OBJECTIVES: Dental wear is considered one of the reasons for composite restorations failure. Several clinical problems may arise as result of uncontrolled wear process, including compromising masticatory function, poor aesthetics, loss of interocclusal space, teeth pain and sensitivity, and tempromandibular problems. Newly released flowable composites have been introduced to the market, that are indicated for occlusal class I and II cavity restorations. The purposes of this study are (1) to evaluate the wear resistance of newly released flowable composites against two antagonists, and compare them to universal packable composite, (2) to compare the wear properties of the two different types of antagonists, (3) to evaluate mechanical and esthetic properties, including microhardness, gloss, and surface roughness, of all resin composites and correlate it to wear characteristics of the materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: (1) Five flowable composites were used in this study: 1. Filtek Supreme Ultra Flow (3M ESPE), 2. NovaPro Flow (Nanova Biomaterials), 3. SureFil SDR Flow (Dentsply), 4. Clearfil Majesty Flow (Kuraray), and 5. G-aenial Universal Flo (GC). One universal resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal) was used as control group. 16 Specimens were prepared from each composite by injecting into aluminum molds, then divided into two groups for two types of antagonists (n=8). The first antagonist from natural enamel cusps, the other type was from feldspar ceramic block, Vitabloc Mark II. Both were standardized and polished. After mounting the antagonists in the wear-testing machine, a uniform sliding abrasion was applied up to 200k sliding cycles. Then the measurement of dry weight, wear depth and surface roughness of the specimens and the antagonist cusps were conducted at 3 different intervals, baseline, 100k, and 200k cycles. The amount of wear was determined by measuring the weight loss and calculating volume loss. One representative sample was randomly selected from each group for scanning electron microscope examination of the surface morphology. (2) 3 samples were prepared from each resin composite material for the microhardness and gloss test. The composite specimens were finishing and polishing by Buehler grinding-polishing system for four minutes each, then rinsed and ultrasonically cleaned in distilled water for 4 minutes. The surface gloss test was performed by using Novo Curve glossmeter. Five gloss readings were taken from each specimen at different locations, and the mean value was calculated and recorded as the GU reading of each specimen. The Knoop’s microhardness was measured on a MICROMET 2003 microhardness tester. Five indentations at different locations with at least 100 μm apart were performed on each specimen. The five readings were averaged to produce a single hardness value for each specimen. RESULTS: (1) In general, statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher surface roughness and higher weight loss of all resin composites when opposed by ceramic antagonists compared to the samples opposed by enamel antagonists. Among the tested resin composites, there were significant differences in regards to specimen wear depth, weight loss, volume loss, and surface roughness, regardless of the antagonist type used. Both Filtek supreme universal and Filtek supreme ultra flow groups showed significantly deeper wear compared to the other flowable materials, regardless of the antagonist type used. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in antagonist’s weight and height loss between the groups. The control group universal composite caused significantly higher weight and height loss of both antagonists. (2) The microhardness and gloss results demonstrated statistical significant differences between all the composite materials. Clearfil Majesty Flow and Filtek Supreme Universal groups exhibited a significantly higher surface gloss compared to the other materials with the exception of the Filtek Supreme Ultra Flow group. Filtek Supreme Universal group exhibited a significantly higher Knoop’s hardness compared to the other materials. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitation of this study, less weight loss and surface roughness of the flowable composites were shown when opposed by dental enamel antagonists. A significantly deeper wear was noticed on both Filtek supreme universal and flowable composites when opposed by ceramic antagonists, indicating the detrimental effect of the Feldspathic ceramic on the nanohybrid composites compared to the other nanofilled flowable composites used in the study.

Population grow in recent years requires an extension of the current pipeline sanitary system. For this purpose, granular excavation and landfill works are associated with pedestrian traffic congestion. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an innovative and sustainable alternative to reduce the problems generated during the execution of the conventional process. This research proposes the use of flowable fill due to the multiple advantages offered by this material. On the one hand, it is economical for medium to large trench fill volumes, considering savings in labor (it is done with a small number of workers), in equipment (does not require the rental or purchase of compaction equipment) and in time (the pouring is done by directly pumping the mixture, from the mixing machines to the excavation). On the other hand, being self-compacting and self-leveling decreases the width of the trenches, reducing excavation and filling volumes; which, in turn, incur money savings. Also, this material guarantees work safety, since people are not required inside the excavation and fill in poorly accessible areas without any problem. Dosages were established for ten flowable fill mixtures with cement contents of 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 kg of cement and a range of admixture from 1.75 to 2.00%; The results indicated that decreasing the fine aggregate - coarse aggregate ratio, the compressive strength of the mixtures increases and the slumps of the mixtures decreases, and the compressive strength increases directly proportional to the cement content.

