A matéria tratada nesta tese é a trajetória pedagógica desenvolvida pelo autor junto aos alunos atores ingressantes do curso de licenciatura em Artes Cênicas da Faculdade Paulista de Artes. Esta trajetória tem como ponto de partida a prática pedagógica da atriz, diretora e professora Myrian Muniz, detentora de olhar bastante particular sobre o trabalho atoral, e contempla também outros processos formativos vivenciados pelo autor. Esta pesquisa busca identificar uma linha de pensamento pedagógico nas Artes Cênicas, que tem o trabalho do ator sobre si mesmo como conceito fundante, e cujos representantes mais importantes são Constantin Stanislávski, Eugênio Kusnet e Myrian Muniz. Esta pesquisa visa também compartilhar as etapas mais relevantes nos processos pedagógicos envolvendo aprendizes em teatro, desde o compartilhamento dos primeiros fundamentos acerca do trabalho do ator até e elaboração de um espetáculo teatral que foi fruto do referido processo. Por fim, o autor analisa e reflete sobre a trajetória percorrida pelos alunos atores, buscando definir novos possíveis caminhos de formação do artista teatral, e também identificar uma linha própria de atuação como formador, sempre tendo o autoconhecimento como princípio pedagógico. / The subject of this thesis is the pedagogical path developed by the author among Performing Arts newcomer students at Faculdade Paulista de Artes. This path starts with the pedagogical praxis of actress, director and professor Myrian Muniz, bearer of a particular vision on actor\'s work, and contemplates also other formative processes experienced by the author. This research aims to identify a pedagogical thinking stream over Performing Arts, which holds the actor\'s work upon himself as cornerstone concept, having Constantin Stanislavsky, Eugenio Kusnet and Myrian Muniz as its most important representatives. Also objects to share the most relevant steps present in this pedagogical processes developed with the theater apprentices, from presenting the basic elements involving the actor\'s work, to the staging of a play as outcome of the related process. Lastly, the author analyses and looks over this pedagogical process that led to the search for defining possible new ways of educating performing artists, along with identifying a personal proceeding process as a drama teacher, having self-knowledge as a pedagogical principle.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-08-20T13:20:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Joao_Paulo_Borges _Silveira_Dissertacao.pdf: 2289542 bytes, checksum: 250610a01d1b964b57e9322c67033adf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-12-19 / This essay focuses on (auto) biographic documents belonging to Coriolano Mário Araújo Benício (1911-1984) personal archives, citizen of Rio Grande whose personnel and professional trajectories were dedicated to his county's cultural and artistics scenes. This study starts with a restlessness due to little knowledge about Coriolano Benicio figure and personal files in Rio Grande. The research is justified by academic novelty, as Coriolano Benicio personal and professional trajectories through his files have never been explored. Once manuscripts from his personal archives features (auto) biographical information, which Coriolano recorded traces of his life's trajectory, these documents, therefore, are holders of it's owner's memories, while also represent important elements to comprehend the collective artistic memory of the city of Rio Grande / O presente estudo tem como foco os documentos (auto) biográficos pertencentes ao arquivo pessoal de Coriolano Mário de Araújo Benício (1911-1984), cidadão rio-grandino que teve suas trajetórias pessoal e profissional dedicadas às cenas artística e cultural de seu munícipio. Este estudo parte de uma inquietação, que é o pouco conhecimento sobre a figura de Coriolano Benício e de seu arquivo pessoal na cidade do Rio Grande. A pesquisa se justifica pelo ineditismo acadêmico, já que a trajetória pessoal e profissional de Coriolano Benício, através de seu arquivo pessoal, nunca foi explorada. Uma vez que os documentos manuscritos presentes no seu arquivo pessoal possuem caráter (auto) biográfico, os quais Coriolano Benício registrou traços de sua trajetória de vida, tais documentos atuam, portanto, como suportes das memórias de seu titular, ao mesmo tempo que apresentam elementos importantes para a compreensão de uma memória artística coletiva da cidade do Rio Grande

The work deals with individual sources of positive relationship to other people in the frame of mainly psychological, but also ethical and philosophical data. It is composed of five thematic chapters. The first four thematic chapters include knowledge about sense of human being, positive relationship of a person to his/her own life, relationship of a person to himself/herself, relationship of a person to other people; if the man loves himself, he is satisfied with himself and impresses friendly and harmonically on his surroundings too. He is social, friendly and he gets on well with the others. Next to it compromises thinking about friendship as a positive attitude to other person, which makes joy, sense of fellowship and protects human life from falls into darkness and suffering; relationship of a person to some other person raises hopes and backing in insecure human life. In the fifth part there is a main cogitation from {\clq}qroots{\crq}q of relationship of a person to other people and aims at beneficial findings in the frame of personal views and positions.

