A hiperacusia e o zumbido representam alterações na percepção dos sons, estando freqüentemente associados. Ambos refletem um estado de hiperatividade da via auditiva, gerado por alterações na plasticidade neuronal geralmente associadas à super estimulação ou deprivação sensorial. A hiperacusia refere-se a uma disfunção na percepção da intensidade de sons externos, o zumbido refere-se à percepção de um som interno que não tem uma fonte geradora externa. Afetam adultos e crianças e podem ocasionar limitações na qualidade de vida. Ainda são muito negligenciados por otorrinolaringologistas e pediatras, apesar da sua presença não ser incomum na infância. Delineamos um estudo populacional transversal randomizado entre crianças de 5 a 12 anos cujo objetivo principal foi estimar a prevalência da hiperacusia e do zumbido. O objetivo secundário foi avaliar a associação a possíveis fatores de risco e a causalidade entre os sintomas. Foram avaliadas 506 crianças em ambiente escolar. Os dados foram coletados por meio de questionário aos pais ou responsáveis, entrevista com as crianças, otoscopia e testes auditivos. A classificação dos resultados seguiu critérios previamente estabelecidos. Participaram 240 meninas (47,4%) e 266 meninos (52,6%), idade média 9.46 anos (DP= 2.09). Os limiares auditivos foram classificados como normais em 81%, disacusia de grau mínimo/leve em 14% e disacusia de grau moderado/ profundo em 4% das crianças. A prevalência da sensação de zumbido foi 37,5%, incômodo com zumbido 19,6% e hiperacusia 3,2%. Os fatores de risco foram analisados por um modelo de regressão multivariado. Em relação ao zumbido, os fatores associados foram: idade, gênero, perda auditiva, história de exposição aos sons e cinetose. Para a hiperacusia, o único fator de risco encontrado foi a perda auditiva leve na orelha esquerda. A presença de hiperacusia demonstrou ser o maior fator de risco associado ao incomodo com o zumbido / Hyperacusis and tinnitus are altered states of sound perception and are frequently associated. Both reflect a hyperactivity of the auditory pathway as an expression of neural plasticity which is often triggered by over stimulation or deprivation of sensorial stimuli. Hyperacusis is a dysfunction on loudness perception of external sounds and tinnitus a perception of an internal sound without an external source. They might affect adults and children causing interference on quality of life. They are still neglected by otolaryngologysts and pediatricians. A prospective cross sectional study was designed to estimate tinnitus and hyperacusis prevalence and evaluate association to possible risk factors and causality among them. Children from 5 to 12 years of age were evaluated in the school environment. Data was collected searching parental information, children\'s interview, otoscopy and audiometric tests. The symptoms were classified according to previous established criteria. The final sample counted on 240 girls and 266 boys, mean age 9.46 (SD= 2.09). Hearing thresholds were classified as normal in 81%, minimum to mild hearing loss in 14% and moderate to profound hearing loss in 4% of the children. Prevalence of tinnitus sensation was found to be 37.5%, tinnitus suffering 19.6% and hyperacusis 3.2%. Age, gender, hearing loss, history of noise exposure and motion sickness were risk factors to tinnitus. Left ear hearing loss was a risk factor for hyperacusis. The presence of hyperacusis demonstrated to be the highest risk factor to tinnitus suffering

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Intended Audience & Purpose: This conference is intended for otologists, audiologists, hearing aid specialists, psychologists, and nurses, who provide clinical management services for patients with tinnitus. The purpose of this conference is to provide a review of current evaluation and management strategies for the treatment of tinnitus.

