Axolotl uniquely generates blastema cells as a pool of progenitor/stem cells to restore an entire limb, a particular property that other organisms, such as humans, do not have. What underlies these differences? Is the main difference that cells residing at the amputation plane (in the stump) undergo reprogramming processes to re-enter the embryonic program, which allows developmental patterning to start, or are there fundamental differences? There is also a significant debate about whether regeneration occurs via stem cell differentiation or by dedifferentiation of mature limb tissue. The aim of my thesis was to address following questions: Are the cells in the blastema reprogrammed or differentiated to regenerate? Are the blastema cells genetically reactivated de novo during regeneration? How does the amputated limb exactly know which part of the limb needs to be regenerate? Using a novel technique of long-term genetic fate mapping, my team demonstrated that dedifferentiation in regenerated axolotl muscle tissue does not occur. Instead, PAX7+ satellite cells indeed play an important role during muscle regeneration in the axolotl limb. Surprisingly, this is in contrast to the newt, which regenerates muscle cells through a dedifferentiation process. Therefore, there is a fundamental difference that underlies the regenerative mechanism ((Sandoval-Guzman et al., 2014) [KR1]). This demonstrates that there is an unexpected diversity and flexibility of cellular mechanims used during limb regeneration, even among two closely related species. Finally, if one salamander species uses a mammalian regenerative strategy (Cornelison and Wold, 1997; Collins et al., 2005) involving stem cells and another uses a dedifferentiative strategy, this raises the question of whether there are other fundamental aspects of regeneration that could also be anomalous. This hypothesis is promising since there could be more than one possible mechanism to induce mammalian regeneration. The process of limb regeneration in principle seems to be more similar to those of limb development as historically assumed. We showed molecularly that embryonic players are reused during regeneration by reactivating the position- and tissue-specific developmental gene programs by using the newly isolated Twist sequences as early blastema cell markers ((Kragl et al., 2013) [KR2]). To gain insights into the molecular mechanisms of the P/D limb patterning in general, it was crucial to study the early patterning events of the resident progenitor/stem cells by using the specific blastema cell marker HoxA as a positional marker along the proximo-distal axis. Our HOXA protein analysis using high molecular and cellular resolution as well as transplantation assays demonstrated for the first time that axolotl limb blastema cells acquire their positional identity in a proximal to distal sequence. We found a hierarchy of cellular restrictions in positional identities. Amputation at the level of the upper arm showed that the blastema harbors cells, which convert to lower arm and hand. We observed ((Roensch et al., 2013) [KR3]) for the first time that intercalation- the intermediate element (lower arm) arises later from an interaction between the proximal and distal cells identities- does not occur. Intercalation, which has been an accepted model for a long time, is not the patterning mechanism underlying normal (without any manipulation) limb regeneration that is unique to axolotl. We further demonstrated, using the Hox genes as markers that positional identity is cell-type specific since their effects were confirmed to be present in the lateral plate mesoderm- derived cells of the limb. As our knowledge about limb blastemas expands concerning cell composition and molecular events controlling patterning, the similarity to development is becoming more and more clear. My work has resolved many ambiguities surrounding the molecularly identification of different types of blastema cells and how P/D limb patterning occurs during regeneration in comparison to development. It has highlighted the importance of combining high-resolution methods, such as in situ hybridizations, single-cell PCR (sc-PCR) of individual dissociated blastema cells and genetic labeling methods with grafting experiments to map cell fates in vivo. In addition to understanding the processes of regeneration, another long-term goal in the regenerative medicine field is to identify key molecules that trigger the regeneration of tissues. Recently, my colleague Takuji Sugiura (Sugiura et al., 2016) observed that an early event of blastema formation is the secretion of molecules like MLP (MARCKS-like protein), which induces wound-associated cell cycle re-entry. Such findings further increase the enthusiasm of biologists to understand the underlying principles of regeneration. By building our knowledge of the molecules and pathways that are involved in tissue regeneration, we increase the possibility of identifying a way to ‘activate’ regenerative processes in humans and thus reach the final goal of regenerative medicine, which is to use the concepts of cellular reprogramming, stem cell biology and tissue engineering to repair complex body structures.

