Introdução: O implante auditivo de tronco encefálico (ABI) é indicado para pacientes com perda auditiva neurossensorial severa a profunda quando há impossibilidade de realização do implante coclear. Em pacientes com surdez por meningite e ossificação coclear total bilateral, o ABI é a opção para a reabilitação auditiva. Objetivos: O estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a contribuição do ABI para os limiares audiométricos e para a percepção de fala após no mínimo 12 meses de uso em pacientes com ossificação coclear total por surdez pós-meningite, bem como descrever as complicações do procedimento. Material e métodos: Dez pacientes com surdez pósmeningite foram submetidos ao ABI por via retrolabiríntica ampliada em um centro terciário de assistência e ensino. Todos os pacientes foram operados pela mesma equipe cirúrgica e a avaliação audiológica foi realizada pelo mesmo fonoaudiólogo. Foram realizados audiometria tonal e testes de percepção de fala no pré-operatório e no mínimo 12 meses após a ativação do implante. Foram descritas as complicações associadas ao procedimento. Resultados: Oito de dez pacientes implantados permaneceram usuários. Dois pacientes não apresentaram respostas auditivas e abandonaram o seguimento. Os oito pacientes apresentaram melhora estatisticamente significativa nos limiares audiométricos, bem como nos testes de discriminação de palavras e vogais comparando pré e pós-operatório com média de seguimento de 3,3 anos. Em dois pacientes, a discriminação de sentenças em formato fechado somente no modo auditivo foi de 30% e 40%. Todos os oito usuários referiram benefício com o uso do ABI. Não houve complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Conclusão: O ABI via retrolabiríntica ampliada é uma opção terapêutica segura para pacientes com surdez pós-meningite e com presença de ossificação coclear total bilateral, contribuindo para melhora nos limiares audiométricos e nos testes de percepção de fala. Embora a melhora nos testes audiológicos seja inferior à do implante coclear, a maioria dos pacientes do estudo usa o ABI diariamente por um período superior a 8 horas e refere benefício em seu cotidiano / Introduction: The Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an option to auditory restoration in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who cannot be fitted with a cochlear implant. This is the only option in patients with post meningitis hearing loss presenting with bilateral total cochlear ossification. Objectives: The main objective of the study is to evaluate the hearing contribution in audiometry and speech perception tests at least 12 months after ABI implantation in patients with post-meningitis profound hearing loss. The complications of the procedure were also described. Materials and Methods: Ten patients with post-meningitis hearing loss went an ABI through extended retrolabyrinthine approach in a tertiary center by the same surgeons. The same audiologist was responsible for audiological follow-up. Tonal audiometry and speech perception tests were made before and at least 12 months after the ABI activation. The procedure complications were described for all patients. Results: Eight of ten patients became ABI users. Two patients had no auditory response and abandoned the treatment. Eight users showed benefit in tonal audiometry, word and vowels perception tests after an average follow up of 3.3 years. Two patients were able to recognize 30 and 40% of closed sentences without lip reading. There were no complications due to the ABI procedure. Conclusion: The extended retrolabyrinthine approach for the ABI is a safe surgical option for patients with post-meningitis hearing loss and totally ossified cochleae. It contributes to hearing performance in audiometry and speech perception tests. Even though the ABI results are poorer than the cochlear implants, in this study the majority of patients use their ABI more than eight hours a day and report benefits in daily activities