Book Summary: Hyperacusis and Disorders of Sound Intolerance: Clinical and Research Perspectives is a professional resource for audiology practitioners involved in the clinical management of patients who suffer from sound tolerance concerns. The text covers emerging assessment and intervention strategies associated with hyperacusis, disorders of pitch perception, and other unusual processing deficits of the auditory system. In order to illustrate the patients perspectives and experiences with disorders of auditory processing, cases are included throughout. This collection of diagnostic strategies and tools, evidence-based clinical research, and case reports provides practitioners with avenues for supporting patient management and coping. It combines new developments in the understanding of auditory mechanisms with the clinical tools developed to manage the effects such disorders exert in daily life. Topics addressed include unusual clinical findings and features that influence a patient s auditory processing such as their perceptual accuracy, recognition abilities, and satisfaction with the perception of sound. Hyperacusis is covered with respect to its effects, its relation to psychological disorders, and its management. Hyperacusis is often linked to trauma or closed head injury and the text also considers the management of patients with traumatic brain injury as an opportunity to illustrate the effectiveness of interprofessional care in such cases. Interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, self-efficacy training, and hearing aid use are reported in a way that enhances clinicians' ability to weave such strategies into their own work, or into their referral system. Hyperacusis and Disorders of Sound Intolerance illuminates increasingly observed auditory-related disorders that challenge students, clinicians, physicians, and patients. The text elucidates and reinforces audiologists contributions to polytrauma and interprofessional care teams and provides clear definitions, delineation of mechanisms, and intervention options for auditory disorders.

OBJECTIVES: to verify the occurrence and the effect of transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), existence of association between: tinnitus degrees and hyperacusis degrees, TEOAE suppressive effect and laterality, tinnitus and hyperacusis degrees, and verify the characteristics of normal hearing individuals with complaints of tinnitus and hyperacusis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 25 normal hearing subjects having complaints of tinnitus and hyperacusis, with 16 female and nine male. About tinnitus, the subjects were asked about the location and tinnitus type and they completed the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), used for the classification of tinnitus degrees. A developed hyperacusis questionnaire and the questionnaire on handedness The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventor were completed too. They were tested about the research of Loudness Discomfort Level (degrees of hyperacusis), Acuphenometry and the suppression effect of otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in the frequencies of 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 KHz. We used descriptive and statistical analysis of the data (Fisher exact test, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and Spearman correlation). RESULTS: The occurrence of TEOAE ranged from 33 to 88%. We observed the presence of TEOAE suppression effect on 63.7% in the right ear and 81.7% in the left ear. There was no association between tinnitus degrees and hyperacusis degrees, and between the TEOAE suppression effect and laterality, degrees of tinnitus and hyperacusis degrees. About tinnitus, the most subjects reported acute pitch, in anamnesis and in Acuphenometry, bilateral location and mild degree. Women had degree of tinnitus statistically superior than men. The sounds considered uncomfortable were the high intensity ones and the reaction to the sounds most often cited were irritation, anxiety and need to depart from the sound. The difficulty in speech understanding at noise was mentioned. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the occurrence of TEOAE in these subjects was lower than that found in normal hearing subjects. A higher percentage of presence of TEOAE suppression effect has been found in both ears. Degrees of tinnitus and hyperacusis degrees were not correlated in normal-hearing individuals with complaints of tinnitus and hyperacusis, and there was no association between the TEOAE suppression effect and laterality and degrees of tinnitus and hyperacusis. The sample presented acute pitch, bilateral location and mild bilateral tinnitus.High intensity sounds were reported as uncomfortable and irritation was the most cited reaction of the sound. / OBJETIVO: verificar a ocorrência e o efeito de supressão das emissões otoacústicas transientes (EOAT), a existência de associação entre: graus de zumbido e de hiperacusia, efeito supressor das EOAT e lateralidade, graus de zumbido e graus de hiperacusia, e analisar as características audiológicas de indivíduos normo-ouvintes com queixas de zumbido e hiperacusia. