The term hybrid warfare is both controversial and debated. Those who favor the use of the term usually use widely different definitions of it. This makes the term problematic to use in an official and academic context, which may contribute to unjustified policy decisions. My thesis aims at using three existing theoretical definitions to identify a more sustainable definition of the hybrid warfare concept. And at the same time contribute to the debate about the usefulness of the concept.    The thesis analyzes three theoretical perspectives of the hybrid warfare concept, by adopting a conceptual study approach founded in Giovanis Sartori's theoretical framework. The result shows that a more sustainable definition of hybrid warfare primarily comprises the coordination of funds and methods for achieving political purposes. Based on this result can hybrid warfare primarily be understood as a management perspective.

本研究乃鑒於台灣的學校教育，未因台灣的民主化讓訓育式教育的力量消失，人權教育的落實就更顯重要。然而人權的概念源於民主理論，所以欲從Dahl與Sartori的民主理論著手釐清。 從人權教育的發展脈落可以發現，人權教育所應包含的核心價值，即平等、自由與民主三者—(1)平等方面：平等不在於外在的平均主義，而在於個人內在的價值上，這種平等的判斷方法稱為「內在平等」原則；(2)民主方面：民主一詞源於古希臘雅典城邦，但現在的民主，指的是一種以有限多數的有效參與、充分知情和議程控制，以及公平選舉與代表權轉移的政治制度，用以保證其公民的基本權利不受侵害；(3)自由方面：十七至十九世紀的古典自由主義思想，為的是防止政府權利對個人的戕害，到十九世紀，更進一步要求政府為人民謀福利，成為所謂的新自由主義。並且平等、民主與自由三者間，可歸納出「以民主達成自由，並以自由完成平等」的關係。 經過分析後，提出幾點對人權教育的建議：(1)釐清人權教育核心概念的意義；(2)涵蓋內在平等原則的人權教育；(3)學習並運用有效的民主議程；(4)諮詢相關專家的重要性；(5)視人權教育是民主社會的根基。如此才能使台灣人權教育的落實更為徹底。 / Because of the importance of human rights education in Taiwan, it is needed to make the meaning of human rights more clear. However, the value of human rights is relating to the history of democracy. This study is intended to search for the construction on human rights education through democracy theory, especially by the view of Robert A. Dahl and Giovanni Sartori, to set up the theoretical foundation. According to the context of the development of human rights education, it could be found out that equality, democracy and liberty are important concepts. After analyzing, we can discover that: (1) Equality is not equalitarianism but “intrinsic equality.” (2) Classical Greece is the source of “democracy”, but the democracy of nowadays is not totally the same to the classical one. (3) The thought of liberty comes from liberalism, and it is in order to prevent the people from the invasions of the government. On the basis of Dahl and Sartori’s writings, democracy is the strategy to achieve liberty, and the liberty is the condition to achieve equality. At the end, the following conclusions are made: (1) The understanding of the equality, democracy and liberty are important. (2) “Intrinsic equality” must be taught in class. (3) The efficient agenda of democracy must be learned. (4) It is needed to consult the experts. (5) We should take human rights education as the base of the democratic society. These above could be helpful to human rights education in Taiwan.