Since the mid-1990s resin composite has been used for Class II restorations in stress-bearing areas as an alternative to amalgam. Reasons for this were the patients’ fear of mercury in dental amalgam and a growing demand for aesthetic restorations. During the last decades, the use of new resin composites with more optimized filler loading have resulted in reduced clinical wear. Improved and simplified amphiphilic bonding systems have been introduced. However, one of the main problems with resin composites, its polymerization shrinkage, has not been solved yet. During the polymerization of the resin composites, they shrink as a result of the conversion of the monomers into rigid polymers by a radical addition reaction. The resulting shrinkage stresses in the bonded resin composite restorations may cause adhesive failures at the resin composite/tooth structure interface and/or cohesive failures within the tooth or the resin composite. The interfacial failures may result in post-operative sensitivity, recurrent caries or pulpal injury. This thesis evaluates different restorative and light-curing techniques that are proposed to reduce the polymerization shrinkage and also the effect of new lightcuring units, light-emitting diodes (LED) and high-power quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light on curing depth and degree of conversion of resin composites. Two restorative techniques using a polyacid-modified resin composite or a flowable resin composite in combination with conventional resin composite in sandwich restorations were evaluated in an intraindividual comparison with a conventional resin composite restoration. The durability of the polyacid-modified resin composite sandwich technique was investigated in a three year clinical follow-up study. A scanning electron microscope replica method was used for evaluation of the interfacial adaptation in vivo of both sandwich combinations. The depth of cure of the flowable resin composite was evaluated with the use of Wallace hardness testing. Degree of conversion for resin composite cured with the new LED units was evaluated with Fourier Transform Raman spectroscopy. Major results and conclusions from the studies are: • Neither the sandwich restoration with polyacid-modified resin composite nor the flowable resin composite improved the interfacial adaptation of the restorations. • No difference in durability was found between the sandwich restorations with polyacidmodified resin composite or the resin composite restorations. A low failure rate was observed for both types of restorations after a clinical observation time of three years. • The depth of cure of the flowable resin composite was higher than the depth of cure of the resin composite. It was found that the curing time of the resin composite studied could be reduced or the increment layer thickness increased compared to earlier recommendations. • LED curing units of the latest generation were able to cure resin composites to a higher degree of conversion than the control QTH unit • The use of soft-start curing did not improve the interfacial adaptation of neither of resin composite restorations tested.

Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM) are cementitious self-compacting materials, comprised of low cement content, supplementary cementing materials, fine aggregates, and water. CLSM is typically used as an alternative to conventional compacted granular backfill in applications, such as pavement bases, erosion control, bridge abutments, retaining walls, bedding and backfilling of pipelines. This dissertation presents the findings of an extensive study carried out to determine the corrosivity of CLSM on ductile iron and galvanized steel pipelines. The study was performed in two phases and evaluated more than 40 different CLSM mixture proportions for their corrosivity. An extensive literature survey was performed on corrosion of metals in soils and corrosion of reinforcement in concrete environments to determine possible influential factors. These factors were used as explanatory variables with multiple levels to identify the statistically significant factors. Empirical models were developed for percent mass loss of metals embedded in CLSM and exposed to different environments. The first and only service life models for ductile iron and galvanized steel pipes embedded in CLSM mixtures were developed. Models indicated that properly designed CLSM mixtures can provide an equal or longer service life for completely embedded ductile iron pipes. However, the service life of galvanized pipes embedded in CLSM should not be expected to be more than the service life provided by corrosive soils.