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: A amostra foi composta por 25 indivíduos normo-ouvintes, com queixas de zumbido e hiperacusia, sendo 16 do gênero feminino e nove do masculino. Em relação ao zumbido, os indivíduos foram questionados sobre o pitch e localização e preencheram o Tinnitus Handicap Inventory brasileiro (THI), utilizado para avaliar o grau de zumbido. O questionário de hiperacusia e o questionário sobre lateralidade manual The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory também foram preenchidos. Os indivíduos foram submetidos a pesquisa do Loudness Discomfort Level (grau de hiperacusia), a acufenometria e a pesquisa e do efeito de supressão das emissões otoacústicas transientes (EOATs) nas frequências de 1, 1,5, 2, 3 e 4 KHz. Utilizou-se análise descritiva e estatística dos dados (testes exato de Fisher, Kruskal Wallis, U de Man Whitney e correlação de Spearman). RESULTADOS: A ocorrência das EOAT variou de 33 a 88%. Houve 63,7% de presença de efeito de supressão na orelha direita e 81,7% na orelha esquerda. Não ocorreu associação significativa entre os graus de zumbido e os graus de hiperacusia, e entre o efeito supressor das EOAT e lateralidade, graus de zumbido e graus de hiperacusia. Em relação ao zumbido, a maioria dos indivíduos apresentou pitch agudo, tanto na anamnese quanto na acufenometria, localização bilateral e grau leve no THI. As mulheres apresentaram grau de zumbido estatisticamente superior ao dos homens. Os sons considerados desconfortáveis foram os de alta intensidade e as reações aos sons mais citadas foram a irritação, ansiedade e necessidade de afastar-se do som. A dificuldade de compreensão de fala na presença de ruído foi referida pela maioria dos indivíduos.CONCLUSÃO: Conclui-se que a ocorrência de EOAT foi inferior a encontrada em sujeitos normo-ouvintes sem esses sintomas. Obteve-se maior percentual de presença do efeito de supressão das EOATs em ambas as orelhas analisadas. Os graus de zumbido e os graus de hiperacusia não apresentaram correlação em indivíduos normo-ouvintes com queixas de zumbido e hiperacusia, bem como não ocorreu associação entre o efeito de supressão das EOAT e lateralidade, graus de zumbido e de hiperacusia. A amostra estudada apresentou predomínio de zumbido de pitch agudo, localização bilateral e grau leve. Os sons considerados desconfortáveis foram os de alta intensidade e a reação de irritação aos sons foi a mais citada.

INTRODUÇÃO: A misofonia é caracterizada pela aversão a sons bem seletivos, que provocam uma forte reação emocional. Foi proposto que a misofonia, assim como o zumbido, esteja associada à hiperconectividade entre os sistemas auditivo e límbico. Indivíduos com zumbido de incômodo significativo podem apresentar comprometimento da atenção seletiva, o que ainda não foi demonstrado no caso da misofonia. OBJETIVO: caracterizar uma amostra de indivíduos com misofonia e compará-la com dois grupos controle, um com zumbido (sem misofonia) e outro assintomático (sem zumbido e sem misofonia). METODOLOGIA: Foram avaliados 40 sujeitos normo-ouvintes, sendo 10 com misofonia (grupo misofonia - GM), 10 com zumbido (sem misofonia) (grupo controle zumbido - GCZ) e 20 sem zumbido e sem misofonia (grupo controle assintomático - GCA). Foi realizada anamnese geral em todos os grupos e anamnese específica apenas para o GM. Nos três grupos, foi aplicado o Teste de Identificação de Sentenças Dicóticas em três situações. Na primeira, foi realizado o exame padrão. Em seguida, foi aplicado incluindo mensagem competitiva, uma com som de mastigação (exame mastigação), e outra com white noise (exame white noise). RESULTADOS: A amostra do GM apontou que os primeiros sintomas da misofonia foram percebidos ainda na infância ou adolescência (média 11,5 anos). O grau de incômodo variou de 6 a 10 na escala visual analógica e, dentre os 10 participantes do GM, nove (90%) responderam que a misofonia atrapalha, sempre ou às vezes, a vida social e profissional. No teste de Identificação de Sentenças Dicóticas, foi observado que no exame mastigação, as médias da porcentagem de acertos diferem entre os grupos GM e GCA (valor-p = 0,027) e entre os grupos GM e GCZ (valor-p = 0,002), sendo menor em ambos os casos no GM. Para os exames padrão e white noise, não há diferença entre as médias da porcentagem de acertos nos três grupos (valores-p >= 0,452). CONCLUSÃO: os participantes do GM apresentaram menor porcentagem de acertos no Teste de Identificação de Sentenças Dicóticas na situação de apresentação de um ruído distraidor (exame mastigação) em relação ao mesmo teste aplicado em situação padrão ou white noise, sugerindo que indivíduos com misofonia podem apresentar alteração da atenção seletiva quando expostos a sons que desencadeiam esta condição / INTRODUCTION: Misophonia is characterized by the