<p>Includes bibliographic references (leaves 184-195)&quot / In this thesis, I contrast Qutbs approach towards jihad with that which is found in the primary sources of Islam and as espoused by the proponents of the four schools of thought, as well as key Islamic scholars. This study also attempts to explore the conceptual confusion between terrorism, jihad, and legitimate defense and resistance by comparing the legislation on jihad in Islam with that which exists in international law and conventions. I then turn my attention to the focal point of this study, the writings of Sayyid Qutb on jihad...&quot / </p>

<p>Includes bibliographic references (leaves 184-195)&quot / In this thesis, I contrast Qutbs approach towards jihad with that which is found in the primary sources of Islam and as espoused by the proponents of the four schools of thought, as well as key Islamic scholars. This study also attempts to explore the conceptual confusion between terrorism, jihad, and legitimate defense and resistance by comparing the legislation on jihad in Islam with that which exists in international law and conventions. I then turn my attention to the focal point of this study, the writings of Sayyid Qutb on jihad...&quot / </p>

The history of the Church’s participation in, and attitudes towards warfare have been well-documented in several fields of research. The development of the doctrine of just war and the medieval crusades within Western Christianity, have been the subject of a considerable amount of scholarship. There has also recently been an increasing amount of research done by historians, theologians and political theorists comparing the status of warfare within the Christian and Islamic traditions. However, the current state of the historiography is focused almost entirely on Western Christianity, and does not address in any depth the attitudes toward warfare present in Eastern Christianity within the Byzantine Empire in the Middle Ages. This thesis seeks to address this historiographical imbalance by comparing the development of the Eastern and Western Church’s positions on warfare throughout the medieval period. The thesis examines the factors that led to the divergence of the two Churches’ attitudes towards warfare, and the development and impact of their differing theologies during the medieval period. It is argued that the fundamental point of divergence between the Eastern and Western Church’s attitude to warfare is linguistic and theological in nature. The linguistic differences between the Greek and Latin Churches, led to different theological interpretive frameworks regarding the subject of warfare. These different fundamental theological assumptions would lead the two Churches down different developmental paths and would prevent the development or acceptance of Western theories of just war and holy war in the Eastern Church.

"Dieses Buch lohnt sich deshalb zum Wiederlesen, weil etliche der Thesen Barbers sich in den letzten Jahren eindrucksvoll bewahrheitet haben. Der bekannte US-amerikanische Politikwissenschaftler, der an der Rutgers University lehrte und nun an der University of Maryland tätig ist, bewies eine nahezu prophetische Gabe..."

This thesis will demonstrate that the modern understanding of the four primary crusades (1095-1204) has been influenced by a fundamentally flawed framework. Defining the crusades as a conflict between two monolithic at-war religious groups (Christians and Muslims) results in an incorrect conception of the period. Therefore, in order to deconstruct this belief, this thesis will view the crusades through the prism of two cities: Constantinople and Jerusalem. The rhetorical relationship that developed between these two cities during the crusading period demonstrates that the moment was defined by political and pragmatic relationships that cut across religious lines. Modern historians, through oversimplifications and assertions of a binary religious relationship, have buttressed public misperceptions of the crusades. Thus, historians have allowed the moment to be used as a rhetorical justification for modern political issues like imperialism and terrorism.

Ring composition is a literary form found throughout the ancient world. In it, a series of elements advances, one after the other, until it reaches a center point, whereupon the sequence is reversed and returns to its beginning in inverted order. Hence, the first element is paired with the last, the second with the second to the last, and so on, with the second half of the ring a mirror image of the first half. Although ring compositions occur throughout the ancient world, the practice of writing in rings fell out of literary fashion and faded from collective memory. Later readers, unfamiliar with its conventions, found ring compositions difficult to recognize, leading to misinterpretations of numerous ancient texts. Such confusion is evident with the Elijah-Elisha cycle of stories in 1 Kgs 16:23--2 Kgs 13:25. Biblical scholars have routinely maligned these stories as a nonsensical jumble of prophetic tales. This dissertation demonstrates that the stories are not disorganized. Rather, they have been redacted in the formal structure of a ring composition with six rungs. The dissertation follows the lead of the late Mary Douglas, who brought new insights to bear on the problems inherent in identifying and interpreting ancient ring compositions--most critically, in helping to establish what constitutes a parallel correspondence. When we recognize the chiastic structure of the Elijah-Elisha cycle of stories, we discover a carefully crafted work of propaganda that promotes the religious, political, and social reforms of King Josiah of Judah (7th century BCE). These tales had their origins in the traditions of northern Israel, but they were later appropriated and recontextualized by a Judean redactor. Retold, transformed, and arranged in the form of a ring composition, the stories of Elijah and Elisha were employed to build northern support for a neo-Davidic kingdom ruled from Jerusalem. Championing the rallying cry of holy war, Josiah and his party sought to reunite the divided kingdom by capitalizing on the misfortunes of the Assyrian Empire. Under the leadership of Josiah, the chariots and horses of fire--the heavenly army of YHWH--would once again battle for Israel.

