Over the last three decades, scholars in management, policy, and geography have examined the growing economic, social, and spatial impact of the financial sector. Venture capital firms have been a focus, generating a contested but deep literature around the roles of such "value-adding" capital providers in supporting the growth of firms, industries, and various territorial innovation models. In parallel, there has been substantial government support-financial, regulatory, and otherwise-of these private sector financial intermediaries, despite scepticism. The past twenty years have seen the emergence and rapid growth of analogous funders in the third sector, itself the realm of substantial experimentation and growth. These new intermediaries, "venture philanthropists", have become important players in shaping, structuring, and channelling funding to the third sector. The activities and effects of venture philanthropists are underexplored, as are their growing interactions with governments-despite intentional and striking similarities between the evolution of venture capital and that of venture philanthropy. This dissertation addresses these gaps by systematically examining the emergence, evolution, and operational practices of two influential British venture philanthropy funds: the first such fund in Europe (Impetus Trust) and the first fund in the world co-created with the state (Inspiring Scotland). The two venture philanthropy organisations (VPOs)-one with roots in venture capital, the other with roots in the voluntary and government sectors-both conducted the venture capital-inspired operational model of venture philanthropy in similar ways. That said, the VPOs reflected the logics and practices of their founders and funders. Impetus Trust more closely resembled early-stage venture capital, with a reliance on London-based networks, funders, and service providers-and a heavily London-focused portfolio. Inspiring Scotland evidenced the logics of government rather than charity in several instances, with substantial original research into social issues, heavily structured portfolios on set timelines, and regionally-distributed staff. This approach broadened access, allowing support of SPOs and their clients across various (and underserved) geographies, but limited options for opportunity-driven or expressive functions of philanthropy. I surveyed the CEOs of most organisations supported by the two venture philanthropy funds (82 of 98 charities and social businesses), supplemented by interviews of selected CEOs and the founders and staff of the two funds. I find that, overall, the two VPOs each engaged in seven core activities of venture capital, intentionally adapting them to the third sector: sourcing and selection, due diligence, an engaged relationship, provision of funding, provision of non-financial support, creation of network linkages, and intentional exiting of relationships. As in venture capital, this process had broader effects: providing signals of investee quality, preparing investees for subsequent funding, and expanding networks. The combination of long-term relationships and high formal reporting requirements imposed significant costs for SPOs-and also created a virtuous cycle of trust and collaboration between VPOs and SPOs. The venture philanthropy model also had broader societal effects, creating data regarding individual organisations and the efficacy of responses to social issues, which in both cases informed policy. As intermediaries, venture philanthropists decreased power differentials and improved the flow of (oft-anonymized) information amongst funders, statutory bodies, and funded organisations, facilitating several types of collaboration. SPO managers indicated that they received, on average, approximately ten different types of non-financial support-like strategy consulting, human resources support, or legal counsel. These managers reported in interviews and surveys that the non-financial services provided by venture philanthropists were highly valued, on average. Further, managers believed these services provided more value than it cost the VPOs to provide them. Likewise, managers highly valued most forms of new networking connections (though not all services or linkages were found to be valuable). Smaller SPOs valued services and network links more highly than larger SPOs, although all sizes of SPOs indicated both were valuable, on average. Importantly, this data was provided by SPO managers and focused on the SPO-VPO dyad-rather than provided by VPOs and focused at the portfolio or trust level. This filled an important gap in the literature: academics and practitioners often lament that the voices of charities supported by foundations are not often enough heard, which limits our understanding of many aspects of organizational philanthropy and its effects-in particular the burdens and benefits for recipient organisations. I documented the co-creation of the first government-supported venture philanthropy fund through eleven interviews with founding managers and government officials. This model, in which state, private, and civil society actors collectively founded and funded a value-adding capital provider, militates against neoliberal assumptions of an ever-diminishing state, as does the leveraging of private resources in alignment with state aims-though it raises concerns around democratic processes, accountability, and local control. This work helps inform the changing nature of the voluntary sector and its relationship with the state. I focus on the increasing interaction of actors between and across systems-sometimes in new roles and coordinated by new intermediaries-in the allocation of resources and delivery of services in the public interest. These new interactions inform broad bodies of work that seek to understand changing sectoral roles, most notably discourses surrounding neoliberalism(s), financialisation, and public management. Overall, I find privately- and publicly-funded venture philanthropy playing a role in the third sector analogous to the role of venture capital in the private sector, with similar practices and concomitant effects in data generation, network formation and strengthening, facilitating partnerships, and signalling the quality of supported organisations. By examining two such emerging models of capital provision, I contribute grounded understanding of the way such systems are created and function across the private, public, and third sectors.