L’ostéopétrose est une pathologie osseuse caractérisée par des os denses et fragiles principalement due à l’incapacité des ostéoclastes, cellules d’origine hématopoïétique, à résorber le tissu osseux. La forme la plus sévère de cette maladie génétique est l’ostéopétrose autosomale récessive infantile due à une mutation du gène Ostm1 (Protéine transmembranaire de type 1 associée à l'ostéopétrose). Le gène Ostm1 est exprimé principalement dans la lignée des cellules hématopoïétiques, mais aussi dans le système nerveux central et les mélanocytes. Cette mutation développe plusieurs symptômes comme l’apparition d’une couleur de pelage gris chez la souris, une anémie sévère, une sensibilité aux infections et des troubles neuronaux chez l’homme et la souris. Afin de mieux comprendre cette maladie, nous avons généré des souris transgéniques sur un fond génétique grey-lethal (gl) dans lesquelles l’expression d’Ostm1 est ciblée à un tissu spécifique. Nous avons caractérisé le gène Ostm1 responsable de la mutation ostéopétrotique spontanée gl chez la souris. La complémentation fonctionnelle des défauts hématopoïétiques a été obtenue dans les souris transgéniques PU.1-Ostm1-gl/gl mais ces souris meurent prématurément avec une neurodegénérescence sévère. Cette perte cellulaire affecte le système nerveux central dans son ensemble incluant la rétine. Ce mémoire porte sur le but d’établir le profil d’expression du gène Ostm1 dans la rétine puisque la perte du gène entraine une dégénérescence rétinienne. Pour définir le rôle d’Ostm1 dans la rétine, nous avons caractérisé son expression dans ce tissu (organe). Des analyses PCR, démontrent une expression d’Ostm1 dans l’œil total et enrichie dans la neurorétine et dans l’épithélium pigmentée (RPE). Après avoir caractérisé avec des marqueurs protéiques spécifiques les sous populations cellulaires de la rétine, in situ hybridation détecte l’expression préférentielle d’Ostm1 dans l’épithélium pigmentée (RPE) et la couche nucléaire interne (INL). Basé sur ce profil d’expression, nous avons induit dans un premier temps la perte de fonction d’Ostm1 spécifiquement dans le RPE. Dans un premier temps nous avons vérifié que l’expression de la recombinasse Cre seule n’est pas toxique. Nous avons ensuite induit la perte d’expression d’Ostm1 dans ces cellules et démontré que la perte d’Ostm1 dans le RPE se traduit par une perte graduelle des photorécepteurs avec l’âge. Ces résultats préliminaires suggèrent que l’expression post-natale d’Ostm1 dans le RPE est essentielle au maintien de l’homéostasie des photorécepteurs dans la rétine. / Osteopetrosis is a disease characterized by high bone density and fragility principally caused by impaired activity of osteoclasts, which are cells that reside in bone and dissolve bone tissue. The most severe form of osteopetrosis is infantile autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) which is caused by mutations in genes Ostm1. As Ostm1(osteopetrosis-associated transmembrane protein 1) is expressed in multiple hematopoietic stem cell lineages, melanocytes and the nervous system, mutations in Ostm1 can cause coat color change in mice as well as bone fragility, anemia, infections and neuronal disorders in humans and mice. To further the understanding of these conditions linked with Ostm1 loss, multiple tissue specific Ostm1 transgenic mice over an Ostm1 knockout (gl/gl) background were constructed. To better understand this disease, we characterized the Ostm1 gene responsible for the spontaneous osteopetrotic mutation grey- lethal (gl) in mice. Functional complementation of hematopoietic defects was obtained in PU.1-Ostm1-gl/gl transgenic mice, but these mice die prematurely with severe neurodegeneration. This indicates that Ostm1 has a crucial role in neuronal and retinal health. As a result, we wished to establish an expression profile of Ostm1 in all the layers of the retina to further decipher the role of Ostm1 in the retina. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of reverse-transcribed mRNA of separated sections of the eye demonstrate that Ostm1 is expressed in the whole eye, neuroretina and retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE). Further specific expression analyses were performed by in- situ hybridization which showed that Ostm1 is expressed specifically in the inner nuclear layer of the neuroretina as well as in the RPE. Based on this tissue expression pattern, we have constructed, for the first time, an RPE specific knockdown of Ostm1 expression and verified that the expression of Cre recombinase in this tissue is not toxic. The reduction of Ostm1 in the RPE of the eye resulted in gradual loss of photoreceptors of the retina. These preliminary results suggest that the post-natal expression of Ostm1 in the RPE is essential for maintaining the homeostasis of the photoreceptors of the retina.