aversion to very selective sounds, which evoke a strong emotional reaction. It has been proposed that misophonia, as well as tinnitus, is associated with hyperconnectivity between the auditory and limbic systems. Individuals with bothersome tinnitus may have selective attention impairment, but it has not been demonstrated in case of misophonia yet. OBJECTIVE: to characterize a sample of misophonic subjects and compare it to two control groups, one with tinnitus individuals (without misophonia) and the other one with asymptomatic individuals (without misophonia and without tinnitus), regarding self-perception of the condition and selective attention. METHODOLOGY: we had evaluated 40 normal hearing participants: 10 with misophonia (GM), 10 with tinnitus (without misophonia) (GCZ) and 20 without tinnitus and without misophonia (GCA). General questionnare was applied in all of three groups and specific misophonia questionnaire was applied only in GM. In order to evaluate the selective attention, it was applied the Dichotic Sentence Identification (DSI) Test in three situations: In the first one, it was applied the original test. Then, the test was applied in two other situations including two competitive sounds, one with chewing sound (chewing test), and the other one with white noise sound (white noise test). RESULTS: The GM sample indicated that the onset of misophonia occurred in childhood or adolescence (mean 11.5 years). According to the visual analog scale, the discomfort with misophonia ranged from 5 to 10, and nine (90%) participants answered that misophonia always or sometimes limits their social and professional interactions. In the chewing test, it was observed that the average of correct responses differed between GM and GCA groups (pvalue = 0.027) and between GM and GCZ groups (p-value = 0.002), in both cases it was lower in GM. In the original and white noise tests, no difference was observed between the averages of correct responses in the three groups (p-values >= 0.452). CONCLUSION: The GM participants had a lower percentage of correct responses in the chewing test, suggesting that individuals with misophonia may have selective attention impairment when they are exposed to sounds that trigger the condition

Hyperacusis is a condition that is described by abnormal reactions to ordinary sounds, however, because of its complexity and newness, this diagnosis still lacks centralized definition and established prevalence rates. Previous research has attempted to define the condition and establish measurements. The Noise Sensitivity Scale (NSS) has been examined several times and new questionnaires have been produced, one being Umeå Hyperacusis Questionnaire (UHQ) produced by Paulin et al. (2019). The latter has not been analyzed in regards to its ability to measure hyperacusis. The current study used exposure data from Paulin et al. (2019) to compare UHQ and NSS abilities to measure the different elements of hyperacusis; the study aimed to a) compare ratings of intensity, concentration, and unpleasantness between UHQ and NSS; b) determine the validity of UHQ. The sample consisted of 64 participants and analyses conducted were linear regression, logistic regression, factor analysis and repeated measures ANOVA. The results indicate that UHQ was greater at measuring intensity, while NSS more accurately measured unpleasantness and concentration. The abilities of the former differed when time was taken in consideration and showed significance in relation to unpleasantness across the lab exposure. The studies suggest that future research should investigate and include more elements that constitute hyperacusis and attempt to increase the sample size. / Hyperacusis är ett tillstånd som karaktäriseras av onormala reaktioner på vanliga ljud, men på grund av att diagnosen är relativt ny och med komplex sjukdomsbild saknas det fortfarande en centraliserad definition och fastställd prevalens. Tidigare forskning har arbetat med att definiera konceptet och utveckla mätinstrument; Noise Sensitivity Scale (NSS) har brukats i flertalet studier och nya enkäter har skapats, bland annat Umeå Hyperacusis Questionnaire (UHQ) av Paulin et al; UHQ har inte analyserats avseende dess förmåga att tillförlitligt mäta hyperacusis. Denna studie använde exponeringsdata från Paulin et al. (2019) för att jämföra UHQ och NSS med avseende på att mäta de olika elementen i hyperacusis. Studien syftade till att a) jämföra självuppskattning av intensitet, koncentration och obehag mellan UHQ och NSS; b) fastställa validitet av UHQ. Urvalet bestod av 64 deltagare och genomförda analyser var linjär regression, logistisk regression, faktoranalys och repeated measures ANOVA. Resultaten visade att UHQ var bättre på att mäta intensitet, medan NSS var lämpligare att mäta obehag och koncentration. UHQs förmåga att mäta obehag skilde sig när tid togs i beaktande och blev då signifikant. Framtida forskning borde undersöka och inkludera fler element som utgör hyperacusis och försöka öka urvalsstorlek.