Magister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent) / Resin filled dental composite materials has been introduced into dental practice since mid-1960s as an aesthetic restorative material for anterior teeth (Bowen, 1962 cited in Peutzfeldt, 1997). Since then, they have undergone several developments in order to enhance the longevity and performance of these materials. Resin filled dental composites consist of three main components namely, organic resin matrix which consists of a monomer, an initiator system and a stabilizer system, inorganic filler such as quartz, silica, etc. and coupling agent such as organo-silane coupling agent that chemically bonds the inorganic fillers to the organic resin matrix (Phillips, 1973). The properties and the performance of the resin filled dental composites are basically dependent upon the components of the materials. Some properties are related to the resin matrix, whereas others are related to the inorganic fillers and coupling agent. Furthermore, properties such as polymerization shrinkage and water sorption are dependent on both the inorganic fillers and the organic resin matrix (Asmussen, 1975; Hashinger and Fairhust, 1984; Munksgaard et al., 1987). Aim and objectives: The aim and the objectives of this study was to compare the water sorption and solubility of four bulk-fill dental resin composite materials namely, two conventional viscosity bulk-fill (Surefil bulk fill composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill) and two low viscosity bulk-fill flowable dental composite materials (Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative and Surefil SDR Flow). Materials and methods: Four types of bulk-fill composite restorative materials (2 bulk-fill conventional viscosity (Surefil bulk fill composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill) and 2 bulk-fill flowable low viscosity (Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative and Surefil SDR Flow) were used to analyse the water sorption and solubility for each resin composite type. Thirty specimens for each type of material were prepared, giving the total number of specimens to be 120 (n=120). To standardize this study Vita shade A2 was used for all the material types. All specimens were prepared in a Teflon mould with internal diameter of 15±1mm and thickness of 1±0.1mm in accordance with ISO 4049. The light curing unit used for all specimens was Elipar™ S10, (3M ESPE, Germany) at an output of 1200 mW/cm2 and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Prior to curing, the intensity of the light was checked using Cure Rite visible curing light meter (Caulk, USA) to ensure light output consistency between specimens and was found to be 1200 mW/cm2 . All the specimens were first removed from the Teflon mould as prepared and described previously and placed in an oven at 37 ºC until their weights were constant and these weights were recorded as m1 by using an analytic balance (OHAUS, TS400D, USA). Ten specimens of each type of resin filled composite were then immersed individually in glass containers filled with 10 ml distilled water and placed in the oven at 37±1 ºC for 24 hours, 7 days, 14 days respectively. The specimens were removed; surface water was blotted with tissue paper until free from visible moisture and weighed using the analytic balance (OHAUS, TS400D, USA). The resultant weights were recorded as m2. The specimens were then placed in a desiccator containing silica gel (Associated Chemical Enterprises, ZA) and freshly dried for two hours in an oven at 58 ºC and then weighted to obtain m3. According to Oysaed and Ruyter formula (Oysaed and Ruyter, 1986), the water sorption and solubility was calculated using the following equation: i.Water sorption (SP) = m2 -m3 / v., ii.Water solubility (SI) = m1 -m3 / v - where v is the volume of the specimen. For monomer leakage high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to identify monomers. The water that contained stored specimens was transferred to a refrigerator immediately after the specimens were removed until HPLC analysis was carried out to determine the amount of monomers that leached out of the cured composite specimens. Results: A significant difference between the materials (p<0.05, ANOVA Analysis of Variance) showed that Surefil SDR Flow composite had the lowest overall mean water sorption values (10.191) over the three time intervals (24 hrs, 7 days and 14 days) which was significantly smaller than the other means, followed by Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative composite (11.135) and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill composite (16.419). The highest water sorption mean value was recorded for Surefil bulk fill composite (21.515). The overall means of water solubility for the two bulk-fill flowables i.e. Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative and Surefil SDR Flow were smaller than bulk-fill conventional viscosity Surefil bulk fill and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill. However, all the test materials displayed no statistically significant increase in water solubility over the time period (p > 0.05 two way ANOVA test). The amounts of eluted monomers from bulk-fill conventional viscosity materials (Surefil bulk fill and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill) were higher than bulk-fill flowable materials (Surefil SDR Flow and Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative). Of all the monomers tested UDMA eluted more than Bis-GMA and TEGDMA. Overall UDMA monomer eluted the most, followed by Bis-GMA and the TEGDMA. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the results of this study did not support the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in the water sorption. The bulk-fill low viscosity flowables showed lower water sorption than the conventional viscosity bulk-fills. Surefil SDR Flow was significantly lower than the other materials followed by Filtek Bulk Fill flowable restorative and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and the highest overall means were recorded for Surefil bulk fill. For water solubility the overall means for the flowables of Filtek and SDR were smaller than Surefil and Tetric N-Ceram. For monomer elution three monomers were detected of which UDMA monomer eluted the most, followed by Bis-GMA and the TEGDMA. With regards to the elution of monomers, it was found that 3 monomers named UDMA eluted more than Bis-GMA and TEGDMA.