Human practices linked with speedy industrialization and globalization have, unfortunately,caused severe harm to the Planet. In the vicious circle for development, Countries proceededtowards forming developed economies, which resulted in rapid depletion of the available renewable and non-renewable resources. It was only after the effects of such reckless practices started showing globally (in terms of environmental issues such as climate change, rising pollution levels, etc.) that the realization about saving the Planet started settling in. Over the years, studies have been conducted to evaluate the damages caused to the Planet through several heavy industrial practices or even through smaller household practices (such as improper waste segregation and waste disposal), and attempts have been made to sensitize the world population about such issues and the growing need to incorporate sustainability intobusiness practices as well as a way of living. The Real Estate and Construction industries have been infamous for having practices which have not been considerate towards the environment. There have been numerous reports about harmful practices, such as the use of certain materials, which have had enormous emissions and have caused depletion of the environment. One of the ways the industry is now looking to make a positive impact is by adopting sustainability practices with finance, thus giving rise to the practice of ‘sustainable finance’ or ‘green finance’. This thesis focuses on studying how certain green finance instruments (sustainability linked bonds, green bonds, circular economy and impact investing) are being implemented for financing green projects and thereby promoting sustainability in the long run in these industries. The study has been conductive using a qualitative approach. The methodology involved adopting the triangulation method, including empirical data collection through extensive literature review along with conducting semi-structured interviews with professionals working iiwithin the field of green finance. The data collected was then analysed via an inductive approach.  The conclusion derived from the data collected shows a growing trend and a changing mindset (including accepting the risks involved) towards accepting the use of these green finance instruments in the best interest of the environment. The process of quantifying the impact caused by the use of green finance instruments as compared to the conventional finance methods is ongoing, and as a result, these instruments are still being researched and reworked for improvisation, which is an ongoing process. However, the presence of malpractices such as greenwashing serves as a hindrance to sustainable finance. Another major issue regarding this is the quantification of greenwashing. This also brings to light the need for increased regulation in this field. Nonetheless, it can be clearly concluded there is huge future scope for such instruments in the future. / Mänsklig verksamhet i samband med snabb industrialisering och globalisering har tyvärr orsakat allvarliga skador på planeten. I den onda cirkeln för utveckling fortsatte länderna mot att bilda utvecklade ekonomier, vilket resulterade i snabb utarmning av tillgängliga förnybara och icke-förnybara resurser. Det var först när effekterna av sådana hänsynslösa metoder började visa sig globalt (i form av miljöproblem som klimatförändringar, ökande föroreningsnivåer etc.) som insikten om att rädda planeten började slå igenom. Under årens lopp har studier genomförts för att utvärdera de skador som orsakats planeten genom flera tunga industriella metoder eller till och med genom mindre hushållsmetoder (såsom felaktig avfallssegregering och avfallshantering), och försök har gjorts för att sensibilisera världsbefolkningen om sådana frågor och det växande behovet av att integrera hållbarhet i affärsmetoder såväl som ett sätt att leva. Fastighets- och byggbranschen har varit ökänd för att ha metoder som inte har varit hänsynsfulla mot miljön. Det har kommit många rapporter om skadliga metoder, till exempel användning av vissa material, som har haft enorma utsläpp och orsakat utarmning av miljön. Ett av de sätt som branschen nu försöker påverka positivt är genom att anta hållbarhetspraxis inom finans, vilket har gett upphov till "hållbar finans" eller "grön finans". Denna avhandling fokuserar på att studera hur vissa gröna finansieringsinstrument (hållbarhetslänkade obligationer, gröna obligationer, cirkulär ekonomi och impact investing) implementeras för att finansiera gröna projekt och därigenom främja hållbarhet på lång sikt i dessa branscher.  