L’expérience de douleur et la réponse à son traitement sont teintées par les facteurs psychologiques, parmi lesquels figurent les attentes. Cette thèse propose de raffiner la compréhension de l’effet des attentes sur la régulation de la douleur par l’entremise de deux études quantitatives. D'abord, une étude expérimentale explore l'impact des attentes sur l'analgésie induite par contre-stimulation. Des volontaires sains ont été assignés à une condition contrôle ou à l’un des trois groupes au sein desquels les attentes étaient évaluées (attentes a priori) ou manipulées par l’entremise de suggestions (hyperalgésie ou analgésie). La douleur, l’anxiété et le réflexe nociceptif de flexion en réponse à des stimulations électriques ont été mesurés avant, pendant et après l’application d’un sac de glace. Les résultats suggèrent que les attentes a priori prédisent l’amplitude de l’analgésie, tandis que les attentes suggérées parviennent à potentialiser ou à bloquer les mécanismes endogènes d'inhibition de la douleur déclenchés par la contre-stimulation, indépendamment du niveau d’anxiété. Ensuite, une étude clinique se penche sur l'apport des attentes aux issues thérapeutiques de patients traités en centres multidisciplinaires de gestion de la douleur chronique. Préalablement au traitement, les attentes des patients quant aux résultats anticipés après six mois de traitement ont été évaluées. Les changements dans l’intensité douloureuse, les symptômes dépressifs, l’interférence de la douleur et la dramatisation face à la douleur, ainsi que l’impression de changement et la satisfaction face au traitement ont été évalués au suivi de six mois. Les résultats d'analyses de modélisation par équations structurelles appuient la relation prédictive entre les attentes et les issues thérapeutiques et soulignent l’impression de changement du patient comme variable médiatrice de cette association. En plus de se montrer supérieur à un modèle alternatif, ce modèle s'est avéré pertinent à travers différents sous-groupes. Dans l'ensemble, cette thèse contribue à démontrer le rôle déterminant des attentes dans le contexte de la douleur, tant au niveau physiologique que thérapeutique. Les conclusions qui se dégagent de cet ouvrage entraînent des retombées non négligeables et réitèrent la nécessité de considérer la perspective du patient afin d'optimiser les soins destinés au soulagement de la douleur. / The experience of pain and response to pain treatments are influenced by psychological factors, such as expectations. This doctoral dissertation aims at refining the comprehension of the impact of expectations on pain regulation through two quantitative studies. First, an experimental study examined the impact of expectations on analgesia induced by heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation. Healthy volunteers were assigned to a control group or one of three experimental groups in which expectations were either assessed (a priori expectations) or manipulated using suggestions (hyperalgesia or analgesia). Acute shock-pain, shock-related anxiety and the nociceptive flexion reflex were measured in response to electrical stimulations before, during and after the application of a tonic cold pain. Results suggest that a priori expectations predict the magnitude of analgesia, while manipulated expectations either enhance or block counter-stimulation analgesia, independently of anxiety processes. Subsequently, a clinical study examined the association between expectations and clinical outcomes of chronic pain patients treated in multidisciplinary pain centers. Prior to their initial visit, patients' expected treatment outcomes were assessed. Six months after their initial visit, changes in pain intensity, depressive symptoms, pain interference and pain catastrophizing, along with satisfaction with treatment and impression of change were measured. Structural equations modeling analyses support the predictive association between expectations and all clinical outcomes as well as the mediating effect of patient’s impression of change. In addition to being superior to an alternative model, the proposed model was shown to be relevant across subgroups. Overall, this thesis contributes to the demonstration of the determinant role of expectations on physiological and therapeutic processes in the context of pain regulation. These findings reiterate the need to consider the patient's perspective and offer a valuable avenue towards the optimization of treatments intended at relieving pain.