Flowable fill was used to strengthen the soft soil surrounding piles and behind the pile cap. The flowable fill placed beneath the pile cap surrounding the piles showed no appreciable increase in lateral resistance, this was partially due to the fact that the flowable fill placed had an unconfined compressive strength of 30 psi. Flowable fill was also used to replace a 12 ft wide, 6 ft thick, and 6 ft deep zone consisting of an average 475 psf clay that was adjacent to a 9-pile group in 3x3 pile configuration capped with a 9 ft x 9 ft x 2.5 ft, 5000 psi concrete cap. The flowable fill placed behind the pile cap had an unconfined compressive strength of about 137 psi. Lateral load testing of the pile foundation was then undertaken. The results of this testing were compared with similar testing performed on the same foundation with native soil conditions. The lateral resistance of the native soil was 282 kips at 1.5 inches of displacement, and the total lateral resistance of the pile foundation with flowable fill placed behind the pile cap was increased by about 53% or 150 kips. Of the 150 kips, 90% to 100% can be attributed to the increased passive force on the face of the flowable fill zone and shearing of the base and sides denoting that the flowable fill zone behaved as a rigid block. The long term strength of the flowable fill when water is allowed to flow over it is still in question. Samples of the 137 psi flowable fill were cured in a fog room for 700 days and showed a 56% decrease in their unconfined compressive strength. Any increase in lateral strength from the flowable fill would be compromised over a period of time less than 700 days. Site specific characteristics concerning water flow would need to be evaluated to determine if flowable fill would be an acceptable material to increase the lateral resistance of a pile group.

A radiopacidade é um importante pré-requisito para materiais utilizados como base e forramento de restaurações, pois possibilita que o profissional identifique a presença do material e permita sua diferenciação com a estrutura dental adjacente. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a radiopacidade de materiais indicados como base e forramento e comparar com a radiopacidade do esmalte, dentina e escala de alumínio. Para isso, foram analisadas 16 marcas comerciais de cimento de ionômero de vidro, 8 marcas de resina composta flow e 4 marcas de cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. Foram confeccionados três conjuntos de três corpos de prova de 4 mm de diâmetro, com espessuras de 1, 2 e 3 mm para cada cimento de ionômero de vidro e resina composta flow e de 1 mm para cada cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. Foram feitas secções transversais de coroas de três terceiros molares humanos para obtenção de espécimes de esmalte e dentina com espessura de 1, 2 e 3 mm. Como controle, uma escala de alumínio padrão com nove degraus de espessura foi utilizada. As tomadas radiográficas foram feitas com o sistema digital RVG 5000 Kodak (Kodak Company, França) e tempo de exposição de 0.32 segundos. As imagens obtidas foram trabalhadas no programa Image Tool® para obtenção dos valores médios de cinza. A análise estatística ANOVA, seguida pelo teste de Tukey (p0.05) detectou diferenças consideráveis entre os materiais da mesma categoria e entre as espessuras. Algumas marcas comerciais apresentaram radiopacidade inadequada segundo as normas ISO 4049 e 9917 (Ionomaster, Maxxion, Bioglass R, Bioglass F, Vidrion R e Vidrion F), apresentando radiopacidade inferior à da dentina, insuficiente para um correto diagnóstico. Todas as resinas compostas flow e cimentos de hidróxido de cálcio estudados apresentam radiopacidade superior a da dentina. As marcas comerciais Vitro Fil, Magic Glass, Vitrebond, Riva SC, Riva LC, Fill Magic, Opallis, Surefil Tetric N, Tetric, Hydro C, Hydcal e Liner apresentaram radiopacidade igual ou superior a do esmalte, em todas as espessuras. De um modo geral, o aumento de espessura dos materiais estudados aumenta significativamente sua radiopacidade. Conclui-se que existem materiais indicados como base e forramento de restaurações com radiopacidade inadequada para serem detectados radiograficamente. / Radiopacity is an important pre-requisite for base and liner materials, once it allows the professional to identify the presence of the material and makes its differentiation from the adjacent tooth structure possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of liner and base materials and compare to the radiopacity of enamel, dentin and aluminum stepwedge. For this, 16 glass ionomer cements, 8 flowable resin composites and 4 calcium hydroxide cements were analysed. It was prepared three sets of three test specimens with 4 mm in diameter and thicknesses of 1, 2 and 3 mm for each glass ionomer cement and flowable composite and 1 mm for each calcium hydroxide cement. Cross sections were made from crowns of three third molars to obtain specimens of enamel and dentin with thickness of 1, 2 and 3 mm. As a control, a standard aluminum stepwedge with nine steps was used. Radiographs were taken with digital Kodak RVG 5000 (Kodak Company, France) and exposure time of 0.32 seconds. The images were analysed through the program Image Tool ® to obtain the mean grey