Karyotype analysis of selected species from arachnid orders Amblypygi and Uropygi Whip spiders (Amblypygi) and whip scorpions (Uropygi) represent relict arachnid orders which has been found already at Upper Carboniferous strata. Although cytogenetic data from amblypygids and uropygids might be important to reconstruct karyotype evolution of arachnids, cytogenetics of these orders is almost unknown. Presented study is aimed in analysis of karyotype and meiosis in 16 species of Amblypygi and 4 species of Uropygi. Both groups are characterized by considerable range of diploid chromosome numbers (2n = 24 - 86 in Amblypygi and 36 - 66 in Uropygi). Analysed species does not exhibit morfologically differentiated sex chromosomes. Differentiation of sex chromosomes on molecular level was revealed in amblypygid Paraphrynus mexicanus by comparative genome hybridization. Obtained data indicate XY/XX sex chromosome system in this species. Comparison of karyotype data indicates reduction of chromosome numbers during evolution of both orders. In Amblypygi, this reduction was accompanied by increase of number of biarmed chromosomes. This trend is not apparent in Uropygi. Karyotypes of most analysed amblypygids and uropygids are also characterized by low amount of heterochromatin. Most studied species exhibit two pairs...

Cytogenetics of mesothelid spiders is largely unkown. The presented diploma thesis is focused on the karyotype evolution of these spiders. As it is the most basal group of spiders, the analysis of its cytogenetics can bring important data about ancestral spider karyotype. In the framework of my thesis, I analysed diploid chromosome numbers, chromosome morphology, meiotic division, sex chromosomes and the pattern of selected molecular markers that were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. According to my results, mesothelid spiders have a high number of chromosomes and the prevalence of monoarmed chromosomes. Unlike other spiders, mesothelids have little differentiated sex chromosomes. Key words: evolution, spider, chromosome, karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, nucleolar organiser region, sex chromosomes

No description available.

No / During development, multipotent progenitor cells establish tissue-specific programs of gene expression. In this paper, we show that p63 transcription factor, a master regulator of epidermal morphogenesis, executes its function in part by directly regulating expression of the genome organizer Satb1 in progenitor cells. p63 binds to a proximal regulatory region of the Satb1 gene, and p63 ablation results in marked reduction in the Satb1 expression levels in the epidermis. Satb1(-/-) mice show impaired epidermal morphology. In Satb1-null epidermis, chromatin architecture of the epidermal differentiation complex locus containing genes associated with epidermal differentiation is altered primarily at its central domain, where Satb1 binding was confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip analysis. Furthermore, genes within this domain fail to be properly activated upon terminal differentiation. Satb1 expression in p63(+/-) skin explants treated with p63 small interfering ribonucleic acid partially restored the epidermal phenotype of p63-deficient mice. These data provide a novel mechanism by which Satb1, a direct downstream target of p63, contributes in epidermal morphogenesis via establishing tissue-specific chromatin organization and gene expression in epidermal progenitor cells.

Objectifs: Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) améliore la régénération axonale et la survie des motoneurones lors du développement embryonnaire. Son rôle dans la régénération des nerfs périphériques lésés chez l’adulte n’a pas encore été étudié. Notre objectif est de déterminer l’expression de HGF dans la moelle épinière murine suite à une axotomie, avec ou sans stimulation électrique, directe ou transcutanée. Méthodes: Soixante souris C57BL/6 adultes ont été divisées en 5 groupes : Contrôle (n=12), Placebo (n=12), Axotomie (n=12, lacération et réparation immédiate du nerf sciatique), Directe (n=12, lacération, réparation immédiate et stimulation électrique directe proximale du nerf sciatique, 1h, 20 Hz) et Transcutanée (n=12, lacération, réparation immédiate et stimulation électrique transcutanée proximale du nerf sciatique, 1h, 20 Hz). Les moelles épinières ont été recueillies 1, 3, 7 et 14 jours suivant l’intervention. L’expression de HGF a été évaluée par technique d’hybridation in situ. Résultats: Nos résultats démontrent une augmentation de l’expression de HGF dans les moelles épinières murines suite à l’axotomie. Cette augmentation est plus rapide suite à la stimulation électrique, autant directe que transcutanée. L’expression de HGF devient localisée aux zones motrices de la moelle épinière murine dans les groupes Axotomie, Directe et Transcutanée. Conclusions: HGF, facteur neurotrophique impliqué de le développement et la survie des motoneurones, a une expression altérée suite à la lacération du nerf sciatique. Ceci suggère fortement qu’il participe aussi à la régénération des nerfs moteurs. De plus, l’expression plus rapide de HGF suite à la stimulation électrique suggère son implication dans l’augmentation de la régénération nerveuse. / Purpose: Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) plays a role in promoting axonal growth and survival of motoneurons during embryonic