Abstract Heterotopic ossification is a pathological condition in which bone forms outside the skeletal system. It can also occur in skin, which is the case in some genetic disorders. In multiple miliary osteoma cutis (MMOC), tiny bone fragments develop in the dermis and nearby subcutaneous tissue of the face and upper chest region during middle age. The etiology of the disease is poorly understood. The origin of the osteoma-forming cells is not known and also unknown are the signaling factors that direct the skin cells towards an osteogenic lineage. The purpose of this study was to investigate MMOC and the pathogenesis of ectopic bone formation by combining patient study and cell biology methods. The results from an extensive review of the literature and five new cases revealed MMOC as a distinct disease entity, where heterotopic bone formation is intramembranous. No correlation was found between MMOC and acne scars, hormonal disturbances or GNAS gene mutations. In cell culture studies mouse and human dermal fibroblasts and mouse dermal papilla (DP) cells were found to differentiate into osteoblast-like matrix mineralizing cells. The bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) homodimer and BMP-2/7 heterodimer had significant effects on the osteogenic differentiation of the above mentioned cells. Interestingly, the BMPs enhanced the differentiation of mouse cells but reduced it in human cells. In mouse DP cells and human fibroblasts BMP-2/7 was more potent than BMP-4. The skin area affected by osteomas in patients was compared to their unaffected skin and also to the corresponding skin areas in controls with regard to osteogenic differentiation and gene expression studies. MMOC patients’ skin differs from controls both in osteoma and unaffected skin areas, which suggests MMOC is not only a local but also a systemic skin disease. The results confirm the previous findings that gene expression in skin is different in different parts of the body, which could explain why the osteomas develop in certain skin areas. The results of this study provide new information about MMOC and heterotopic ossification in skin and could be useful when developing treatments for MMOC. This study also presents new information about BMPs and their different effects in mouse and human cells, which may stimulate discussion about the generalization of mouse studies in humans and the clinical use of BMPs. / Tiivistelmä Virhesijaintinen luutuminen on patologinen tila, jossa luuta muodostuu luisen tukirangan ulkopuolelle. Tätä voi tapahtua myös ihossa, kuten käy tietyissä sairauksissa. Ihon lukuisat jyvämäiset osteoomat on tauti, jossa pieniä luujyväsiä ilmaantuu verinahkaan ja ihonalaiskudokseen keski-iässä. Taudin syytä, osteoomia muodostavien solujen alkuperää tai sitä, mitkä viestinvälittäjät saavat esiastesolut siirtymään luusolulinjalle, ei tiedetä. Tässä työssä tutkittiin ihon lukuisia jyvämäisiä osteoomia ja virhesijaintista luutumista yhdistämällä kliinisiä ja solubiologisia menetelmiä. Laajasta kirjallisuuteen perehtymisestä ja viidestä omasta potilaasta saadut tulokset osoittivat ihon lukuisten jyvämäisten osteoomien olevan oma erillinen tautinsa, jossa virhesijaintinen luutuminen tapahtuu suoran luutumisen mekanismilla. Tauti ei näytä olevan yhteydessä aknearpiin, hormonihäiriöihin tai GNAS-geenin mutaatioihin. Soluviljelykokeissa hiiren ja ihmisen verinahan fibroblastien ja hiiren karvatupen nystyn solujen havaittiin erilaistuvan osteoblastityyppisiksi soluväliainetta mineralisoiviksi soluiksi. Luun morfogeneettisillä proteiineilla (BMP) 4 ja 2/7 oli merkitsevä vaikutus yllä mainittujen solujen erilaistumisessa. Yllättävää kyllä, ne edistivät hiiren solujen, mutta vähensivät ihmisen solujen erilaistumista. Hiiren karvatupen soluille ja ihmisen fibroblasteille BMP-2/7 oli tehokkaampi kuin BMP-4. Potilaiden osteoma-aluetta verrattiin heidän terveeseen ihoalueeseensa samoin kuin vastaaviin ihoalueisiin kontrollihenkilöillä käyttäen menetelminä solujen erilaistamista luuta muodostavaan suuntaan sekä geenien ilmentymisen tutkimista. Potilaiden iho erosi kontrollien ihosta sekä osteooma-alueella että terveellä ihoalueella, mikä viittaa taudin olevan koko elimistöön vaikuttava. Tulokset vahvistavat aikaisempia löydöksiä siitä, että geenien ilmentyminen ihossa on erilaista eri puolilla kehoa. Tämä voisi selittää osteoomien esiintymisen vain tietyllä alueella. Tämän tutkimuksen tulokset antavat uutta tietoa ihon lukuisista jyvämäisistä osteoomista ja virhesijaintisesta luutumisesta ja saattavat olla hyödyksi kehitettäessä taudin hoitoa. Tutkimus antaa uutta tietoa luun morfogeneettisten proteiinien erilaisesta käyttäytymisestä hiirellä ja ihmisellä, mikä herättänee keskustelua hiirikokeiden yleistämisestä ihmiseen ja luun morfogeneettisten proteiinien kliinisestä käytöstä.