The purpose of the study is to present a valid definition of how the struggle against the Cathars was portrayed in papal propaganda between 1179-1236. This is seen as important because of the contradictory state of research and deserves an answer. One line in the research field claims it was a genocide, another claims it was not and another line claims that the whole idea of a genocide definition in this struggle is anachronistic. This study seeks to explore how this struggle against the Cathars could be explained in its time as well as an explanation for our time.   The results shows that the main goal was to defend the Church and its unity, one sub goal was to convert and to offer opportunities for renunciation, and another sub goal was annihilation. The sources admit that both an eradication of the view if self and of the collective group were a general line. The Cathars could make an apology, if they did they escaped death. The study claims it was not a genocide because of this. But an intention was eradication. This is seen as a tenable historical definition. It´s an example of religious persecution in it´s most violent form.  The study further claims that the organization and planning were systematic in order to accomplish the goals. There are some aspects of these results that indicate that new knowledge has been presented. The society was characterized by religious intolerance, the actions of the papacy must be seen in this context.

No description available.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-27T13:48:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jean Fabricio Dias Verissimo.pdf: 431633 bytes, checksum: 5cf3db545669d610f9dd82a778191b0b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-12-20 / This research is proposed to investigate the imaginary of pentecostals. To achive this goal, it is limited to interpret some papers (and it's intentions) of the intellectual spokesmen of pentecostal churchs . These are considered archetypes papers and it makes possible the increasing in the number of the faithfuls. To prove this idea, we make a study of the holy war and of the devil, in a historic perspective, where these archetypes are transmitted from generation to generation. Inside the pentecostal imaginary, the rival symbolic offers are related to the devil, second the intention of these papers. We propose to study one of these rival symbolic offers, the Spiritism. For this, we did a study covering the brazilian kardecism and the relation with Kardec's theories. In the end we ex pose the Spiritism inside pentecostal imaginary. This attitude (to devil the rival symbolic offers) has as main goal to make possible the hegemony between pentecostals churchs inside religious subject. / Esta pesquisa se propõe a investigar o imaginário dos pentecostais. Para tanto, limitou-se a interpretar alguns textos (intenção dos mesmos) dos porta-vozes intelectuais das Igrejas Pentecostais. Esses são considerados textos arquétipos, isso possibilita o crescimento dos pentecostais. Para justificar essa afirmação, é feito um estudo da guerra santa e do Diabo, numa perspectiva histórica, em que os mesmos foram passados de geração para geração, e estão presentes no inconsciente coletivo. No imaginário dos pentecostais, as ofertas simbólicas concorrentes são relacionadas com o Diabo, segundo a intenção dos textos estudados. Aqui é proposto estudar uma dessas ofertas simbólicas concorrentes, o Espiritismo. Para tanto, foi feito um estudo do kardecismo no Brasil e a relação desse com as obras de Kardec, e por fim é exposto o espiritismo no imaginário pentecostal. O espiritismo é uma das representações do Diabo no imaginário pentecostal. Essa atitude (demonizar as ofertas simbólicas concorrentes) teria como objetivo possibilitar a hegemonia dos pentecostais no campo religioso.

The purpose of this essay is to investigate how the official propaganda concerning the Christian holy war was constructed, legitimized and motivated according to papal bulls and one letter during 1074-1213.  One conclusion is that the official propaganda was very content rich and multifaceted. This is most obvious in the bull of pope Innocent III and least so in the letter of pope Gregory VII. The propaganda used all the analysis points I constructed through the theoretical framework and previous research except the horizontal propaganda in order to legitimize and motivate the upcoming crusades. Another important conclusion is that previous research has paid to little attention to the political or the secular aspects of the propaganda. I show that both this and the religious elements were wowen into each other in order to construct a comprehensive synthesis or a crusader ideology. And I also show that this propaganda used more biblical references from the New testament than from the Old testament, in contrast to previous research.