development. This factor might also be important in directing the regeneration of adult motoneurons following laceration. We aim to identify the expression patterns of HGF following axotomy, with or without direct or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in a mouse model. Methods: Sixty adult C57BL/6 mice were divided into 5 groups: Control (n=12), Sham (n=12), Axotomy (n=12, sciatic nerve laceration and immediate repair), Direct (n=12, sciatic nerve laceration, immediate repair and application of direct electrical stimulation on the proximal nerve end, 1h, 20 Hz) and Transcutaneous (n=12, nerve laceration and immediate repair followed by proximal transcutaneous electrical stimulation, 1h, 20 Hz). Spinal cords were harvested at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days post-surgery. The expression patterns of HGF were measured using in situ hybridization. Results: Our results showed an upregulation of HGF expression in mouse spinal cords following sciatic nerve axotomy. This occurred more quickly following electrical stimulation in both Direct and Transcutaneous groups. The expression pattern of HGF became localized to the motor neuron pools in the Axotomy, Direct and Transcutaneous groups. Conclusions: HGF, a growth factor involved in directing the outgrowth of motor axons in development, has an altered expression pattern following sciatic nerve laceration, suggesting it may also play a role in directing motoneuron regeneration. Furthermore, rapid change in the expression pattern of HGF following electrical stimulation suggests it may also be involved in the upregulation of nerve regeneration following electrical stimulation.

L’addiction est un désordre psychobiologique caractérisé par des prises de drogue répétées, une incapacité à en contrôler la consommation et une tendance chronique à la rechute. Dans le cas des opiacés (morphine, héroïne), l’arrêt de la consommation de drogue induit un syndrome de sevrage qui peut être associé de manière forte et durable à l’environnement dans lequel il est vécu. Cette association est telle que même après une longue période d’abstinence, la simple réexposition à cet environnement peut faire émerger un état émotionnel aversif qui pourrait favoriser la rechute. Dans le cadre de la dépendance aux opiacés, il est de plus en plus clair que la réactivation des mémoires affectives associées au sevrage joue un rôle dans la motivation à rechercher de la drogue. Au plan neurobiologique, il a été montré au laboratoire que le processus de plasticité synaptique se met en place lors du conditionnement des stimuli conditionnés au sevrage des opiacés, au sein de structures limbiques impliquées à différents titres dans le processus d’apprentissage associatif. Il a été proposé que les effets de la réexposition aux stimuli conditionnés au sevrage soient dus à la réactivation spécifique de ces structures limbiques. Dans ces travaux, les stimuli environnementaux étaient associés à la fois à l’état aversif précoce du sevrage et à des symptômes somatiques, ce qui permet une première avancée dans la compréhension des processus cellulaires impliqués dans la formation et le rappel de la mémoire du sevrage. Cependant afin de mieux comprendre comment cette mémoire pourrait exercer un rôle dans la rechute, il est nécessaire d’analyser les substrats neuronaux mis en jeu de manière plus spécifique dans les effets conditionnés de la seule composante aversive précoce du sevrage. En effet, cette composante dite « motivationnelle » joue un rôle majeur chez l’individu dépendant dans le besoin de continuer à consommer la drogue, et potentiellement chez l’individu abstinent dans sa vulnérabilité à la rechute.L’objectif de mon travail de thèse a consisté à préciser les substrats neurobiologiques impliqués dans le sevrage des opiacés et dans le rappel des mémoires aversives associées notamment à la composante motivationnelle du sevrage.Dans un premier temps, nous avons développé une approche d’hybridation in situ fluorescente (catFISH) dont le principal avantage est de préciser la dynamique des activations neuronales induites par une stimulation. Nous avons validé l’utilisation du catFISH en caractérisant la dynamique d’activation neuronale dans le cortex préfrontal (CPF), le noyau accumbens (Nac), le noyau central (CeA) et basolatéral (BLA) de l’amygdale lors de la précipitation d’un syndrome de sevrage des opiacés. Nos résultats montrent que le catFISH permet de révéler des activations neuronales durables et que le CeA et le Nac présentent une dynamique d’activation différente en réponse à la précipitation du sevrage des opiacés.Dans une deuxième partie nous avons étudié les substrats neuronaux impliqués lorsque le rappel des mémoires du sevrage des opiacés exerce un effet sur un comportement opérant dirigé vers la nourriture, et ceci en fonction de l’intensité du sevrage. L’utilisation du catFISH nous a permis de différencier les activations neuronales induites par la réexposition au contexte du sevrage ou par la présentation du stimulus conditionné au sevrage. Nos résultats montrent que le CPF et le Nac shell sont impliqués dans le rappel des mémoires contextuelles du sevrage et que le CPF ainsi que le Nac core et le BLA sont activés par le rappel du stimulus conditionné au sevrage.Enfin, nous avons analysé dans un protocole d’aversion de place conditionnée les substrats neurobiologiques recrutés par le rappel des mémoires associées au syndrome