The present dissertation has the intention to establish how measured Sartre obtains to surpass the solipsism of the conscience, interpreting the registers that compose the phenomenological concept of Looking at, in The Being and the Nothing. After to define the concept of solipsism, will be in evidence the problem that it implies and that, according to Sartre, is originated from the notion of Cartesian Cogito. It is manifested the construction of conceptual-description of the notion of Looking at and the paper that this concept plays in the measure that offers a not cognitive evidence of the Other s existence. There are evaluated the contributions and obstacles of the concept s use of Looking at in the Sartrean attempt of overcoming the solipsism. Concluding, it is verified the reach of this Cogito extended , as Sartre calls to the experience of Looking at. From a phenomenological point of view, it results evident that the solipsism is a false problem and that the Other exists without no doubt. Ontologically, is more difficult to have this certainty, therefore Sartre does not resign to the starting point of Cogito. / O texto discute em que medida Sartre consegue superar o solipsismo da consciência, interpretando os registros que compõem o conceito fenomenológico de Olhar, em O Ser e o Nada. Após definir o conceito de solipsismo, ficará em evidência a problemática que este implica e que, segundo Sartre, origina-se da noção de Cogito cartesiano. Mostra-se a construção histórico-conceitual da noção de Olhar e o papel que este conceito joga na medida que oferece uma evidência não cognitiva da existência do Outro. Avaliam-se as contribuições e malogros do uso do conceito de Olhar na tentativa sartreana de superação do solipsismo. Em conclusão, indica-se o alcance desse Cogito ampliado , como Sartre chama à experiência do Olhar. Fenomenologicamente, a existência do Outro resulta evidente. Porém, não se dá a mesma certeza no nível ontológico. Isso exigiria sair do Cogito, como ponto de partida do filosofar, mas Sartre não abre mão dessa perspectiva.

La première partie de l’étude est consacrée à l’invocation, intra et extra muros, du droit à un procès équitable. Sont analysés ainsi, dans un premier temps, l’applicabilité directe de l’article 6 et la subsidiarité de la Convention par rapport au droit national et de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme par rapport aux juridictions nationales. Le droit à un procès équitable étant un droit jurisprudentiel, l’étude se focalise, dans un second temps, sur l’invocabilité des arrêts de la Cour Européenne et plus précisément sur l’invocabilité directe de l’arrêt qui constate une violation du droit à un procès équitable dans une affaire mettant en cause l’Etat et l’invocabilité de l’interprétation conforme à l’arrêt qui interprète l’article 6 dans une affaire mettant en cause un Etat tiers. L’introduction dans l’ordre juridique français et hellénique de la possibilité de réexamen de la décision pénale définitive rendue en violation de la Convention a fait naitre un nouveau droit d’accès à la Cour de cassation lequel trouve son terrain de prédilection aux violations de l’article 6 et constitue peut-être le pas le plus important pour le respect du droit à un procès équitable après l’acceptation (par la France et la Grèce) du droit de recours individuel. Quant au faible fondement de l’autorité de la chose interprétée par la Cour Européenne, qui est d’ailleurs un concept d’origine communautaire, cela explique pourquoi un dialogue indirect entre la Cour Européenne et la Cour de cassation est possible sans pour autant changer en rien l’invocabilité de l’interprétation conforme et le fait que l’existence d’un précédent oblige la Cour de cassation à motiver l’interprétation divergente qu’elle a adoptée.La seconde partie de l’étude, qui est plus volumineuse, est consacrée aux garanties de bonne administration de la justice (article 6§1), à la présomption d’innocence (article 6§2), aux droits qui trouvent leur fondement conventionnel dans l’article 6§1 mais leur fondement logique dans la présomption d’innocence et aux droits de la défense (article 6§3). Sont ainsi analysés le droit à un tribunal indépendant, impartial et établi par la loi, le délai raisonnable, le principe de l’égalité des armes, le droit à une procédure contradictoire, le droit de la défense d’avoir la parole en dernier, la publicité de l’audience et du prononcé des jugements et arrêts, l’obligation de motivation des décisions, la présomption d’innocence, dans sa dimension procédurale et personnelle, le « droit au mensonge », le droit de l’accusé de se taire et de ne pas contribuer à son auto-incrimination, son droit d’être informé de la nature et de la cause de l’accusation et de la requalification envisagée des faits, son droit au temps et aux facilités nécessaires à la préparation de la défense, y compris notamment la confidentialité de ses communications avec son avocat et le droit d’accès au dossier, son droit de comparaître en personne au procès, le droit de la défense avec ou sans l’assistance d’un avocat, le droit de l’accusé d’être représenté en son absence par son avocat, le droit à l’assistance gratuite d’un avocat lorsque la situation économique de l’accusé ne permet pas le recours à l’assistance d’un avocat mais les intérêts de la justice l’exigent, le droit d’interroger ou faire interroger les témoins à charge et d’obtenir la convocation et l’interrogation des témoins à décharge dans les mêmes conditions que les témoins à charge et le droit à l’interprétation et à la traduction des pièces essentielles du dossier. L’analyse est basée sur la jurisprudence strasbourgeoise et centrée sur la position qu’adoptent la Cour de cassation française et l’Aréopage. / The first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights.