L‟objectif de ce mémoire est de comprendre la possibilité et les développements de ce dont nous percevons comme une forme différente d‟aborder l‟histoire, celle qui privilégie la catégorie d‟événement dans sa composition. Pour soutenir cette idée, nous avons choisi de vérifier son opérabilité à travers l‟oeuvre de Michel Foucault en partant d‟une lecture qui rend explicites les relations entre les domaines du discursif et du non-discursif pour faire état des modifications acquises par son « événementialisation » de l‟histoire. Nous prétendons donc analyser une spécificité qui résulte de cette construction théorique qui vise à réaliser une histoire du présent : la configuration du pouvoir pastoral à partir de la problématique de sa conduction et sa relation avec le diagnostic foucaldien de l‟insurrection iranienne de 1979. / O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender a possibilidade e os desdobramentos do que percebemos como uma forma diferente de abordagem da história, que privilegia a categoria de acontecimento em sua composição. Para tal, escolhemos verificar sua operacionalidade através da obra de Michel Foucault partindo de uma leitura que explicita as relações entre os domínios do discursivo e do não-discursivo para dar conta das modificações trazidas por sua acontecimentalização da história. Pretendemos, desta maneira, analisar uma especificidade decorrente desta construção teórica que visa realizar uma história do presente: a configuração do poder pastoral a partir da problemática da condução e sua relação com o diagnóstico foucaultiano da Insurreição Iraniana de 1979. / The aim of this thesis is to understand the possibility and developments of what we perceive as a differentway of approaching history, one that gives privilege to the category of event in its composition. To achieve this, we have chosen to check its operational plausibility in the work of Michel Foucault based on a reading that makes explicit the relations between the domains of the discursive and the non-discursive. Our objective is to give an account of the modifications brought out by his eventalization of history. We thus aim to analyse a specific result stemming from the theoretical construction whose purpose is to accomplish a history of the present: the configuration of pastoral power as based on the problematic of its conduction and its relation to the Foucauldian diagnosis of the Iranian Insurrection of 1979.

L‟objectif de ce mémoire est de comprendre la possibilité et les développements de ce dont nous percevons comme une forme différente d‟aborder l‟histoire, celle qui privilégie la catégorie d‟événement dans sa composition. Pour soutenir cette idée, nous avons choisi de vérifier son opérabilité à travers l‟oeuvre de Michel Foucault en partant d‟une lecture qui rend explicites les relations entre les domaines du discursif et du non-discursif pour faire état des modifications acquises par son « événementialisation » de l‟histoire. Nous prétendons donc analyser une spécificité qui résulte de cette construction théorique qui vise à réaliser une histoire du présent : la configuration du pouvoir pastoral à partir de la problématique de sa conduction et sa relation avec le diagnostic foucaldien de l‟insurrection iranienne de 1979. / O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender a possibilidade e os desdobramentos do que percebemos como uma forma diferente de abordagem da história, que privilegia a categoria de acontecimento em sua composição. Para tal, escolhemos verificar sua operacionalidade através da obra de Michel Foucault partindo de uma leitura que explicita as relações entre os domínios do discursivo e do não-discursivo para dar conta das modificações trazidas por sua acontecimentalização da história. Pretendemos, desta maneira, analisar uma especificidade decorrente desta construção teórica que visa realizar uma história do presente: a configuração do poder pastoral a partir da problemática da condução e sua relação com o diagnóstico foucaultiano da Insurreição Iraniana de 1979. / The aim of this thesis is to understand the possibility and developments of what we perceive as a differentway of approaching history, one that gives privilege to the category of event in its composition. To achieve this, we have chosen to check its operational plausibility in the work of Michel Foucault based on a reading that makes explicit the relations between the domains of the discursive and the non-discursive. Our objective is to give an account of the modifications brought out by his eventalization of history. We thus aim to analyse a specific result stemming from the theoretical construction whose purpose is to accomplish a history of the present: the configuration of pastoral power as based on the problematic of its conduction and its relation to the Foucauldian diagnosis of the Iranian Insurrection of 1979.