de sevrage motivationnel des opiacés. Nos résultats indiquent que le Nac shell et le BLA sont les deux structures cérébrales les plus sensibles au rappel des mémoires du sevrage. L’ensemble de ce travail a permis de faire ressortir le rôle crucial du Nac shell et du BLA au sein du réseau de substrats neuronaux impliqués dans le traitement des mémoires émotionnelles aversives associées au sevrage des opiacés. Ces structures pourraient représenter les substrats communs au traitement des mémoires émotionnelles associées aux effets de drogues d’abus. L’ensemble de ces résultats devra être mis en perspective avec des travaux débutés lors de ma thèse en électrophysiologie in vivo sur animal se comportant. Ces travaux consisteront à étudier de façon longitudinale les dynamiques du réseau CPF/Nac/BLA lors de la formation et le rappel des mémoires du sevrage et permettront de mieux définir les rôles spécifiques que jouent les substrats neurobiologiques que nous avons étudiés dans le traitement des mémoires du sevrage des opiacés. / Addiction is a psychobiological disorder that is characterized by repeated drug intakes, inability to control its consumption and a chronic tendency to relapse. Concerning opiate addiction (heroin, morphine), cessation of drug consumption induces a withdrawal syndrome, which can be strongly and persistently associated with the environment in which it is experimented. This association is so tight that a single re-exposure to this specific environment is enough to provoke a negative emotional state, which may promote drug relapse. In opiate dependence, it becomes clearer and clearer that reactivation of the affective memories associated with drug withdrawal play a major role in drug seeking. In terms of neurobiological processes, previous works conducted in the lab have shown that synaptic plasticity takes place during the conditioning of stimuli to opiate withdrawal, in limbic structures known to be involved in associative learning. It has been suggested that the consequences of the re-exposition to withdrawal conditioned stimuli are due to the reactivation of these specific limbic regions. In theses studies, environmental stimuli were both associated to the early aversive state of withdrawal and to somatic symptoms. This represents a first step in the understanding of the cellular processes involved in the formation and retrieval of withdrawal memories. However, in order to better understand how these memories could play a role in relapse, it is necessary to analyze the neuronal substrates involved in the conditioned effects of the sole early aversive motivational component of opiate withdrawal. Indeed, this motivational component is considered as exerting a strong influence on the maintaining of drug consumption, and eventually on the vulnerability to relapse in abstinent addicts. The aim of my work was to specify the neurobiological substrates involved in opiate withdrawal and in the retrieval of the aversive memories especially the memories associated with the motivational component of withdrawal. We first developed an in situ hybridization approach (catFISH) whose main advantage is to add a dynamical dimension to the neuronal activations induced by a stimulation. We validated the use of the catFISH method by studying the dynamics of neuronal activations in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the nucleus accumbens (Nac), the central (CeA) and basolateral (BLA) nucleus of the amygdala as a consequence of the precipitation of opiate withdrawal. Our results show that catFISH allows determining persistent neuronal activations and that the CeA and the Nac have a different dynamics of activation in response to opiate withdrawal. In the second part, we studied the neuronal substrates involved when the retrieval of opiate withdrawal memories modifies an operant goal-directed behaviour, according to the withdrawal intensity. The use of catFISH allowed us to differentiate the neuronal activations induced by the re-exposition to the withdrawal context or to the conditioned stimuli. Our results show that the PFC and the Nac shell are involved in the retrieval of contextual memories of withdrawal and that PFC, Nac core and BLA are activated by the retrieval of more specific conditioned stimuli.Lastly, we analysed, using a conditioned place aversion protocol, the neuronal structures recruited by the retrieval of the memories associated with the motivational component of opiate withdrawal. Our results suggest that the Nac shell and the BLA are the brain structures that are the most sensible to the retrieval of the memories of opiate withdrawal.Overall, our work emphasized the crucial role played by the Nac shell and the BLA within a network of neuronal substrates involved in the processing of aversive emotional memories associated with opiate withdrawal. These structures could be considered as the common substrates to the processing of emotional memories associated with the effects of drugs of abuse. These results will be compared with an in vivo electrophysiology on behaving animals’ approach that we initiated during my PhD. This study will consist of detailing longitudinally the dynamics of the PFC/Nac/BLA network during the formation and the retrieval of the memories of opiate withdrawal. This study will also provide more details on the specific functions of the previously studied neuronal substrates in the processing of opiate withdrawal memories.