values. Statistical test ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p 0.05) detected significant differences between the materials of the same category and between the thicknesses. The commercial brands Ionomaster, Maxxion, Bioglass R, Bioglass F, Vidrion R and Vidrion F, presented radiopacity lower than the radiopacity of dentin, insufficient for a correct diagnostic. All flowable resin composites and calcium hydroxide cements studied showed radiopacity superior than dentin. Vitro Fil, Magic Glass, Vitrebond, Riva SC, Riva LC, Fill Magic, Opallis, Surefil, Tetric N, Tetric, Hydro C, Hydcal and Liner showed radiopacity equal to or greater than the enamel for all thicknesses. In general, the increased thickness of the materials studied increases its radiopacity significantly. It was concluded that some materials indicated as base and liner for restorations have and inadequate radiopacity to be detected radiographically.

A radiopacidade é um importante pré-requisito para materiais utilizados como base e forramento de restaurações, pois possibilita que o profissional identifique a presença do material e permita sua diferenciação com a estrutura dental adjacente. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a radiopacidade de materiais indicados como base e forramento e comparar com a radiopacidade do esmalte, dentina e escala de alumínio. Para isso, foram analisadas 16 marcas comerciais de cimento de ionômero de vidro, 8 marcas de resina composta flow e 4 marcas de cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. Foram confeccionados três conjuntos de três corpos de prova de 4 mm de diâmetro, com espessuras de 1, 2 e 3 mm para cada cimento de ionômero de vidro e resina composta flow e de 1 mm para cada cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. Foram feitas secções transversais de coroas de três terceiros molares humanos para obtenção de espécimes de esmalte e dentina com espessura de 1, 2 e 3 mm. Como controle, uma escala de alumínio padrão com nove degraus de espessura foi utilizada. As tomadas radiográficas foram feitas com o sistema digital RVG 5000 Kodak (Kodak Company, França) e tempo de exposição de 0.32 segundos. As imagens obtidas foram trabalhadas no programa Image Tool® para obtenção dos valores médios de cinza. A análise estatística ANOVA, seguida pelo teste de Tukey (p0.05) detectou diferenças consideráveis entre os materiais da mesma categoria e entre as espessuras. Algumas marcas comerciais apresentaram radiopacidade inadequada segundo as normas ISO 4049 e 9917 (Ionomaster, Maxxion, Bioglass R, Bioglass F, Vidrion R e Vidrion F), apresentando radiopacidade inferior à da dentina, insuficiente para um correto diagnóstico. Todas as resinas compostas flow e cimentos de hidróxido de cálcio estudados apresentam radiopacidade superior a da dentina. As marcas comerciais Vitro Fil, Magic Glass, Vitrebond, Riva SC, Riva LC, Fill Magic, Opallis, Surefil Tetric N, Tetric, Hydro C, Hydcal e Liner apresentaram radiopacidade igual ou superior a do esmalte, em todas as espessuras. De um modo geral, o aumento de espessura dos materiais estudados aumenta significativamente sua radiopacidade. Conclui-se que existem materiais indicados como base e forramento de restaurações com radiopacidade inadequada para serem detectados radiograficamente. / Radiopacity is an important pre-requisite for base and liner materials, once it allows the professional to identify the presence of the material and makes its differentiation from the adjacent tooth structure possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of liner and base materials and compare to the radiopacity of enamel, dentin and aluminum stepwedge. For this, 16 glass ionomer cements, 8 flowable resin composites and 4 calcium hydroxide cements were analysed. It was prepared three sets of three test specimens with 4 mm in diameter and thicknesses of 1, 2 and 3 mm for each glass ionomer cement and flowable composite and 1 mm for each calcium hydroxide cement. Cross sections were made from crowns of three third molars to obtain specimens of enamel and dentin with thickness of 1, 2 and 3 mm. As a control, a standard aluminum stepwedge with nine steps was used. Radiographs were taken with digital Kodak RVG 5000 (Kodak Company, France) and exposure time of 0.32 seconds. The images were analysed through the program Image Tool ® to obtain the mean grey values. Statistical test ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p 0.05) detected significant differences between the materials of the same category and between the thicknesses. The commercial brands Ionomaster, Maxxion, Bioglass R, Bioglass F, Vidrion R and Vidrion F, presented radiopacity lower than the radiopacity of dentin, insufficient for a correct diagnostic. All flowable resin composites and calcium hydroxide cements studied showed radiopacity superior than dentin. Vitro Fil, Magic Glass, Vitrebond, Riva SC, Riva LC, Fill Magic, Opallis, Surefil, Tetric N, Tetric, Hydro C, Hydcal and Liner showed radiopacity equal to or greater than the enamel for all thicknesses. In general, the increased thickness of the materials studied increases its radiopacity significantly. It was concluded that some materials indicated as base and liner for restorations have and inadequate radiopacity to be detected radiographically.

