Submitted by admin tede (tede@pucgoias.edu.br) on 2017-03-23T12:38:05Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CRISTIANO MARTINS DE SOUZA.pdf: 874233 bytes, checksum: 4305029c683e224e1652678363f8f4d7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-23T12:38:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CRISTIANO MARTINS DE SOUZA.pdf: 874233 bytes, checksum: 4305029c683e224e1652678363f8f4d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-03-19 / This work operates from the perspective of the phenomenon of globalization and its consequences eventually require a new redefinition of citizenship, a broader definition, compared to the impact that new paradigms in political, economic, social and cultural development have revealed to individuals, to state, and international actors finally. Under this approach, we have a Brazilian Constitution, promulgated in 1988 which deals with citizenship. The goal is to investigate whether the concept of citizenship addressed in the text accompanying this new perspective of the term, seen under the eyes of globalization. If citizenship brought to light by the 1988 Charter, has evolved in these 21 years of enactment as to meet the compliance of this new citizenship, whose parameters are still uncertain and complex, but to whose problems are present. So, after a previous approach the themes of constitutionalism, human rights and citizenship, is entering the 1988 Constitution in its entirety, in our conception authoritative theoretically correspond to the definition of citizenship according to our legal system. And how to use the theoretical framework neoconstitutionalism, whose design is based on lessons from Luís Roberto Barroso, Daniel Sarmento and Flavia Piovesan, in others, presented as a phenomenon set to the theory of constitutional law and understood by us as a base to expand the role of Constitution in the ideals of citizenship. The following will be prepared an analysis of globalization and its repercussions in the sphere of rights. The methodology we used for consulting work, case law and legislation related to the topic. The conclusion will ultimately determine whether citizenship in our Constitution walked sufficiently to follow the complexities of citizenship in global terms. / Este trabalho opera sob a perspectiva de que o fenômeno da globalização e suas conseqüências acabam por exigir uma nova redefinição de cidadania; uma definição mais ampla, frente às repercussões que novos paradigmas na área política, econômica, social e cultural têm revelado aos indivíduos, ao Estado, aos atores internacionais enfim. Sob este enfoque, temos uma Constituição brasileira, promulgada em 1988 que trata da cidadania. O objetivo é investigar se a concepção de cidadania tratada no texto constitucional acompanhou essa nova perspectiva desse termo, pensada sob os olhares da globalização. Se a cidadania trazida a lume pela Carta de 1988, evoluiu nestes 21 anos de promulgação a ponto de responder às conformidades dessa nova cidadania, cujos parâmetros ainda são incertos e complexos; mas, de cujos problemas se fazem presentes. Para tanto, após uma abordagem prévia dos temas do constitucionalismo, dos direitos humanos e da cidadania, se adentrará à Constituição de 1988, em seus elementos que, em nossa concepção abalizada teoricamente, correspondem à delimitação de cidadania segundo nossa ordem jurídica. E como marco teórico se utilizará o neoconstitucionalismo, cujo delineamento se assenta nas lições de Luís Roberto Barroso, Daniel Sarmento e Flávia Piovesan, dentro outros, apresentado como fenômeno ajustado à teoria do direito constitucional e por nós entendido como base a se ampliar o papel da Constituição no ideário de cidadania. A seguir, será elaborada uma análise da globalização e de sua repercussão na esfera dos direitos. A metodologia utilizou-se de consulta a obras, jurisprudência e legislação correlata ao tema. A conclusão terminará por definir se a cidadania em nossa Constituição caminhou suficientemente a ponto acompanhar as complexidades de uma cidadania em termos globais.

Le patrimoine culturel ne s’arrête pas aux monuments et aux collections d’objets. Il comprend également les traditions ou les expressions vivantes héritées de nos ancêtres et transmises à nos descendants ; ce qu’on appelle le patrimoine culturel immatériel. L’importance de ce patrimoine ne réside pas tant dans la manifestation culturelle elle-même que dans la richesse des connaissances et du savoir-faire qu’il transmet d’une génération à une autre. Cette transmission du savoir a une valeur sociale, économique, culturelle et juridique pertinente pour les groupes minoritaires et majoritaires et pour le monde entier. Le choix des techniques de protection internationale est directement lié aux objectifs poursuivis par l’UNESCO. Au-delà du texte de la Convention de 2003 et d’autres instruments internationaux adoptés par l’UNESCO, il peut être utile d’aborder plus largement les solutions juridiques de sauvegarde du patrimoine culturel immatériel. L'objet de notre étude consiste à analyser l’action normative en matière de patrimoine culturel immatériel en mettant la lumière sur sa définition, les normes internationales relatives à sa protection, ainsi que sur la question de l’effectivité et de l’efficacité internationale de la sauvegarde de ce patrimoine. Pour conclure, les résultats de l’action normative et d’effectivité n’échappent pas à notre analyse. Il s’agit d’évoquer enfin la possibilité de mettre en place une feuille de route pour une meilleure protection à l’avenir. / Cultural heritage doesn't only include monuments and the collection of objects. /cultural heritage is about more than monuments or the collection of objects. It, also, includes the traditions or the modern inherited expressions from our ancestors and transmitted to our descendants, what we call the intangible cultural heritage. The importance of this heritage doesn't reside so much in the cultural demonstration itself, but in the richness of knowledge, and the know-hows that are transmitted from one generation to another. This transmission of knowledge has social value, economical, cultural and legal relevance for minority groups, as well as for the main social groups, and is also, important for the world. The choice of the techniques used for international protection is linked directly to the objectives pursued by the UNESCO. Beyond the text of the 2003 convention and other international agreements adopted by the UNESCO, it can perhaps be useful to tackle more widely the legal solutions of the intangible cultural heritage. The aim of our study consists of analysing the normative action concerning the intangible cultural heritage in placing the light on the definition of the intangible cultural heritage as well as the international standards important to its protection and also in tackling the question of effectivity and efficiency of the international protection of this heritage. In conclusion, the results for the normative action and effectivity do not escape our analysis. It is, in the end about the possibility of putting in place a plan for the protection of a better future.