Les noyaux supraoptiques (NSO) et paraventriculaires (NPV) de l’hypothalamus montrent un phénomène réversible de plasticité structurale neurono-gliale dans diverses conditions physiologiques telles que la parturition, l’allaitement ou lors d’une surcharge en sel. En effet, les feuillets astrocytaires qui enveloppent normalement les somas et dendrites des neurones à ocytocine (OT) ou à vasopressine (AVP) se rétractent alors, autour des neurones à OT, laissant place à la formation de nouvelles synapses, surtout GABAergiques. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse voulant que ces mouvements cellulaires soient régulés par des molécules connues pour leurs rôles dans l’adhérence et la motilité cellulaires, notamment les récepteurs Eph et les éphrines (Efn). Nous avons étudié le rôle de l’un de ces récepteurs, EphA4, un récepteur à tyrosine kinase reconnaissant l’ensemble des Efn, A ou B, puis tenté d’identifier les Efn partenaires dans le NSO, à la suite d’une surcharge en sel. Pour démontrer la présence d’EphA4 dans le NSO et déterminer l’effet d’une surcharge en sel sur son expression et sa localisation, nous avons utilisé l’hybridation in situ et l’immunohistochimie en microscopie électronique, sur des coupes de cerveaux de souris ou rats traités ou non à l’eau salée pendant 1-7 j, avec des ribosondes ou des anticorps spécifiques pour EphA4. Ces travaux ont démontré une augmentation de l’expression d’EphA4 dans le NSO, notamment dans des dendrites, après le régime salé. La distribution de cette expression correspondait à celle des neurones OT et était absente de la glia limitans. Nous avons ensuite déterminé l’effet d’une absence d’EphA4 sur les mouvements astrocytaires et la synaptogènese autour des dendrites à OT et AVP, en utilisant des souris EphA4 knockouts et des souris de type sauvage des mêmes portées. Nous avons ainsi mesuré la couverture astrocytaire des dendrites OT ou AVP, identifiées par immunocytochimie anti-OT ou anti-AVP, en microscopie électronique. Ces mesures ont confirmé la rétraction des feuillets astrocytaires et la synaptogenèse autour des dendrites OT, mais pas autour des dendrites AVP, chez les souris de type sauvage, et démontré que la rétraction des feuillets astrocytaires et la synaptogenèse sur les dendrites OT ne se produisait pas chez les souris knockouts soumises à la surcharge en sel. L’ensemble de ces résultats démontre un rôle d’EphA4 dans cette plasticité structurale neurono-gliale. Afin d’identifier l’Efn partenaire d’EphA4 dans cette fonction, nous avons utilisé l’hybridation in situ et l’immunohistochimie pour les EfnB3 et -A3. L’hybridation in situ n’a pas démontré d’expression de l’EfnB3 dans le NSO, tandis que les résultats pour l’EfnA3 restent à quantifier. Cependant, l’immunohistochimie anti-EfnA3 montre un marquage d’astrocytes dans le NSO et la glia limitans, marquage qui semble augmenter après surcharge en sel, mais il reste à démontrer que l’anticorps anti-EfnA3 est bien spécifique et à quantifier les éventuels changements sur un plus grand nombre d’animaux. L’ensemble de ces observations démontre un rôle du récepteur EphA4 dans les mécanismes à la base des changements structuraux neurono-gliaux du NSO et pointe vers l’EfnA3 comme partenaire d’EphA4 dans ce modèle. / The supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular (PVN) nuclei of the hypothalamus display reversible neurono-glial structural plasticity in various physiological conditions, such as parturition, lactation, or following salt loading. In such conditions, astrocytic leaflets that normally envelop the somas and dendrites of ocytocin (OT) or arginin-vasopressin (AVP) neurons retract from OT processes where they are replaced by new synapses, mainly GABAergic. Our hypothesis proposes that these cellular movements are regulated by molecules known for their roles in cell adhesion and motility, notably Eph receptors and ephrins (Efn). We have examined the role of one of these receptors, EphA4, a tyrosine-kinase receptor recognizing all ephrins, A or B, and then tried to identify the Efn interacting with EphA4 in these functions, following salt-loading. To demonstrate the presence of EphA4 in the SON and determine the effect of salt loading on its expression, we used in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in light and electron microscopy, on brain sections from rats or mice treated with salted water during 1-7 d, using riboprobes and antibodies specific for EphA4. These experiments demonstrated that EphA4 is expressed in the SON, with a distribution of its mRNA similar to that of OT neurons, and that it was absent from the glia limitans. Its expression increased following salt loading, particularly in dendrites. We then tested the effect of an absence of EphA4 on astrocytic process retraction and on synaptogenesis, using EphA4 kockout mice