The increasing volume of waste of all kinds is currently a phenomenon of economically developed society and one of the problems of environmental protection. It is therefore imperative, in the interest of sustainable development, to monitor impacts related to the impact on our ecology, to regulate waste production by legislation and universally promote their reuse and recycling. Construction and demolition waste occupy a significant share of the total waste volume. This category also includes excavated soils. Recycling of these materials could significantly reduce the amount of landfilled waste and at the same time, these materials could be used as an important source of secondary raw materials. The doctoral thesis describes the research and development of the new technology of reuse soils in the form of self-compacting grouts. The result of the solution will be a suspension of optimal rheological properties, providing a perfect leaking around the stored utility networks. Emphasis will be placed on the study of the interaction of different types of soils with the stabilizers, flowable or plasticizing additives and its typical dispersible substance, including verification of the developed technology in situ.

El Relleno Fluido o también conocido como Material Controlado de Baja Resistencia (CLSM por sus siglas en inglés) vienen siendo requeridos sobre todo en épocas de pandemia por el COVID-19 en lugar del relleno compactado, debido a su gran facilidad y rapidez para los rellenos de cavidades de zanjas, tanto en redes de agua, desagüe y alcantarillado, relleno de cimentaciones de edificios y puentes, entre las principales aplicaciones. El presente estudio contempla el desarrollo de mezclas con contenidos de cemento Portland tipo I de 60 a 90 kg/m3 para rangos de resistencia a compresión entre 5 a 15 kg/cm2 a 28 días, con agregados de la cantera Tinguiña de Ica, y aditivo agente espumante para conferir la fluidez y trabajabilidad necesaria que facilite su colocación en obra. Resultados satisfactorios de fluidez entre 9 ½” a 10 ½” y pérdida de fluidez promedio de 2”/ hora, y rangos de resistencia de hasta 24 kg/cm2 fueron obtenidos, los cuales permitieron un buen comportamiento costo beneficio tanto en ahorro económico, y tiempo de ejecución propuesto para un proyecto real de saneamiento en la ciudad de Ica. Asimismo, gracias a la aplicación de las mezclas de Relleno Fluido propuestas, se preservará el distanciamiento social durante su empleo en obra, dado que solo requiere de una persona para su aplicación en los rellenos de zanjas. / Flowable Fill or also known as Controlled Low Resistance Material (CLSM) have been required especially in times of pandemic by COVID-19 instead of traditional compacted fill, due to its great ease and speed for fillings works of trench cavities, both in water and wastewater networks, filling for foundations in buildings and bridges, among the main applications. The present study contemplates the development of mixtures with Portland cement type I from 60 to 90 kg / m3 for 28 days compressive strength ranges between 5 to 15 kg / cm2, coarse and fine aggregates from the Tinguiña quarry, in Ica city, and foaming agent chemical admixture to provide the adequate fluidity and workability to cast in place at the job site. Satisfactory fluidity results between 9 ½ ” to 10 ½” and average fluidity loss ratio of 2 ”/ hour, and compressive strength ranges of until 24 kg/cm2 were obtained, which a good cost-benefit performance both in economic savings, and execution time for a proposed sanitation project in the city of Ica. Likewise, thanks to the application of the proposed flowable fill mixtures, social distancing will be preserved during its use on site, because it only requires one person to apply it in the trench fillings. / Tesis