s use of the supernatural has been, rather hastily, considered as typical of magical realism or marvellous realism. This dissertation aims at showing that the fantastic, as defined by Tzvetan Todorov (1970), is better suited to describe this aspect of Chamoiseau’s novels, especially Biblique des derniers gestes (2002).Our main objective is, however, not to decide whether the novel belongs to the fantastic as a genre, but to examine the reasons why it is used. A close analysis shows that it is often in relation to the past of Martinique that the supernatural appears. Thanks to the theory of the fantastic, we find three possible explanations of this fact. Firstly, the supernatural is juxtaposed to the real in order to reveal its limits and its “constructedness”. Martinican past thus appears as a French construction. Secondly, the fantastic can be used to reveal the absence of genuine Martinican history. Finally, the fantastic can be a reminder of a terrible event from the past. In conclusion it can be said that Chamoiseau uses the fantastic in order to write the history of an event that he sees as the origin of Martinique: slavery. By doing this he contributes to the fantastic as well, by showing that it is not necessarily gratuitous and by providing a good example of original and innovative use.

In mainstream literary histories, Aloysius Bertrand (1807-1841) is still remembered as the canonical inventor of the prose poem in France. The established classification of Gaspard de la Nuit (1842) within the realm of the prose poem inevitably involves a retrospective appreciation of Bertrand’s work in light of the better-known authors that succeeded him in the history of this genre, such as Baudelaire and Mallarmé. The result is that Bertrand is often viewed as the inventor and/or the precursor of this genre; an important but, ultimately, minor contributor to its development. This hindsight brings with it a risk of critical anachronism against which Bertrand's contribution is often downplayed, especially because his thematic choices are seen to be outmoded, when compared to works by poets writing decades later. This thesis is a re-examination of Bertrand's Gaspard de la Nuit, incorporating an analysis of the cultural context that contributed to its production. The central argument is that in order to fairly assess Bertrand’s work, it is crucial to consider the poet’s contribution to, as well as his position in, the wider cultural exchange typical of his time. Using this contextual and historical approach, this thesis examines and challenges some of the main traditional considerations of Bertrand, such as his being a petit romantique, his provincialism, his unoriginality, and his role as the precursor and/or inventor of the prose poem. The overall aim is to assess fairly Bertrand’s unique synthesis of contemporary cultural and literary material with his own original work. By emphasising the crucial role of cultural exchange at the time of Gaspard de la Nuit’s production, we are thus able to begin to understand Bertrand in his own terms, rather than those of his successors, ourselves included, challenging commonly-held views and opening up new avenues for research.

The concept of ‘middlebrow’ literature in the twentieth century, which received minimal critical attention from the Leavises onwards, has recently become a site of literary and sociological interest, especially regarding the interwar period. This thesis considers the ways in which a corporate middlebrow identity, amongst an intangible community of like-minded readers, was affected by a popularity of the fantastic in the 1920s and 1930s. This subgenre, which I term the ‘domestic fantastic’ (in which one or more elements of the fantastic intrude into an otherwise normalised domestic world) allowed middlebrow authors and readers to focalise and interrogate anxieties affecting the status of the home and its inhabitants which were otherwise either too taboo or, conversely, too well-worn for a traditional, non-fantastic examination. This fantastic vogue was largely initiated by the success of David Garnett’s metamorphosis novel Lady Into Fox (1922), which prepared the way for the other novels discussed in this thesis, predominantly Sylvia Townsend Warner’s Lolly Willowes (1926), Elinor Wylie’s The Venetian Glass Nephew (1926), Ronald Fraser’s Flower Phantoms (1926), Edith Olivier’s The Love-Child (1927), John Collier’s His Monkey Wife (1930) and Green Thoughts (1932), and Frank Baker’s Miss Hargreaves (1940). Through the lenses of metamorphosis, creation, and witchcraft, these novels respond to and reformulate contemporary debates concerning sexuality in marriage, childlessness, and autonomous space for unmarried women. The ‘middlebrow fantasy’ of the stable, idealised home was being revealed as untenable, and the fantastic responded. During the interwar years, when assessments of British society were being widely recalibrated, the domestic fantastic was a subgenre which produced a select but significant range of novels which (whether playful or poignant, hopeful or tragic, nostalgic or progressive) provided the means for both author and reader to interrogate and comment upon the most pervading middle-class social anxieties, in unusual and revitalising ways.

Cette étude est consacrée aux expressions de la thématique de la révolte chez les écrivains belges Jean Muno (1924-1988), francophone, et Hugo Raes (1929-), néerlandophone. Il ne s’agit pas d’une étude comparée de leurs œuvres respectives, une approche exclue par les différences qui les séparent, mais d’une mise en valeur d’une thématique qui relie deux écrivains du même pays et de la même génération, tous deux actifs dans le domaine de la littérature de l’imaginaire. L’objectif est double : le premier est de relever et analyser les différentes composantes de la thématique de la révolte dans leurs textes. Le second est de cerner la particularité de leur fantastique à l’aide d’un modèle élaboré dans la section théorique du présent travail, inspiré par la théorie des prototypes telle qu’elle a été formulée par Eleanor Rosch. / This thesis focuses on the thematic of revolt in the work of the two Belgian writers Jean Muno (1924-1988), French-speaking, and Hugo Raes (1929-), Dutch-speaking. It is not a comparative study of their texts; the differences between them exclude such an approach. The present study highlights a thematic that connects two authors from the same country, of the same generation, both active in the field of fantastic literature. It has a double aim: the analysis of the different components of the thematic of revolt in their work is the first. The second is to define the distinctive features of their fantastic texts with the aid of a model elaborated in the theoretic section of the thesis, inspired by Eleanor Rosch’s prototype theory.