and wild-type littermates. We measured the ratio of astrocytic contact, and counted the number of synapses on the circumference of OT and AVP dendrites, identified in electron microscopy by immunocytochemistry, after 7 d of salt loading. The results confirmed the retraction of astrocytic processes from OT dendrites in wild-type animals after salt loading, and no change around AVP dendrites. However, there was no retraction from OT dendrites in EphA4 knockout mice, following salt loading. Altogether, these results constitute strong evidence for a role of EphA4 in the astrocyte leaflet retraction and accompanying synaptogenesis, specifically around OT dendrites. In order to identify the Efn interacting with EphA4 in this function, we used in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for EfnB3 and –A3. The in situ hybridization did not show the presence of EfnB3 in the SON, while the results for EfnA3 are currently being quantified. Nevertheless, anti-EfnA3 immunohistochemistry showed labelling in astrocytes and in the glia limitans of the SON, a labelling that seemed to increase following salt loading, although the specificity of the anti-EfnA3 antibody remains to be demonstrated on EfnA3 knockout mice, and its expression requires to be measured on a larger number of mice. The latter observations indicate EfnA3 as the potential partner (receptor/ligand) for EphA4 in the neurono-glial structural plasticity occurring in the SON following salt loading.

<p>HER2 Gene-Protein Assay (GPA) је посебно погодан за истовремено процењивање експресије HER2 протеина и статуса амплификације HER2 гена на нивоу појединачних ћелија и њихово повезивање са ћелијском морфологијом. Циљ истраживања био је испитати да ли су постојећи критеријуми препоручени од стране ASCO/CAP довољни за дијагностиковање HER2 позитивности код пацијенткиња које показују интратуморску хетерогеност, како у примарним туморима тако и у метастазама у регионалне лимфне чворове, учесталост HER2 хетерогености у макрометастазама лоцираним у лимфним чворовима, те да ли постоји јасна корелација између хетерогености нађене у примарном тумору дојке и припадајућим метастазама у лимфним чворовима. Испитивање је обухватило 41 од планиране 51 пацијенткиње које су испуниле све критеријуме укључивања. Репрезентативни парафински блокови метастатских лимфних чворова одабрани су из архивираног материјала, обојени GPA методом и процењени у складу са критеријумима ASCO/CAP 2013. Анализирано је 120 ћелија у хистолошком резу сваког метастатског лимфног чвора. Статус HER2 се разликовао између примарног тумора и његових метастаза у 13,2% (5/38) случајева. Један случај HER2 позитивног примарног тумора имао је HER2 негативне метастазе, два додатна случаја са HER2 позитивним примарним тумором су имала метастазе са статусом граничне амплификације без прекомерне експресије HER2 протеина и два случаја са HER2 негативним примарним тумором су имала метастазе са статусом граничне амплификације без прекомерне експресије HER2 протеина. У 17.4% (4/23) случајева са HER2 не-амплификованим примарним тумором метастазе су постале граничне у статусу генске амплификације. Једна од четири метастазе HER2 негативног примарног тумора показала је мали фокус HER2 позитивних туморских ћелија (&lt;3% тумора). Микрохетерогеност је анализирана у 108 лимфних чворова код 38 пацијенткиња и уочена у 22 лимфна чвора, тј. код четири пацијенткиње у свим анализираним лимфним чворовима, док је код једне пацијенткиње од 4 анализирана лимфна чвора микрохетерогеност потврђена у једном лимфном чвору. На основу добијених резултата може се закључити да постојећи критеријуми препоручени од стране ASCO/CAP применом прихваћених метода нису довољни за дијагностиковање HER2 позитивности код пацијенткиња које показују интратуморску и интертуморску хетерогеност како у примарним туморима тако и у метастазама, те да постоји статистички високо сигнификантан број макрометастаза лоцираних у лимфним чворовима које показују HER2 хетерогеност и позитивна корелација између хетерогености нађене у примарним туморима и припадајућим метастазама у лимфним чворовима.</p> / <p>HER2 Gene-Protein Assay (GPA) je posebno pogodan za istovremeno procenjivanje ekspresije HER2 proteina i statusa amplifikacije HER2 gena na nivou pojedinačnih ćelija i njihovo povezivanje sa ćelijskom morfologijom. Cilj istraživanja bio je ispitati da li su postojeći kriterijumi preporučeni od strane ASCO/CAP dovoljni za dijagnostikovanje HER2 pozitivnosti kod pacijentkinja koje pokazuju intratumorsku heterogenost, kako u primarnim tumorima tako i u metastazama u regionalne limfne čvorove, učestalost HER2 heterogenosti u makrometastazama lociranim u limfnim čvorovima, te da li postoji jasna korelacija između heterogenosti nađene u primarnom tumoru dojke i pripadajućim metastazama u limfnim čvorovima. Ispitivanje je obuhvatilo 41 od planirane 