Studien har genomförts med hjälp av en kvalitativ ansats. Metoden innebar att använda trianguleringsmetoden, inklusive insamling av empiriska data genom omfattande litteraturgenomgång tillsammans med semistrukturerade intervjuer med yrkesverksamma som arbetar inom området grön finansiering. De insamlade uppgifterna analyserades sedan med hjälp av en induktiv metod. Slutsatsen från de insamlade uppgifterna visar en växande trend och ett förändrat tankesätt (inklusive att acceptera de risker som finns) mot att acceptera användningen av dessa gröna finansieringsinstrument i miljöns bästa intresse. Processen att kvantifiera den påverkan som orsakas av användningen av gröna finansieringsinstrument jämfört med konventionella finansieringsmetoder pågår, och som ett resultat forskas dessa instrument fortfarande och omarbetas för improvisation, vilket är en pågående process. Förekomsten av oegentligheter som greenwashing utgör dock ett hinder för hållbar finansiering. En annan viktig fråga när det gäller detta är kvantifieringen av greenwashing. Detta belyser också behovet av ökad reglering på detta område. Trots detta kan man tydligt dra slutsatsen att det finns ett enormt framtida utrymme för sådana instrument i framtiden.

Investment decision-making processes within the Venture Capital (VC) industry are increasingly including sustainability impact aspects, particularly when investing in start-ups. However, the lack of a common understanding and standard for measuring sustainability presents a significant challenge. This thesis explores the current state of sustainability impact assessment within the VC industry, highlighting the gap between academic literature and practical reality. Through a literature review, desk research, and expert interviews, the frameworks and measures used in practice, and the extent to which they align with academic suggestions, are examined. In addition, the impact of the new EU regulation, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), on the development of sustainability assessment within VC investment processes is briefly examined. The findings reveal a need for a unified, holistic framework for assessing the sustainability impact of start-ups, emphasizing the potential of existing research streams and the importance of collaboration between academic and practical experts. This work serves as a steppingstone for practitioners, policy makers, and future research in the field of sustainability assessment and in particular of start-ups. / Beslutsprocesser för investeringar inom riskkapitalbranschen inkluderar i ökande omfattning hållbarhetsaspekter, särskilt vid investeringar i nystartade företag. Avsaknaden av en gemensam förståelse och standard för att mäta hållbarhet utgör dock en betydande utmaning. Denna avhandling undersöker det aktuella läget för hållbarhetsbedömning inom VC-industrin och belyser klyftan mellan akademisk litteratur och praktisk verklighet. Genom en litteraturstudie, skrivbordsundersökningar och expertintervjuer undersöks de ramverk och mått som används i praktiken och i vilken utsträckning de överensstämmer med akademiska förslag. Dessutom undersöks kortfattat hur den nya EU-förordningen, Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), påverkar utvecklingen av hållbarhetsbedömningar inom riskkapitalinvesteringsprocesser. Resultaten visar att det finns ett behov av ett enhetligt, holistiskt ramverk för att bedöma hållbarhetseffekterna av nystartade företag, vilket betonar potentialen i befintliga forskningsströmmar och vikten av samarbete mellan akademiska och praktiska experter. Detta avhandling fungerar som en utgångspunkt för praktiker, beslutsfattare och framtida forskning inom området hållbarhetsbedömning och i synnerhet nystartade företag.