L‟objectif de ce mémoire est de comprendre la possibilité et les développements de ce dont nous percevons comme une forme différente d‟aborder l‟histoire, celle qui privilégie la catégorie d‟événement dans sa composition. Pour soutenir cette idée, nous avons choisi de vérifier son opérabilité à travers l‟oeuvre de Michel Foucault en partant d‟une lecture qui rend explicites les relations entre les domaines du discursif et du non-discursif pour faire état des modifications acquises par son « événementialisation » de l‟histoire. Nous prétendons donc analyser une spécificité qui résulte de cette construction théorique qui vise à réaliser une histoire du présent : la configuration du pouvoir pastoral à partir de la problématique de sa conduction et sa relation avec le diagnostic foucaldien de l‟insurrection iranienne de 1979. / O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender a possibilidade e os desdobramentos do que percebemos como uma forma diferente de abordagem da história, que privilegia a categoria de acontecimento em sua composição. Para tal, escolhemos verificar sua operacionalidade através da obra de Michel Foucault partindo de uma leitura que explicita as relações entre os domínios do discursivo e do não-discursivo para dar conta das modificações trazidas por sua acontecimentalização da história. Pretendemos, desta maneira, analisar uma especificidade decorrente desta construção teórica que visa realizar uma história do presente: a configuração do poder pastoral a partir da problemática da condução e sua relação com o diagnóstico foucaultiano da Insurreição Iraniana de 1979. / The aim of this thesis is to understand the possibility and developments of what we perceive as a differentway of approaching history, one that gives privilege to the category of event in its composition. To achieve this, we have chosen to check its operational plausibility in the work of Michel Foucault based on a reading that makes explicit the relations between the domains of the discursive and the non-discursive. Our objective is to give an account of the modifications brought out by his eventalization of history. We thus aim to analyse a specific result stemming from the theoretical construction whose purpose is to accomplish a history of the present: the configuration of pastoral power as based on the problematic of its conduction and its relation to the Foucauldian diagnosis of the Iranian Insurrection of 1979.

L’Angola est devenue indépendante du Portugal le 11 novembre 1975, au milieu des disputes internes qui ont conduit à l'éclatement de la guerre civile provoquée par le fait que le MPLA a déclaré unilatéralement l'indépendance à Luanda. Ce moment a été déterminée en grande partie par le soutien reçu de Cuba et le bloc de l'Est, plus précisément l'URSS, au cours des 14 années de lutte anticoloniale. Dans la période postindépendance, entre 1975 et 1991, même si des bases militaires soviétiques ne furent pas été installées en Angola, il faut signaler l’influence politique-idéologique et la présence militaire de l’Union Soviétique, qui s’exerça à un degré élevé en comparaison avec d’autres pays dans le contexte d’une bipolarité mondiale. Du point de vue idéologique, l’influence soviétique se manifesta dans des actions de l’Etat angolais en ce que cela touchait à la construction d’un sentiment et d’une identité nationale, ainsi que dans l’appartenance à une nation angolaise, objectivée dans le processus de constitution de l’Homme Nouveau, promu par le Parti-Etat. Du point de vue militaire, l’implication de Moscou dans la guerre en Angola nous a amené à conclure que dans ce territoire les Soviétiques donnèrent une plus grande importance à la consolidation de l’Etat en ce qui touchait la sécurité et le renforcement des appareils politiques, en fournissant matériel et le soutien consultatif pour les forces militaires de l’Angola, bien qu'il soit important de remarquer que les Soviétiques n'ont pas contrôlé la politique intérieure du pays. / Angola became independent from Portugal on 11 November 1975, in the midst of internal disputes that led to the outbreak of civil war caused by the fact that the MPLA unilaterally declared independence in Luanda. This moment has been determined largely by the support received from Cuba and the Eastern bloc, specifically the USSR during the 14 years of anti-colonial struggle. In the post-independence period, between 1975 and 1991, although Soviet military bases were not been installed in Angola, it should be noted the political-ideological influence and military presence of the Soviet Union, which exercised a high degree compared with other countries in the context of global bipolarity. From an ideological point of view, Soviet influence was manifested in the actions of the Angolan government in that it affected the building and a sense of national identity, as well as membership in an Angolan nation, objectified in the process of formation of the New Man, promoted by the Party-state. From a military point of view, the involvement of Moscow in the war in Angola has led us to conclude that in this territory the Soviets gave greater importance to the consolidation of the state in which affected the safety and building equipment policies, providing material and advisory support to the military forces of Angola, although it is important to note that the Soviets did not control the internal politics of the country.