51 pacijentkinje koje su ispunile sve kriterijume uključivanja. Reprezentativni parafinski blokovi metastatskih limfnih čvorova odabrani su iz arhiviranog materijala, obojeni GPA metodom i procenjeni u skladu sa kriterijumima ASCO/CAP 2013. Analizirano je 120 ćelija u histološkom rezu svakog metastatskog limfnog čvora. Status HER2 se razlikovao između primarnog tumora i njegovih metastaza u 13,2% (5/38) slučajeva. Jedan slučaj HER2 pozitivnog primarnog tumora imao je HER2 negativne metastaze, dva dodatna slučaja sa HER2 pozitivnim primarnim tumorom su imala metastaze sa statusom granične amplifikacije bez prekomerne ekspresije HER2 proteina i dva slučaja sa HER2 negativnim primarnim tumorom su imala metastaze sa statusom granične amplifikacije bez prekomerne ekspresije HER2 proteina. U 17.4% (4/23) slučajeva sa HER2 ne-amplifikovanim primarnim tumorom metastaze su postale granične u statusu genske amplifikacije. Jedna od četiri metastaze HER2 negativnog primarnog tumora pokazala je mali fokus HER2 pozitivnih tumorskih ćelija (&lt;3% tumora). Mikroheterogenost je analizirana u 108 limfnih čvorova kod 38 pacijentkinja i uočena u 22 limfna čvora, tj. kod četiri pacijentkinje u svim analiziranim limfnim čvorovima, dok je kod jedne pacijentkinje od 4 analizirana limfna čvora mikroheterogenost potvrđena u jednom limfnom čvoru. Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata može se zaključiti da postojeći kriterijumi preporučeni od strane ASCO/CAP primenom prihvaćenih metoda nisu dovoljni za dijagnostikovanje HER2 pozitivnosti kod pacijentkinja koje pokazuju intratumorsku i intertumorsku heterogenost kako u primarnim tumorima tako i u metastazama, te da postoji statistički visoko signifikantan broj makrometastaza lociranih u limfnim čvorovima koje pokazuju HER2 heterogenost i pozitivna korelacija između heterogenosti nađene u primarnim tumorima i pripadajućim metastazama u limfnim čvorovima.</p> / <p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Author>ilija vogel</o:Author> <o:Version>16.00</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG/> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false" DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="371"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footer"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of figures"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope return"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="line number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="page number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of authorities"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="macro"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toa heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Closing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Message Header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Salutation"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Date"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Note Heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Block Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Hyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="FollowedHyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Document Map"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Plain Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="E-mail Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Top of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Bottom of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal (Web)"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Acronym"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Cite"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Code"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Definition"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Keyboard"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Preformatted"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Sample"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Typewriter"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Variable"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Table"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation subject"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="No List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Contemporary"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Elegant"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Professional"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Balloon Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="Table Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Theme"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Placeholder Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Revision"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/