[Context] Social impact refers to the positive and negative consequences of any organization on the environment and society. One actor in the social impact landscape is the impact investor who expects financial return for their investments as well as positive social impact. Although the impact investor plays a crucial role in the social impact capital market by financing organizations that explicitly address social and environmental problems, the academic literature regarding impact investing has yet to develop especially from the investor perspective. One reason for the lack of academic research in this field is that the impact investor stands at a crossroad, between social impact and social enterprise research. [Purpose] Therefore, the purpose of this research is to determine the current state of impact investment processes as well as the challenges that investors face and, lastly, the role of social impact measurement within the impact investing process. [Findings] An exploratory multi-case study was conducted with semi-structured interviews which resulted in eight interviews from impact investors across four countries and within different focus areas in the social impact landscape. The findings show that impact investors face a variety of challenges based on the stage of their portfolio enterprises, the alignment of the social enterprise’s business model with their social impact mission, the horizon of their investments and, last but not least, their investment exit strategies. As for the role of social impact measurement in the investment process, the findings show that the majority of impact investors measure the impact of their investments although the method of measurement varies while the remaining investors, that do not measure social impact, illustrate the challenges that come with measuring impact in their personal contexts such as the difficulty of measuring the impact of an early stage social enterprise that may be susceptible to pivots. / [Kontext] Social påverkan avser de positiva och negativa konsekvenserna av alla organisationer på miljön och samhället. En aktör i det sociala påverkanslandskapet är påverkansinvesterare som förväntar sig ekonomisk avkastning för sina investeringar samt positiva sociala effekter. Även om påverkansinvesterare spelar en avgörande roll på kapitalmarknaden för social påverkan genom att finansiera organisationer som uttryckligen behandlar sociala och miljömässiga problem, har den akademiska litteraturen angående impact investering ännu inte utvecklats särskilt ur investerarperspektivet. En anledning till bristen på akademisk forskning inom detta område är att påverkansinvesterare står vid en korsning mellan social påverkan och social företagsforskning. [Syfte] Syftet med denna forskning är därför att undersöka det aktuella tillståndet för effekterna av investeringsprocesser samt de utmaningar som investerare står inför och slutligen rollen för mätning av sociala effekter i effekten av investeringsprocessen. [Resultat] En undersökande multifallstudie genomfördes med semistrukturerade intervjuer som resulterade i åtta intervjuer från påverkansinvesterare i fyra länder och inom olika fokusområden i det sociala påverkanslandskapet. Resultaten visar att påverkansinvesterare möter olika utmaningar baserat på affärsfas i deras portföljföretag, anpassningen av det sociala företagets affärsmodell med deras sociala påverkan, deras investeringshorisont och, sist men inte minst, deras investeringsutgångsstrategier . När det gäller rollen för mätning av sociala konsekvenser i investeringsprocessen visar resultaten att majoriteten av påverkansinvesterare mäter effekterna av sina investeringar även om mätmetoden varierar medan de återstående investerarna, som inte mäter social påverkan, illustrerar de utmaningar som komma med att mäta påverkan i deras personliga sammanhang, såsom svårigheten att mäta effekterna av ett tidigt skede socialt företag som kan vara känsligt för svängningar.

An ontology describing the constructs and their inter-relationships for business models has recently been built and evaluated: the Business Model Ontology (BMO). This ontology has been used to conceptually power a popular practitioner visual design tool: the Business Model Canvas (BMC). However, implicitly these works assume that designers of business models all have a singular normative goal: the creation of businesses that are financially profitable. These works perpetuate beliefs and businesses that do not create outcomes aligned with current natural and social science knowledge about long term individual human, societal and ecological flourishing, i.e. outcomes are not strongly sustainable. This limits the applicability and utility of these works. This exploratory research starts to overcome these limitations: creating knowledge of what is required of businesses for strongly sustainable outcomes to emerge and helping business model designers efficiently create high quality (reliable, consistent, effective) strongly sustainable business models. Based on criticism and review, this research project extends the BMO artefact to enable the description all the constructs and their inter-relationships related to a strongly sustainable business model. This results in the Strongly Sustainable Business Model Ontology (SSBMO). To help evaluate the SSBMO a practitioner visual design tool is also developed: the Strongly Sustainable Business Model Canvas (SSBMC). Ontological engineering (from Artificial Intelligence), Design Science and Systems Thinking methodological approaches were combined in a novel manner to create the Systemic Design Science approach used to build and evaluate the SSBMO. Comparative analysis, interviews and case study techniques were used to evaluate the utility of the designed artefacts. Formal 3rd party evaluation with 7 experts and 2 case study companies resulted in validation of the overall approaches used and the utility of the SSBMO. A number of opportunities for improvement, as well as areas for future work, are identified. This thesis includes a number of supplementary graphics included in separate (electronic) files. See “List of Supplementary Materials” for details.